Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Legal Forms
Legal Forms
(Revised 2007)1
THEODORE O. TE2
" "#
&# $'!
"
"
These forms were first published in 1998 for use in the UP Law Bar Ops for that
year. Assistant Professor and Director, University of the Philippines Office of
Legal Aid; Ll.B., U.P. (1990); Grateful acknowledgement is given to Feliz Marie M.
Guerrero, Ll.B. U.P. (2008, expected) for invaluable assistance in reformatting,
proofreading and updating of legal references.
2
1
*) # + "
! #,,#- . #/,0 $" * " " 2 3 4 " " . . " ) 4 5 " ) 4 ! , 3 7 / 8 " " 0 2 " ) ' : " !
! ! ) " $ ; ," $
" $"
"
" 3 "
"
$3 -5 $-3#* / 5 3 0 7 $ # , -* - 4 0 % ' 1" = " 6" / 9" $ 1" $ " $ & & , 1" , 3 % /
8 " , % ' 6" , 2 9" <" , >" , " , ?" , 0 $ 1" "
" #
6
) " " " A " ) " " " " $"
9 < > ? @
$3 -5 $-3#* / 0 7 &$ 1" &$ " &$ 1" " ) * " " $ " . %
"
/ , A A 0
, , , ,
4"
$0 0 $-30
$
# 3 " 4" 3 $" " " 3 " " . " 5 " 7 " " 2 " : " ) 7 + 5 3 $ # , -* 0 << << <> < < <?
<? <@ > >1 >1 ) $ 0 0 0 / 0 , $ >1 > >6 >9 >< >> > >? >@ <9
3 3 3 3 3 3 3
/ / , %3
% % %)
)'
1 1
ON WRITING, LEGALLY
“Therefore, its name was called Babel, because there the Lord confused the language
of all the earth.” – Genesis, 11:9, ESV
If brevity is the soul of wit, what now is to become of lawyers (and law students)
who would nonchalantly write a 100-page document and dare call it a “Brief”? The
traditional notion of legal writing is that it is a competition to put together as
many four to five-syllable words in a one-paragraph sentence. The language of the
law mystifies and with this comes the power of the lawyer. The more obscure and
obtuse the language, the greater the need for a lawyer. History has given us many
language handicaps and obstacles to clarity and precision. Throughout four years of
law school, the law student, who eventually becomes a lawyer, is trained to think
in archaic words and phrases–legalese–which appear to have legal significance but
is actually too imprecise to help anyone understand what is going on. And to add to
the babelish situation, there are hundreds of words in a dead language–Latin–that
have little relevance to the contemporary world. There is a sea change, however,
going on in legal writing. More and more, pleaders are asked to be clear and
concise, precise not pedantic. Why waste five words when three will do?3 But
change, as always, is difficult and painful. Yet, it is an essential response to
today’s evolving legal profession. Indeed, when the most common means now of
communicating is text, with its own subculture and lingo, there must be a re-
examination of the archaic manner by which legal writing presents itself. What this
short introduction to the accompanying handbook of Pleadings, Petitions, Motions
and Other Legal and Judicial Forms seeks to do is to put forth the need to write
clearly and concisely, precisely but not pedantically. When a judge’s attention
span is short and his backlog of reading is long, the need to write concisely,
clearly, precisely but not pedantically becomes absolutely clear. Writing concisely
and not pedantically, however, does not mean that the legal writer ought to cut
corners when it comes to substance as well as form; the only thing that that
guarantees is a baleful stare and a rude dismissal from the judge. Not only must
the writer know the arguments and the bases for his arguments, but she must also
realize that these arguments need to be presented in a manner that is technically
sufficient.
My favorite, and many of my students will attest to this, is the absolutely archaic
“Comes Now, the Plaintiff, by the undersigned counsel, unto this Honorable Court,
respectfully states that” as part of every pleading. Why waste 15 words, when 6
will do, thus: “Plaintiff, by counsel, respectfully states that”. The latter loses
none of the legal gravitas but loses every bit of the archaic pretense that
mystifies the law and perpetuates the notion that laywers know what they are doing
each and every time.
It is hoped that the forms presented here, with checklists4 of legal requirements
and short annotations, will provide the impetus for demystifying legal writing and
legal drafting. These forms come from actual forms used in the author’s practice,
some from worthy opponents and still some from traditional form books, with updates
to fit the current state of the Rules. While this handbook was produced, primarily,
with the bar examinees and the law intern or law student in mind, it is hoped that
it might prove helpful as well when September ends5 and life, as a lawyer, begins
in earnest.
Theodore O. Te Room 105, Malcolm Hall University of the Philippines August 2007
4 Acknowledgment is given to Atty. Alex M. Enriquez, (Ll.B., UP, 1990) for the
original template of the Checklists, which have been updated to suit current
practice. 5 Vide Green Day, “Wake Me Up When September Ends”, which has become an
unofficial anthem for bar examinees in the Philippines.
$
!! $ %
! & / ) / # /*
"" ) The CAPTION is that part of the pleading, which sets forth: 1. the name of the
court 2. the title of the action 3. the docket number, if assigned (Sec. 1, par. 1,
Rule 7, ROC). "" ) The TITLE indicates the names of the parties, who shall be named
in the original complaint or petition. However, in subsequent pleadings, it shall
be sufficient if the name of the 1st party on each side be stated with an
appropriate indication when there are other parties. Their respective participation
in the case shall be indicated (Sec. 1, par. 2 &3, Rule 7, ROC).
2 / 5 #-$ * $ / 1! ,
' /$D /
) !
