You are on page 1of 9

WHAT REALLY

WORKS
The 4+2 Formula for
Sustained Business Success
WILLIAM JOYCE, NITIN NOHRIA & BRUCE ROBERSON

WILLIAM JOYCE is professor of strategy and organization theory at the Dartmouth College School of
Business.
NITIN NOHRIA is professor of business administration at the Harvard Business School.
BRUCE ROBERSON currently serves as part of a new management team undertaking the turnaround of a
major corporation. He previously worked as a partner with McKinsey & Company for eleven years.

SUMMARIES.COM is a concentrated business information service. Every week, subscribers are e-mailed a
concise summary of a different business book. Each summary is about 8 pages long and contains the
stripped-down essential ideas from the entire book in a time-saving format. By investing less than one hour
per week in these summaries, subscribers gain a working knowledge of the top business titles. Subscriptions
are available on a monthly or yearly basis. Further information is available at www.summaries.com.
What Really Works - Page 1

MAIN IDEA
What is the secret to sustained business success? When it comes to being successful over the long haul, what really works?
To answer this question scientifically, a five year research project – dubbed the “Evergreen Study” in recognition its attempt to search
for the “evergreen” principles of success – was undertaken by consultants and business school professors at top universities around
the country. They analyzed more than 200 management practices, fads, silver-bullet cures and management buzzwords commonly
used by 160 companies to statistically identify what really matters in business and what does not.
At the end of this five year analysis, the Evergreen Study came up with a stunningly simple result: All successful companies master six
specific management practices, four of which are compulsory (the four primary management practices) and two of which are optional
but which must come from a list of four secondary management practices. This 4+2 pattern is found in every company which has
achieved and sustained long-term success.

Four Primary Management Practices Four Secondary Management Practices

1 Strategy 1 Talent
2

3
Execution

Culture 4+2 2

3
Leadership

Innovation
4 Structure 4 Growth

Companies must excel in all of Companies must excel in any two of


these management practices these management practices

In essence, the 4+2 formula is an unambiguous road map to success. Any company or organization which aspires to succeed in the
future simply needs to find effective ways to excel in the four primary practices and any two of the secondary practices.
“The results of the Evergreen Study were startling. Most of the 200 practices we started with turned out to be chaff – their success or
failure was irrelevant to total-return-to-shareholders. But we found a clear and compelling correlation between
total-return-to-shareholders and eight general areas of management practice: four primary and four secondary. The link between
4+2 practices and business success was astonishing. A company consistently following the formula had a better than 90-percent
chance of being a Winner. We don’t maintain that our formula for predicting, achieving, and sustaining superior performance is the
only way to go. We do say that it stacks the odds heavily in favor of success.”
– William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
“What do the Evergreen results mean for managers? They show why success is so elusive, and why so few companies achieve it in
the long term. A business has to run full speed on six tracks at once in order to win, and a single misstep on any of them can be fatal.
That is why it is so difficult to be a long-term, consistent Winner.”
– William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson

1. The four primary management practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pages 2 - 5

Four 1 Strategy Devise and articulate a strategy which is clear and narrowly focused
Primary
Management 2 Execution Execute flawlessly – consistently meeting or exceeding expectations
Practices 3 Culture Build a culture which is intensely performance based and oriented
4 Structure Be fast and flexible by having a flat organizational structure

2. The four secondary management practices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pages 6 - 8

Four 1 Talent Retain talented employees and find or develop more of the same
Secondary
Management 2 Leadership Have directors and leaders who are committed to the business
Practices 3 Innovation Bring to market innovations that transform your industry
4 Growth Make growth happen through ongoing mergers and partnerships
What Really Works - Page 2

