Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Diagnosing Dermatomycosis in General Practice
Diagnosing Dermatomycosis in General Practice
6
© Oxford University Press 1999 Printed in Great Britain
sity of Liège, Belgium. Correspondence to Dr D Lousbergh, algorithm for the diagnosis of mycosis in these patients,
Academisch Centrum voor Huisartsgeneeskunde, Kapucijn- including both diagnostic accuracy and cost in the
envoer 33, Blok J, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. calculations.
611
612 Family Practice—an international journal
TABLE 1 Diagnostic value of clinical examination, KOH-test and CSSS using culture as the gold standard (n = 148)
Test Culture
+ –
test+ test– test+ test– sens spec PPV NPV LR+ LR–
(95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI)
KOH = potassium hydrochloride test; CSSS = cyanocrylate surface skin scraping; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval; PPV = positive predictive
value; NPV = negative predictive value; LR = likelihood ratio.
Diagnosing dermatomycosis in general practice 613
The sensitivity of individual signs and symptoms in all patients, irrespective of the clinical picture, proved
ranged between 4% (yellow colour) and 77% (minimal to be the most effective policy (accuracy = 83%). In
scaling), and the specificity between 20% (minimal patients with a positive clinical diagnosis, the accuracy of
scaling) and 96% (brown colour) (Table 2). the CSSS was considerably higher compared with the
After calculating the accuracy of each possible next best (KOH-test with or without CSSS). In patients
combination of test results (Table 3), determining CSSS with a negative clinical diagnosis, however, the difference
TABLE 2 Diagnostic value of clinical signs, using culture as the gold standard (n = 148, of which 26 dermatomycosis)
No. of positive test results Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV LR+ LR–
TABLE 3 Results of each branch of the decision tree when diagnosing dermatomycosis starting from the clinical examination result in patients with
an erythematosquamous skin lesion (n = 148)
between all possible policies was minimal. In these followed by the consequent local treatment, are
patients not implementing any additional test resulted in estimated at £3.60, £21.00 and £14.00, respectively.
only one additional false result. For the whole group, the
combination of accepting a negative clinical judgement,
and performing a CSSS in patients with a clinical picture Discussion
of dermatomycosis only, resulted in an accuracy that was
almost identical to performing a CSSS on all patients The prevalence of dermatomycosis in general practice is
(82%). high1,2 and commonly misdiagnosed by GPs.3,4 Elements
The likelihood ratio of CSSS on all patients was 5.17 of the clinical picture are not very reliable. Although
(95% CI = 2.85–8.75) for a positive test result and 0.43 its sensitivity (81%) is highly acceptable, more than
(95% CI = 0.27–0.74) for a negative test result. When three out of four clinical diagnoses could not be con-
applying CSSS to patients with a positive clinical picture, firmed by culture. According to our results, 71% of the
with no additional test in patients with a negative clinical oral treatment and 76% of the topical treatment were
picture, these values were 4.69 (95% CI = 2.47–8.91) and inappropiate.
0.56 (95% CI = 0.38–0.83), respectively. Such policy The KOH test results in significant additional
would result in an overall sensitivity of 50%, a specificity diagnostic value if the GP suspects a positive diagnosis
of 89%, a positive predictive value of 50% and a negative based on the clinical picture. The optimal diagnostic
predictive value of 89%. value was reached with a CSSS test performed on all
The total financial cost per patient for the actual patients (LR+ = 5.17, LR– = 0.43). However, compared
treatment, for the prescription of a CSSS test in all with a clinical diagnosis only, the only benefit of this
patients and for the prescription of a CSSS test in test is for patients with a clinical picture suggesting
patients with a clinical diagnosis of mycosis only, dermatomycosis.
Diagnosing dermatomycosis in general practice 615
10
Considering the low extra diagnostic benefit, the ad- Van de Poel GT, Lamberts H. Schimmelinfecties in de huisarts-
ditional costs and the logistic disadvantages if all patients praktijk. Huisarts Wet 1981; 24(S5): 32–36.
11 Feld R, Jacobs A, Middag-Broekman J. Dermatomycosen van kop
were tested with CSSS, our results support a policy to tot teen. Beerse Janssen Pharmaceutica B.V., 1991.
treat patients with a negative clinical diagnosis as a 12 Brodell RT, Helms SE, Snelson ME. Office dermatologic testing:
patient without dermatophytosis. On the other hand, the KOH preparation. Am Fam Physician 1991; 43: 2061–2065.
13 Nielsen PG. A comparison between direct microscopy and
patients with a positive clinical picture have to be tested
culture in dermatological mycotic material. Mykosen 1981; 24:
using CSSS. This algorithm results in a LR+ of 4.96 and a 555–560.
LR– of 0.56. 14 Strauss JS, Kligman AM. An experimental study of tinea pedis and
onychomycosis of the foot. Arch Dermatol 1957; 76: 70–79.
15 van Dijk E. Mycologisch onderzoek van huidziekten: de kweek.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1984; 128: 513–515.
Acknowledgements 16 Gip LJ, Nilsson J. Skin sampling for dermatophytes with adhesive
tape. Castellania 1976; 4: 25–26.