%0
"" ) The JURAT accompanies any notarized document that is declaratory in nature, as
opposed to a notarized document that transmits rights or property, which must be
accompanied by an ACKNOWLEDGMENT. Note that if the document is subscribed before a
public officer duly authorized to take oaths, then there is no need for the affiant
to produce a CTC nor for the entry into a Notarial Register; thus, the italicized
portion of the JURAT is dispensed with but not the oath itself.
"
1
*$ +
, 4 / . $*#-
"" ) A pleading is verified by an affidavit that the affiant has read the pleading
and that the allegations therein are true and correct of his personal knowledge or
based on authentic records (Sec. 4, par. 2, Rule 7, ROC). Under Sec. 4, par.3, Rule
7, a verification based on “information and belief” or upon “knowledge, information
and belief” is considered defective and the pleading unverified/unsigned. ""
Exams ) 1994 and 2004 Bar
-)2 ) 1" $ " " ) " " 6" 9" $ <" " ) " " " " 8 ) /
. /
= ) )
) , 7) -
"
% . % -5
/*. $*#- $5 -0*. $ #/ , 07 # / ) CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC ": 7 " 1" 7 " 7 6" * 9" ! ' ' "
" ) % ) ) ! ! %<' %0 -)2 "' ": 7 .5 / " ) 8 &= ) 7 'F
F F ) "
"" ) Under Rule 7, Sec. 5, the plaintiff or principal party must certify under oath
in the complaint, initiatory pleading, or sworn certification that: 1.he has not
commenced any action or filed any claim involving the same issues in any court,
tribunal or quasi-judicial agency and, to the best of his knowledge, no such other
action or claim is pending there 2. if there is such other pending action or claim,
a complete statement of its present status, and 3. if he should thereafter learn
that the same or similar action or claim has been filed or is pending, he shall
report that fact within 5 days to the court where his complaint or pleading was
filed. Failure to comply with this req’t is not curable by mere amendment but shall
be cause for dismissal w/o prejudice, UNLESS otherwise provided, upon motion and
after hearing.
"
"
% . % -5 # $ 3&
F F ) "
-)2
/ $ !
" & *
, #
"
% . %
"
-5 # $ 3&
H#
B /
B 3
I
) ) !
16 $
;
F
! "
CCCCCCCCCCCCC"
0 $
1 #,
. #.7 $/ -5
(
.
! 16 $
"" ) NOTE: The Notice of Hearing is actually both a REQUEST and a NOTICE; a REQUEST
for the Branch Clerk of Court to include the motion in the calendar for hearing on
a specific date and a NOTICE to opposing counsel of the hearing date requested. In
non-litigious motions or ex parte motions, it is sufficient that the request not
contain a date, and for that purpose, the underlined portion in the Request may be
omitted with the Notice to opposing counsel simply stating that “counsel will
submit the motion to the court for approval immediately upon receipt.”
! 16 $
?E6
"' , * 7, 3 / 3 * . 0 !A J
,, # %
& 2 # E
", * . 0
, 3 3 !A J
6
( $
'
.#
" &
3& %
,&
# 2
E $ ", , 3 3
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC! 0 1 !/
* * * * #.* . 5 -5 # 7 / 7 7 #/ # ! "
%0
"' 7 $/
/ $
-)2
4 & $ ,
#. ! 16 $ "
# #
"
"
",
"" ) As per SC En Banc Resolution on Bar Matter No. 1132 dated Nov. 12, 2002, all
pleadings must indicate the ff: 1. Roll of Attorneys number of counsel 2. Current
Professional Tax Receipt number (PTR No.) 3. IBP Official Receipt or Life Member
number
9
$ / ) ,
& . " ' ' " " $ ! 3 # ' ! , I %3 1 2 ; ( ! ; ! - " - <& ! & ) ' )
$* * H "
. #/ , ! 16 0 .- 7 ! H4 I% *
- + * 00 +7 / #. ! "
%0
! ' CCC ! % !
E CCC !
'!
$ 7 >$ ) " 3
A J
"' , * 7, 3 / 3 * . 0 !A J
<
$ $
/ "
! '% &
+ . # " .#
"" ) 1976, 1982, 1985, 1988, 1993, 1994, 1996, 1997 and 2000 Bar Question
11 # >" $
! *
! A J 1 $-- K
! )
F $-- K " ! (
" /
) . $
<" 3 () ( ) 0L < * % < ! " '" =
"$
"" ) This particular allegation may actually be unnecessary considering the facts
given and that the plaintiff is a juridical person. It is included in this
complaint simply for educational purposes as a representative allegation of this
fact.
$-- K "
= " 3 ( . )
) % ' . *
% < ! #
$ 8 )
7= A J 8
F 16 $
-) 1" 7? 4 8 " 2
>
9 $
"% &
, #" , "
'
""
$ -* E
! . ! !
> < !. )
> < . ) ;, ; !
;, ; ! !
F )
2 " 3 7
< * ! ) " % @
) )
!)
"$
% '
! . $ !
"
'
" ) )
7= A J 8
- ) 7? 4 8
.
: $
"% &
% 2 & 76 / 8 ) 2 / / 5 #-$ * $ # /* / 1 1! , ;
""
1< ,
9" * J % @ !
?
; $
"% &
# %
, '
#, & #
/ # /*
111
J0
9$ $
) %6' .
"$ *
7<8+7 / . ! #/ )
@
$
# 6 $ #
&" &"
%+ 3 . -3 $-* ) ! !
$ ,'
<"1"
! 8
3 !
$)
! ) E # ) # 7 ) ,
% 7 1! ) * % 1
( , # 3 = ! 8 %) . ' ) * $ "
= ) (. "
) E% '# ,
)
1
7> A J 8
F 16 $
7@A 6 8 / . $*#- G B 4 ! D # -5 #: $! = F ; F # % ! F ) !
