Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Copyright © 2010 The Philalethes Society. This PDF file may be redistributed for non-profit use, provided it is unaltered and includes
this cover page and the subscription form on the concluding page. It may not be reproduced in any other manner, nor in any product
offered for sale.
Winter 2010 23
Now that Masonic education is finally back in style, there is a growing demand for lodge
talks, interpretive articles, and research papers among the Craft. But for one who has
never worked on such a project before, where to begin?
O
ne of the best ways to increase our store of whether there is anything new or valuable to say.
knowledge is to engage in a bit of Masonic Nor should one be distressed by claims that our
study. This is something that nearly anyone work is self-explanatory and has no need of study
can do, given the support and encouragement _ and or interpretation.1 The opposite is true, and George
not just do, but do well. Writing a Masonic paper Oliver got it right when he said that “we ought not
provides an opportunity for us to : to be contented with deriving one moral lesson
from every single emblem depicted on our Tracing
• contemplate the ritual itself more seriously Board . . . [b]ut to consider each as a text on which to
and thoroughly build a copious Lecture.”2 There is, in fact, no end to
• become more familiar with standard Masonic the delights of Masonic research.
references (encyclopedias, monitors, interpre- As we resolve to begin such a project, let us re-
tive works) member that in the monitorial lecture of the First
• converse with our Masonic peers for their Degree, we are taught that it is “necessary that there
insights should be Wisdom to contrive, Strength to support,
• and (most importantly) to better apply the and Beauty to adorn all great and important under-
lessons of Freemasonry in our own lives. takings.”
Since there is every reason to consider your
Although thousands of books have been writ- research project as a “great and important under-
ten about Freemasonry already, we shouldn’t worry taking,” one might say that, in a sense, the tradi-
tion itself proposes a method for how we might
approach the work of a Masonic paper. Let’s take a
Shawn Eyer MPS is the Worshipful Master look at how Wisdom, Strength and Beauty can be
of Academia Lodge No– 847 of Oakland, our “template” for excellence as we set off on our
California, and the Editor of Philalethes.
studies.
24 philalethes
A logical first stop for any beginning Mason- available online, we need to avoid “junk-food”
ic work is at the reference shelf. Several authors level information. There are websites everywhere
compiled Masonic encyclopedias, and each of that claim to offer serious Masonic information,
them has merit. The most influential and impor- but many are not actually as scholarly as they rep-
tant Masonic encyclopedia is by Albert G. Mackey. resent. Too many website citations can make any
W∴ Bro∴ Mackey took Freemasonry seriously as paper look less credible. We should cite printed
a spiritual and philosophical tradition. His ency- sources whenever possible.
clopedia is not entirely accurate (nothing of that
length is), but generally speaking it’s a great “first Record Appropriate Citations
stop” for getting a sense of what the Masons who A lodge talk is not an academic paper, and does not
came before us had to say about a given topic. need to be cited like one. However, it is a good habit
Most of the other Masonic encyclope- to cite the sources one has used. Of course all direct
dists _ such as Lenning, Oliver, Macoy, Woodford, quotations must be cited in a footnote.
Mackenzie and Waite _ shared Mackey’s perspec- When papers are read in Lodge, of course, the
tive that Masonry was profound. In the mid-twen- footnote citations are not read. To do so would
tieth century another perspective emerged : that of make the meeting tedious and distract from your
Masonry as a merely fraternal and philanthropic overall message.
organization. This school of thought has pro- But for publication, sources are critical. One
duced one Masonic encyclopedia (edited by H. W. mistake Masonic writers often make is failure to
Coil fps), which is worth consulting for historical include enough citations. When it comes to the
information, but which tends to state that certain “cold facts,” remember that unless you personally
symbols have only trite and commonplace mean- witnessed something, you are reliant upon sources.
ings, or none at all. And in the realm of opinion, if someone else has ex-
From there, it’s time to see if there are any books pressed a given point of view before you, you should
or respected Masonic periodicals which might have provide a citation to that effect.
bearing on our subject. A visit to the Lodge library
may be in order, and perhaps we will find ourselves Provide Context
investing in some new Masonic books of our own. Remember, when introducing a work or an author
As we explore our topic and begin to write, we that may be unfamiliar to some members of the au-
shouldn’t be afraid to share our own perspectives dience, always briefly state some context. Example:
even as we summarize the opinions of the Masons
of the past. Our perspective today is vitally impor- Unclear :
tant, especially when it is properly informed by The Corpus Hermeticum tells us that “The sun is situ-
reference to the ideas that came before us and pro- ated in the center of the universe, and wears it like a
duced the Masonry we know. crown.”