4. Clearly communicate your strategy – to your customers, to


1. The four primary management practices
your stakeholders and internally.
A good strategy in and of itself is of little use unless it is
known. Therefore, you have to become highly adept at
Primary Strategy communicating your business strategy. Explain it in detail to
Management 1 your managers and the employees who will be bringing that
Devise and articulate a strategy which
Practices strategy to life. Let your customers know precisely what
is clear and narrowly focused
you’re attempting to do for them. Talk with your stakeholders,
and invite them to become partners in the chain of value
Winning companies and organizations: creation. The more you convey your strategy, the better.
1. Stay tightly focused on their chosen business strategy – 5. Keep growing your core business and avoid unfamiliar
whether that strategy is low prices, innovative products, best business opportunities.
service or another option. Every company leader loves the idea of growth as a sign of
2. Find ways to continue to grow their core business over time – progress. Unfortunately, that generally means seizing every
typically doubling the size of their core business every five commercial opportunity that comes along, even if it’s in a line
years through organic expansion, mergers and acquisitions of business you have no experience in. A much better
or a combination of both. approach is to stay focused and grow your existing business
rather than go into a new field altogether.
To develop a clear and focused business strategy which can be The best performing companies don’t plunge into unrelated
readily and logically explained to others, you need to do five businesses. Instead, they:
basic things: n Attempt to grow their core business by 15-percent each
1. Build your strategy around a clear value proposition for the year – which means they will double their turnover every
customer. five years or so.
A good value proposition specifies not what you want to be n Attempt to develop a new ancillary business equal in size
but what you are. It serves as the interface between your to their current company – by moving into something
organization and your customer. Winning companies have a which is closely related, such as a new customer
realistic perspective of their own capabilities and their target segment, channel of distribution, geographical market or
customer needs. Sometimes value propositions emerge product market.
from an intensive analysis while at other times they come n Start building their next growth business before the
about as the intuitive insight of a single individual. growth potential of their current business is completely
For example, Target’s value proposition is: “The physical exhausted – so they can dynamically evolve into a strong
comforts of a department store but with bargain prices.” competitive position in the future.
That’s clear and concise. It expresses the company’s goal to
offer a shopping experience that makes customers feel good “One thing most managers can agree upon, at least in principle,
about themselves. is that growth of the core business should be the major strategic
focus. But in the heat of the moment, with demands for greater
2. Develop your strategy from the outside in – that is, based
support arriving hourly from all segments of the organization, too
upon what your customers, your partners and your investors
many leaders allow their resources to be used for lesser
have to say.
purposes while the core business languishes. That doesn’t
If you rely solely on your own “instincts” and “feel” for the
happen in winning companies. They keep their strategic goals
marketplace, you might inadvertently head off in the wrong
firmly in mind and tailor their budgets to fit.”
direction. Or you may feel all that’s needed is a little time for
– William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
the market to warm to your idea. That’s dangerous, because
it ignores the realities and disciplines of the marketplace. “That moment when a company discovers that a competitor is
High performers avoid this trap by always developing their about to remake the marketplace, or that its core product is about
strategies from the outside-in rather than the inside-out. By to be commoditized, is inevitably a turning point. There is a
using feedback from others, your business strategy can be temptation to rush into new businesses to make up for the
much more robust and applicable. Your best strategy will looming loss of income, but that can easily lead to the weakening
always be based around the desires of your customers, not of the company’s focus on its core value proposition, and induce
your own convenience or advantage. a long decline. In fact, the situation is usually not out of control:
3. Put in place antennae that will allow you to fine-tune your the company may have an extended period of profitability as less
strategy so you can respond to changes in the marketplace. resolute competitors take flight, and it may be able to reinvent its
A good strategy is never set in stone. Instead, it needs to core so that profitability can continue while the company pursues
evolve as new developments come along. This is only opportunities for growth in related areas. As a general rule,
feasible if you can learn about marketplace trends early though, Winners stay Winners because they start building their
enough to react. Therefore, you need to have multiple next growth business before the growth potential of their core
antennae in place with your customers and your competitors. business shows signs of disappearing. The dynamically evolving
It’s also a good idea to keep abreast with what’s happening strategic focus on growth is the formula for business success.”
with customers and potential competitors in adjacent – William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
businesses. If you track of what’s happening on the margins,
“Even the most successful strategy will fail unless it is constantly
you’ll know when they are starting to make inroads. That way
monitored and refreshed to meet changing market conditions.”
you can respond before they succeed in attacking your
– William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
mainstream product line.
What Really Works - Page 3