. , ,
!
' "
. #% &
# # '% &
3 , , C
%<' )
& # &
" "
16 $
' 0 % ) '
11
9 $ . - " &1!
# !) &&
&"
#D & " #
) )
"
&
7> A J 8
,$-5 $ 5 0# ) 5 $-*
F CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC" 7? %0 8
"' , * 7, 3 / 3 H$ I
. ' 0 % )
0 '
1
$
&
, / )
2 / / 5 #-$ * $ # /* / @ !A J
"" ) Rule 18, section 6. Checklist: 1. Proposed terms for amicable settlement 2.
Alternative modes of dispute resolution 3. Summary of admitted facts 4. Proposed
stipulation of facts and issues 5. Documents to be presented 6. Names of witnesses
and substance of their testimony 7. Resort to discovery 8. Available trial dates
/ . &* ! E
1"1" 0 ) = ! 76 A 9 1" " 8 ) ) ( ) " "1" * 1@?@" " " 3 " "1" ( ( ; &: # ) ! 9 , 6@
@> ! ! & 6 , ? )
" !
"" ) NOTE: There is no need to attach a Notice of Hearing for a Pre-Trial Brief.
Also, pre-trial is now mandatory in criminal cases under Rule 118, 2000 Rules on
Criminal Procedure as well as under RA 8493 (The Speedy Trial Act), although
neither the law nor the Rules require the submission of a PreTrial Brief in
criminal cases (in practice, courts also do not require the submission of a
pretrial brief in criminal cases). Consequently, the requirement of a pre-trial
brief and the consequences for failure to submit one (e.g., non-suit or dismissal)
appear to pertain exclusively to civil cases. "" ) This is a new requirement
imposed by the 1997 Rules on Civil Procedure.
; 7 %1 M'
) ! &# , 2& ) ) F /
. "6" ! 7
% 7 ! #
"
) =
) =
16
9" " "
( () 4" F 4 3E ! F
7= <"1" 3 8 <"1"1" 3
* )
; "
"
E $ " ,$ # $
19
*$ ! # 6 ! $
# # " #
1 #,
"" ) Cf. Rule 15, 1997 Rules on Civil Procedure Checklist: 1. Ground(s) 2.
Argument(s) 3. Prayer/Relief 4. Notice of Hearing 5. Proof of Service 6.
Attachments (if any) 7. Verification (in certain cases) "" ) 1988 and 2002 Bar
Question
, ; * +# 7 -3 3 /
%1' %1' , ; (
8 " $ ) ) 3 0, 00 3 8 ! ( 8 "
"" ) Rule 15, section 5; Cf. Rule 15, section 4 (on period of service)
?E6
"' , * 7, 3 / 3 * . 0 !A J
"" ) Rule 15, section 6 in relation to Rule 13, section 13
- ) 7<8
0
1<
9 ! $ .#
, % & &
3& %
, # 2
'
"" ) Cf. Rule 13, section 13 Checklist: 1. Ground(s) 2. Argument(s) 3.
Prayer/Relief 4. Notice of Hearing 5. Proof of Service 6. Attachments (if any) 7.
Verification (in certain cases) "" ) In motions filed before the Supreme Court and
the Court of Appeals, a Notice of Hearing is not required.
) 0 / , ,
# /*
"" ) Under Rule 15, section 9, 1997 Rules on Civil Procedure, a motion for leave to
file a pleading or motion shall be accompanied by the pleading or motion sought to
be admitted.
1>
: ! $
. " / )
% &
. #
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
""
2 / / 5 #-$ * $ # /* / 6@! A J
76 A 9 " 8 ; ) * $ 8 ! = 7: +7 / . ! 8 #/ " A J F 16 $
" %0 "' $* * H$ 0 .- 7 I
"" ) NOTE: This is a litigious motion, i.e., it must be set for hearing. Thus, a
specific hearing date must be requested and notice thereof given to adverse party
through counsel.
1
; 3% $
"
# , % D / )
&
2 / / 5 #-$ * $ # /* / 6@! A J
"" ) Under Rule 18, section 1 of the 1997 Rules on Civil Procedure, it is now
mandatory on the part of the plaintiff to move ex parte for setting of pre-trial.
Note that the motion is expressly denominated as ex parte, i.e., no need for
hearing. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. "" ) Checklist: Ground(s) Argument(s) Prayer/Relief
Notice of Hearing Proof of Service Attachments (if any) Verification (in certain
cases)
! ;
&
" )
/ &
1?! 0 "
1@@ /
7: +7 / . ! 8 #/ 7 ) A J F 16 $
&
"" ) Note the difference between this “Request and Notice” and that contained in
Form II-D1; this does not contain a date of hearing because under Rule 15, section
4, it is a motion which the Court “may act upon without prejudicing the rights of
the adverse party” and moreover because Rule 18, section 1 expressly defines this
to be an ex parte motion.
- ) 7<8
1?
<$ !
, % #%
" / )
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
""
2 / / 5 #-$ * $ # /* / 6@! A J
! <, !
) 16@ "
* @@??! )
%0
"' , * 7, 3 / H$ I
"" ) In some instances, this motion is considered a nonlitigious motion; thus, the
request and notice need not specify a date of hearing and simply state that it is
being submitted for approval “immediately upon receipt.” Although, the better
practice would be to file such a motion early so as to be able to set it for
hearing and approval by the court.
