The document discusses the uniform and staggered magnetic susceptibilities of correlated metallic systems like the Hubbard model. It states that at half-filling, the uniform susceptibility approaches a constant value as temperature decreases, while the staggered susceptibility can diverge, indicating antiferromagnetism. It also discusses how dynamical mean-field theory can be used to map out the phase diagram as a function of filling and interaction strength in the Hubbard model, with antiferromagnetism expected at intermediate coupling and possibly ferromagnetism at strong coupling and low fillings.
The document discusses the uniform and staggered magnetic susceptibilities of correlated metallic systems like the Hubbard model. It states that at half-filling, the uniform susceptibility approaches a constant value as temperature decreases, while the staggered susceptibility can diverge, indicating antiferromagnetism. It also discusses how dynamical mean-field theory can be used to map out the phase diagram as a function of filling and interaction strength in the Hubbard model, with antiferromagnetism expected at intermediate coupling and possibly ferromagnetism at strong coupling and low fillings.
The document discusses the uniform and staggered magnetic susceptibilities of correlated metallic systems like the Hubbard model. It states that at half-filling, the uniform susceptibility approaches a constant value as temperature decreases, while the staggered susceptibility can diverge, indicating antiferromagnetism. It also discusses how dynamical mean-field theory can be used to map out the phase diagram as a function of filling and interaction strength in the Hubbard model, with antiferromagnetism expected at intermediate coupling and possibly ferromagnetism at strong coupling and low fillings.
over by XH(U = oo,d,q) (the susceptibility of the U = 00 Hubbard
model). Strictly at n = 1 the U = 00 model is a set of decoupled spins, and its susceptibility is the q-independent x(U = oo) = C/T with the appropriate Curie constant. It follows that the susceptibility of the paramagnetic phase of the t-J model satisfies
(10.79)
At low temperatures, the uniform susceptibility approaches x N l/J
as n + 1. Thinking of reasonable t / J ratios, the enhancement with - respect to the Pauli value x l / t is large, but certainly not diverging. On the other hand, the q=Q suscepibility can diverge at sufficiently low T and we expect antiferromagnetism in a finite interval of n centered onn=l. The same idea can be exploited to map out the large-U part of the n-U phase diagram of the Hubbard model [308]. (10.78) says that the uniform susceptibility
(10.80)
is suppressed as we lower U . At the same time, the staggered suscepti-
bility
is enhanced. In the intermediate-coupling regime, the surviving order is
antiferromagnetism (or SDW). Whether we have ferromagnetism in the strong coupling limit, depends on finding x(V = 00, q = 0, n) + 00 in a range of n. Our variational study (Sec. 10.6.4) indicated that there is such a range but it would be comforting to have independent evidence from DMFT. QMC cannot be applied at U = 00, but the question can be investigated with the so-called non-crossing approximation (NCA wm developed originally for the Anderson impurity problem). The result is that the U = 00 model is ferromagnetic for ncr < n < 1, where ncr is estimated to lie between 0.6 and 0.7, The Curie temperature is