“Contrary to the familiar notion that companies should outsource


Primary Execution the execution of as many activities as possible, we found that
Management 2 Execute flawlessly – consistently there was no relationship between the degree to which a
Practices meeting or exceeding expectations company embraced outsourcing and its financial performance.
Success did not hinge on the extent to which a company invested
Winning companies and organizations: in technologies and in systems like enterprise-resource
planning, supply-chain management, or customer-relationship
1. Never disappoint their customers. They deliver products and
management. It did not make much difference to its bottom line
services that customers gauge to be of good value and
whether a company adopted a total-quality-management
consistent with their value proposition.
program or some other execution-oriented initiative.”
2. Consistently reduce their operating costs – while at the same – William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
time increasing productivity by 6- to 7-percent per year.
“Consider some of the highly touted practices that turned out to
have no cause-and-effect connection to sustainable, superior
Operational excellence – the ability to execute flawlessly – is returns. Superb information technology, for example, is widely
never arrived at easily. Rather, it always requires analysis, considered a sine qua non of business success. Our research
ingenuity, constant effort and a willingness to flout conventional found no correlation between a company’s investment in
wisdom. To execute well, a company must meet three basic technology and its total-return-to-shareholders over the decade
mandates: of our study. The same absence of correlation marked corporate
1. Deliver products and services that consistently meet change programs. Despite their popularity, they were not the
customer expectations. determining factors in achieving superior total-return-to-
Winning companies excel at doing things backstage to make shareholders. Neither were purchase and supply-chain
their products and offerings shine. Contrary to popular management practices. They may, in the short run, increase
management wisdom, however, this does not require profit margins and customer responsiveness, but they have no
exceeding the customer’s expectations on a regular basis or sustainable cause-and-effect relationship with total-return-to-
even delighting the customer regularly. Rather, it refers to shareholders. Another striking finding involved corporate
rarely delivering products and services that are of poor governance. It is widely accepted that companies should attract
quality. Winning companies are depended on to have in high-quality outside directors. Indeed, winning companies in our
place the necessary systems to deliver products and study did better than losers in that respect. But there was no
services that customers judge to be consistently good. Or, evidence that attracting better outside directors specifically
put differently, the winning companies keep their promises to improved total-return-to-shareholders or sustainable business
customers and consistently raise the bar of their level of performance. The causality may actually run in reverse: perhaps
service delivered. being a winner helped a company upgrade its board.”
2. Empower front-line employees to respond to customer – William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
needs quickly and adequately.
“The 4+2 formula casts a new light on the manager’s role,
The conventional approach is to keep front-line employees
making it clear why winning is so hard to sustain. Winning
on a tight leash so as to eliminate variations. Winning
managers tend to be master jugglers, keeping six balls in the air
companies take a different tack altogether by giving front-line
at the same time. Sporadic victories, however spectacular, aren’t
employees authority to make immediate and binding
enough. A consistently successful company never stops
decisions for the company. This allows the employee to solve
pursuing success. More tortoise than hare, it keeps working at all
a customer’s problem then and there while they are talking to
the small wins that ensure repeated big wins.”
the customer.
– William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
To make such decentralization of decisions work, the
front-line employees also need to be given sufficient training “All companies, successful or not, have days when the stock
so they will make good decisions. This also requires making market hates them; equally, winners are no more likely than
the front-line employee the “boss” with the rest of the losers to have days when their stock moves up sharply. Winners
company honoring whatever is agreed upon. These front-line simply have more days when their stock inches upwards. As in
employees need to be provided with sufficient information to football, winning is the difference between averaging three yards
be able to make good choices. per carry and four yards per carry. And to do that, you must
consistently outdo your competition on all the fundamentals –
3. Constantly attempt to improve productivity and eliminate
blocking and tackling, giving the passer extra protection, holding
waste in key processes and areas.
down turnovers, converting on third down. The 4+2 formula is a
Counterintuitively, winners don’t try and outperform their
lesson in life.”
competitors in every conceivable operating parameter.
– William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
Rather, they determine which processes are the most critical
in meeting customer expectations and focus their energies “For managers, the 4+2 formula is a road map to success. But
and resources on those. they must learn to use it with patience, discipline and
This is a smart approach. Attempting to perfect all and sundry consistence. The intent to focus on the 4+2 practices must not be
processes can be time consuming, resource intensive and allowed to waver. Should circumstances require a company to
distracting. By focusing instead on upgrading the critical invest more in some practices – to meet a competitive threat, for
processes, their likelihood of success is enhanced. Winning example – the organization must not start to stint on the others. It
companies also find vendors and partners who can make is too easy for an enterprise, particularly one with a long track
fresh contributions to the effort to improve execution in those record of success, to let down its guard.”
key areas. – William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
What Really Works - Page 4

