Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GMP News
17/11/2010
ISO Technical Committee 209 has been working on the revision of the basic airborne cleanliness
classification standard for the last 4 years. The ISO community voted in favour of revision to update and
improve the standard specifically to address the following:
Simplify the classification process, and if possible remove the need to evaluate the 95% UCL for
2-9 sample locations
Review the classification procedure and make it more applicable to rooms in operation. In this
situation, the contamination isn't expected to be evenly distributed, an assumption the current
statistical approach makes
Generally update the standard as required to current thinking and industry requirements
Avoid any radical change to the principles of the current ISO cleanliness classes 1-9
So, this was the challenge, and now we have the first public airing of the proposals. The DIS (draft
International Standard) should be published for public comment and national vote in December 2010.
The revised standard has some important new and revised requirements. These are summarised below:
The classification would be based on a table (see fig.1.), with the well known formula used for the
intermediate decimal classes (see fig.2.). In the current standard, the table is provided in an
informative annex (see fig.3.). By using a look-up table as the basis for classification, it is easier
to constrain the reader to appropriate particle sizes for specific classes
Fig.2 The formula proposed for intermediate decimal classes in ISO DIS 14644-1:2010
http://www.gmp-compliance.org/pa4.cgi?src=eca_new_news_print_data.htm&nr=2257 05/01/2011
Page 2 of 3
The selection of number of sample locations has been based on a more rational basis intended to
confirm with 95% confidence that 90% of the cleanroom will meet the intended classification (see fig.4.) .
Also shown is the difference between the number of old and new sample locations
Fig.4 The table proposed for determining the number of sample locations in ISO DIS 14644-1:2010
http://www.gmp-compliance.org/pa4.cgi?src=eca_new_news_print_data.htm&nr=2257 05/01/2011
Page 3 of 3
and B "at rest" will have to use the macro-particle descriptor retained in the standard
Author:
Gordon Farquharson
Convenor ISO TC209 WG1
Critical Systems Ltd.,
Guildford, Surrey, UK, GU1 2SY
http://www.gmp-compliance.org/pa4.cgi?src=eca_new_news_print_data.htm&nr=2257 05/01/2011