ential during the European Renaissance, tells us that Beauty, like Wisdom and Strength, cannot be
“The sun is situated in the center of the universe, and faked. The ultimate source of it is within us, and
wears it like a crown.” 99 the best way to ensure that our papers are beautiful
. . . with the footnote : is to dare to reveal ourselves in them. Allowing our
99. Corpus Hermeticum 16.7 . emotions to guide our writing, without permitting
them to override the logical part of the discussion,
With style, you’ll stand out a mile is critical to taking any Masonic talk into that spe-
Finally, if you are submitting your article to a jour- cial zone where the “classroom” feeling disappears,
nal, be sure to follow its chosen style. Philalethes has and we feel (as we should) that we are all meeting
adopted the Chicago Manual of Style, and supple- on the level for the contemplation of the best and
ments this with special guidelines for Masonic finest within the Craft.
writing available upon request. Editors appreciate But what should we do if that human side, our
attention to these details. personal perspective, is too personal, or comes off
The careful use of good and relevant sources sounding too self-absorbed _ as anything intro-
will lend real Strength to a paper on just about spective and contemplative can do ? Simple : rely
any topic. Let’s make our papers and presentations upon the words of others to communicate your
strong, like the Doric pillars of the Parthenon, a message in those cases. After all, not every citation
temple of wisdom that, even in ruins, inspires and in our paper needs to be for the purposes of mere
enchants all who lay eyes upon it. documentation of facts. A quotation can “docu-
ment,” so to speak, emotional and spiritual reali-
Beauty to Adorn : ties rather than facts. The interesting thing about
Polishing, Framing & Style a wonderful quote is that it allows us to say some-
Though all of the classi- thing grand without asking the audience to believe
cal orders of architecture that we personally are “grand enough” to say it on
are based upon the ratios our own authority. We can quote the Psalms or
of the human body and the Ralph Waldo Emerson or Plato or T. S. Eliot in sup-
harmonies of nature, only port and appreciation of beautiful ideas, without
the Corinthian order actu- needing to actually be an inspired prophet, a mys-
ally includes shapes of life tic, a philosopher or a poet ourselves.
within it. What was abstract Such quotations can add luster, impact and
stone now bursts forth with wider context to our prose. Where can they be
living forms. Hard principle found ? Masonic writers who are well known for
flowers into warm, delicate life. their eloquence are William Preston, Albert Pike,
Adorning our paper with Beauty follows much W. L. Wilmshurst and J. F. Newton. And one need
the same pattern. Although this is not a step com- not limit oneself to Masonic authors. If a quote re-
mon in academic writing, it is highly desirable in ally fits what we are saying, it doesn’t matter if the
the context of Lodge talks and papers dealing with author is a Mason. The Masonic ritual itself quotes
our ancient and gentle Craft. Our strong columns from the Bible, Josephus, Vitruvius and William
are best crowned with green laurel. Shakespeare.
Winter 2010 27
Some Extremes to Avoid been done on the topic. Or perhaps we have writ-
Of course, a large part of Beauty is understanding ten a good summary, but neglected to lend it the
what not to do. The Greek playwright Euripides said character of our own interpretations and feelings.
that moderation is “the noblest gift of heaven.” 3 The Tuscan pillar’s simplicity is also potential . . . it
As we work to subdue our passions and keep within could be turned into any other kind of pillar by
due bounds, we naturally tend to avoid destructive the judicious use of the working tools. Keep work-
extremes. In writing our papers and talks about ing _ soon we will have the paper we need.
Freemasonry, we can ensure better work by care-
fully guarding our writing from some immoderate A Composite paper
tendencies that all-too-frequently hamper today’s might be one when too
Masonic discourse. much is there. Perhaps
themes arise and disappear ;
THE ARCHITECTURAL EXTREMES or the citations are over-
Just as Wisdom, Strength and Beauty are aptly il- abundant and inconsis-
lustrated by the classic orders of Ionic, Doric and tent ; or unnecessary detail
Corinthian architecture, our tradition also reminds abounds, stifling the main
us of two other orders : the Tuscan and the Compos- narrative. A paper like this
ite. The Tuscan order, we are taught, is simplistic is definitely unsuitable for
and unoriginal. The Composite is an amalgama- presentation in lodge, as it will be too confusing for
tion of all the orders, overly ornate and lacking in the listener. Even for reading, it may be too bogged
its own essential character. It’s not hard to imagine down. For such a paper we recommend the gauge
these two “wayward” orders _ as our Fellow Craft and the common gavel. Chisel away : there may be
degree seems to represent them _ as metaphorical an impressive Corinthian pillar under there !