4. Establish and then live clear company values.


Primary Culture Good organizations stand for something. They work on the
Management 3 Build a culture which is intensely premise that good behavior promotes good business. Lying
Practices performance based and oriented at the heart of acceptable behavior for any culture is the
organization’s values. Winning companies think through
Winning companies and organizations: their values and write them down in clear and forceful
language so as to avoid ambiguity. High performance
1. Have a culture which values performance over every other
cultures communicate those values to all employees by
option – even fun and spontaneity.
making them an implicit part of every interaction which
2. Have the courage to deal with poor performers appropriately occurs.
– by firing them before they weaken the culture.
For example:
n Home Depot employees are provided with seven core
In the best companies, everyone puts in maximum effort. As values which range from “excellent customer service” and
obvious as this may sound, actually achieving this in practice is “doing the right thing” to “giving back” and “creating
difficult, and yet winning companies do so. To build a shareholder value”. One of these core values is
performance-based culture: expressed in this way: “We exercise good judgement by
1. Inspire each employee to do their best . ‘doing the right thing’ instead of just ‘doing things right’.
This is achieved by making everyone feel responsible for We strive to understand the impact of our decisions, and
corporate success, not just the managers. Responsibility we accept responsibility for our actions”.
usually goes hand-in-hand with empowerment to make n Campbell Soup employees receive a booklet which sets
individual decisions towards that goal of exceptional out the company’s world-wide standards of conduct. This
performance. A good culture will nurture feelings of loyalty booklet describes the company’s goals in quality,
towards both the employee’s own team and the organization handling conflicts of interest and competitive practices
as a whole. firmly and unambiguously, leaving little room for
A corporate culture is a stew of many factors like notions, misinterpretation. The booklet also asks any employee
emotions, standards of behavior and ways employees are who witnesses management actions which may violate
treated. In winning companies, the employees come to feel these standards to report those incidents without fear of
motivated to seek out ways to improve the company’s retribution.
operations. There is an inbuilt bias for setting stretch goals
and then working hard to achieve better results. When “Too often, companies fool themselves into believing they are
employees are internally motivated, they achieve much doing well because they have better results than in the previous
more. In a high performance culture, the status quo is never year. To be sure, year-to-year improvement is nothing to take for
enough. granted, but it is an insufficient measure. The only way to
meaningfully define an organization’s progress is to compare it to
2. Reward accomplishment with praise and pay, but remember the record of its competitors. To the degree that a company lags
to keep raising the bar. behind others in its competitive arena in the measure that counts
Good cultures make rewards tangible, obvious and alluring. the most – whether it be in sales or shareholder return or selling,
There’s nothing that can match a substantial pay raise for general, administrative expense – to that degree it is falling
motivational impact on coworkers. High performance behind. An SG&A cutback of 2-percent in a given year is no
cultures use financial rewards to provide tangible motivation cause for celebration if your immediate rivals have achieved a
to employees. They also go one step further and provide 3-percent cutback. Yet a high performance culture doesn’t limit
psychic motivation as well by paying public tribute to itself to defeating immediate competitors. It constantly raises the
accomplishment. This is done by publicly recognizing bar, aiming at surpassing top-ranked companies in any and
achievement and linking opportunities for promotion to every industry. Once the business has overmatched its industry
performance. rivals in, say, the effectiveness of its logistics, the culture asks:
3. Create a work environment that is mentally stimulating. ‘Why can’t we do it better than Federal Express?’ And when such
Since culture is so strongly influenced by workplace stretch goals turn out to be unreachable, it serves to alert the
conditions, high-performance cultures focus on their winning company to another potential opportunity. If some
physical surrounds. A draconian atmosphere usually organization outside its industry is so clearly superior in some
generates dour, uninspired workers. If the workplace is particular area, why not outsource the task? Excellence is
pleasant and satisfying, the people who work there are far excellence, whether a function is handled in-house or by a
more likely to be in a better emotional state. supplier.”
In practice, many companies have found informality helps. If – William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
executives can be addressed by their first name in person
“One of the more surprising results of our research was the lack
rather than through written memos, everyone will feel more
of correlation between some of the various categories into which
relaxed. This, in turn, will lead to greater trust and more
experts tend to put cultures and the success of the winning
effective communication of ideas. All of these elements help
companies surveyed. In other words, the corporations viewed
build the culture, as does common practices like regular job
their cultures as neither hierarchical nor cooperative,
rotations, profit sharing and reimbursement for education.
competitive nor collegial, but preferred descriptions such as
When employees feel inspired, there is a buzz that
‘action-oriented’ or ‘risk-taking’.”
permeates the culture and generates genuine enthusiasm –
– William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
the kind of enthusiasm for achievement which is never
generated by showing a video or writing a memo.
What Really Works - Page 5

