You are on page 1of 21

E.B.

Prof. Kalas

ECE 260

12 September 2017

Picture Book File

 #1 – younger readers

 Author: Beatrix Potter

 Title: Beatrix Potter Nursery Rhymes

 Publisher: Derrydale Books

 Summary: A board-book collection of little rhyming stories and pictures. Includes “Five

Little Pigs” and “Three Blind Mice”.

Evaluation

 Plot

o Believability (absence of coincidence/sentimentality, etc.): 5

 Comment: These stories have little believability. Though they aren’t

overly ridiculous in plot, they are stories depicting animals in humanlike

roles.

o Major dramatic question (clear early in book?): Yes

 Comment: There is very little drama in these rhymes, but there are MDQs

throughout the stories (Where do the geese wander? What’s in the

cupboard? Who’s tapping?), but they’re weak at best.

o Other considerations (satisfactory conclusion, tension, clear conflict, etc.): 6


 Comment: Most rhymes end happily after a slight bit of tension or

mystery.

o Style and language (precise vocabulary, figurative language, dialogue, cadence,

understatement, unexpected insights, line in sand, etc.): 8

 Comment: Ms. Potter is excellent at writing rhyming poems for children

that are pleasing to both the eye and the ear. They have a beautiful

cadence. They are all quite literal, and there is no use of figurative

language.

o Pacing: 9

 Comment: Poems are a good length for young children, whether they are

listening or reading themselves.

o Character (dynamic protagonist, characters “ring true” [including cultural

considerations], etc.): 6

 Comment: None of the characters stay with you. They are all colorful and

unique in design, but not memorable personality-wise.

o Setting (detail, texture): 7

 Comment: The rhymes and illustrations work together to paint a picture of

a quiet, lazy countryside populated by charming animals.

o Theme (absence of overt didacticism?): 9

 Comment: These surprising little stories about animal adventures have

zero signs of didacticism. They exist for the story alone.

o Other considerations (mood, tone, etc.):

 Comment: Stories are told in a surprised and delighted tone.


o Is it a well-rounded piece? 6

 Comment: While rhymes and illustrations are excellent and fun for young

readers, the characters and short plots are in wanting.

o Overall rating: 7

 Comment: Without longer plots or engaging characters, these clever

rhyming stories are likely to be forgotten as soon as the young reader is

capable of reading other books.

 #2 – younger readers

 Author: Dr. Seuss

 Title: Dr. Seuss’s ABC

 Publisher: Random House, Inc.

 Summary: Outlandish creatures help children learn the alphabet by using various words

starting with the appropriate letter.

Evaluation

 Plot

o Believability (absence of coincidence/sentimentality, etc.): 3

 Comment: This is a book kids won’t believe in for a moment, simply

because of the mythical beings and the clear focus on alphabet.

o Major dramatic question (clear early in book?): Yes.

 Comment: The only dramatic question is “What words begin with this

letter?”
o Other considerations (satisfactory conclusion, tension, clear conflict, etc.): 5

 Comment: Alphabet continues in a fun and imaginative way at every page

turn, and the ending is a fun surprise, but there is no tension or conflict, as

there is little in the way of plot to being with.

o Style and language (precise vocabulary, figurative language, dialogue, cadence,

understatement, unexpected insights, line in sand, etc.): 8

 Comment: Each letter has fun rhymes and interesting sentences structure.

Letters each have unique arrangements and rhyming schemes and are fun

and easy to say.

o Pacing: 9

 Comment: Focuses not only on a letter’s primary sound, but on its

secondary sound as well. Introduces a letter, then moves on before

becoming repetitive.

o Character (dynamic protagonist, characters “ring true” [including cultural

considerations], etc.): 3

 Comment: Characters are fun and colorful, but are manufactured purely

for the sake of the alphabet.

o Setting (detail, texture): 3

 Comment: There is no setting to speak of. Cartoon characters appear

against bright colored backgrounds.

o Theme (absence of overt didacticism?): 5

 Comment: This book clearly drives home the alphabet. Though done

imaginatively, its entire purpose is teaching sounds of letters.


o Other considerations (mood, tone, etc.): 7

 Comment: The book has a very silly and fun tone, expressed through the

rhymes and words chosen as well as through the illustrations.

o Is it a well-rounded piece? 7

 Comment: It fulfills its purpose in teaching the alphabet in a fun way for

young readers.

o Overall rating: 7

 Comment: The sum is greater than its parts. This book has little plot,

characters, believability, setting, or anything else a good book needs. And

yet, this alphabet book has endured through the ages.