1@
= ! $
# / -
, " )
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
2 / / 5 #-$ * $ # /* / 6@! A J
E ($ )1 , ) " / ;
76 A 9 " * 8 ) 8
7
> ! $
&
, / )
, &
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
2 / / 5 #-$ * $ # /* / 6@! A J
$ )
<$ 7 F "
F ) " 3
7: +7 / . ! 8 #/ ) A J F $ " %0
) ) ; "
"' 3 70 3 # 0 $/* H$ I
"" ) NOTE: The defendant is entitled to be notified of this motion and the order
declaring him/her in default; thereafter, defendant loses the right to receive any
other notices except for judgment in default.
1
? ! $
& ,
, , & / )
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
""
2 / / 5 #-$ * $ # /* / 6@! A J
. #/3 / #.3 . * $ E
! 7
, ) ) 7
< , O "
# , 3 "
. 3 *
7
$ % 6 $
& 2& $
# ! " #
"" ) Rule 65, 1997 Rules on Civil Procedure Checklist: 1. 60 days from notice of
judgment or final order (cf. Rule 65, sec. 4) 2. Names of petitioner and respondent
3. Grounds relied upon 4. Prayer/Relief 5. Combined Verification, Certification
against Forum Shopping, and Statement of Material Dates 6. Attachments a. Certified
true copies of the judgment/order subject of petition b. All material portions of
the record as would support the petition*
* ' **#-
! B / B ) ! ! ) "'
8
"'
/
7: 6" 8
!
%0
= ;
9" %0
! H) I !
" % ' 3
) -2 # " %0 "' $* * H$
) ! )
$-"
-5 =
0 .- 7 I . 0 ! 0 , 3
"" ) To the standard “Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping”, ADD
the date when the Decision or Judgment was received pursuant to the requirements
under the Rules of Court. (See Form I-G)
- ) 7<8
P/ 9>! ,
><! 6 . "
>! )
" " / % 1 #
; / <>!
<>! /
) 9>! 9?! 9@! <1! < <> & ' ' , & % # , "O
! "/ % , ' #
6
$ % * ' **#**#- /! ) 79 1" %0 8 " % )! ! E
""
B! 3 !
%0
! B /
"'
/
7: 6" 8
"' B ! != ! ! "'
8
=
9" %0
) ! H) I ! )
"" ) Checklist: 1. 60 days from notice of judgment or final order (cf. Rule 65,
sec. 4) 2. Names of petitioner and respondent 3. Grounds relied upon 4.
Prayer/Relief 5. Combined Verification, Certification against Forum Shopping, and
Statement of Material Dates 6. Attachments a. Certified true copies of the
judgment/order subject of petition b. All material portions of the record as would
support the petition*
) ) = )
" % ' 3
* /# )
- ) 7<8
!
,
"" ) To the standard “Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping”, ADD
the date when the Decision or Judgment was received pursuant to the requirements
under the Rules of Court. (See Form I-G)
9
$!
" # % **#'
B ) = =
"'
"' B !
"" ) Checklist: 1. 60 days from notice of judgment or final order (cf. Rule 65,
sec. 4) 2. Names of petitioner and respondent 3. Grounds relied upon 4.
Prayer/Relief 5. Combined Verification, Certification against Forum Shopping, and
Statement of Material Dates 6. Attachments a. Certified true copies of the
judgment/order subject of petition b. All material portions of the record as would
support the petition*
! '!
<
9 F $ $ -$ * #! !
"% &
% & % &
. ,
&
&
'
&,
"" ) Rule 62 Checklist: 1. Parties - Petitioner, who must claim no interest or has
an interest not disputed by claimants; and claimants over the same subject matter
2. Material Allegations of Ultimate Facts - facts showing conflicting claims made
on the same subject matter over which petitioner claims no interest or an interest
that is not disputed by claimants 3. Prayer/Relief 4. Date/Place of Execution 5.
Signature of Counsel 6. Verification and Certification against Forum Shopping "" )
1995 Bar Question
5 / " # " !
# )
<2
! 1@@@!
6" "
! ;
7: +7 / . ! 8 #/ ; " 7; A J 8 F 2 "
7<8 %0
) !
) =
"" ) It is important to allege this because otherwise plaintiff would be required
to pay the docket fees involved in filing the Complaint in Interpleader which would
be determined by the value of the property. In this way, plaintiff will not be
unduly prejudiced by the costs of the suit.
"' $* * H$ I 0
0 .- 7
- ) 7= 4 8
>
$
" 2
&
&
"" ) Rule 63, sec. 1, par. 2 Checklist: 1" Parties - Any person interested under a
deed, will, contract or other writing, before breach thereof, and who stands to
suffer injury by operation of the said deed, will, contract or other writing "
Material Allegations of Ultimate Facts - facts showing interest under a deed, will,
contract or other written instrument and injury arising from operation of said
deed, will, contract or other writing and facts showing that no violation or breach
has occurred; may also show facts showing need to reform instrument, quiet title
(arising from conflicting claims or cloud thereon) or to consolidate ownership (as
when property under pacto de retro not redeemed) 6" Prayer/Relief 9" Date/Place of
Execution <" Signature of Counsel >" Verification and Certification against Forum
Shopping
- "
- " 1 69<
- ) 7= 4 8
.
$ -$ $ ! ! & &
, *
&
'
&,
- " 9>?
# J
"" ) Rule 63, sec. 1, par. 1 Checklist: 1. Parties - Any person interested under a
deed, will, contract or other writing, before breach thereof, and who stands to
suffer injury by operation of the said deed, will, contract or other writing 2.
Material Allegations of Ultimate Facts - facts showing interest under a deed, will,
contract or other written instrument and injury arising from operation of said
deed, will, contract or other writing and facts showing that no violation or breach
has occurred; may also show facts showing need to reform instrument, quiet title
(arising from conflicting claims or cloud thereon) or to consolidate ownership (as
when property under pacto de retro not redeemed) 3. Prayer/Relief 4. Date/Place of
Execution 5. Signature of Counsel 6. Verification and Certification against Forum
Shopping
?