By keeping good front-line people in place, a company also


Primary Structure signals there isn’t all that much work which should be carried
Management 4 Be fast and flexible by having a out at the corporate level. Instead, all of the key decisions
Practices flat organizational structure should be made at the front-lines, where the customer’s
voice is loudest.
Winning companies and organizations: Some of the ideas companies are using to keep their best
1. Are quick – to put in place any changes to the organization front-line people happy include:
which reduces bureaucracy and simplifies work. n Allowing them to try new ideas without the threat of being
2. Set ongoing goals – to become progressively simpler and fired if the new idea doesn’t pan out as planned.
faster in everything that’s done. n Providing front-line employees with performance
bonuses in cash or company stock.
How, exactly, do winning companies structure themselves? n Doing away with any and all executive perks – like
While there is no single organizational model which is universally reserved parking spaces, executive dining rooms, etc.
applicable, high performing organizations follow three basic n Giving complete operating responsibility to local sales
guidelines in deciding how to structure themselves. To decide on managers rather than requiring head office approval.
how best to structure your organization:
“The structure management practice encompasses the systems
1. Simplify – do everything possible to eliminate redundant
that speed the flow of information within the organization and
organizational layers and structures.
between the organization and the outside world. Winning
The simpler your company structure, the more rapidly
companies are organized to recognize market changes before
decisions will get made, and the more opportunities you can
their competitors do and to adapt to them quicker. The means to
seize before a competitor acts. Winning companies keep the
that end is a flat and bureaucracy-free organizational structure.”
bureaucratic layers to a minimum so they can consider new
– William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
ideas quickly.
Simplification also has an important added benefit. If the “In every business there is a natural drift toward complexity. The
management have not invested large amounts of time and urge to add permanent new rules and procedures to existing
energy in a decision, they are more likely to reverse course if processes reflects a desire to quick-freeze current results. It can
necessary. This avoids those situations where an “escalating also reflect a manager’s desire to fix his or her control of the
commitment to a predetermined course of action” occurs, process in concrete. Winners are aware of this bureaucratic drift
and makes the organization quick on its feet. and have established systems to prevent it.”
2. Encourage cooperation, teamwork and the sharing of every – William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
piece of information across the entire organization. “Theoretically, there is nothing wrong with bureaucracy per se.
Large companies sometimes have boundary turf wars – Some procedures and protocols – which is what bureaucracy is
where one department competes against another for all about, after all – are absolutely necessary to the smooth
resources. In these situations, information is power, which functioning of any large organization. But there is such a thing as
means information hoarding is commonplace. Winning having too much of a good thing. When an excess of
companies move in the opposite direction. They let everyone bureaucracy puts roadblocks in the way of progress, when it
know the competitors that should be focused on are outside dampens employees’ enthusiasm and leaches away their
the company rather than inside. energy, it becomes a clear and present danger to business
Information sharing is the great leveler. If everyone knows success. Superfluous bureaucracy is a tax on the value your
everything about what’s happening in the marketplace, they employees create. It leads to impatience, which eventually
can make a meaningful contribution. If information is devolves into an unhappy acceptance, which, in turn, breeds
concentrated instead with a few gatekeepers, only they will indolence. The Evergreen Project found that excellence in the
know enough to come up with good ideas. Some companies structure management practice was one of the four primary
even go as far as assigning staff members to be responsible distinguishing marks of Winners – and that they were dedicated
for the dissemination of information to all the various to trimming away every possible vestige of unnecessary
divisions and departments. Other companies have regular bureaucracy. It was a full-time job.”
all-hands meetings where ideas and know-how can be – William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
exchanged.
“As was often the case, the Evergreen Project cast cold water on
3. Put your best people where they can do the most good – some traditional views as to what distinguishes successful
close to the action rather than sitting at a desk at the companies from unsuccessful ones. The project found that there
corporate headquarters. was no particular structure which separated Winners from the
The concept that the best people should be pushed into rest. Whether the structural elements of the company were
front-line positions rather than up the management chain organized according to function or geography or product made
seems counterintuitive at first. Yet research has shown this is little difference. By the same token, it did not matter much
precisely what winning companies do. They put their most whether or not a winning company gave its business units
promising people where they can come into regular contact profit-and-loss responsibility or if new businesses could adopt
with customers. This definitively demonstrates the future of structures and processes distinct from the corporate norm.”
the company lies not with the brilliance of the management – William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
team but on the dedication and actions of the people who are
face-to-face with customers. It also signals everything should
be front-line driven and focused.
What Really Works - Page 6

