December 1, 2011 (http://somatosphere.

net/2011/12/the-neuroanthropology-of-
embodiment-absorption-and-dissociation.html)

Science,

The Neuroanthropology of Medicine, and

Anthropology

Embodiment, Absorption, and A collaborative website

covering the intersections of

Dissociation medical anthropology,

science and technology

(http://somatosphere.net/2011/12/the-
studies, cultural psychiatry,
psychology and bioethics.

neuroanthropology-of-
embodiment-absorption-and-
dissociation.html)
By Neely Myers (http://somatosphere.net/author/neely-myers)

Got Absorption? Towards a Neuroanthropology of Play and Ritual

Cross-posted with Neuroanthropology

(http://blogs.plos.org/neuroanthropology/2011/12/02/the-neuroanthropology-
of-embodiment-absorption-and-dissociation/).

On Thursday, Nov. 17th at the American Anthropological Association

meetings in Montreal, Canada, I attended a double panel of
neuroanthropologists hosted by the Society for Psychological Anthropology.
Organized by Christopher Dana Lynn
(http://www.as.ua.edu/ant/name/Christopher%20D./Lynn/) (University of
Alabama) and Jeffrey G. Snodgrass
(http://anthropology.colostate.edu/pages/faculty/snodgrass.aspx)
(Colorado State University), the panel was entitled “The Neuroanthropology
of Embodiment, Absorption, and Dissociation: Research in Ritual, Play, and
Entertainment.”

So, I will begin with a warning – this is a pale attempt to summarize the ideas
of 12 people plus various discussion questions and theorists mentioned by
presenters. With that in mind, let’s get an overview of what happened, which
was immensely interesting.

This group of scholars, who call themselves neuroanthropologists,

distinguishes themselves from biocultural anthropologists by grounding
themselves in rich ethnography, and then using this ethnography to launch
dialogues with neuroscience methods in ways that advance both the scientific
and anthropological approaches to the study of human adaptation in context.

Part I. The Papers

“Transcendental Medication”: Tests of a Functionalist Model of the
Dissociation/Absorption Spectrum via Speaking in Tongues and Fireside
Relaxation (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/22656059/Transcendentallynn-
%20Medication-AAA%202011-11.28.11.pdf )

First up was Christopher Lynn

(http://www.as.ua.edu/ant/name/Christopher%20D./Lynn/), University of
Alabama, whose Groucho Marx mustache is unforgettable. Chris reported on
two studies, which I admired for their innovation and simplicity. First, Chris
undertook research on the interaction of salivary cortisol levels (a stress
hormone that seems to elevate in the body in the presence of social stressors)
and glossolalia (speaking in tongues). While measures of salivary cortisol are
limited in the kinds of claims that can be made about them, the study was
certainly innovative and speaks to the understudied intersections of religion,
brain and behavior.

Chris found that Pentecostals with relatively greater lifetime glossolalia

experience compared with Pentecostals with less glossolalia experience had
less stress on a non-religious service day than on the day of Sunday service.
This suggested that there is a possibility that stress may be reduced or
prevented by the days in which people did attend services and allowed
themselves to experience “culturally-mediated dissociation” in the form of
glossolalia.

Chris also discussed a fireside study that compared a simulated electronic fire,
and electronic fire with noise (for a more multi-sensory approach), and a
blank TV screen showing fuzz. Chris found reduced blood pressure with the
fire, which was enhanced by the multisensory fire. Further data involving
EEG patterns and skin conductance are pending data collection. Chris
suggested that his findings may have implications for addiction interventions.