$F
G % #, $ -* E '
) "' "'
"'
)
6" %0
)
7: +7 / . ! 8 #/
7; A J 8
- ) 7= 4 8
@
$ $
! ! D , 2 ,
) , ;
D !
* +
76 ! ! 8 !* K4 1" 3 7: " 8
! !, ; ! ) 0 ) $ 6<? ) ! $ ,"
!. ) * K4
!
E 7 $ " / H ! %0 "* ) < # ($
79 8
%N $
O '
! $! / ) 2
3 3 ; ) E
!* '!
K4
, ; ! , )
%A $ 6" ;" I
8
!
N I "
. $
N 0 , ,
O )
* $
) ! N "," ) O ( ; )
) ! ) ! ," ) 8 " . ! " & # & . ! $! ," ." " , !& & # # 6B BB BB B B $B 0 # # # <B B
BB B B $B " & " .# # # <B B BB B B $B 3 "% ' " . # & " * * * * #.* . 5 -5 # 7 / 7 7
#/ # ! 7; %0 8 "' ! &$ 7<8 0 0 / 3$-30+#/- * # %0 "' . #/ , 16 $ &$
&
16 $
"
"
"" ) Rule 112, sec. 3(a), 2000 Rules on Criminal Procedure. Note that this may be
done before a prosecutor, or any government official authorized to administer an
oath, or in their absence or unavailability, a Notary Public.
6
9 $ / ) , ;
! , ! A J !
) ) & &
! A J
/ -
) 1@ 2
" *
,$
, ; -
9" " A , "5 9"6" # ," 5 # 9"9" 0 ! ) 9"<" $ ! " # " ! ! ," 5 = ) )
, , "5
; ","5
, " * " )
(#
F , (
" 0
,"5 ) "
," 5 =
,"5 ,"5 )
) ,"5
, " 5 F ) ) " !
) ) ) , "
"
. # % , " 5 , !
"
61
" !) "
) )
) "* !
* * * * #.* . 5 -5 # 7 / 7 7 #/ # ! 7; %0 8 $ "' ,$ $ #
6 .)
"
6
$
% # #.* 7 7 - 0! !
'
<>
E = ,#: #! !
"" ) Rule 110, section 613, 2000 Rules on Criminal Procedure Checklist: 1" Parties
a. Name of offended party b. Name of accused " Designation of offense by statute 6"
Acts or omissions complained of as constituting the offense including a statement
of the qualifying or aggravating circumstances 9" Approximate time of the
commission of the offense <" Place of commission >" Signature of Prosecutor (for
Information) " Signature of Offended Party, Peace officer or Public officer charged
with enforcement of the law (for Complaint) ?" NOTE: if Information is filed after
inquest (and not preliminary investigation), ADD: a. Place where accused is
actually detained b. Full name and address of evidence custodian c. Detailed
description of recovered items, if any @" Verification 1 " Certification of
Preliminary Investigation or Inquest "" ) 1989 Bar Question
#*- 00 $
"" ) NOTE: The allegation of any aggravating circumstances should be made here.
/*. $* #. / ) F )
) "
#*- 00 $
0 /
3$-30+#/- * #
. #/ , $
@ $ #-
$
>
A J
"
"" ) See Rule 112, section 4, 2000 Rules on Criminal Procedure. This Certification
is appended to an Information filed after a full blown preliminary investigation is
conducted; if the accused was arrested without a warrant and refused/failed to
execute a written waiver of the provisions of Article 125, Revised Penal Code, the
ACP should have conducted an INQUEST and not a preliminary investigation. Any
Information filed would thus have a different Certification, i.e., a Certification
on Conduct of Inquest.
E 1 !
"
"" ) See Rule 110, sections 3, 4, 2000 Rules on Criminal Procedure. Please note
that the oath is administered by a public officer authorized to administer an oath;
thus, the JURAT does not contain any reference to the CTC details. Contrast this
with the Jurat in Form I-C, which applies when a Notary Public administers the
oath.
66
$
, % '
#.* 7
- 0! ! - " <>
& :
&
. E*
* ,$- $ ! #
11 ! ;
"" ) See DOJ Circular No. 61 (September 21, 1993; “New Rules on Inquest”), section
14. As noted above, this Certification accompanies an Information filed after an
inquest and not a preliminary investigation is conducted. An inquest is conducted
only if the respondent was arrested without a warrant and does not waive the
provisions of Article 125 of the RPC and does not wish to avail of a full-blown
preliminary investigation.
69
$
"%
% % '
""
#.* 7
- 0! ! - " / <>
& ,$ 0 $!
&
. E$
! ) J
6<
$
! % '
#.* 7
- 0! ! - " , <>
&
. E.
6>
$! # 6 ! $
, " 76 / 8 ) 2 / / 5 #-$ * $ # /* / @ !A J
#.* 7
- 0! ! - " <>
"" ) 1988 Bar Question Checklist: 1. Caption and Title 2. Parties 3. Distinct
specification of factual and legal grounds for quashal 4. Relief 5. Date/Place 6.
Signature of counsel 7. Notice of Hearing 8. Affidavit of service "" ) 1976, 1986,
1988 and 1990 Bar Question
& :
&
. E*
* ,$- $ ! #
6
9 ! $
G 76 % 8 '
#.* 7
- 0! !
& 45 7 $-!