 #3 – younger readers

 Author: Diane Johnston Hamm

 Title: Rockabye Farm

 Publisher: Simon & Schuster Books For Young Readers

 Summary: A farmer lovingly and individually rocks the animals on his farm to sleep.

Evaluation

 Plot

o Believability (absence of coincidence/sentimentality, etc.): 7

 Comment: Though the story gets sillier as it goes on (the farmer rocking

his pig, cow, and horse), most of the story is rather simple and believable.

o Major dramatic question (clear early in book?): Yes.


 Comment: This is a very predictable book from the beginning. Each

illustration shows a preview of what will happen on the next page.

o Other considerations (satisfactory conclusion, tension, clear conflict, etc.): 6

 Comment: There is no tension or conflict whatsoever. The story just

proceeds in one direction until the end. The ending, however, is perfect.

o Style and language (precise vocabulary, figurative language, dialogue, cadence,

understatement, unexpected insights, line in sand, etc.): 4

 Comment: The text is very straightforward. There is no figurative

language, and every sentence is very much like the one before it and the

one after it.

o Pacing: 9

 Comment: Proceeds at a good pace for young readers.

o Character (dynamic protagonist, characters “ring true” [including cultural

considerations], etc.): 2

 Comment: Other than seeing that the farmer is patient and caring in

rocking each animal to sleep, there are really no character traits to speak

of.

o Setting (detail, texture): 3

 Comment: Based on text alone, the setting isn’t even established. This is

obviously a picture book and meant to work with the illustrations, but

without the illustrations, we wouldn’t have a setting at all.

o Theme (absence of overt didacticism?): 5

 Comment: A simple story of a farm going to sleep.


o Other considerations (mood, tone, etc.): 7

 Comment: It’s a very cozy book, perfect for bedtimes because of its theme

and its simple repetition.

o Is it a well-rounded piece? 7

 Comment: Simple and easy to understand on all accounts, paired with

charming illustrations.

o Overall rating: 7

 Comment: Though too simple for any but young readers, and perhaps

forgettable, this is fine, cozy little bedtime story.

 #4 – younger readers

 Author: Margaret Wise Brown

 Title: Goodnight Moon

 Publisher: Macmillan Book Clubs, Inc.

 Summary: A boy says goodnight to everything in his bedroom.

Evaluation

 Plot

o Believability (absence of coincidence/sentimentality, etc.): 7

 Comment: The only fantastical aspect of the book is that the little boy and

the old woman are indeed anthropomorphic rabbits, yet everything else is

familiar to everyday life.

o Major dramatic question (clear early in book?): Yes, but slow.


 Comment: The direction of the book isn’t immediately seen from the first

page, but is soon made clear.

o Other considerations (satisfactory conclusion, tension, clear conflict, etc.): 7

 Comment: No conflict or tension is present in the book, but the story is

wrapped up nicely.

o Style and language (precise vocabulary, figurative language, dialogue, cadence,

understatement, unexpected insights, line in sand, etc.): 9

 Comment: This book is famous for its memorable rhyming schemes for a

reason.

o Pacing: 8

 Comment: Perfect pacing for a children’s bedtime book.

o Character (dynamic protagonist, characters “ring true” [including cultural

considerations], etc.): 4

 Comment: The book lacks characters. We know the old lady is watchful

and wants the boy to go to sleep, and that the boy is imaginative and

curious. Other than that, there is nothing to note.

o Setting (detail, texture): 5

 Comment: We’re given a simple, down-to-earth setting of a boy’s

bedroom. The details in his room give us the rhymes.

o Theme (absence of overt didacticism?): 8

 Comment: Curiosity and a boy’s refusal to go to sleep on time are what

drive the book forward.

o Other considerations (mood, tone, etc.): 9


 Comment: This is almost a sleepy bedtime story with a hint of nostalgia.

o Is it a well-rounded piece? 9

 Comment: Rhymes and their content complement the illustrations

perfectly.

o Overall rating: 9

 Comment: A classic for a reason, this book has a unique way of getting

children ready for sleep.