The fascinating suggestion that “trance” or dissociative states may biologically

help people to cope with stress was compelling. Chris drew upon
neurotheologist Andrew Newberg (http://andrewnewberg.com/) and
Luhrmann, Nusbaum and Thisted (2010
(https://stanford.edu/dept/anthropology/cgi-bin/web/?
q=system/files/absorption.pdf )) to make his claims. Luhrmann, for
example, posited that “God” may replace the self in the brain during religious
experience. This is perpetuated, Luhrmann argued – and Chris reminded us
– by a proclivity to absorption (as measured by the Tellegen Absorption
Scale), having a particular cognition on which to focus (insert ritual here, e.g.,
glossalalia) and then lots of practice.

Absorption Theories, Spirit Mediums, and Pentecostal Prophecies: Cases

and Questions from Thailand
(http://dl.dropbox.com/u/22656059/AAA2011-ZehnerPaper-3.pdf )

Next up was Edwin Zehner

(http://www.westmont.edu/_academics/departments/sociology_anthropology/EdwinZehner.html),
who discussed Thai Buddhist practices using visualization. Dissociation, he
argued, is dys-functional while absorption is eu-functional. A useful Venn
diagram (with dissociation in one circle and absorption in the other) showed
how dissociation and absorption might overlap to create prophetic or
visionary experiences in Thai meditation practice. Those who experience
absorption and dissociation, such as prophets and mediums, may become
overwhelmed by this experience and become unstable. He provocatively asks
– how do we know what is absorption and what is dissociation? Often, he
explains, we do not.
But he makes some useful distinctions. Absorption is scale-able and divisible
and can be measured in degrees, whereas dissociation is one overriding level
of experience and cannot be broken down. In addition, absorption is marked
by a certain trainability. In addition, though absorption is marked by a certain
trainability, people who have the strongest levels absorptive ability (such as
prophets and others likely to have high TAS scores) often resist social
manipulation.

“I came here to conquer!”: The Role of the Holy Spirit and Prosperity
Theology in the Well-being of Brazilian Neo-Pentecostals.
(http://dl.dropbox.com/u/22656059/AAA_2011_DengahHJF.pdf )

The next speaker was H. J. Francois Dengah

(http://anthropology.ua.edu/name/Francois/Dengah/) who is doing his
NSF-funded dissertation research in Brazil on a group called Espirito Santo.
In this church, which appeared to be very popular from the photos shared,
baptism by Holy Spirit was a part of well-being. To welcome the Holy Spirit,
ES practitioners used dissociative rituals that foster hypersuggestive states
like hypnosis. Dengah admitted that he just went ahead and dissociated along
with the rest while he was in church – otherwise, there would be nothing to
do!

He argued that these “hypersuggestive states” carry cultural meanings that

then shape the interpretation and appraisal of life events. In this case most life
events were attributed to the presence of the Holy Spirit and the church also
helped people liberate the self from demons so regularly that exorcisms were
described as “quotidian.”

Dengah also argued that Igreja Universal do Reino de Deus (IURD) was
changing the religious marketplace in Brazil as it circulates to over 6 million
households. He plans to make other arguments about spiritual experience
and health measures like perceived stress, depression, and blood pressure,
when he is done collecting his data! He also had a fascinating model of the
ways absorption and embodiment interact to produce dissociation and well-
being, so if this is your line of interest you should beg him to share.

Focusing a Thousand Miles Distant: Enskilling Gong fu through

Taijiquan’s Martial Training Techniques

In the next talk, Adam Frank (http://uca.academia.edu/AdamFrank)

presented his viewpoint of a Tai Chi and martial arts technique that he had
recently presented at an Oxford Symposium. I admit at this point I tried to
find the original talk, which distracted me from the demonstration he was
giving of the practice. But he was using Tim Ingold’s idea of “enskillment” as
an organizing principle, while looking for ways to go beyond it. He said that
approaches like Ingold’s look at natural ecology in which culture may have its
origins, and that this was not a new position but one that Ingold and Mark
Changizi (http://www.changizi.com/) and David Abram
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Abram) are advancing.

