Fake and fabricated matrimonial case after 3 years of separation with over 12 years of marriage misusing provision of 498 to frame innocent and criminalise using LEGAL TERRORISM by advocates of "aps Sherrill Chandigarh"
Fake and fabricated matrimonial case after 3 years of separation with over 12 years of marriage misusing provision of 498 to frame innocent and criminalise using LEGAL TERRORISM by advocates of "aps Sherrill Chandigarh"
Fake and fabricated matrimonial case after 3 years of separation with over 12 years of marriage misusing provision of 498 to frame innocent and criminalise using LEGAL TERRORISM by advocates of "aps Sherrill Chandigarh"
Respondent/accused on bail with counsel Sh. PS Bassi
Arguments addressed and heard on application filed by
applicant/complainant under Section 311 Code of Criminal Procedure for summoning witnesses Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Arvinder Singh and Kamaljeet Kaur (second wife of the accused) in order to prove the FIR and other connected documents in the interest of justice, equity and fair play on the ground that the above said witnesses were specifically mentioned as material prosecution witnesses to the investigating officer, but they have not been entered in the list of witnesses in the challan filed in the FIR due to some inadvertent bonafide mistake of the investigating officer or for reasons best known to him. These witnesses are the most crucial and material witneses who can clearly prove the criminal acts of the accused as they have been very closely associated with him should be examined by the court in order to prove allegations in the FIR and challan and for presenting true and correct picture of the events as they happened in relation to the FIR. No prejudice would be caused to the accused as the allegations in the FIR and charges are required to be proved against him. Therefore, he prayed that the instant application be allowed and above said witnesses be summoned on behalf of applicant/complainant failing which prosecution case is likely to be defeated and an illegal advantage will accrue to the accused and it will result in defeating the ends of justice. 2. Per contra, the present application has been opposed by the learned counsel for respondent/accused on the ground that since the petitioners 1, 2 and 3 does not have any locus standi to file the present petition as the petitioners neither is relative of the alleged in the present case nor related to any evidence, empirical, anecdotal or material witness to said case except petitioner 3 Kamalpreet Kaur mentioned in the petition that has already been testified in trial case for same cause mentioned herein petition of alleged being second
Harjinder Kaur, Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, SAS Nagar (Mohali).
wife of accused in FIR NO. 48 of 2015 vide session case No. RT14 dated 30.09.2015/26.04.2016 decided on 03.02.2017 where alleged all allegations stand falsified against accused. As such, no cause of action has incurred in favour of the petitioner to file present petition in the present matter except this petition in the present matter except this petition evidence intent is ultimate but phony justification used as an excuse to usurp exercise of jurisdiction under Section 311 CrPC to falsely implicate and procrastinate current case decision after having gone through all original witness mentioned in the FIR No. 32 of 2015 having failed to prove any guilt or wrong doing by the accused Surinderjit Singh. With these averments, respondent/accused prayed for dismissal of the application under reference. 3. This Court has observed that the present application is filed by the applicant/complainant to summon witnesses Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Arvinder Singh and Kamaljeet Kaur to prove the FIR and other connected document. Firstly, the prosecution wants to examine the said witnesses before the examination of complainant Taranjeet Kaur. This court has observed that complainant Taranjeet Kaur has already been examined by prosecution as PW2 on 07.03.2018. The proposed witnesses never accompanied the complainant and the accused as per the record available then how they can know anything about the relationship between the complainant and the accused. Section 311 Code of Criminal Procedure provided for the power of court to summon material witness or examine person present and no assistance from this section can be taken to include new cause of action to the occurrence already taken place in the year 2015. Therefore, the application under reference stands dismissed. Let the case be adjourned to 05.07.2018 and PW's mentioned at Sr. No. 5 and 9 in the list of witnesses be summoned for date fixed. Dated: 14.06.2018 (Harjinder Kaur) Nirmala Adhikari JMIC/ SAS Nagar (Mohali) Next Date: 05.07.2018 UID No.PB0502 Purpose:
Harjinder Kaur, Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, SAS Nagar (Mohali).