 #5 – younger readers

 Author: Margaret Wise Brown

 Title: The Runaway Bunny

 Publisher: Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc.

 Summary: A young boy wants to run away from his mother, who insists that she will

always find him.

Evaluation

 Plot

o Believability (absence of coincidence/sentimentality, etc.): 4

 Comment: The story follows a series of hypothetical and not-at-all feasible

scenarios.

o Major dramatic question (clear early in book?): Yes.

 Comment: It’s clear what this book is asking. Will the mother succeed in

catching her son? Will he finally come home?


o Other considerations (satisfactory conclusion, tension, clear conflict, etc.): 9

 Comment: This book is a mystery and makes you hope that the boy will

come back to his loving mother. Both mother and son are persistent,

leaving you unsure as to how it will end.

o Style and language (precise vocabulary, figurative language, dialogue, cadence,

understatement, unexpected insights, line in sand, etc.): 8

 Comment: It’s a delight how each role chosen by the boy is then countered

by what the mother chooses to be. There’s a lovely cadence in the

arrangement of sentences, which sounds wonderful out loud.

o Pacing: 9

 Comment: Each “daydream” is only a couple of pages long – long enough

to picture and appreciate without getting dull.

o Character (dynamic protagonist, characters “ring true” [including cultural

considerations], etc.): 8

 Comment: Though mother and son are rabbits, they share a very real

child-parent dynamic, one of unconditional love versus developing

independence.

o Setting (detail, texture): 5

 Comment: We’re not introduced to much of a setting through the text, but

the illustrations depict the story perfectly.

o Theme (absence of overt didacticism?): 8

 Comment: The probable main theme is that a mother’s love will stop at

nothing to care for her children.


o Other considerations (mood, tone, etc.): 8

 Comment: This story is dreamy, almost wistful. There is determination

and rebellion matched by persistent love.

o Is it a well-rounded piece? 9

 Comment: From the illustrations to the characters and their disagreements,

everything in this story is excellent.

o Overall rating: 9

 Comment: A lesser-known yet fantastic book by Ms. Brown.

 #1 – older readers

 Author: Rebecca Caudill

 Title: The Best-Loved Doll

 Publisher: Holt, Rinehart and Winston

 Summary: A girl chooses amongst her dolls which to take to a special birthday party.

Evaluation

 Plot

o Believability (absence of coincidence/sentimentality, etc.): 8

 Comment: Other than the “discussions” between the dolls, everything else

is rather believable. Any girl who has multiple dolls could relate to this

story.

o Major dramatic question (clear early in book?): Yes.

 Comment: Which doll will Betsy take?


o Other considerations (satisfactory conclusion, tension, clear conflict, etc.): 8

 Comment: Readers spend most of the book wondering which doll will be

chosen. The text does a good job of highlighting one doll’s aspects, then

showing the love Betsy has for one doll in particular. Ending is satisfying,

though not particularly surprising. Nothing negative happens in the book.

o Style and language (precise vocabulary, figurative language, dialogue, cadence,

understatement, unexpected insights, line in sand, etc.): 5

 Comment: Dialogue is rather simple and stilted. Descriptions lack

figurative language, but use precise wording.

o Pacing: 8

 Comment: Story moves along at a good pace. About half the book is spent

choosing a doll, and the other half is spent at the party.

o Character (dynamic protagonist, characters “ring true” [including cultural

considerations], etc.): 5

 Comment: The dolls all have unique personalities and interactions, but

Betsy and the other characters are flat.

o Setting (detail, texture): 8

 Comment: The details in the descriptions are in such a way that you feel as

though you’ve seen and met each doll.

o Theme (absence of overt didacticism?): 8

 Comment: The hidden theme here is that even if you aren’t particularly

beautiful, smart, or skillful, having love is the most important thing.

o Other considerations (mood, tone, etc.): 7


 Comment: Story is expectant, with all parts of the plot leading to one point

– choosing a doll and going to the party. It’s a soft, happy, carefree book.

o Is it a well-rounded piece? 7

 Comment: High marks on almost all aspects, but characters and dialogue

could have used more life and realism.

o Overall rating: 7

 Comment: Predictable plot and relatively stiff characters, yet an engaging

story overall.