Changizi, for example, claims that culture has shaped itself to be like nature in
order to reshape ancient brains so that they are more capable of thriving. In
this kind of model, shamanic madness is a hyper-receptivity to the larger,
more-than-human field. Enskilment is a receptivity to the meaningful
interpretation of the exercise.
Frank is asking not a question of dissociation or absorption but rather a
pedagogical question – how are practices taught. If we take this as a moment,
then how is it felt or understood by the practitioner? Frank argues that bodily
memory aligns with practice when the practitioner is training with his teacher
and he finds a moment of peace. Frank gives an ethnographic example of a
teacher who continually overcomes the charge of a larger, stronger, younger
man on a nice spring day outdoors. When asked how he manages this, the
teacher explains that he can “hear” the student’s movement before he begins
to execute the movement.

Frank found himself feeling skeptical – was what he saw real? He turned to
Marcel Mauss’s “Techniques of the Body
(http://www.scribd.com/doc/29890878/Marcel-Mauss-Techniques-of-the-
Body)” and Tim Ingold’s enskilment and decided that the novice’s
observation of accomplished practitioners is perceptually grounded in his
surroundings – in the whole sphere of bodily experience. Knowledge of these
techniques is passed on generationally by repeatedly exposing novices to
surroundings in which there are selected opportunities for attention and
action. Bodily experience, then, is related to social life and engagement but
moves beyond, Frank argues, the acquisition of technique. There is a body-
environment spatial connection that exists beyond the body, he concludes.

Looking at the Legacy of Trance and Possession by Tracing Our

Understanding of Dissociation
(http://dl.dropbox.com/u/22656059/patricialerch%20aaa%20paper%202011.pdf
)

In the following talk, Patricia Lerch (http://people.uncw.edu/lerch/) opened

with a discussion of the demonic possession described by Felicitas Goodman
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felicitas_Goodman) in The Exorcism of
Analiese Michelle (http://www.amazon.com/Exorcism-Anneliese-Michel-
Felicitas-Goodman/dp/0385157894/ref=sr_1_1?
ie=UTF8&qid=1322754845&sr=8-1). In this case, there were doubts about
demonic possession and the cure of exorcism – perhaps, they asked, she
should see a psychiatrist? Spirit possession, then, may be approached
medically as needing therapy or understood contextually in its social milieu.

Lerch herself works with people of the Umbanda religion of Brazil. She has
used Erika Bourguignon (http://pro.osu.edu/profiles/bourguignon.1/)’s
work on possession trance in which she wanted to get at an individual belief
system. She then offers an overview of trance and possession studies since
2000, which I am probably going to butcher here. But there are correlations,
she argues, between trance and social marginality and rigid social hierarchies.
And there is a local social context from which embodied meanings of gender,
power and resistance may be drawn. Winkelman offers an integration of
cross-cultural studies of shamanism and neurological perspectives and leads
to the conclusion that shamanism constitutes humanity’s first theological and
spiritual system.

There are therapeutic aspects of dissociation for shaman and patient,

suggesting a clinical utility for what otherwise might be known as
Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID). Relational personhood, they might
argue, gives power to people, spirits and animals. Such spiritual
communication may also have the power to influence human behavior in
everyday life. There are myriad ways people endeavor to change self and
world through storytelling, spiritual forms, and the genius of the shaman’s
therapy is that it is an invocation of triggers pejoratively dismissed as placebo
effects in western medicine.
In this case, Rebecca Seligman’s (2010
(http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1548-1352.2010.01146.x/full))
concept of self – making and unmaking as essential to cure of embodied
suffering in mind-body healing becomes helpful. In trance rituals, Lerch
explains, there is a self-regulatory mechanism that has failed in the devotee
that must be recreated to bring one’s body back into control and help a
divided self that needs healing. For a person experiencing trance rituals, then,
for example one who is becoming possessed by an Orisha (a term referring to
a broad class of spiritual entities), the possessing spirit becomes part of the
self-concept and the feeling of being divided is fixed.