4. Become personally involved in recruiting, retaining and


2. The four secondary management practices
enhancing top performers.
The traditional approach was for the human resources
department to advertise, interview and hire new people. If
Secondary Talent you aspire to attract top talent, however, that approach won’t
Management 1 work. Instead, your organization’s senior executives need to
Retain talented employees and find
Practices become personally involved in recruitment. Why? For one
or develop more of the same
reason, the future of your organization may rest on your
hiring decision. Therefore, this is too important a task to leave
Winning companies and organizations: to anyone else. And the other reason is if you aspire to attract
1. Have the ability to grow their own star performers – from smart people, they need to feel like their efforts will be noticed
within the ranks of their own employees. and acknowledged. The only way you can provide this
2. Have great bench strength – so when any executive leaves, a assurance is if the recruitment process is important enough
backup staffer or understudy can take over without the to demand the involvement of senior management.
company missing a beat.
“The existence of a talent rich environment also tends to attract
able people from outside a company. No organization can have
To excel in this practice, you’ll need to be willing to dedicate too much talent, and Winners pursued it outside as well as inside
resources (human and financial) to building an effective and their ranks, even though new hires tend to be more expensive. In
innovative team. Winning companies show a distinct preference so doing, they rejected the false premise that companies must
for developing their own stars from inside their organizations. choose between promoting from within and hiring outside talent.
To build an outstanding pool of talent: Winning companies did both. By the same token, they ignored
the false dichotomy between a high-performance culture and
1. Fill any and all mid- or high-level job openings with internal ‘being good to our people’. Once again, they did both.”
talent whenever feasible. – William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
Talented people within your organization are a known
quantity. Therefore, it makes good sense to devote major “The most important indicator of the depth and quality of talent in
resources to retaining the people you have available. One of your organization is whether you can grow your own stars from
the best ways to demonstrate your intentions in this area is to within – not whether you can buy talented outsiders in a crisis.
fill all management position openings from your internal pool The latter may provide brilliance but not for long, since they
of talent rather than hiring outsiders. Not only will this be typically move on to greener pastures.”
cheaper but it will also provide tangible evidence of your – William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
future intentions. It makes good sense to make room for your
people to move up in the organization. Leadership
Secondary
2. Create and maintain high quality training and educational Management 2 Have directors and leaders who
programs accessible by everyone in the organization. Practices are committed to the business
It is all very well and good for you to say that you promote
from within but that premise is hollow unless you also offer
Winning companies and organizations:
the training employees need to move up the organization. By
offering a host of educational opportunities – and refusing to 1. Put in place a strong CEO – who becomes directly
dictate who can and cannot use these materials – you send a responsible for raising the performance of the organization.
clear signal of commitment to the people who work for your 2. Have a good board of directors – full of people who
organization. By helping them rise through the ranks, you understand the business and are passionate about
create a situation where your people will feel good about achieving success.
giving their best efforts.
3. Develop job openings and a career path that will intrigue and Academic studies have shown the choice of a CEO can increase
challenge top performers. or decrease the total-return-to-shareholders by around
The key to keeping top performers onboard is to give them 15-percent. A good CEO who walks the talk, communicates well
challenging and interesting job assignments. With this in and acts with integrity is crucial. Every other leader in the
mind, many winning companies now create firm work paths organization will take their lead from the CEO.
of assignments with increasing levels of difficulty. If your
organization aspires to retain its best performers, you’ll need To excel in the business leadership management practice:
to do something similar. For example, you may be able to 1. Inspire your organization’s management to build strong
give emerging talent the opportunity to run small operations relationships with people at many different levels.
in various parts of the world. Or you may consider putting If employees interact only with their immediate managers
together a team of people with exceptional talent and turn a while the senior management team are distant figures, then
business unit over to them with complete autonomy and their decisions will be viewed with suspicion. On the other
responsibility for results. The more challenging and engaging hand, if front-line employees are confident the senior
these assignments are, the greater the challenge for your management are aware of their circumstances, those same
talented employees, and the greater the learning experience decisions will be welcomed. The more the rank-and-file see
they will enjoy. Smart companies now schedule aggressive the executives, the better they will feel about doing what
assignments for new management talent to learn skills by they’re asked to do. Smart organizations create
doing rather than simply reading about it or participating in opportunities for regular employees to rub shoulders with
hypothetical planning exercises. executives as frequently as possible.
What Really Works - Page 7

