Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • IS 1893 (Part 1) 2016

    Uploaded by

    asvenk309
    104 views48 pages
    IS 1893 Part-1 2016

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    IS 1893 Part-1 2016

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    104 views48 pages

    IS 1893 (Part 1) 2016

    Uploaded by

    asvenk309
    IS 1893 Part-1 2016

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 48
    St Eros Un sre eB er LARSEN AND TOUBRO RNETRATION MANOR, CHE oe 4 83 ae Is 1893 (Part 1) : Indian Standard levnossazaort Bi arerrett a yarattet fesrga ands am | arr wae SR a (ear RET) Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures Part 1 General Provisions and Bi ( Sixth Revision ) ings Ics91.120.25 © Bis 2016 ner the cere frm BS for LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION - MANAPAKKAM, CHENNA ON 0005-2017 10:94 59 (129.89 2496) arta are art BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS BRE was, 9 aEgEMe AH wel, aE Ree MANAK BHAVAN, 9 BAHADUR SHAM ZAFAR MA\ NEW DELH-t10002 ety Butea 2 3 December 2016 Price Group #3 > Supply Bureau Under the Licente from BIS for LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION - MANAPAKKAM, CHENNAI ON 0205-2017 50-2453 (129 83.2426) valid Eanhquake Engineering Sectional Committee, CED 39 FOREWORD This Indian Standard (Part 1) (Sixth Revision) was adopted by the Bureau of Indian Standards, after the draft finalized by the Earthquake Engineering Sectional Committee had been approved by the Civil Engineering Division Council India is prone to song earthquake shaking, and hence earthquake resistant design is essential. The Committee hhas considered an earthquake zoning map based on the maximum intensities at each location as recorded from damage surveys after past earthquakes, taking inte account, 8) known magnitudes and the known epiventres (see Annex A) assuming all other conditions as being average; and ) tectonics (see Annex B) and litaology (see Annex C) of each region ‘The Seismic Zone Map (see Fig. 1)is broadly associated with 1964 MSK Intensity Scale(see Annex D) corresponding, to VI orless), VI, Vill and IX (and above) for Seismic Zones I, II, IV and V, respectively. Seismic Zone Factors for some important towns are given in Annex E, Structures designed as per this standard are expected to sustain damage during steong earthquake ground shaking. ‘The provisions of this standard are intended for earthquake resistant design of only normal structures (without ‘energy dissipation devices or systems in-built). This standard proviées the minimum design force for earthquake ‘resistant design of special strictures (suchas large and tall buildings, large and high dams, long-span bridges and. ‘major industrial projects). Such projects require rigorous, site-specific investigation to arrive at more accurate carthquake hazard assessment ‘To control loss of life and property, base isolation or other advanced techniques may be adopted, Currently, the Indian Standacd is under formulation for desig of such buildings; until the standard becomes available, specialist 'ierature should be consulted for design, detail, installation and maintenance of such buildings. 1S 1893 : 1962 “Recommendations for easthquake resistant design of structures’ was frst published in 1962, and revised in 1966, 1970, 1975 and 1984. Further, in 2002, the Committee decided to presen the provisions fr different types of structures in separate parts, to keep abreast with rapid developments and extensive research carried out in earthquake-resistant design of various strictures. Thus, IS 1893 was split into five parts. The other parts in the art 1 General provisions and buildings Part 2 Liquid retaining tanks — Elevated and ground supported Part 3 Bridges and retaining walls Pan 4 industrial structures, including stack-like structures Part § Dams and embankments (0 be formulated) ‘This standard (Part 1) contains general provisions on earthquake hazard assessment applicable to all buildings and structures covered in Parts 2t0 5. Also, Part 1 contains provisions specific to earthquakesresistan design of buildings. Unless stated otherwise, the provisions in Parts 2 to 5 are toe read necessarily in conjunction with the general provisions as laid down in Pat In this revision, the following changes have been included: 8) Design spectra are defined for natural period upto 6 5 'b) Same design response spectra are specified forall buildings, irrespective ofthe material of construction ‘Supplied by Book Supply Bureau Under the License fom BIS for LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION - MANAPAXKAM, CHENNAI ON 03-05-2017 10°3488 (123.63 24 35) valid upto34-12.2017 ‘supply Bureau Under the License rom BIS for LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION - MANAPAKKAM, CHENNAL ON 02.05.2017 10:34 69 (12360.24.36) val 1S 1893 (Part 1): 2016 Indian Standard CRITERIA FOR EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN OF STRUCTURES PART 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS AND BUILDINGS (Sixth Revision ) 1scoPE SNe Tite 1.1 This standard (Part 1) primarily deals with 800:2007 ee earthquake hard assessment for earthquake-rsisiant eanarction in ste (second revision design of) lings) guid reainingstctn, Code of patie for desig loads {G) bridges, (4) embankments and reining walls (ote: han cathe) orbalings {S) industrial and stack-like structures, and (6) concrete, Deca tenaet deals with entnquake-esstnt design of buildings, lees Hs quake-resistant design of the other structures i eee ere earthquske-resistant design ofthe other is — ee eee (Pan? 1987) Imposed loads (second revision) 1.2. All structures, like parking structures, security (Part3:2015) Wind loads (third revision) cabins and ancillary structures need to be designed for (Part 4:1987) Snow loads (second revision) appropriate earthquake effects as per this standard. (Part5 1987) Special loads and load combinations (second revision) 13 Tenporayckmens.nchassefblinganitemponey 343.2912 Code of paces for prestessed excavations, need tobe designed as per this standard, peep) sicieadball sh 1.4 This standard does not deal with construction 1498:1970 Classification and identification of features relating to earthquake-resistant buildings and soils for general engineering other structures. For guidance on carthquake-resistant purposes (frst revision) construction of buildings, reference may be made tothe 1888:1982 Method of load test on soils (second latest revisions of the following indian Standards: revision) 15 4326, 1S 13827, (S 13828, 18 13920, 18 13935 and 1893, Citra for earthquake resistant design 1 15988, of structures: (Part2):2014 Liquid retaining tanks (Pat 3):2014 Bridges and retaining walls (Pan4):2015 Industrial structures including stack- like structutes (firs revision) 1.5 The provisions of ths standard are applicable even 1 critical and special structures, like nuciear power plants, petroleum refinery plants and large dams. For ‘such structures, additional requirements may be 195:1987 Cole af pace for stl we of imposed based on pei sts sch ast speci Calo rect fx acta uso tera assessment nich ce, he Saruake yyy, fred mason Wrdrnon ‘effects specified by this standard shall be taken as at Teastthe minimum, or soils (frst revision) 2809:1972 Glossary ofterms and symbols relating pea tosoil engineering (frst revision) 2810:1979 Glossary of terms relating to soil “The standard liste below contain provision, which, dynamic first revision) through reference in his tex, constite provisions of 297g Code of practice for design and cons- this standard. Atte time of publication, the editions truction of machine foundations indicated were valid. All standards are subject © Pq 1):1982 Foundation for reciprocating ype revision, and parties to agreements based on this machines " aes standard are encouraged to investigate the possibilty (Part2):198) Foundations for impact type of applying the most recent editions ofthe andards machines (Harmer foundations} indicated betow: (Pan): 1992 Foundations forrotary type machines ISN. Tite (Medium and high frequency) 456:2000 Code of practice for plain and (Patt4):1979 Foundations for rotary. type reinforced eonerete fourth revision) ‘machines of low frequency ‘Supplied by Book Supely Bureau Under te License om BIS fer LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION - MANAPAKKAM, CHENNAI ON 03-05-2017 10:49 (129 6328 3) valid wpio3 1.122017 Supoty Bureau Unde the License rom BIS er LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION - MANAPARKAM. CHENNAI ON03 15 1893 (Part 1) 2016 ISNo, Title (Pat5):1987 Foundations for impact machines ‘other than hammer (Forging and stamping press, pig breaker, érop ‘rusher and joker) Earthquake resistant design and ‘construction of buildings —Code of Practice (third revision) Code of practice for determination of bearing capacity of shallow foundations (first revision) Improving earthquake resistance of earthen buildings — Guidelines Improving earthquake resistance of low strength masonry buildings Guidelines Ductile design and detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces — Code cof practice (first revision) 13935:1993 Repair and seismic strengthening of buildings — Guidelines Seismic evaluation and strengthening of existing reinforced conerete building — Guidelines National Building Code of nia: Pan 6 Structural Design, Section 4 Masonry 3 TERMINOLOGY For the purpose of this standard, definitions given below shall apply to all structures, in general. For definition of terms pertaining to soil mechanics and soil dynamics, reference may be made to IS 2809 and 18 2810, and for definition of terms peraining to Toads’, reference may be made to 1S 875 (Parts | to). 3.1 Closely-Spaced Modes — Closely-spaced modes of a structure ate those of the natural modes of oscillation of a structure, whose natural frequencies differ from each other by 10 percent or less of the lower frequency. 3.2 Critical Damping — The damping beyond which the free vibration motion will not be oscillatory. 4326:2013, 6403: 1981 138071993 13828: 1993 13920:2016 15988:2013 $P7:2016 3.3 Damping — The effect of internal friction, inclasticity of materials, sipping, sliding, etc, in reducing the amplinade of oscillation; it is expressed as a fraction of eriical damping (see 3.2). 3.4 Design Acceleration Spectrum — Design acceleration spectrum refers to an average smoothened graph of maximum acceleration as a function of natural frequency or natural period of oscillation for a specified damping ratio for the expected earthquake excitations at the base of a single degree of freedom system. 3.5 Design Horizontal Acceleration Coeficient(4,) — Iisa horizontal acceleration coefficient that shall be used for design of structures, 3.6 Design Horizontal Force ~ It is the horizontal seismic force prescribed by this standard that shall be used to design a structure, 3.7 Duetility — It isthe capacity of a structure (or its members) to undergo large inelastic deformations without significant loss of strength or stiffness. 3.8 Epicentre — itis the geographical point on the surface of earth vertically above the point of origin of| the earthquake. 