Lerch concludes that there is a universal human capacity for absorption and
dissociative “disorders” and that ethnographic data about dissociation is rich
with information on the ways people use this capacity to heal through
meaning-making, mind-brain-body connections, and the intertwining
notions of self, gender, and relationships. This claim provocatively suggests
that dissociation is not a disorder, but rather, an adaptive mind-body-culture
pathway for healing by a re-ordering of the self through ritual.

Tripping through time or controlled frenzy? A discussion of immersion in

Civil War and Viking Reenacting
(http://dl.dropbox.com/u/22656059/AmsterAAA14%2011%2011.pdf )

Matthew Amster
(http://www.gettysburg.edu/academics/anthropology/faculty/employee_detail.dot?
empId=02263606649019065&pageTitle=Matthew+H.+Amster)’s
presentation on “Tripping through Time” focused on the immersion of Civil
War re-enactors and Vikings in battles to the point where they lose their
connection with reality. He presents the similarities of these groups as those
of camaraderie and an appreciation of history. However, the groups also have
differences. Civil War re-enactors reminisce about rare and magical moments
like “civil war-gasms” or “going into the bubble,” which are very intense and
brief moments of being transported into the past. Amster describes these as
positive dissociative experiences.

These dissociative experiences are more common in the early years of re-
enacting until people become more experienced and habituated and the
surreal becomes less frequent. I am not sure how this aligns with Luhrmann
and Nussbaum’s model of proclivity, practice and outcome, though.

Amster notes that re-enactors become caught up in such moments and report
a temporary loss of orientation as they taste the chaos and confusion of what
happened during real battle.

In contrast, Amster found that the Vikings did not desire extreme mental
states. They had real weapons like hatchets and wanted to try and stay in the
moment so they would not hurt people. They wanted to take a step back from
the “frenzy” of acting, and so they frame their involvement in regular training
like a martial art rather than in terms of authenticity as the Civil War re-
enactors did.

Some people do occasionally freak out among the Vikings, Amster noted, but
there are rules about what you can and cannot do. The hard part, for them, is
not hurting each other. But both groups must learn to keep focus – to remain
immersed in and transformed by the enactments while keeping one foot in
the every day. During questions following his paper, it was discussed how
Amster and others might link ethnography to structured measures like
oxytocin and attention (and a host of other measures that I did not document
clearly enough to repeat here).

Part I. Discussion

In the discussion that followed, someone asked if the coupling of

ethnographic findings with biological measures meant that
neuroanthropology might somehow be privileging science? In connecting the
brain to experience, for example, by trying to image cultural phenomena,
how do we not privilege science? I might add – why can we not just trust our
ethnographic data?

It was suggested that rather than experimental design we can use experiments
to get at what we think is going on the brain, but unfortunately the f MRI is
not particularly portable. Nor, I might add and Daniel Lende
(http://anthropology.usf.edu/faculty/dlende/) mentioned, does it capture
more than the “tip of the iceberg” because it documents the combined brain
activity of a composite group of humans and so captures the most prominent
mental activity across people and throws away the rest (Lende suggested
85%) away. For anthropologists who want the variation, then, the rest of the
iceberg is hidden. Lende also talked about using experiments, for example,
Greg Downey (http://www.anth.mq.edu.au/staff/staff_gdowney.html) was
trying to use portable imaging devices to avoid the artifacts of imaging studies
and capture “cognition in the wild.” Other audience members argued that
heart rate and other physiological data might be more useful than scanning.
Another audience member asked if neuroscientists have any interest in
cultural variability. Will they be willing to begin to step back and realize that
cultural variability plays a significant part and throw it into the hopper?
Another good question.

Well, someone said, we have to start somewhere.

