Professional Documents
Culture Documents
y Q&A
Application platform
support Application response
time
Local site Remote site
Oracle Exchange SQL Application- Oracle Exchange SQL
consistent
recovery
Corruption
protection
SAN SAN
Disaster-recovery
testing
Communications
cost
Existing
infrastructure
Heterogeneous
storage
Significant
points in time
Continuous
Any point
in time
Replication
Snapshot
Daily backup
24 hours
Yesterday Midnight Now
© Copyright 2008 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. 5
Agenda
y Q&A
“How important are the following motivations for adopting server virtualization?”
Very important Important Slightly/somewhat important Not important Doesn’t know or does not apply to me
Improve server
41% 46% 8% 4% 1%
manageability and flexibility
Create a shared IT
27% 40% 22% 10% 1%
infrastructure
Improve disaster recovery
49% 34% 12% 4% 2%
and business continuity
Base: 197 server decision-makers at North American and European enterprises that are interested in, are
implementing in the next 12 months, or have already implemented server virtualization for x86 servers
(percentages may not total 100 because of rounding)
Source: Enterprise and SMB Hardware Survey, North America and Europe, Q3 2007; Forrester Research, Inc.
SRDF
RecoverPoint CRR
MirrorView
SAN Copy SRDF/Star
Open Replicator RecoverPoint CLR
Celerra Replicator VMware
Centera replication Centera STAR
TimeFinder RepliStor
RecoverPoint CDP OnCourse
SnapView Multi-site
SnapSure Increasing
Remote distance improves
NetWorker Processing protection
RepliStor Remote
Automatic
PowerPath Recovery Information processing
AutoStart All critical data resumption: “lights
Quick, accurate, safe at remote out”
Backup predictable location
Frequent, recovery
Platform consistent,
Storage, switch, nondisruptive
and server backups
protection
Local Remote
© Copyright 2008 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. 8
Enabling Technology—
VMware Site Recovery Manager
2
Synch/Async replication 1
y Q&A
Site A Site B
Target Target
Source Source
Primary requirement: Provide for minimal data loss (RPO = less than two
minutes) at any geographical distance in event of a local or regional disaster
Objective achieved: Yes, with Site B available for disaster restart
Site A Site B
y Q&A
RecoverPoint RecoverPoint
SAN SAN
WAN
CDP CRR
Journal Journal 3rd
3rd Party
Party
Local Continuous Data Protection (CDP) Continuous Remote Replication (CRR) for DR
Transactional, any-point-in-time recovery Concurrent Local and Remote (CLR) replication
Out-of-band, network-based architecture Bidirectional replication across IP networks
Bookmarks for application consistency WAN bandwidth reduction and compression
y Host splitter
– Lightweight splitter runs on host O/S
– Windows, Solaris, AIX
– EMC DMX/CX storage
Application Database File and
– VMware RDM replication servers servers Print servers
y CLARiiON splitter
– Runs on CLARiiON storage processor
– Wide O/S Coverage
– CLARiiON CX3 and CX4 arrays only
– VMware VMFS replication
– Supports iSCSI
© Copyright 2008 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. 21
RecoverPoint Consistency Groups
Cluster Nodes
with Cluster Nodes
RecoverPoint/CE with
installed File Share Witness RecoverPoint/CE
with RecoverPoint/CE installed
installed
IP or
Stretched Fibre
Fibre Channel
Channel
Journals Journal
RecoverPoint RecoverPoint
SAN SAN
WAN App
Server
Remote
EMC Journal EMC
Local SAN
SAN Journals Storage
Storage
RecoverPoint RecoverPoint
SAN SAN
WAN
LUN LUN
y Q&A
Use Case
y Overview
Customer:
– Microsoft Exchange 2007, Windows Server 2003
State Government
– 4 TB of replicated capacity, CLARiiON CX3 Arrays
Department of Health
– Replicating 200 miles across 10MB WAN link
y Pain points
– 15-minute recovery point objective, quarterly disaster- recovery tests
– Must maintain cross-host consistency
– Previously used host-based replication, performance issues
y Implementation
– Continuous replication, 1-minute lag, hourly application consistency
– Placed storage groups and logs into single consistency group
– Used Microsoft VSS to bookmark images ensuring Exchange consistency
– Leveraged logged image access to test recovery
Production Recovery
(Jacksonville) Capture Application Bookmarks Test Recovery (Tampa)
o Periodically put Exchange into p Select image, Exchange Recovery
Exchange Cluster VSS backup mode mount replicated Servers
volume to recovery
server in R/W mode
RecoverPoint RecoverPoint
WAN
Remote Copy
Used for disaster recovery
Production Copy
n Consistency group:
storage groups and logs Remote History
Tracks significant changes:
PIT Image 121
VSS BOOKMARK 2
PIT Image 120
Local Copy :
Used for application recovery PIT Image 61
VSS BOOKMARK 1
Local History Journal PIT Image 60
:
Tracks all changes History Journal
PIT Image 1
y Q&A
Thank you