You are on page 1of 2

DAIGA GRANTINA

by Stephanie Seidel

Daiga Grantina’s sculptures and installa- Grantina’s works are slowly grown ensem-
tions are material experiments as much as bles that break down and metabolize their
they are associative formations. Subjecting material like fuel or nutrients, mutating their
collaged material to associations of bodies matter by forces of heat, adhesion and the
and landscapes, Grantina addresses human pull of gravity. They are not singular things
desires and longings as they become activa- in themselves but rather an aggregate of va-
ted through the eye of the viewer. Grantina ried substances, flowing into each other, re-
directs the view in manifold ways, both se- jecting each other, merged forcefully and
cluding and revealing, as she opens surfa- stringing into process-like narrations which
ces and volumes at one point and seals are elliptical, irrational, sensual. Interference
them through the amalgamation of disparate and overlapping result in barbed frictions.
materials at another. Spanning between the These shimmering, sticky concatenations
poles of figure and landscape, her layered evince the irreconcilable tension that results
sculptural installations are at times voyeuri- from deliberate making and a yielding to the
stic, panoramic and archeological. unfolding of material properties, forces of
forming and deforming.
In her exhibition The Mountain Guide (2015),
shown at Mathew Gallery, Berlin, Grantina At the center of Grantina’s exhibition is the
set the exhibition space as a landscape, po- eponymous piece The Mountain Guide, both
pulated by sculptures, which acted as its “in- a figure and a landscape. In a wreckage of
habitants.” Winding up out from the floor, wire, plexi, plastic and aluminum enveloped
protruding from the walls as well as sitting by a floppy membrane of acrylic, the work
heavily and slothfully on the ground, these suspends from the ceiling at the same time
sculptures amalgamate disparate materials leaning on an askew crutch-like pole, dug in
into dismembered figures. Floating along a the ground. Its leg and poles are wrapped in
Plexiglas bell of a jellyfish, bright red textile cables bundling energy, while blue marble
bobbles wiggle along plastic encrusted wires. eyes vigilantly peep out of a multitude of folds
A glass marble is suspended in the wide and creases of plastic sheeting. Through the
throat of an extractor tube staring back at the multiple layers of half-melted plastic, a pro-
viewer like the abject iris of Bataille’s Story jector throws a grid pattern, similar to a map,
of the Eye. Another work supports a net of in splintered facets and at kaleidoscopic array
wire distended with transparent bulges of an onto the room, as if diagramming the posi-
anonymous, coagulated liquid, streaked tion of the other figures in the room.
with slim red strings like veins, summoning
the female body as morphologically mud- The sculpture’s posture resembles the pose
dled and abstracted. A little crystal earring of the mountain guide in Balthus’ painting
dangles coquettishly over the whole ensem- The Mountain (1937). Here, seven scattered
ble as if to lure prey into a trap. figures are depicted on an imaginary moun-
tain plateau, unaware of one another. Their

202—HOT!
gaze is trancelike. Rendered in exacting destabilized and deformed, as it filters the
detail, the realism of the figures and lan- manifold components of the installation.
dscape seem at odds with the surrealisti- The works of The Mountain Guide oscil-
cally contrived narrative. A young woman, late between figure and micro-landsca-
stretching her upper body into the sun is pes, gestalts, which shift in scale. These
subject to the desirous look of the moun- voluptuous, slumped characters, reveal
tain guide, who is kneeling on the ground mini-vistas within their cracked surfaces:
resting on his hiking pole. While the con- mountains and valleys built-up of smolde-
nection between the figures is dramati- ring plastic and bent metal, suffused with

Buff in Red, 2016 Installation view, Heap-core,,, kim? Contemporary Art Centre, Riga, 2016 Photo: Toan vu-Huu Courtesy: Galerie Joseph Tang (opposite page)
cally mute, there is a tight correspondence projected light, marbled with stripped wire.
between the shape and posture of each
person and the surrounding mountain for- Grantina’s sculptural approach to lan-
mations. Here, the figures seem to merge dscape continues in her solo exhibition

IsourceD, 2015 Installation view, The Mountain Guide, Mathew, Berlin, 2015 Courtesy: Galerie Joseph Tang and Mathew (p. 203)
with the mountains and become as inert Heap-core,,, for kim? Contemporary Art
as the rocks, while the landscape gains vi- Centre in Riga, Latvia (2016). Building a
tality through theatrical light. The distin- second wall that frame the windows of the
ction between animate and inanimate, space in a dramatic angle turning them into
body and place, seems to be suspended light shafts soaring into the sky, Grantina
as matter in a state of phase change – the manipulates the architecture of the exhi-
precise material condition of which Gran- bition space so that the walls seem excep-
tina induces in her exhibition. tionally thick, giving the whole space a
darkened vault-like enclosure which seems
Balthus’ brother Pierre Klossowski descri- to be cloistered underground. Sculpting
bes this conversion of materials into one the light that is directed into the space
another, writing about the effect of light on The Natural History of Tan hits the skin of
the landscape: the figures inside the space as the latter
becomes a secluded grotto. This motif of
“The landscape of Turin, the monumental the skin continues in Buff in Bloom, Glow
squares, the promenades along the Po and Thumos, a group of sculptures shown
River, were bathed in a kind of ‘Claude in the frame of the group exhibition Adhe-
Lorraine’ luminosity […], a diaphanou- sive Products at Bergen Kunsthall at the
sness that removed the weight of things same time, comprised of resin-stiffened
and made them recede into an infinite di- spandex, suspended from electrical cords,
stance. The stream of light here became a interspersed with luminous plastic strings
stream of laughter – the laughter from and with gaping openings of bent metal
which truth emerges, the laughter in ventilation pipes. The outer shell of the
which all identities explode […]. What also works is skin colored and leathery – “Buff”
exploded was the meaning that things can originally referred to the color of a buffalo’s
have or lose for other things, not in terms skin. They recall hollowed out nudes, repo-
of a limited linkage or a narrow context, sing open-air, each bearing tiny traces of
but in terms of variations of light (despite personality, such as the accessories of a
the fact that this light is perceived by the grand dame: a fluffy garland and pouting
mind before it exists for the eye, or that a aluminum wings; bright green curls and
reminiscence emanates from its rays).” blue-ish veils. Yet, their cast-off skin bears
no flesh. The skin is not substance but
In her compositing of aluminum tubes, threshold, an interface that does not di-
Plexiglas, cables, plastic objects and vide an inside from an outside but assem-
wires, Grantina explodes functionality into bles contact, where light and surface
a vortex of material and haptic properties momentarily hold shape before shape-
which sediment into unstable bodies. shifting again.
Light here is treated as a material equally

HOT!—205

You might also like