3.9 Floor Response Spectrum — I is the response spectrum (for a chosen material damping value) ofthe time history of the shaking generated at a floor of a structure, when the structure is subjected to a given earthquake ground motion tits base. 3.10 Importance Factor ()—Itisafactorused toesimate ‘design seismic force depending on the functional use of the structure, characterized by hazardous consequences ofits failure, post-earthquake Functional needs, istorial value, or economic importance 3.11 Intensity of Earthquake —Itisthe measure of the strength of ground shaking manifested ata place during the earthquake, and is indicated by 9 roman capital numeral on the MSK scale of seismic intensity (see Annex D). 3.12 Liquefaction — It isa state primarily in saturated ‘cohesionless soils wherein the effective shear sength is ‘reduced to negligible value for al engineering purposes, When the pore pressure approaches the total confining pressure during earthquake shaking. In this condition, the soil tends to behave lke a uid mass (see Annex F). 3.13 Lithological Features — Features that reflect the nature of the geological formation ofthe earth's crust above bed rock characterized on the basis of structure, ‘mineralogical composition and grain size 3.14 Modal Mass (4) in Mode (4) a Structure —It isa part ofthe total seismic mass ofthe stracture that is effective in natural mode & of oscillation during horizontal or vertical ground motion, 3.15 Modal Participation Factor (F,)in Mode (i) of Structure — The amount by which natural mode & contributes to overall oscillation ofthe structure during horizontal or vertical earthquake ground motion, Since the amplitudes of mode shapes ean be scaled arbitrarily, the value of this factor depends on the scaling used for defining mode shapes. 3.16 Modes of Oscillation — See 3.19, 3.17 Mode Shape Coefficient (9) — It isthe spatial +-Z0HT 1034 53 (123.69 24 35) vk 1s Under the Licance kam iS er LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION - MANAPAKKAM, CHENNAI ON 09-05-2017 10:3459 (123 6224 36) valid upto3 1-12-2017 ‘Supsiod by Book Supply Bu oformation pattern of oscillation along degree of freedom, when te structue is oscillating in its natural mode k. A structure with NV degrees of freedom possesses N natural periods and N associated natural ‘mode shapes, These natural mode shapes are together presented in the form of a mode skape matrix (¢], in Which each column represents one natural mode shape. The element 4, is called the mode shape coefficient associated with degre of freedom i, when the structure is oscillating in mode k. 3.18 Natural Period (7,) in Mode (4) of Oscillation — ‘The time taken (in second) by the sircture to complete ‘one cycle of oscillation in its natural mode k of oscillation 3.18.1 Fundamental Lateral Translational Natural Period (T,) — Itis the longest time taken (in second) by the structure to complete one eyele of oscillation in its lateral translational mode of oscillation in the considered direction of earthquake shaking. This mode of oscillation is called the fundamental lateral translational natural mode of oscillation. A three dimensional model of a structure will have one such fundamental lateral translational made of oscillation along each of the two orthogonal plan directions. 3.19 Normal Mode of Oscillation — The made of ‘oscillation in which there are special undarnped free oscillations in which all points on the structure oseillate harmonically at the same frequency (or period), such that all these points reach their individual maximum responses simultaneously. 3.20 Peak Ground Acceleration — is the maximum acceleration ofthe ground in given direction of ground shaking. Here, the acceleration refers to that of the horizontal motion, unless specified otherwise. 3.21 Response Reduction Factor (R) ~ Itis the factor by which the base shear induced in a structure, if it wore to remain elastic, is reduced 10 obtain the design base shear. Ir depends on the perceived seismic damage performance of the structure, characterized by ductile ‘or bitle deformations, redundancy in the structure, oF ‘overstrength inherent in the design process. 3.22 Response Spectrum — Itisthe representation of ‘maximum responses ofa spectrum of idealized single degree freedom systems of different natural periods but having the same damping, under the action of the ‘same earthguake ground motion at their bases, The response referred to here can be maximum absolute acceleration, maximum relative velocity, or maximum relative displacement 3.23 Response Acceleration Coefficient ofa Structure (5.4) — Its a factor denoting the normalized design acceleration spectrum value to be considered for the 18 1893 (Part 1): 2016 design of structures subjected to earthquake ground shaking; this value depends on the natural period of oscillation of the structure and damping to be considered in the desiga of the structure. 3.24 Seismic Mass ofa Floor — Iti the seismic weight of the floor divided by acceleration due to gravity 3.25 Selsmale Mass of a Structure — It isthe seismic ‘weight of a structure divided by acceleration due to gravity, 3.26 Selsmie Weight of a Floor (7) ~ itis the sum of ead load of the floor, appropriate contributions of ‘weights of columns, walls and any other permanent elements from the storeys above and below, finishes and services, and appropriate amounts of specified {imposed load on the loo. 3.27 Seismic Weight of a Structure (J#) — It is the sum of seismic weights ofall floors. 