descriptions of a Masonic writing effort that hasn’t While polar opposites on the one hand, the too-
quite hit the mark. simplistic and the overworked styles actually have
something important in common. As Masonry
A Tuscan paper could be one teaches, both the Tuscan and the Composite were
where there isn’t enough unoriginal, “having nothing but that which is bor-
there _ not so much in terms rowed.” Originality, your own personal Masonic per-
of length, but of substance. spective, is the breath of life within your paper.
Perhaps the author is simply Your brethren will benefit because it makes a
summarizing some things paper more interesting to read or to hear. But you
he has read, but puts very will reap the greatest benefit : a more personal ap-
little effort into interpreta- plication of Masonry within your daily life.
tion. The paper may read a
bit like an outline. It might Abuse of MASONIC AUTHORITIES
be a good start, a good basis . . . but more effort will An unfortunate trend in Masonic writing for the
allow it to flourish. Perhaps it needs a more thor- last half century has been the adoption of a conde-
ough grounding in reference to work that’s already scending or dismissive tone of address in reference
28 philalethes
to well-known Masonic writers of the past. This we should read into it, permute it, explore it, imag-
has worsened in recent decades, devolving into an ine it, make it our own. But let’s never forget that it
open disrespect for many formerly treasured Ma- claims to transmit symbolism of great importance.
sonic philosophers. The cause is partly that reli- It challenges us : “Understand me !”
gious opponents of Freemasonry frequently cite the
works of George Oliver, Albert Mackey, Albert Pike, AVOID ABSOLUTISM
J. S. M. Ward and W. L. Wilmshurst. Some brethren On the other hand, it is critical to avoid statements
mistakenly feel that, in defense, we should disown or implications that our work interprets Masonry
these brethren and disregard their work as worth- “once and for all.” While few authors state it that
less or largely worthless. There has even been some explicitly, it can come across in their work through
revisionism, attempting to suggest that few people phrases like “this can only mean” or “the true
ever read these writers or that they were ever highly meaning.” When symbolism is being discussed we
regarded in the first place. should always leave room to include further in-
These authors were human, and made mis- sights, and even in discussing historical facts, we
takes _ sometimes big ones. However, the popular should avoid claims of establishing “proof.”
approach of insulting the memories and the life’s Avoiding absolutism doesn’t mean we need
work of the Masons of the past is contrary to both be timid and apologetic for every opinion we offer.
sense and virtue. The works of these authors are But we should use phrases like, “it may well be”
not the “final word,” but interesting words they and “wouldn’t it be astonishing if” when offering
are, and good brothers they were. Do not attempt our own original views or when endorsing those of
to appear sophisticated by taking jabs at the experts others.
of the past. This is the lowest form of Masonic By imbuing our papers with heartfelt commen-
discourse _ if it can be termed Masonic at all. tary, by enriching them with fitting quotations, by
honoring those brethren who came before us as is
AVOID RELATIVISM their due, by finding the mean between the cynical
It is true that we must all interpret Freemasonry for and uncritical approaches, we will surmount our
ourselves, and it is also true that all Masons “meet massy stone pillars of wisdom with the lush green
on the Level” of equality. There is no limit to the of the forest _ with the Beauty that attracts the
possible interpretations that Masons have for their soul and cannot be ignored.
Craft experience. However, in recent years it has
become popular to somehow translate these facts When the Paper is Completed
into a conclusion that doesn’t follow : that Masonry Once a paper is fully crafted, it is time to share it.
means “whatever we want it to mean,” and that If it doesn’t deal explicitly with the private ritual
it has no meaning of its own, other than what we work, it can be shared with the whole world. If the
give it. This directly contradicts Masonry’s claim to paper is suitable only for Masonic consideration,
embody “wise and serious truths,” as well as the then it is best if it is presented orally before a tiled
notion of the Craft as a progressive science. gathering of Masons.
So we must not get pulled into the idea that
Masonry is just a Rorschach test. Yes, by all means,
Winter 2010 29
Payment
Check International Money Order Credit Card (Visa or Mastercard)
Credit Card No. ________ ________ ________ ________ Exp. _________ Signature ____________________