Part II. The Papers

Toward a Neuroanthropology of Immersive Online Gaming and

Cyberdependence
(http://dl.dropbox.com/u/22656059/aaa_montreal_jgs_cyberdependence_11_14_2011_FFF_SEND.pdf )

In the exciting second half of the panel, Jeffrey Snodgrass

(http://anthropology.colostate.edu/pages/faculty/snodgrass.aspx) opened
the conversation. A recent article by Kuhn and colleagues in Translational
Psychiatry (“The neural basis of video gaming,
(http://www.nature.com/tp/journal/v1/n11/full/tp201153a.html)” (2011)
e53, doi:10.1038/tp.2011.53) compared the brains of frequent and infrequent
video game players. They found a higher volume of left striatal grey matter in
the brains of frequent players. This is a part of the brain known to be
connected to addiction. There is thus some hope that his work might help
identify core candidates for addictive behaviors.

Snodgrass uses two scales, absorption and immersion. He made up the

immersion scale, which looked pretty useful as an addiction measure to me.
In this case, dissociation occurs when you get too “into” character. In this
case, dissociation leads to an embodiment that perpetuates a loss of higher
self-monitoring. For example, not being able to turn off the game. Here,
Snodgrass delved into myriad details talking about various parts of the brain
and their correlations with gaming so you should really look at his panel paper
or at his recent publications for more details.

Snodgrass moves from his analysis to policy questions – a move that I

appreciated. Is there such a thing, he asks, as internet addiction or is it a
moral panic? Neuroanthropology will be an important tool for answering
these questions. Neuroanthropologists are uniquely equipped to direct part of
their critical gaze more towards objects like stress and relaxation systems, as
they exist in particular cultural contexts, rather than just brain structures.

Digital Games: A Neuroanthropological Approach

(https://webmail.uchicago.edu/wm/mail/fetch.html?
urlid=g27612c29d36d578e956240fdccd2a3333l1kkgagbl&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdl.dropbox.com%2Fu%2F22656059%2FCampbell%

Ben Campbell
(http://www4.uwm.edu/letsci/anthropology/faculty/campbell.cfm) and
Thomas Malaby
(http://www4.uwm.edu/letsci/anthropology/faculty/malaby.cfm) then
offered a joint presentation on massive multi-player online games, which they
seek to understand anthropologically because, they argue, the “game” is a
cultural form. For example, in The Savage Mind
(http://books.google.com/books?
id=CSdGIIZes9UC&printsec=frontcover&dq=the+savage+mind&source=bl&ots=EN-
UMO3OrW&sig=E0cIpdcxqphnwcEMndKloXL9QL8&hl=en&ei=fJ1sS_mEOYaMtAPE9aWxDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=resu
Lévi-Strauss lists games as a serious ritual. Campbell and Malaby will be
situating cultural-historical games in cultural-historical moments.

In this case, online games are complex, implicit conditions. Their research
looks at the ways the dopaminergic system is implicated in gaming. Citing
work by neurophysiologists, they note how dopamine re-establishes the cue
and reward until the brain experiences a dopaminergic firing in expectancy of
the reward – one example of learning and relearning in a contingent world.

There is also a hedonic value of rewards, they argue, which links various
aspects of the attention and brain (that is again beyond my ability to recount
properly) to make an emotionally compelling game. In other words, they
explain, playful attention is coaxed from us by a good game that strikes a
balance between randomness and challenge to keep us engaged. Marshall
Sahlins
(http://books.google.com/books/about/Stone_age_economics.html?
id=_qPSLy9564cC) speaks of this as fragile reciprocity at the edge of the
social during which socially contingent circumstances become situations in
which networks can form or fall apart.

In this case, researchers are discussing the “social brain,” which maps onto the
human brain but appears to arise out of what generated the brain in the first
place (presumably, experience). In the social brain, there are two systems –
one is slow, deliberative and cognitive. The other is fast and emotional (the
anterior cingulated cortex). These two systems combine so that we might
imagine the self or another and their actions. In the social brain, then,
embodied emotional salience is the most important for learning and
cooperation.