& . E )
- "
"" ) Rule 126, sec. 14, 2000 Rules on Criminal Procedure; this is a new pleading
expressly recognized for the first time in the Rules, although it has been used
widely in practice and even acknowledged by the Supreme Court in case law. Please
take note that this may be filed in and acted upon only by the court where the
action is filed but if no action has yet been filed, it may be filed with the court
that issued the search warrant. If no resolution has yet been made by the Search
Warrant Court by the time an Information is filed, then the trial court shall
resolve the Motion to Quash. "" ) Checklist: 1. Caption and Title 2. Distinct
Specification of Factual and Legal Grounds for Quashal a. Failure to comply with
form prescribed by law b. Served beyond period c. More than one offense d. No
personal determination of probable cause by Judge e. No probable cause 3. Relief 4.
Place/Date 5. Signature of Counsel 6. Notice of Hearing 7. Proof of Service
79 1" / 8 ) " 0 11 $ !
>! $
- " 11
) A $07 3
) = $
6?
: ! $
% # 2 % # 76 % 8 '
#.* 7
- 0! !
& 45 7 $-!
& . E )
- "
"" ) Rule 126, sec. 14, 2000 Rules on Criminal Procedure; this is a new pleading
expressly recognized for the first time in the Rules, although it has been used
widely in practice and even acknowledged by the Supreme Court in case law. Please
take note that this may be filed in and acted upon only by the court where the
action is filed but if no action has yet been filed, it may be filed with the court
that issued the search warrant. If no resolution has yet been made by the Search
Warrant Court by the time an Information is filed, then the trial court shall
resolve the Motion to Quash. "" ) Checklist: 1. Caption and Title 2. Distinct
Specification of Factual and Legal Grounds for Suppression a. Search without
witnesses b. Served beyond period c. More than 1 offense d. No receipt e. No
inventory f. Property not subject of seizure g. Not evidence in plain view 3.
Prayer/Relief 4. Place/Date 5. Signature of Counsel 6. Notice of Hearing 7. Proof
of Service
79 1" 0 8 " *
- " 11 J 3
11
" ) J "
H1I 0 "
+ 11
- " 11 ! !
1" / ) " >! $ $ 11 ! 0
1 >! 0 %1 ' +
"1
- " 11 F % ! 6 2 ! ) >F 0
1 2 )
" 6" ) E J
H I* ) 9" # ; J "
! )
) =
N J O "*
( !
K 2
)"*
! 2
7<8 %0
"' ,$ * $-5 $ $ H$ I
6@
; ! $
& 76 % 8 '
#.* 7
- 0! ! - " <>
& -$: $ * !
&
. E,
-)/ 8
9
*$ % & %
& 76 % 8 '
#.* 7
- 0! !
& / D3 4 0* !
&
- " 119? ?
E )
6 .
91
+ $
/ * 0 / * *$ , , ,2 % # % 6 $ " &, , ,2 / )
! ""
!! , ,
2 / / 5 #-$ * $ # /* / @ !A J
#.* 7
- 0! ! - " 11
& / D3 4 0* !
&
1" T ;
) $&1! & !
!
'F
N $ .F 3 O ; ! ) $
9
9 $ # #.* 7
"" 7
% # % - 0! !
, ,
11
) $&1! )"
'F
N $ .F 3 O
$ #/3 -5 D ! -$3 00 , ! A J F 2
$ 0 3 !) K 33 " " %0
)
"" ) NOTE: The purpose of the offer is never objected to; rather it is the
admissibility of the document that is objected to. The purpose of offer goes to
weight of the document (unless of course, the objection is relevance, then purpose
may properly be objected to as relevance also determines admissibility). Any
objections to purpose should be made in the Memorandum and an appropriate
reservation to do so may be stated in the Comment.
"' , * 7, 3 / $ H$ I
E #*- 00 ) $* * 0 .- 7
96
$* " 6 $ "
2 & ## % '
#.* 7
- 0! ! - "
&
&
. E4
31?>>
/#0
*#-( 4 3 0
! E
"" ) A Demurrer may also be called a “Motion to Acquit” as the relief sought is
acquittal. "" ) There is a different rule in criminal procedure as regards a Motion
for Leave to File A Demurrer. The Motion for Leave must be filed prior to the
Demurrer. It is only when the Motion for Leave is granted that the Demurrer may be
filed.
) " * ! ! "
"*
"
F
!
!)
) 3 0, 00 3 "
99
9 $
2& # # % '
-)/ 8
9<
$
, #
# / ) 9 2 / / 5 #-$ * $ / 1! $
""
# /*
3 $,
$ $-5
9>
*$ % %
#& / ) / 5 #-$ * $ # /* / 2 / 1 1! A J
E 3 70 3 # 0 $/*
9
$G 6 G $
$ 9 G
&#
#& G
0 % '
3 # % #
& , ,
"7
% &
;
,, ,
#
"" ) NOTE: If the client gives express conformity, no reason for withdrawal needs
to be given. However, if withdrawal is without conformity, the court may ask
counsel to secure conformity. If withdrawal is due to fundamental and
irreconcilable professional differences, then it must be stated so that the absence
of conformity of the erstwhile client is justified.
/ 0 A J
* . F
D0 2
9?
$
#& % '
$3 $, 3 $! , $ 3 " &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& 0 * 7 ) ; / 0 A J * . F D0 2 ,*
3 * " " # +$- : -# 3 / ! -3 /0 5 3 3 , ! ) ) " ) " 7 0** *#- #. # -0 $ !
/ $
,% & % / / 1! , ) 2 / -
""
"" ) NOTE: The Notice of Appeal is filed with the trial court, not the appellate
court.
>!
9@
+ $ $
/ * * / , 0
/ #
! %# / )
* !