3.28 Seismic Zone Factor (Z) —Itisthe value of peak ground acceleration considered by this standard for the design of structures located in each seismic zone. 3.29 Time History Analysis — Itis an analysis ofthe dynamic response of the structure at each instant of time, when its base is subjected to a specific ground ‘motion time history, 4 SPECIAL TERMINOLOGY FOR BUILDINGS 4.1 The definitions given below shall apply for the purpose of earthquake resistant design of buildings, 1s enumerated in this standard 4.2 Base — it is the level at which inertia forces generated in the building are considered to be transferred to the ground through the foundation. For buildings with basements, it is considered at the bottommost basement level. For buildings resting on, 4) pile foundations, it is considered to be atthe top of pile cap; b) raf itis considered to be atthe top of raf; and ©) footings, itis considered to be atthe top of the footing. For buildings with combined types of foundation, the base is considered as the battom-mest level af the bases of the constituent individual foundations as per ‘efinitions above 4.3 Base Dimension (d) — Its the dimension (in metre) ifthe base of the building along a direcrion of shaking. 4.4 Centre of Mass (CM) —The point inthe oor of a building through which the resultant ofthe inertia force of the floor is considered to act during earthquake « Supply Bureau Under te License frm BIS for LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION - MANAPAKKAM, CHENNAL ON 09.09.2017 10:94 53 (12369:24.36)vakd ‘Supoied by Bock Supply Bureau Under he License fom BIS fr LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION - MANAPAKKAM, CHENNAI ON 03-05-2017 10:34:83 (128.69.24 35) vab upto 1S 1893 (Part 1) 22016 shaking. Unless otherwise stated, the inertia force considered is that associated with the horizontal shaking ofthe building. 458 Contre of Resistance (CR) 45.1 For Single Storey Buildings — tts the point on the roof of a building through wihich when the resultant intemal resistance acts, the building undergoes, 2) pure translation in the horizontal direction; and ') no twist about vertical axis passing through the CR. 45.2 For Multi-Storey Buildings — i is the set of points on the horizontal floors of a multi-storey building ‘through which, when the resultant incremental internal resistances across those floors act, all floors of the building undergo, 8) pure translation in the horizontal direction; and ) no twist about vertical axis passing through the CR. 4.6 Recentricity 4.6.1 Design Eccentricity (ey) — It is the value of eccentricity to be used for floor i in calculations of design torsion effects 4.6.2 Statie Eccentricity (e,) — {tis the distance between centre of mass (CM) and centre of resistance (CR) of floor. shaking that the structure shall be designed for. 4.8 Diaphragm — Itis «horizontal or neatly horizontal structural system (for example, reinforced concrete floors and horizontal rating systems), which transmits Iateral forces to vertical elements connected toi. 4.9 Height of Flor (>) — iste difference in vertical elevations (in metre) of the base of the building and top of floor i ofthe building 4.10 Height of Building () —Itisthebeight of building iamerre) from ts base to top of roof level, a) excluding the height of basement storeys, if basement walls are connected with the ground floor slab or basement walls are fited between the building columns, but ') including the height of basement storey ‘basement walls are not connected with the ground floor slab and basement walls ae not fitted between the building colurnas. In step-back buildings, it shall be taken asthe average of heights of all steps from te base, weighted with their corresponding floor ateas, And, in buildings founded on hill topes, it shall be taken asthe height oF the roof from the top ofthe highest footing levelor pile cap level 4.11 Horizontal Bracing System — Its a horizontal truss system that serves the same function as a diaphragm. 4.12 Joints — These are portions of columns that are ‘common to beams/braces and columns, which frame to columns. 4.13 Lateral Force Resisting System — Itis part of the structural system, and consists of all structural ‘members that rosstaterat inertia forces induced inthe ‘building during earthquake shaking 4-14 Moment-Resisting Frame —Itis an assembly of ‘beams and columns that resist induced and externally applied forces primarily by flexure. 4.14.1 Ordinary Moment-Resisting Frame (OMRF) — Itisa moment-resisting frame designed and detailed as perS 456 or 1S 800, but not meeting special detailing requirements for ductile behaviour as per IS 13920 or 15 800, respectively. 4.14.2 Special Moment-Resisting Frame (SMRF)— It is a moment-esistng frame designed and detailed as per IS 436 of IS 800, and meeting special detailing requirements for ductile behaviour as per IS 13920 o 15 800, respectively. 4.15 Number of Storeys(r) — Its the umber of levels ‘Fa building above the base at which mass is present in substantive amounts, This 4) excludes the basement storeys, where basement walls ae connected with the ground floor deck or fitted between the building ‘columns; and 1b) includes the basement storeys, when they are ‘ot so connected. 4.16 Core Structural Walls, Perimeter Columns, ‘Outriggers and Belt Truss System — Iisa structural system comprising of a core of structural walls and perimeter columns, resisting the vertical and lateral Toads, with 4) the core structural walls connected to select perimeter column element(s) (often termed ‘outrigged columns) by deep beam elements, known as outriggers, at discrete locations along the height of the building, and b) the outrigged columns connected by deep beam elements (often known a belt truss), i Supaty Busou Unde th Licensa fom BIS for LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION. MANAPAKKAM, CHENNAI ON 03.05.2017 10:34 53 (123.85 24.36) vaio ‘Supplied by Book Supply Bureau Under he License tom BS for LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION - MANAPAKKAM, CHENNAI ON 02-05-2017 10:94 59 (123.63 24.25} vali pled -12-20¢ typically at the same level as the outrigger clement, ‘A structure with this structural system has enkanced lateral stiffness, wherein core structural walls and Perimeter columns are mobilized to act with each other through the outriggers, and the perimeter columns themselves through the belt russ. The global lateral stifiness is sensitive to: lexural stiffness ofthe core clement, the flexural stiffness of the outrigger element(s), the axial stiffness of the outrigged ccoluma(s), and the flexural stiffness of the outrigger elements connecting the core structural walls to the perimeter colunas, 4.17 Principal Plan Axes — These are two mutually perpendicular horizontal directions in plan ofa building along which the geometry ofthe building is oriented. 