DESIGN OF UBUD ‘S MRF,

GIANYAR DISTRICT, BALI

K A N I A S A L M A A 1 A N D I M A D E WA H Y U W I DYA R S A N A 2
E N V I RO N M E N TA L I N F R A S T R U C T U R E E N G I N E E R I N G P RO G R A M
F A C U LT Y O F C I V I L A N D E N V I R O N M E N TA L E N G I N E E R I N G . B A N D U N G I N S T I T U T E O F T E C H N O L O G Y.
J L . R AYA J AT I N A N G O R K M 2 0 . 7 5 S U M E D A N G
1K A N I A S A L M A A @ S T U D E N T S . I T B . AC . I D A N D 2WA H Y U @ T L . I T B . AC . I D

INTRODUCTION ANALYSIS RESULTS

Waste is the residual activity of human and/or
natural processes in the form of solid (National
Law-18/2008). The presence of waste often
creates problems, both in terms of health. and
environmental impact. Therefore urgency to
waste management becomes high for tourism
area. Ubud is well known and popular tourist area
in Bali. With the increasing number of tourists, the
amount of waste generated will also increasing. A
traditional village in Ubud Village, Padangtegal
Pekraman Village which has one of Bali's main
tourism destinations Monkey Forest., responds to
this problem by establishing a waste management
institution named Rumah Kompos. Unfortunately
Figure 2 Waste material flow analysis of Padangtegal Village
the processing activities undertaken are still not
well implemented. Therefore to support the
waste reduction activities, the planning of waste Table 1 Waste generation of Padangtegal Village
100%
Hazardous;
management and design of Ubud’s MRF is needed. Waste Waste Glasses; 1.97% 2.08%
Other
No. Source Unit Generation Generation (Residues); 90%

(kg/unit/day) (L/unit/day) Metal; 2.11% 1.82%

80%
1 Household person 0.37 4.15 Rubber and Hazardous

Leather; Plastics;
METHODOLOGY
2 Clinic bed 1.18 10.60 70%
Glasses
Worship 0.14% 12.99% Food Waste;
3 m2 0.01 0.08 28.74% 60%

%Wet Weight
place Textiles; Metal

4 School student 0.02 0.26 0.49% 50%

Plastics
5 Road m 0.01 0.17 Paper and 40%
Rubber and
6 Store m2 0.01 0.09 Cardboard; Leather
30%
7 Hotel bed 0.12 1.40 9.15% Leaves and Textiles

8 Restaurant chair 0.42 2.16 Plants; 40.51% 20%

Paper and
Figure 1 Methodology flow chart 9 Office employee 0.05 0.78
10%
Cardboard
Leaves and
Tourist 2 Plants
10
Destination
m 0.00007 0.00057 0%
Food Waste
Figure 3 Waste composition of
SERVICE
PLANNINGAREA
LOCATION Total waste generation of
Padangtegal Village
(%wet weight)
Padangtegal Pekraman Village is one of traditional Padangtegal Village
villages in Ubud. With an area of 134 ha, 38.49 m3/ day Figure 4 Waste treatment potential
Padangtegal Village has population of 2644 people
or equivalent to 661 families. One of the main
tourism destinations in Ubud, Monkey Forest is DESIGN CONCEPT
located in Padangtegal Village which makes
Table 2 Scenario of waste management services
Padangtegal Village as a strategic tourism area.
Padangtegal Village manages its own solid waste %Service
by establishing a waste management institution No
Type of Waste Short- Mid- Long-
Processing
named Rumah Kompos. Term Term Term
(2020) (2024) (2028)
1 Source Reduction 15% 18% 23%
2 Aggregation 100% 100% 100%
Processing 40% 60% 70%
3 a. TPST Ubud 20% 10% 0%
b. Temesi Recycling 100% 100% 100%
Figure 3 Waste treatment flow at MRF

Figure 2 Map of Padangtegal Village

The number of residents served by Rumah

Kompos in 2018 is 661 families and 300 business
units. The amount of waste transported daily
reaches ± 40m³ or about 20 tonnes per day, with
30% organic and 70% non-organic waste(Rumah
Kompos Padangtegal Pekraman Village, 2017).

Reference:
National Law no. 18 Year 2008 on Waste Management.
Jakarta: DPR RI
Figure 4 Conceptual layout designof Ubud’s MRF
Rumah Kompos Padangtegal Pekraman Village. (2017). Waste
Management System of Pilot Unit Village.