*
"" ) 1979 and 1992 Bar Question
2 / / 5 #-$ * $ # /* / 1@1! , ;
$0 : 0 - " 111669
9"
0 ;
6" !
) "
% '
<
$
; ) !
+7 / . ! #/ $-$:- 0: +$ : / D B B A J F 2 " %0
"' ,$0* / D $ #3 H$ I 0
-)4
<1
$ #
, *
&
&' , & !
%& %
2#
&
"" ) Under AM No. 02-1112-SC Proposed Rule on Provisional Orders adopted by the SC
on 4 March 2003 and which took effect on 15 March 2003, the ff. provisional orders
may be applied for upon filing of a petition for declaration of nullity of
marriage: a) spousal support [§ 2] b) child support [§ 3] c) child custody [§ 4] d)
visitation rights [§ 5] e) hold departure orders [§ 6] f) order of protection [§ 7]
g) admin of common property [§ 8]
* I E " . H
. )
J !
H ,
I )
! )
) ) ; 1@@? ) )
1" (
"" ) NOTE: It may be psychological incapacity only on the part of one party so the
allegations may be tailored to address that situation.
<" )
* )F
! ! ! ) H ) 8
"" ) Under the Rule on Provisional Orders, child custody may be sought in a
petition for declaration of nullity where the court considers the best interests of
the child as paramount; provisional custody may be awarded to the following based
on the order of preference: 1) to both parents jointly 2) to either parent taking
into account all relevant considerations, esp. the choice of the child 3) to the
surviving grandparent, or if there are several of them, to the grandparent chosen
by the child above 7 years of age unless the grandparent chosen is unfit or
disqualified 4) to the eldest brother or sister over 21 years of age unless unfit
or disqualified 5) to the actual custodian over 21 years of age unless unfit or
disqualified, or 6) to any other person deemed by the court suitable to provide
proper care and guidance. § 4. "" ) Under the Rule on Provisional Orders, child
support may also be sought. It must first be taken from the properties of the
absolute community or the conjugal partnership. In the discretion of the court,
either parent or both may be ordered to give an amount necessary for support,
maintenance and education of the child in proportion to the resources or means of
the giver and to the needs of the recipient. Thus, the earning capacity of the
parent and the amount needed for support must be alleged.
"
>" ) !
8 ! ) ! !
I" 3
) N , O F ;& ) ?3 ) ( ! N 1" 6 ) 0
N >!
;& % %N /
! ) "$ )
( ) ! ! ! !
) ) % +7 / . ! #/ ) ) )
<
! ) && H1I 3 ; ! H I $ ; H6I $ )
!=
) )
) !
! ) = F ! ( % F ' ) = = " )
$ A J
= F 2
) " %0 "' $* * H$
"
0 .- 7 I
-)4
<6
*$
, 0 &. % / )
G& &
""
2 / / 5 #-$ * $ # /* / 6 !0 2
-50 $ 2 ) /"!
+7 / . ! #/
<9
+$
* * $ %
* & , 0
0 ' $
!
"" ) 1976, 1986 and 1992 Bar Exams
#+ / #.$* #/- D *
: -#+ $
, - D* 0 7
! # +$- : -# ! $3 $, 3 $! , $ !
& &.
5 8 " - + * 00 +7 / #. ! " %0
"' #
+$- : -#
05 3-* 7 %0 %0 $ ;
/ 0 -
#. E
"' / 3 "' 6 #
$/
&
-#+ $ :
, - D* 0 7
! # +$- : -# ! $3 $, 3 $ , $ ) !
- + * 00 +7 / #. ! %0 "' # +$- : -#
"
05 3-* 7 %0 %0 $ ;
/ 0 -
#. E
"' / 3 "' 6 #
<<
$
# #-* *#. $0 /$
: -#+ $ * $7 ! $D ! 1" $
, - D* 0 7 $ !
0#0 % <! $
" (#
" "
* ;
) ) F ; = J F =
"6"
00#/ !
00#/ - + * 00 +7 / #. ! " 3 $, $7 $D
$-5 $7 $D
+ $0$ +$
$ ; . #/ , ! ! ) , ; * ! ) E B B ! CC ! ; ! ) ) " 2 !
3 $, $7 $D $ $-5 $7 $D ; )
"
<>
*$ 0 &. %
G& & 0 2 2 !, ,
"' $
-50 $ 0/"
"" ) 1979, 1983 and 2004 Bar Exams
-50 $! 0/"! 0 2 ! , ! !
$ -5: /$! ! ) ; ! ! ;
! ! )
! + "$
* )
' +
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
!,
"
<
$
& # ,
"" ) This applies also to Donations Mortis Causa, which are essentially wills. Not
applicable, however, to donations inter vivos.
+ ! ) CCC ! ! ! E ) B 8
! CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
/ $
& . "
. #/ , ! E $ % 0$: 0
2 !
-5 0 $! 0/" %* '! >2 1 %+ '! >2 %+ >2 '! >F '! >F '! >F 4 4 4
'! >F
CCCCCCC
CCCCCCC
) %
CCCCCCC
) %
1 %+ '! >2 )
CCCCCCC
) %
+ ! ! " ;
* ) )
+ -
CCC "
! )
- + * 00 +7 / #. !
! %0
"
<?
0 * $
+2 # 3 3#.3 #-$*#-
: -#+ $ *
, - D* 0 7
/ 0 -* 0E ! ! B B !
) E '
B *
! ) F ) !
! ) )
3 #-#/ !
3 #3 #- !
! B !
! B
) 3 #-#/"
&
A J
$ , 3 $ $, 3 3 *3 E * $-5
0$
05 3-* 7 %0 %0 -)$ ;
/ 0 -
#. E
"' , /#- 1 "', /#-
<@
$
& . "
"
#." #
! $, / : / %N 7 " %N
! ) F
! !