4.18 P-A Effect — It is the secondary effect on shear forces and bending moments of lateral force resisting elements generated under the action of the vertical loads, interacting with the lateral displacement of building resulting from seismic effects 4.19 RC Structural Wall — Its a wall designed to resist lateral forces acting in is own plane. 4.19 Ordinary RC Structural Wall — Nis areinforced concrete (RC) structural wall designed and detailed 2s per IS 456, but aot meeting special detailing requirements for ductile behaviour as per 'S 13920. 4.19.2 Special RC Structural Wall — It is a RC structural wall designed and detaited as per IS 13920, and meeting special detailing requirements for ductile behaviour as per IS 13920. 4.20 Storey — It is the space between two adjacent floors. 4.20.1 Soft Storey — It is one in which the lateral stiffness is less than that inthe storey above, The storey lateral stiffness isthe total stifness ofall seismic Force resisting elements resisting lateral earthquake shaking effects in the considered direction 4.202 Weak Storey —~ It is one in which the storey lateral strength {cumulative design shear strength of all strctural members other than that of unceinforced ‘masonry (URM) infil) is less than that in the storey above. The storey lateral strength isthe total strength ofall seismic force resisting elements sharing the lateral storey shear in the considered direction 4.21 Storey Drift — It is the relative displacement ‘between the floors above and/or below the storey under consideration. 422 Storey Shear (H) — Itisthe sum of design lateral forces at all levels above the storey i under considerati 181983 (Part 1): 2016. 4.23 Storey Lateral Shear Strength (S;) — Its the total lateral strength of all lateral force resisting elements in the storey considered in a principal plan direction ofthe building. 4.24 Storey Lateral Translational Stiffness (K,)— It is the total lateral translational stiffaess of all lateral force resisting elements in the storey considered in a principal plan direction ofthe building, 4.25 RC Structural Wall Plan Density (p,,) — {¢is the ratio of the cross-sectional area atthe plinth level ‘of RC structural walls resisting the lateral Toad and the plinth of the building, expressed as a percentage. 5 SYMBOLS The symbols and notations given below apply to the provisions of this standard: A, Design horizontal earthquake acceleration coeficient Ay Design horizontal earthquake acceleration spectrum value for mode k of oscillation 1b, Plan dimension of fle { of the building, perpendicular to direction of earthquake shaking C Index for the closely-spaced modes 4 Base dimension (in metre ofthe bulding in the direction in which the earthquake shaking is considered DL Response quantity due to dead load eq; Design eccentricity 10 be used at floor # calculated as per 7.8.2 ey, Static eccentricity at floor i defined as the distance between centre of mass and centre of resistance FL, Response quantity due to earthquake load for horizontal shaking along X-ditection Ely Response quantity due to earthquake load for horizontal shaking along ¥-direction ', Response quantity due to earthquake load for horizontal shaking along,Z-direction Foe Design lateral forces at the roof due to all modes considered F, Design lateral forces atthe floor /due to all ‘modes considered & Acceleration due to gravity Height (in metre of structure A, Height measured from the base of the building to floor i 1 Importance factor 1. Response quantity due to imposed load {Lateral translational stiffness of storey 1 surly Buea Under eens tom BS fr LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION. MANAPARKAL, CHENNA 4 G506.2097 10.3459 (129 682430 va ‘Supp by Book Supply Burau Under the License Hom BIS fr LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION - MANAPAKKAM, CHENNAI ON 03052017 103453 (123.63 2638) valid uplo31-12.2017 Ste Bas Udy i est er LARGEN AND TOVGRO CONSTRUCTION MANAPARKAM,CHENNAON G8 0520171034 891236024365) abs "art w ", Zz Cs a > Ps ®, Dimension of a building in a considered direction Modal mass of mode # Number of storeys or floors Corrected SPT value for soil Number of modes to be considered as per 7.1.5.2 ‘Mode participation factor of mode & Lateral force a floor ‘Design lateral force a floor tin mode & Response reduction factor Design / Response acceleration coefficient for rock or soil sites as given by Fig. 2 ‘and 6.4.2 based on appropriate natural period Lateral shear strength of storey / ‘Undamped natural period of oscillation of the structure (in second) Approximate fundamental period (in second) Undamped natural period of mode & of oscillation (in second) Fundamental natural period of oscillation in second) Design seismic base shear Design base shear calculated using the approximate fundamental period 7, Peak storey shear force in storey i due tall, modes considered storey /in mode k Peak storey shear force in the top storey due to all modes considered Seismic weight ofthe building Seismic weight of floor Seismic zone factor ‘Mode