We thank the 34 GPs for participating in this study, 17 Nielsen PG. Two different methods for direct microscopy of mycotic
Mr Pierre Stefan of the Laboratory of dermatopathology material. Mykosen 1981; 25: 270–273.
18 Goldschmidt H, Kligman AM. Exfoliative Cytology of Human
of the University of Liège for his technical support, Horny Layer; methods of cell removal and microscopic
Dr Janssens Monique and Mr Gillé Dirk of the Janssen techniques. Arch Dermatol 1967; 96: 572–576.
19
Research Foundation for their technical and scientific Marks R, Dawber RPR. Skin surface biopsy: an improved technique
support, Dr Van Cutsem J of Janssen Pharmaceutica for for the examination of the horny layer. Br J Dermatol 1971, 84:
117–123.
his scientific advice, and Mr Blanckaert of ICI Belgium 20 Agache P, Mairey J, Boyer JP. Le stripping du stratum corneum au
and Mr De Filette of Loctite Belgium for their material cyanoacrylate; intérêt en physiologie et en pathologie cutanées.
support. J Médecine Lyon 1972; 53: 1017–1022.
21 Pierard-Franchimont C, Pierard GE. Skin surface stripping in diag-
nosing and monitoring inflammatory, xerotic and neoplastic
diseases. Pediatr Dermatol 1985; 2: 180–184.
References 22 Rurangirwa A, Pierard-Franchimont C, Pierard GE. Growth of
Candida albicans on the stratum corneum of diabetic and non-
1 Registratienet van huisartspraktijken. Gezondheidsproblemen diabetic patients. Mycoses 1989; 33: 253–255.
en diagnosen in huisartspraktijken 1993; 5: 1 (maart 1993). 23 Rurangirwa A, Pierard-Franchimont C, Pierard GE. Culture of
Maastricht: Rijksuniversiteit Limburg, 1993. fungi on cyanoacrylate skin surface strippings—a quantitative
2 Van den Hoogen HJM, Huygen FJA, Schellekens JWG et al. bioassay for evaluating antifungal drugs. Clin Exp Dermatol
Morbidity figures from general practice. Data from four general 1989; 14: 425–428.
pactices 1977–1982. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University Depart- 24 Pierard GE, Pierard-Franchimont C, Dowlati A. La biopsie de
ment of General Practice, 1985. surface en dermatologie clinique et expérimentale. Rev Eur
3 Pariser DM. Superficial fungal infections. A practical guide for Dermatol MST 1992; 4: 455–466.
primary care physicians. Postgrad Med 1990; 87: 205–214. 25 Nikkels AF, Pierard-Franchimont C, Pierard GE. Oppervlakte-
4 De Doncker P. Randomized, double-blind trial of the efficacy and biopsie. Ned Tijdschrift voor Dermatologie & Venereologie
tolerability of itraconazole 220 mg compared with terbinafine 1993; 3: 362–364.
250 mg in the treatment of superficial dermatomycoses of the 26 Lachapelle JM, Gouverneur JC, Boulet M, Tennstedt D. A modified
glabrous skin. Janssen Research Foundation Belgium, Clinical technique (using polyester tape) of skin surface biopsy.
Research Report ITR-INT-47, 1995 Oct. (N 112826). Br J Dermatol 1977; 97: 49–52.
5 de Kock CA, Sampers GH, Knottnerus JA. Diagnosis and manage- 27 Whiting DA, Bisset EA. The investigation of superficial fungal
ment of cases of suspected dermatomycosis in the Netherlands: infections by skin surface biopsy. Br J Dermatol 1974; 91: 57.
influence of general practice based potassium hydroxide 28 Knudsen EA. Growth on Sabouraud’s agar of dermatophytes
testing. Br J Gen Pract 1995; 45(396): 349–351. obtained by conventional scraping and by stripping with vinyl
6 Masri-Fridling GD. Dermatophytosis of the feet. Dermatol Clin tape. Br J Dermatol 1974; 90: 163.
1996; 14: 33–40. 29 Bergus GR, Johnson JS. Superficial Tinea infections. Am Fam
7 Miller MA. Sensitivity and specificity of potassium hydroxide Physician 1993; 48: 259–268.
smears in skin scrapings for the diagnosis of tinea pedis (letter). 30 Knight TE, Shikuma CY, Knight J. Ketoconazole-induced hepatitis
Arch Dermatol 1993; 129: 510–511. necessitating liver transplantation. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991;
8 Salomon RJ. The sensivity and specificity of the potassium hydroxyde 25: 398–400.
smear (letter; comment). Arch Dermatol 1993; 129: 1342–1343. 31 Janssen PA, Symoens JE. Hepatic reactions during ketoconazole
9 Teunissen AKK, Van der Voort PHJ, Nieboer C, De Haan P, van treatment. Am J Med 1983; 74: 80–85.
Dijk E. Diagnostiek van dermatomycosen door middel van de 32 Lewis JH, Zimmerman HJ, Benson GD, Ishak KG. Hepatic injury
sellotape-KOH-methode. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1989; 133: associated with ketoconazole therapy. Analysis of 33 cases.
615–617. Gastroenterology 1984; 86: 503–513.