9"
<" *
A J
>
( $
'# J
'
/ 0# 4 3 ! 6" * ! "
""""""""""""""""""" ) ) ; ! )
CCCC
CCCCCCCCCCCCCC"
"
- " CCC B 6 - / $0 $, -3 ) $ 3
$ %-
2 ! 3
, ; '
"
>1
$*
, #." # 3 3#.$00 5 -, -*
: -#+ $
, - D* 0 7 ! 3 $, 07 0! $/
; 7 )
) ! #
2 !
>
!$* / ) , ;
, & ,
&
&
"" ) 1979, 1983, 1984, 1989, 1991 and 1997 Bar Exams
3 3#.$ 0# : -#+ $ , - D* 0 7 / 0 -* 0E
* 0$
! ,$ D ,$-! . $
%* B
' )
- " CCCCCC!
- + * 00 +7 / #. ! ,$ D ,$$ 4
2 !
, ;
"
H-
E !
! EI + 4
) E $0$ +$ (+
/ 0 -
!
3
"
05 3-* 7 %0 %0 -)$ ;
#. E
>6
$* / ) , ;
, & , -
&
&
* 0$
: -#+ $
, - D* 0 7
! ,$ D ,$-! . $
%3 ) )
) CCCCCCCCCCCCCC CCCCCCCCCCCC
B , ; " ! !
) ) CCCCCCCCC % * 3 * 3
! - " - "
) " 2 ! ,$ D ,$$ 4
- " 9@>
- + * 00 +7 / #. !
, ;
"
H-
E !
! EI + 4
) E $0$ +$ (+
/ 0 -
F
"
05 3-* 7 %0 %0 -)$ ;
#. E
>9
$* / ) , ;
&
&
+* $ * 3 / * 7 # /# ) $0$ +$! ) E
$ * $! $
+ * 00 * E * T 7 * 4 -3 #/ ! % ) * 3 , ; F * 4 -3 #/! ) 4 -3 4 -3 ! ! * 4 -3 ! ! !
3 $) " 0 ! ) = 8 4 -3 #/! ! CCCC 4 -3 #/ ) ) )! ) ) ! ) ) / 0 CCCCCCCCCCCCCC %
CCCC'F ! CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC % CCCCC'! ) 0 !* /$-0. / #-4 D ! ) F / / 7 ! $0 % #
' ) , ; ! * *# * B ' * - " CCCCCC ) / ) ! ) E
- + * 00 +7 / #. ! ,$ D ,$$ 4 ,$ 5 4
2 ! $-5
, ;
"
+ $0$ +$
+ $* $ $
/ 0 #. E
05 3-* 7 %0 %0 -)$ ;
><
$* / ) , ;
, &
#&
: -#+ $
, - D* 0 7 ! ,$ 5
E '
- " CCCC ) ) / !
- + * 00 +7 / #. ! ,$ 5 4 $-5
2 !
H-
E !
! EI + 4
) E $* $ $ (+
/ 0 -
"
05 3-* 7 %0 %0 -)$ ;
#. E
, &
..
3 3#.0$ * 3 0 /
+ * ,#/* $5 7 5 ) ) E
; ! ) F
) CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC 4 -3 #/&,#/* $5 5 ( %0
) ,#/* $5 5 ) 4 -3 &,#/* $5 5 #/ , ) )
) 4 -3 #/&,#/* $5 ! 5
- + * 00 +7 / #. ! ,$ D ,$$ 4
"
+ $0$ +$ 4 (+
+ $* $ $ 4 (+
/ 0 #. E
05 3-* 7 %0 %0 -)$ ;
>
$*
. *
, #." #
&#
%' "
% CCCCCC'
'
* $00 5 CCCCCCCCCCCCCC
- + * 00 +7 / #. ! 3 $, $ * $-5
, ;
"
>?
$ / ) , ;
& !
""
: -#+ $
, - D* 0 7
/ 0 -* 0E , ; ! ) D $,$- -D $! ! ! ! !
F F !
! )
2 3 $, : 0 #* $ 5 . ! D $,$- -D $! )
, ;
"
+ , ) D $,$- -D $
3 $, : 0 ! #* "
! )
3 $, : 0 #* 0 E Q
Q1 -)$ ;
>@
+ $ *$ 6 $
+
"" 122 ) Rules 40, 42, 43, 44, ) Rule 40
&
% & % &
""
%/
= 9 ! 0 " 6'
; %/
%/ 9 !0 " '
9 !0
" 9'
""
) Rule 41
'
9 $ $
" & "! ; E • 1< • • $ • $
## #
& =
% & % &
""
$ ( (
B , B ,
"" ) Rule 122, sec. 1(b), sec. 3(a)
$ • • • • $ • • • •
"" ) Rule 122, sec. 3(c); the ONLY instance when an ordinary appeal from the RTC is
with the Supreme Court and where resort is made by simple notice of appeal; the
only ground is where the penalty imposed is reclusion perpetua or life imprisonment
or where a lesser penalty is imposed but involving offenses committed on the same
occasion or arising out of the same occurrence that gave rise to the more serious
offense for which the penalty of death or life imprisonment/reclusion perpetua is
imposed.
$ 6 $
""
, " 1 #D
&.
""
. . 0 = 0 )/ B , % 8 )'
"" ) Rule 13, section 13
9 $
" ; E • 1< • • • 0 • , $ • 4 • $ o o • 0
1 # =
# , &
% & % &
)0 9<! )/
"
6 % , !/ 3 $ . 0 = ) 0 )/ , % )' B 8
B =
B =
'
""
)/
16!
16