shape coefficient at floor i in mode & Peak response (for example, member forces, displacements, storey forees, storey shears lorbase reactions) due to all modes considered Absolute value of maximum response ia mode k Absolute value of maximum response in mode c, whete mode c is @ closely-spaced mode Shear foree Peak response due to the elosely-spaced modes only Coefficient used in complete quadratic combination (CQC) method while combining responses of modes é and j Circular Frequency (in rads) ia mode 6 GENERAL PRINCIPLES AND DESIGN CRITERIA, 6.1 General Principles 6 ‘The characteristics (intensity, duration, frequency content, ee) of seismic around vibrations expected at any site depend on magnitude of earthquake, its focal depth, epicentral distance, characteristics of the path through which the seismic waves travel, and soil stata fon which the structure is founded. The random ccarthquske ground motions, which eause the structure to oscillate, can be resolved in any three mutually perpendicular directions. The predominant direction of ‘ground vibeation is usually horizontal Effects of earthquake-induced vertical shaking can be significant for overall stability analysis of structures, especially in structures (a) with large spans, and (©) those in which stability is» criterion for design. Reduction in gravity force due to vertical ground ‘motions can be detrimental particularly in prestressed horizontal members, cantilevered members and gravity structures. Hence, special atention shall be paid to effects of vertical ground motion on prestressed or cantilevered beams, gitders and slabs. 6.1.2 The response ofa structure to ground vibrations ‘depends on (a) type of foundation; (b) materials, form, size and mode of construction of structures; and (©) duration and characteristics of ground motion. This. standard specifies design forces for structures founded ‘on rocks or soils, which do not sete, liquefy or slide due to loss of strengtis during earthquake ground vibrations. Ground Motion 6.13 Actual forces that appear on structures daring earthquakes are much higher than the design forces specified in the standard. Ductility arising from inelastic material behaviour with appropriate design and tating, and overstcength resulting from the addtional reserve strength in structures over and above the sign strength are relied upon forthe deficit in actual and design lateral loads. In other words, earthquake resistant design as per this standard relies on inelastic ‘behaviour of structures. But, the maximum ductility that cean be realized in structures is limited. Therefore, structures shall be designed for atleast the minimum, design lateral force specified in this standard, 6.1.4 Members and connections of reinforced and prestressed concrete structures shall be designed (as per. 456 and IS 1343) such that premature failure does not occur due to shear or bond. Some provisions for appropriate ductile detailing of RC members are given in IS 13920, Members and their connections of steel strvetures shouldbe so proportioned that high duct is obtained in the structure, avoiding premature failure due to clastic or inelastic buckling of any type, Some ‘Seoped by Book Supply Butta Unde the License fom BIS fr LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION - MANAPAKKAM, CHENNAI ON 03-05-2017 10:34 59 (129.6324 95) aid upg provisions for appropriate ductile detailing of steel mmeinbers are given in 1S 800 6.1.5 The sol-structure imeraction refers to effects of. the flexibility of supporting soil-foundation system on the response of structure. Sol-structue interaction may not be considerod in the seismic analysis of structures ‘supported on rock or rocklike material a shallow deprh, 6.1.6 Equipment and other systems, which are supported at various floor levels ofa structure, will be subjected to different motions at their support points. Im such cases, it may be necessary to obiain floor response spectra for design of equipment and its supports. For details reference may be made to 1S 1893 (Pare), Additions o Existing Structures Additions shall be made to existing structures only as fallows: 8) An addition that is structurally independent from an existing structure shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the seismic requirements for new structures. b) An addition that is structurally connected to aan existing structure shall be designed and constructed such that the entire structure conforms to the seismic force resistance requirements for new structutes, unless the {ollowing thee conditions are complied with: 1) Addition shall comply with the requirements for new structures, 2) Addition shall not increase the seismic forces in any structural element of the existing structures by more than 5 percent, unless the capacity of the clement subject tothe increased force is still in compliance with this standard, and 3) Addition shall not decrease the seismic ‘resistance of any structural element of te existing structure unless reduced resistance is equal to or greater than that required for new structures 6.1.8 Change in Occupancy When a change of occupancy results ina structure being reclassified toahigher importance factor (0), the structure shall conform to seismic requirements lid down for new structures withthe higher importance factor. 