Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Moreno Irq Par U20 PDF
Moreno Irq Par U20 PDF
1:0
(IRQ) IRAQ PARAGUAY (PAR)
a.e.t.
Round of 16, 03 July 2013, 20:00 CET – Antalya (TUR)
Evaluation scale
(for referee, ARs and Description of the Marks
fourth official)
9.0 – 10.0 Excellent.
8.5 – 8.9 Very good. Important decision(s) correctly taken.
8.3 – 8.4 Good. Expected level.
8.2 Satisfactory with small areas for improvement.
8.0 – 8.1 Satisfactory with important areas for improvement.
7.9 One clear and important mistake, otherwise 8.3 or above.
7.8 One clear and important mistake, otherwise 8.0 – 8.2.
Below expectation, poor control, significant point(s) for
7.5 – 7.7
improvement.
Disappointing. Below expectation with one and clear important
7.0 – 7.4 mistake or a performance with two or more clear and important
mistakes.
6.0 – 6.9 Unacceptable.
Referee
Crucial Decisions (refer to penalty kicks, sending-off situations etc.)
Basic Observations (refer to the general application of the LotG, highlight the
referee’s tactical approach, personality, match control, management of the teams
and players, teamwork etc.).
Please deploy short but precise and detailed sentences!
Positive Points
Foul detection. He had a good foul detection overall and even though he missed
1.
some he was able to give all the big offences punishable with a caution.
Card Management and Control. He issued all the mandatory cautions and
2.
controlled the match in a very good way being authoritative.
Decision making. He had to evaluate 3 crucial decisions and he solved them all
3. correctly. He appeared very confident at this area and with great awareness of
such situations.
very very
Tactical Approach lenient medium strict
lenient strict
Description X
Yes So-so No
Consistency in the tactical approach / style X
The tactical approach suited to the require-
ments of the match / the match benefitted X
from the tactical approach of the referee
Ability to adapt the tactical approach if
X
needed
Assistant Referee 1
Assistant Referee 2
Please assess the second assistant referee’s performance.
Fourth Official
Minute and Description of the Scene / Assessment of the fourth official’s behavior
He executed his duties in a defective way. Even though all technical procedures
were executed properly, he did nothing to stop the Paraguayan coach from
Full time protesting to almost every decision the referee took especially at the extra time.
At min. 40 he should intervene to calm the coach in order not to protest. At the
extra time he had the chance to intervene several times but failed to do so.