4 views

Uploaded by Shivalik Naik

Lab Report 3

- 8580789 Aero eBook Design of Low Speed Aircraft
- Finalreport Newton Jason
- Aerodynamic Modeling of a Membrane Wing
- Fluent12 Workshop 02 Airfoil
- Sheet 1
- R/C Soaring Digest - Nov 2002
- Gurney Flap
- 10004_001
- Jou Kowski
- BERNOULIE
- 2 Aerodynamics
- Control Surfaces and in Flapping Foil Propulsion.
- THEORY OF FLIGHT-1
- Lectures on Wind Tunnel
- 2D numerical modelling of the unsteady flow in the achard turbines mounted in hydropower farms
- Aerodynamic Theory
- Design and Analysis of Marine Propeller with Leading-Edge Protuberances
- 19930092272_1993092272
- Simulation Lab 1_aircraft Modelling (1)
- 11-Exercícios-MAN-PNA-RES_PROP_CTR-GABARITO

You are on page 1of 10

L Shivalik Naik , Uttam Jodawat , Akash Kanaujiya

Department of Aerospace, Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology

The experiment was a study on the lift and drag coefficients from the pressure distribu-

tion over an airfoil of NACA series 662-015 in a wind tunnel run. The same was compared

with the XFLR5 results. Though these were comparable, they were not exactly same as

the experimental datas were taken only for finite number of points on the arfoil.

Nomenclature

P Pressure, N/m2

τ̄¯ Shear tensor, N/m2

N Normal force, N

A Axial force, N

CL Coefficient of lift

CD Coefficient of drag

q Dynamic pressure, N/m2

◦

θ Angle between chord and resultant force,

α Angle of attack, ◦

Subscript

∞ Freestream

i Index

u Upper surface of aerofoil

l Lower surface of aerofoil

I. Introduction

In this experiment, an open suction wind tunnel operating at lower pressures is used to measure the

static pressure at various points on an aerofoil. Since the Mach no. of the flow is low, it can be assumed

to be incompressible. Stall angle, the angle at which flow separation (fluid flow detaches from the object

and eddies and vortices are formed) occurs was measured at various Reynolds number. Turbulent flow has

lesser tendency to separate because of higher energy to molecules nearer to the surface. However, the flow

over the airfoil is laminar under the conditions of operation of the wind tunnel. Flow separation reduces lift

and increases drag and so is a important phenomenon to be dealt with. Assuming inviscid flow, the pressure

distribution is used to measure the lift and drag acting on the air foil. CL and CD are calculated for various

Reynolds number and compared.

II. Theory

Consider a small portion of the aerofoil that can be considered as a straight line with unit length and

area dS and over which the surface forces can be assumed constant. Thus, the force on this small area is

¯ = −P dS

dF ¯ + τ̄¯.dS

¯

Neglecting viscous effects, and resolving the force into axial and normal components for the entire aerofoil

(Fig. 1),

1 of 9

Figure 1. Figure showing the pressure and shear forces acting on the upper and lower surface of the airfoil.

Z TE

N= (−Pu dSu cosθ + Pl dSl cosθ)

LE

Z TE

A= (−Pu dSu sinθ + Pl dSl sinθ)

LE

Since, the integral requires pressure at each and every point on the aerofoil, it is not possible to calculate

directly. It can however be approximated by polygonizing the aerofoil and assuming the force to be constant

on each of the sides of the polygon. Thus,

p

dSi = (yi − yi+1 )2 + (xi − xi+1 )2

X

N= Pl(avg) cosθdSi − Pu(avg) cosθdSi

i

X

A= Pl(avg) sinθdSi − Pu(avg) sinθdSi

i

L = N cosα − Asinα

D = N sinα + Acosα

where α is the angle of attack of the aerofoil. The coefficient of lift, CL and coefficient of drag CD are given

by,

L

CL =

q∞ Splan

D

CD =

q∞ Splan

2 of 9

III. Experimental Setup

The experiment was performed on a suction type wind tunnel. The aerofoil to be tested is kept in the

test section with static pressure probes attached to various points on the aerofoil. A variable inclination

multi-tube manometer with ethanol as the manometric fluid, is used to measure the pressures.

IV. Procedure

1. The ambient temperature and pressure were noted down.

2. The multi-tube manometer was checked, the angle of inclination was noted and the probes connected

to various sections of importance were noted.

3. The motor was switched on. It was ensured that the blades of the fan was rotating in the same direction

as marked.