 #2 – older readers

 Author: Jeff Brumbeau

 Title: The Quiltmaker’s Gift

 Publisher: Scholastic Inc.

 Summary: A selfless old woman will only make a quilt for a greedy king after he has

given away everything he has.

Evaluation

 Plot

o Believability (absence of coincidence/sentimentality, etc.): 7

 Comment: We can already detect the roles each main character is to play –

mean, greedy king and kind quiltmaker – which makes the otherwise

charming story lose a bit of believability. The way the quiltmaker escapes
danger each time is also rather coincidental, or utilizing “deus ex

machina”.

o Major dramatic question (clear early in book?): Yes, but slow.

 Comment: Once our setting and characters are established, the implied

question is then “How will the king get a quilt?”

o Other considerations (satisfactory conclusion, tension, clear conflict, etc.): 9

 Comment: The tension in this book is very well done, and the ending is a

complete turn-around from the beginning and very satisfying.

o Style and language (precise vocabulary, figurative language, dialogue, cadence,

understatement, unexpected insights, line in sand, etc.): 9

 Comment: This book’s highlight is the language. Story is a delight to read

due to the words chosen as well as their flow and unique arrangement.

Lovely cadence with every sentence.

o Pacing: 9

 Comment: Moves along at a nice, leisurely pace. Digs into the story

without becoming boring.

o Character (dynamic protagonist, characters “ring true” [including cultural

considerations], etc.): 7

 Comment: Besides the fact that the quiltmaker is the “good kind” hero and

the king appears to be the “mean greedy” villain, the characters are

actually well fleshed-out, the king especially. He’s more than he seems at

first – he’s greedy because he thinks possessions will make him happy, yet

he becomes a happy, enjoyable, selfless person by the end.


o Setting (detail, texture): 8

 Comment: Descriptions work well with gorgeous illustrations to depict

emotions, characters, and surroundings.

o Theme (absence of overt didacticism?): 6

 Comment: This book has an excellent theme of the joy of giving, yet an

obvious one. It could be argued that the book was written to teach this

principle.

o Other considerations (mood, tone, etc.): 6

 Comment: The story has a mystical, magical tone, though it contains a hint

of condescension.

o Is it a well-rounded piece? 8

 Comment: The overt lesson can be forgiven in light of the overall story.

o Overall rating: 8

 Comment: A lovely book in both language, plot, and theme.

 #3 – older readers

 Author: Patricia Polacco

 Title: When Lightning Comes in a Jar

 Publisher: Babushka Inc.

 Summary: A light-hearted story of a family reunion and the connections between and

older generation with a younger.

Evaluation
 Plot

o Believability (absence of coincidence/sentimentality, etc.): 8

 Comment: Quite believable plot. A simple, happy-go-lucky story of a

large family.

o Major dramatic question (clear early in book?): Yes.

 Comment: How do you catch lightning in a jar?

o Other considerations (satisfactory conclusion, tension, clear conflict, etc.): 7

 Comment: Little tension or conflict. The entire story takes place over one

day, and is filled with a happy family event. Satisfying ending clearing up

the mystery of “lightning” in jars.

o Style and language (precise vocabulary, figurative language, dialogue, cadence,

understatement, unexpected insights, line in sand, etc.): 7

 Comment: Colorful descriptions and down-to-earth language.

o Pacing: 8

 Comment: Nice, quick pacing and doesn’t linger too long on unimportant

details.

o Character (dynamic protagonist, characters “ring true” [including cultural

considerations], etc.): 7

 Comment: The author’s background and heritage is reflected in the family

reunion, but also is a good representation of any typical family reunion. A

relatable and realistic portrayal of children and their relatives.

o Setting (detail, texture): 8


 Comment: We’re easily able to see the surroundings of the book via the

descriptions.

o Theme (absence of overt didacticism?): 8

 Comment: A theme of the importance of family and the special moments

spent together across generations.

o Other considerations (mood, tone, etc.): 7

 Comment: There’s a young, happy, excited mood and a feeling of

anticipation during the entire book.

o Is it a well-rounded piece? 8

 Comment: Well-written and engaging.

o Overall rating: 8

 Comment: Though nothing about the book is particularly memorable, it’s

a fine book about family and making memories.