The Flow Experience in Jazz Pianists: Absorption, Embodiment,

Transformation- Grant Rich
(http://dl.dropbox.com/u/22656059/AAA_Montreal_2011_Rich_Flow%20Experience%20in%20Jazz%20Pianists_presentatio
[Neely stepped out and missed this fine presentation by Grant]

Automaticity and Imitation in the Enjoyment of Formulaic Fiction

(http://dl.dropbox.com/u/22656059/11%20Stromberg%20AAA%20paper.pdf )

Peter Stromberg (http://caughtinplay.com/about/)then presented his own

work on reading fiction. He claims that we have episodes of experiential
engagement- play and ritual performance. Absorption also has a role in play
and pathology. One may experience a strongly focused attention – as with any
external absorptive activity – that diminishes one’s sense of time and self as
the person “becomes one” with activity.

In this case, the lapse in a sense of agency is “the most salient subjective sub-
component.” Something is happening to replace agency. Automaticity and
imitation leads to a lapse in sense of agency during a wide range of
phenomena, for example, reading literature. It is easiest, Stromberg argues, to
become caught up in the formulaic. But why is beach reading such an
appropriate vehicle for absorption?

He argues that this activity is similar to games and rituals and characterized by
awareness and predictable patterns of action. Conscious control, he explains,
is cognitively expensive, but we can assign any familiar situation to
automation.

Absorption itself is a highly developed physical skill requiring a focused

attention and process of engagement. This is an important first step toward
understanding absence of or lapse of agency when reading formulaic fiction.

Imitation is also a basic component of human functioning (a discussion of

mirror neurons then occurs, and I encourage you to look these up for more
info).

In research on language processes, neurons are grabbing and grasping – the

body understands a term before the mind does. Empathy and recognition of a
person’s actions, Stromberg argues, are the same as a mirror – mental
processes instantiate neural patterns that mirror interlocutor’s goals –
independently of the self.

Remember? Culture unites us and culture divides us. There are states in ritual
and play that can enhance our understanding by looking at component
processes. Automatized behaviors thus work together to produce some of
what we call absorption. The brain, Stromberg suggests, may be primed to
perform great tasks – creativity from extensive practice. For some, he adds,
this process may lead to anxiety instead of to flow.

Lightness of being: dark play at Burning Man

Next, Megan Heller (http://www.anthro.ucla.edu/people/grad-pages?

lid=3386) (UCLA) gave a compelling presentation about “play” at Burning
Man where she conducted her field research. Burning Man is a festival in the
Nevada dessert that is widely unregulated and where people build a
temporary community for seven days each year where, for the most part,
anything goes. Heller describes this as “free play” because it is freely chosen
and directed by participants. This is rare, she finds, in the U.S. and is pursued
for its own intrinsic value. At Burning Man, Heller claims, cultural scripts and
models can be ignored and satirized and players proceed uninterrupted even
when they are posing a danger to themselves or others.
Heller sees “play” as a mood characterized by lightness, freedom, and an
intense focus on the present – elaborate local worlds and psychocultural
practices designed to create and sustain pleasure. When at play, she wonders,
are more brain pathways open?

Certainly children use play as part of their social and emotional development,
suggesting a certain plasticity in the process. At play, we shed habitual
responses and experience a reprieve from fears of injury or death. People,
Heller explains, forget selves, censorship, and concerns as they become
absorbed in their playscape.

Heller describes dark play, specifically, as play that may be dangerous or cruel.
In the dominant capitalist culture, one risks being labeled irrational or insane
when they play. They may earn or lose social capital in the process. Dark
players thus require more help to get caught in play. Play is like a trance
within a playscape.

Part II. Discussant

At this point, Daniel Lende (http://anthropology.usf.edu/faculty/dlende/)

began his discussion with a pitch for the new book, The Encultured Brain, due
soon from MIT Press, which is a product of their 2009 conference
(http://neuroanthropology.net/conference/)of the same title at University of
Notre Dame. Lende encourages future and current neuroanthropologists to
mix things together and look for commonalities across topics.