6.2 Assumptions The following assumptions shall be made in the earthquake-resistant design of structures: 8) Earthquake ground motions are complex and 1S 1893 (Part irregular, consisting of several frequencies and of varying amplitudes each lasting fora small aration. Therefore, usualy, resonance ofthe type as visualized under steady-state sinusoidal excitations will not occu, a twould need time to build up such amplitudes. But, there are exceptions where resonance-like conditions have been seen to occur between long distance waves and tall structures founded on deep soft soils. b) Earthquake is not likely to oceur simultaneously with high wind, maximum flood ©) The values of elastic modulus of materials, wherever required, will be taken as for static analysis, unless more definite values are available for use in dynamic conditions [see IS 456, 1$ 800, IS 1343, IS 1905 and IS 2974 (Parts | 105) {6.3 Load Combinations and Increase in Perm Stresses 63.1 Load Combinations ‘The load combinations shall be considered as specified in respective standards duc toall load effects mentioned therein. In addition, those specified in this standard shall be applicable, which include earthquake effects. 6.3.1.1 Even when load combinations that do not ‘contain earthquake effects, indicate larger demands than combinations including them, the provisions shall be adopted related to design, ductile detailing and ‘construction relevant for earthquake conditions, which sre given inthis standard, IS 13920 and IS 800. 6.3.2 Design Horizomtal Earthquake Load {6.3.2.1 When lateral load resisting elements are oriented along two mutually orthogonal horizontal directions, structure shal be designed for effects duc ofall design ‘earthquake foad in one horizontal direction ata time, and not in both directions simultancously. 6.3.2.2 When lateral load resisting elements ate not oriented along mutually orthogonal horizontal directions [as per 7.1 and Table Se], stuctute shall be designed forthe simultaneous effects due to full design ‘earthquake load in one horizontal ditection plus 530 percent of design earthquake load along the other horizontal direction. Thus, structure should be designed forthe following sets of combinations of earthquake effects: a) £EL,+03£L,,and b) 2032L,+EL,, where X and Y are two orthogonal horizontal plan + upay Buea Unde me Lens YS fr LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION - MANAPARKAM, HENNA 65:05:20) 103459 (129692439) va ‘Suvoied by Book Supply Bureau Under the License tom BIS fr LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION - MANAPAKKAM, CHENNAI ON 02-05-2017 10:24:88 (129 69-2438) vad uptog1-12-2017 1S 1895 (Part 1): 2016 4008 rormes, (25, OP <0588 ium sit 438 9555<7.<4.00s soit sites | 7 034 T>4008 2S O400s by For use in response spectrum method [sce Fig. 200)] Leis? 70.108 Forrocky|2.5 0.10s4.00s +157 70.10 Formed. [25 0.10s400s D55s<1<400s +157 T<0.10s, s4.008 6.4.2.1 For determining the correct spectrum to be used inthe estimate of (,/g), the type of soil on which the structure is placed shall be identified by the classification given in Table 4, as a) Soit pe 1— Rock o- hard soils Soil pe M1 — Medium or sff soils; and ©) Soil ype Ill — Soft soils. In Table 4, the value of N to be used shall be the ‘weighted average of N of sol layers from the existing ‘ground level to 30 m below the existing ground level, here, the NV values of individual layers shall be the corrected values. supy Bureau Under the License fom BIS for LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION - MANAPAKKAW, CHENNAI ON 09:05.2017 10 363 (123 68:24.35) valet 122017 ‘Susi by Book Supply Bureau Under the License Rom BIS fr LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION - MANAPAKKAM, CHENNAI ON 03-05-2017 10:3453 (123 83.24 36) vai pis Supety ucou Une he Licanee fom BlS for LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION - MANAPAKKAM CHENNAI ON 0205-2047 10:94'69 (12269 2495) vais 1S 1893 (Fart 1) 2016 Table 1 Percentage Increase in Net Bearing Pressure and Skin Friction of Soils (Clause 63.52) SI Ne, Soil Type Percentage Increase Allowable we o 1) Type A Rock orhard voile 50 1h) Type 8) Mediem or sifFsots 25 iid) Type © Son sits NovEs 1 The not Bearing pressure shall be detecmined in ‘Only const vans of W shal be wed any ineease in net bearing presse bas already been permited for fores other than seismic forces, the Increase in allowable bearing pressure, when esi force inal inclodod, all oot enceed ihe lite speefed shove 4 The desiabe minimum coneted Fel ales OF N shal teas speed blow “Seam [ pth wy bow |W Foes] — Remarks “Zone | Ground Leet iy = 15 [fora lana 210 25-_| denis baween ir 35 10 flim 210 20 fimerpotaion recomend Ue sols of omer W values are encounteed than those specified inthe table above, then suitable ground {Emprovement techniques shall be adopted #9 achieve these values Alemately, deep pile Foundations shout ‘ened wich ae anchored in songe strat, wring the sil layer that do act met the eequcement. ile should be designed fratello negeting ata resistance of ose sl layers (i ay) which ae lable to lige, 6 tian Standards 15 1498 and 18 2191 may be refered for soil notation, and corrected 1” values tall Be etermined by applying cotection for Cy for eesive overburden pressure, using relation N= Cy, where C= JBOSS. P, is the atmospheric pressure and NI the saconected SPT value for sit. While using this tbl, he valve of 816 be considered shall be determined a belo a} footed footings — Weighted average of 1 of sit layer fom doth of founding, to depth of founding sl tse the breadth of footing 6) Raft foundaions ~ Weighted werage of 1 of sil ayers fom pth of founding, t depth of Sounding ples tise the breadth ofr ©) Pile foundation — Weighted average of X of sit layers fem depth of bottom tip of ple 1 dept of ottom ip of ple plus tice the diameter of ple Group pile foundation — Weighed average of ¥ of ‘il lvers from deth of Boom lip of pile 00 0 ‘epih of botom sp oF ple group pls ice the width ‘of pile group: and ©) Well foundation — Weighted averape of 1 of sol layers tom depth of bottom ip of well. to depth of otiom tp 0” wel plas