2. Encourage management to become better at spotting


emerging opportunities early. Secondary Innovation
Most CEOs are competent in dealing with the immediate Management 3 Bring to market innovations that
problems which arise. Top performing managements, Practices transform your industry
however, don’t stop there. While addressing the challenges
of today, they also keep a keen eye on the emerging Winning companies and organizations:
opportunities of tomorrow.
1. Are agile – that is, they keep on turning out innovative new
Good management teams anticipate change before their products and services.
hand is forced. They understand what the impact of change
2. Anticipate industry disruptions and hopefully cause them –
will be on their organization. They become proactive in
instead of being forced to always react to external events.
developing the products and services which will take full
advantage of those changes. By doing the same, you can
secure potential competitive advantages for your own Great organizations are constantly on the lookout for the main
organization. chance – a breakthrough with the potential to reshape the entire
3. Have a board of directors who each have a substantial marketplace. To do the same, you need to do three things well:
financial stake in your organization’s success. 1. Be willing to introduce and champion disruptive technologies
The best boards of directors take their jobs seriously. The and business models.
only way you can guarantee this will happen is if the directors If you’re looking for incremental growth, improving old
personally have some money riding on how well the company products will probably achieve it. A better approach,
performs. To really drive this point home, you should however, is to be more aggressive. Demand double-digit
structure the remuneration packages of the board members increases in growth and earnings and challenge your people
so part of it is base pay and part of it is at risk. That way if the to come up with the blockbusters that will be required to
company does well, so too do the directors and vice versa. achieve that. By actively looking for these dramatic
The more the directors have invested personally in the developments, at the very least you will stay at the leading
company’s stock, the better. That will spur them on to choose edge of your industry rather than being forced into imitating
a good CEO, to scrutinize actions which the company takes what others are doing.
and everything else you’d naturally expect of an effective 2. Exploit new and old technologies to enhance your operations
board. wherever and whenever possible.
4. Link the pay of the management team with their performance The natural tendency is to think of new products and services
as closely as feasible. when talking about breakthroughs. While they are highly
At the end of the day, top performing companies always link desirable, winning companies apply equal care and attention
executive remuneration packages with performance against to technical breakthroughs which impact on internal
a set of predetermined goals. You should do the same. Make efficiencies. By applying new technology to your internal
it so that if the company does well, your executive team do systems and processes, you may be able to lift profitability
well. To maintain integrity, that will also require that if the just as impressively as if a new product had been launched.
company doesn’t do well, executives will also share the pain 3. Be willing to cannibalize your existing products before
through the loss of bonuses and other financial incentives. someone else beats you to it.
For example, Campbell Soup has a firm policy of “Miss your Top performing organizations believe in cannibalization and
target, miss your pay”. In the case of their CEO, 75-percent of practice it regularly. They bring out new products which
his or her pay is linked to company results. That creates a compete with their existing products sooner rather than later
strong link between personal interests and corporate so as not to allow a rival to get a head start. For example,
performance – which is highly desirable. Home Depot sometimes opens a second store in close
proximity to an existing store so it can maintain a
“As the Evergreen project showed, there are some common customer-friendly atmosphere. This may appear illogical on
beliefs about leadership that actually had very little to do with a the surface, but it allows the company to maintain its high
company’s becoming and remaining a Winner. For example, a level of customer service.
leader’s decision-making style, whether he or she makes most
decisions independently or in collaboration with the top “Some of the myths about the innovation practice turned up by
management team, did not matter in terms of winning. Nor does the Evergreen study were especially interesting. They showed
any such correlation exist as concerns the personal that there was no correlation between Winners and any single
characteristics of the CEO, whether he is patient or impatient, source of ideas. Neither internal R&D labs nor external labs,
visionary or detail-oriented, secure or insecure. It also made little neither front-line employees nor management, neither
difference to a company’s success whether senior managers customers nor suppliers were necessarily where winning
relied on quantitative or qualitative assessments in making key companies found their key innovations. Any one of the Winners
decisions.” might have relied successfully on one or more of those sources,
– William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson but none proved to be essential to Winners as a group.”
– William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
“Good chief executives are likely to be chosen by good boards.
Our results suggest that of all the characteristics that make for a “The world moves too fast these days to hesitate for long with a
good board, only two really matter: Do the board members truly new product. The competition is too likely to be close on your
understand the business and are they passionately committed to heels. Given the evert shorter shelf life of so many products, a
its success?” head start is essential to get the most from an innovation.”
– William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson – William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
What Really Works - Page 8