 #4 – older readers

 Author: Jon J. Muth

 Title: The Three Questions

 Publisher: Scholastic Press

 Summary: A boy sets out on a quest to answer the most important questions in the world.

Evaluation

 Plot

o Believability (absence of coincidence/sentimentality, etc.): 7


 Comment: This is almost a fantasy. A boy can talk to animals and they

talk back. The plot seems a bit contrived.

o Major dramatic question (clear early in book?): Yes.

 Comment: What are the answers to Nikolai’s questions?

o Other considerations (satisfactory conclusion, tension, clear conflict, etc.): 8

 Comment: Good tension and conflict, with an ending to tie everything up.

o Style and language (precise vocabulary, figurative language, dialogue, cadence,

understatement, unexpected insights, line in sand, etc.): 6

 Comment: Simple language – straightforward, little to no figurative

language. Plain and to the point. Dialogue seems fake.

o Pacing: 8

 Comment: Nice pacing, moving from act to act seamlessly.

o Character (dynamic protagonist, characters “ring true” [including cultural

considerations], etc.): 6

 Comment: Characters are flat and serve simplistic roles in the story.

o Setting (detail, texture): 7

 Comment: Loosely established setting, but with nice descriptions

occasionally (example: the storm).

o Theme (absence of overt didacticism?): 6

 Comment: Very obvious theme is included in the questions Nikolai is

trying to ask – how should we spend our time, and who is most important?

A bit too overt.

o Other considerations (mood, tone, etc.): 7


 Comment:

o Is it a well-rounded piece? 7

 Comment: It’s a nice story, and the illustrations are lovely, but the

language and characters are lacking.

o Overall rating: 6

 Comment: Rather shallow and reads like a proverb, but still an enjoyable

story.

 #5 – older readers

 Author: M.T. Anderson

 Title: Me, All Alone, at the End of the World

 Publisher: Candlewick Press

 Summary: A boy lives by himself at “the end of the world”, but is lured back by a wild

amusement park.

Evaluation

 Plot

o Believability (absence of coincidence/sentimentality, etc.): 6

 Comment: Character dialogue is stiff and flat, and setting is fantastic and

unbelievable.

o Major dramatic question (clear early in book?): Yes, but slow.

 Comment: What will happen at the End of the World?

o Other considerations (satisfactory conclusion, tension, clear conflict, etc.): 8


 Comment: Building plot and excitement make this interesting and

engaging. Surprise ending that may leave older children thinking.

o Style and language (precise vocabulary, figurative language, dialogue, cadence,

understatement, unexpected insights, line in sand, etc.): 8

 Comment: Precise and figurative language are the main features. Lots of

personification.

o Pacing: 9

 Comment: Excellent pacing. Like a rollercoaster – starts slow, picks up

speed, then stops unexpectedly.

o Character (dynamic protagonist, characters “ring true” [including cultural

considerations], etc.): 6

 Comment: Characters are rather flat. Each plays the part they’re meant to,

lacking depth beyond that.

o Setting (detail, texture): 7

 Comment: Particularly in the early descriptions of the boy living on his

own, the detail and texture is gritty and real. Descriptions get looser as

plot gets wilder.

o Theme (absence of overt didacticism?): 7

 Comment: Theme is too obvious to those paying attention – endless fun

may turn out to be not fun at all.

o Other considerations (mood, tone, etc.): 8

 Comment: Dreamlike and almost wistful, in contrast to the crazy

happenings.
o Is it a well-rounded piece? 8

 Comment: A bit uneven in places, and lacking memorable characters.

o Overall rating: 7

 Comment: Flat characters, but a lovely story overall.

You might also like