vie the width of well 10 ‘Table 2 Classification of Types of Soils for Determining Percentage Increase in Net Bearing Pressure and Skin Friction (Clause 63.52) ST No Sel ype Remarks ae) o Ty Wipe A Wellgaded gavel (GW) or well ged an Rock or (SW) oth wih es tan percent passing hard sls 7S mm seve (Fines) Well graded gravel —~ sand mites with or without es (GW-SW) Poosy-graded sand (SP) oF Clyey sand (SC), al Baving W above 30 Sue hard lays naving 9 above 30 whee Ws cured sada peneraton tet value i) Type ® — Poocy graded sacs or poly grade Sands Medium or with grave (SP) wh ile oma ince ing sfFsale between 10200 30 Sut 10 medio sti Bne-gtained sols, sits of low compressibiy (ML) & lays of low compres (CL) ving N berweon 10 and 30 iy Type © AlfsoR sails ner tan SP with M10. The SoM soils various posible sos are Sits of stemediate compressibility (hy Sits or high compressbity ( Clays of intermediate compressibiity (C1, Clays of high comprerbity (CH): Sills and clays of intermediate to high campressiblty (MloMM or CCH) Sit wth clay of irene compressy Silt with clay of igh compressibility oeec, ivy Type D—_Requtes siteapecitc sty and speci Unstable. weetmene according to ste condition (sce cllapiie, 63.5.3) ‘Table3 Seismic Zone Factor Z (Clause6.42) Semic Zone Factor OW ao 2 8 © & Zz O10 016 024 036 6.4.3 Effects of design earthquake losds applied on sruetures can be considered in two ways, namely’ a) Equivalent static method, and b) Dynamic analysis method. In tur, éynamic analysis can be performed in three ways, namely: 1D) Response spectrum method, 2) Modal time history method, and 3) Time history method. In this standard, Equivalent Static Method, Response Specirum Method and Time History Method are ‘Svooted by Book Supply Bureau Unde te Lloense trom BIS for LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION - MANAPAKKAM, CHENNA! ON 03-05-2017 10:34'59 (129.6924 35 valid uo MAP OF INDIA SHOW _SEISMIG ZONES OF INDUA 5 a coven a aca 6 Sekar Sy ta i ay padi tensa anes Pech tan nda tec op eee Bt Eason Ae Ragen Ae 7, Aa he ‘Bete rh natn rah at hs Mey Pa ern ath Ge sc Bei sansa ir tly Sr id i : : + supBy Bureau Unde the License fom BIS fr LARSEN ANO TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION . MANAPAKKAM, CHENNAI ON 63.05.2017 10 3469 (129.69 2425) vais 15 1893 (Part 1): 2016 30 ——— Tipe! Rock OR ROBO ret weoumsor | tye sorrson | Ett 25 20 10 os ° 1 2 3 4 8 6 NATURAL PERIOD Ts 2h SPECTRA FOR EQUIVALENT STATIC METHOD 30 —— Tye! ROCK OR HARD SOIL Type ll MEDIUM SOIL Type it SOFT SOIL 25 20 ° 1 2 3 4 6 6 NATURAL PERIODT, ¢ 28 SPECTRAFOR RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD Fic. 2 Desion Accetenation Coerricies (S,/g) (Coxtesronpino 10 5 Percent DaMerss) ‘Table 4 Classification of Types of Soils for Determining the Spectrum to be Used to Estimate Design Barthquake Force (Clause 6.42.1) SENo. Sei! Type Remarks o oe @ aod 1) Well raed gavel (GW) of well add sad (SW) both wih ess tam § pacen pasting 75 Um seve (eines) Rock ot) Well ged gravel-snd matures wither without fines (GI-SW) Hard soils) Footy graded sid (SP) oc clayey sané (SC) all having above 30 1) Sutt totard clays having W above 30, where 1 is standarépenevation test vahe » oo 42) Poot gael Sans or gery we sad with gavel (SP) i ie emo fs bing between 1 and 39 Medi of) Sti 0 edie stiff Bne-eraned soils, lke site of low compressibility (ML) or clays of fow Su sa compressibility (CL) having 8 between 10 and 30 iy) All sft sls eer thn SP with NV. The Sof wile) Sits of itermatiatecompresinty (MU) 1) Sits of Sigh compresstbliy (MIF ©} Chays of mermediae compressibility (Ch) % viny «CH €) Sie and clay of Itemmadat 1 high compressibility (MI-MH of CL-CH} 5 ‘of intermediate compres (MI-CI: 508 2) Silt wh shay oF high eompressbiy [MMH.-CH. B upped by Book Supply Bureau Under the License fom BIS for LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION - MANAPAKKAN CHENNAI ON 03-05-2017 10:3489 (123 83 2438) vabd unlog1-12:2017 1893 (P ti): 2016 ‘adopted. Equivalent static method may be used for analysis of regular structures with approximate natural peviod T, less than 04s 643.1 For structural analysis, the moment of inertia shall be taken as 8) In RC and masonry structures: 70 percent of um OF Column, and 35 percent OF fy, OF beams: and b) In steel structures: J, of both beams and columas 6.4.4 Where a number of modes are to be consideredin response spectrum method, A, as defined in 64.2 for etch mode k shall be determined using natural period T, of oscillation of that mode, 6.4.8 For underground structures and buildings whose base isocated at depths of 30m or more, A, atthe base shall be taken as half the value obtained from 64.2 This reduced value shall be used only for estimating inertia effects due to masses atthe eoresponding levels below the ground: the inertia effects for the above aground portion ofthe building shall be estimated based. fn the unreduced value of 4, For estimating inertia effects due to masses of structures and foundations placed between the ground level and 30 m depth, the Kiva Kir? K fs: ‘a ELEVATION 4A STIFFNESS IRREGULARITY (SOFT STOREY) these Ms W>1.5Win W, > 1.5Wi4 EVATI 4B MASS IRREGULARITY 1.2.2 Minimum Design Lateral Force ‘Supid by Book Suoply Bureau Une he License tom BIS for LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION - MANAPAKKAM, CHENNAI ON 02-05-2017 103453 (128.63.24 36) vali upto Supsty Bureau Unc he Licanee rom Bis for LARSEN AND TOUBRO CONSTRUCTION - MANAPAKKAIM, CHENNAI ON 03-05-2017 10.34 69 (12863 2635) wah 1S 1893 (Part 1) 2016 A> 025. BS ELEVATION. AC VERTICAL GEOMETRIC IRREGULARITY = tor oatw tuevation HE 4D NLPLANE DISCONTINUITY INVERTICAL ELEMENTS RESISTINGLATERAL FORCE Set Sat< She S S

    You might also like