Neuroanthropology, he reminds us (and many agree) is a new synthetic effort

of a holistic anthropology. Neuroanthropology uses biological anthropology
and the classic ethnographic comparative method of cultural anthropology to
investigate the underlying mechanisms and processes of human adaptation. In
the process, we examine the psychological relation between individual and
environment while also adding the layer of neuroscience. Neuroanthropology
thus offers insight into social processes, the brain and the world, thereby
creating an opportunity for both applied and critical perspectives on
neuroscience as a new metaphor of the self, pharmaceuticals for the changing
the brain, and so on.

Most importantly, Lende explained, neuroanthropology – as opposed to the

older biocultural anthropology -is grounded in ethnography. Without
ethnography, it is hard to imagine how lived experience, cultural variation,
and human variation in the brain interact. This is a new and different
approach to both anthropology (culture as it is taken into and shaped by the
brain) and neuroscience (the encultured brain), it seems.

Part II. Discussion

Question 1. How do you turn this into a research strategy?

Answer 1. We need to break processes down to a neural level – there are

different processes at play. This is where a comparative process helps. Look
across games and dissociation. Processes can work at different levels, which
lends dynamism to this approach. We engage in experience but there is also
an automaticity that takes care of experience. We need to understand
automaticity at the level of cultural rules.

Question 2. What is process of being controlled by story? Of being pulled

along?
Answer 2. Went step by step, which was good. Flow is presented as
naturalized rather than something that is being socialized. How does this
happen in the wild? Not just flow as internal sense but flow in context.
Challenge-skill balance.

Looking at ethnography, the danger is to naturalize – keep coming back to the

idea that these things happen socially. Social things drive neural plasticity.

Question 3. I am intrigued by idea of play as mood. Public space, public

mood, public play – the idea that participants forget themselves. How do we
develop this?

Answer 3: Emphasize arousal and context and neuronal mirroring.

Neuroscience is hard but not fruitful. Studying up – recreate what
neuroscientists do – video game designers, for example. Offer a critical
perspective on how to change it. Culture is structuring stuff. How patterns of
brain activation work. Culture can drive the patterning. What are the
patterns of connections? What does our ethnography reveal?

References Cited (that I recognized)

Luhrmann, T. M., Nusbaum, H. & Thisted, R. The Absorption Hypothesis:

Learning to Hear God in Evangelical Christianity.
(https://stanford.edu/dept/anthropology/cgi-bin/web/?
q=system/files/absorption.pdf )American Anthropologist 112, 66-78,
doi:10.1111/j.1548-1433.2009.01197.x (2010)

Seligman, R. The Unmaking and Making of Self: Embodied Suffering and

Mind Body Healing in Brazilian Candomble.
(http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1548-1352.2010.01146.x/full)
Ethos 38, 297-320 (2010).

Similar Posts

Sex/Gender: Part III: What Counts as Adequate Function?

(http://somatosphere.net/2016/06/sexgender-part-iii-what-counts-as-adequate-
function.html)
Critical neuroscience and anthropological engagement
(http://somatosphere.net/2008/07/critical-neuroscience-and-anthropological-
engagement.html)
A Critical Neuroscience manifesto (http://somatosphere.net/2009/05/critical-
neuroscience-manifesto.html)
Laurence Kirmayer, "Revisioning Psychiatry: Cultural Phenomenology, Critical
Neuroscience, and Global Mental Health" (http://somatosphere.net/2012/11/laurence-
kirmayer-revisioning-psychiatry-cultural-phenomenology-critical-neuroscience-and-
global-mental-health.html)
Videos from "Critical Neuroscience" course (http://somatosphere.net/2013/07/videos-
from-critical-neuroscience-course.html)

[view academic citations]