“Since it is difficult for any company to find enough internal


Secondary Growth sources of growth to keep up with the need for expansion, growth
Management 4 Make growth happen through by mergers is a secondary practice that many Winners pursue.
Practices ongoing mergers and partnerships The Evergreen mandates for this practice also call upon
companies moving into a new business with a partner to choose
Winning companies and organizations: a field that is suited to the unique combination of talents the two
organizations can muster. Companies are urged to develop
1. Generate growth internally – by growing the core business
expertise in recognizing and closing advantageous deals.”
rather than wandering off into unrelated fields.
– William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
2. Become good at doing mergers and forming partnerships –
with a bias towards consistent small deals rather than one or “One of the findings of the Evergreen study was something of a
two grandstand plays. surprise. Winners and Climbers shared no single motivation in
their determination to buy or join with other organizations. Some
were seeking cross-selling opportunities, others wanted
To become better at growing your organization, there are four economies of scale, while still others were simply chasing
mandates to remember: market share. They agreed as to how to proceed but differed in
1. Acquire only those new businesses which will leverage your their reasons for proceeding.”
existing customer relationships. – William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
The essence of this idea is to grow not by selling more to your
existing customers but by acquiring a bigger customer base “W hen W inners acquire a company, it is not a
from someone else. If you buy the right business, you’ll also spur-of-the-moment, seat-of-the-pants adventure. The ground
have a new product or service which you can sell to your has been carefully studied and prepared, the buyout plan worked
current customers. Top performing companies become very out in detail, and the negotiations conducted with skill and a
good at structuring these types of acquisitions to leverage certain amount of panache. They know what they are doing, and
the customer relationships each company already has. The this shows up in their outstanding results.”
challenges lie first in selecting the right company and then in – William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
managing both businesses efficiently after they are merged. “The 4+2 formula has important applications beyond the borders
2. Only enter into a new business if it will complement your of the corporation. It can be of substantial value, for example, to
company’s existing strengths. individual investors who must judge the future worth of their
Winning organizations only make acquisitions which extend investments on the basis of past and present performance. In
or complete their value propositions – perhaps by becoming analyzing companies, the investor should pay closest attention
a one-stop shop or by allowing the company to expand its to their level of achievement on the primary management
market reach. Diversification as a hedge against the ups and practices. That is where vital clues to a company’s prospects can
downs of the general economic cycle never works out, and be found.”
merging the cultures of two companies with diametrically – William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
opposed target markets never works. Therefore, choose
your new businesses carefully and deliberately. “The 4+2 formula points to the practices that are essential to
success, but it does not tell how to go about excelling. The
3. Only enter into a new venture with a partner if the new
mandates that accompany each practice provide only limited
business will use your partner’s talents.
guidance. What we offer is not so much a recipe as a road map.
Partnerships have many of the advantages of acquisitions
The details of the journey – the route, the personnel, the means
and fewer of the disadvantages. In particular, since both
of payment – will vary with each organization. Our mission has
parties to a partnership remain separate entities, getting out
been to identify the destinations you need to focus on, and, by
of a partnership that doesn’t work is much easier than
extension, those that require less attention. The rest is up to
unraveling an acquisition.
you.”
In just the same way as the top performers are deliberate and – William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
careful about which businesses they acquire, so too they pick
partners with care. You should do the same. Ideally, you want “In the hurly-burly of business competition, no less than in the fog
to be in a position to leverage the advantages you offer and of war, managers yearn for clarity and certainty and solid
those your partner offers with each new partnership. The directions for success. Until now, they had only gut instinct,
best joint ventures help each party reach their goals quicker guesstimates, and celebrity tycoons to suggest which maze
than if they try to do it all themselves. might or might not lead to victory, let alone consistent victory.
Now that they have the results of the Evergreen Project, the long
4. Develop expertise in the way you identify, screen, negotiate
era of trial and error is over. The 4+2 formula is not a myth, not a
and close deals.
theory, not a mere motion of how to get from here to there. It is
For top performing organizations, mergers and acquisitions
the first proven set of approaches that tell managers precisely
are too important to be considered as unimportant sidelines.
where to focus their efforts and where not to. It is a True North
Instead, they put together an efficient team who network to
compass that works in any business weather.”
identify potential partners. This team then follows through
– William Joyce, Nitin Nohria and Bruce Roberson
with the requisite due diligence. If you aspire to do the same,
you should assemble a team with strong financial,
investigative and business skills.

© Copyright 2003 All Rights Reserved Summaries.Com

You might also like