4. The RPM was slowly increased to 760 RPM by rotation the knob on the potentiometer.

5. The angle of attack was of the aerofoil was kept at -6◦ .

6. The manometer measurements were noted down and measurements were taken for increments of angle

of attack (in 3◦ steps) till stall is reached. The onset of stall is indicated by a sudden change in the

manometer readings.

7. This was repeated for different RPMs.

8. The RPM of the motor was brought down slowly and the motor was switched off.

It can be observed that a linear relationship exists between Lift and Angle of Attack(AoA) over some

range of AoA, uptil the Critical Angle of Attack(αc ), where the maximum lift or lift coefficient is obtained.

As AoA increases, near to the Critical AoA(αc ), the simple linear relationship between lift and AoA breaks

down. Also, beyond the c, any increase in AoA is accompanied by a decrease in lift along with a simultaneous

decrease in lift coefficient. This observation can be attributed to the drastic increase in adverse pressure

gradient which causes ow separation.

It was also observed that for zero AoA, a non-zero residue of lift existed, which is characteristic of an

asymmetric airfoil (in this case NACA 662 015). Thus by varying the AoA of the airfoil, the stall angle

was determined to be equal to 11.7 deg. The experimental results are compared with the results obtained

from ow simulation software XFLR5. The drag vs graph shows that the drag is increasing with the angle

of attack for a particular velocity. Similarly the coefficient of drag vs α follows the same trend.

3 of 9

Figure 2. Lift vs Angle of attack

CL

Figure 3. CD

vs Angle of attack

4 of 9

Figure 4. CL vs Angle of attack

5 of 9

Figure 6. CD vs Angle of attack

6 of 9

VI. Conclusion

Slight deviation of results from the theoretical values obtained using xr was observed. This is due to

the method of calculation that was considered to nd the values of lift and drag where average pressure has

been considered over a nite surface area to calculate magnitude of force acting over it. These deviations are

also due to the manufacturing defects where perfectly symmetric airfoil cannot be obtained. The airfoil was

already placed at a positive angle of attack due to which negative lift was not obtained.

In this experiment, lift was calculated by integrating the pressure on the walls of the airfoil (not very

far above or below the airfoil over a long enough length). This method is very convenient to measure and

calculate lift as well as drag. The lift and the coefficient of lift varied linearly with the angle of attack. The

CL vs α characteristics were same for dierent V.

VII. Appendix

A. Sample Calculations

Calculation of Atmospheric pressure:

Pbarometer × 101325

Pa = Pa

760

750 × 101325

Pa = = 99991.7763Pa

760

h2 = 9.8

h3 = 9.5

P2 = 99991.77632 − (789) × 9.81 × (10.1 − 6.7) × 10−2 × 0.5 = 99685.33066Pa

So, P3 = 99701.74739Pa

The average between two points is defined by:

Pi + Pi+1

Pavgi = (1)

2

So, Pavg2 = 99693.53902 Pa

The X and Y locations of the probe points 5 and 6 are:

X2 = 0.01980198

X3 = 0.03960396

Y2 = 0.002

Y3 = 0.004

=⇒ dx = 0.01980198

dy = 0.002

7 of 9

Calculating the forces:

N = Pavgi × dx

N = 99693.53902 × 0.01980198 = 1974.129466 N

A = Pavgi × dy

A = 99693.53902 × 0.002 = 199.387078N

Substituting the above values in equation 2 and 3:

L = 1955.412046N

D = 1974.129466 × sin4◦ + 199.387078 × cos4◦

D = 336.6096096914N

Computing ρ :

From the state equation

Pa = ρ × R × T (4)

Pa

=⇒ ρ =

R×T

99991.77632

ρ= = 1.1498kg/m3

287 × 304

Uncertainty Analysis

RP M = 600

α = 4◦

Taking partial derivate of equation 2 and equation 3 with respect to the variables:

1. α

2. N

3. A

∂L

= cosα (5)

∂N

∂L

= −N sinα − Acosα (6)

∂α

∂L

= −sinα (7)

∂A

8 of 9

r

∂L ∂L ∂L

UL = ( ∂N )2 + ( ∂α)2 + ( ∂A)2 = (8)

∂N ∂α ∂A

∂D

= sinα (9)

∂N

∂D

= N cosα − Asinα (10)

∂α

∂D

= −sinα (11)

∂A

r

∂D ∂D ∂D

UD = ( ∂N )2 + ( ∂α)2 + ( ∂A)2 = (12)

∂N ∂α ∂A

∂CL 2

= (13)

∂L ρV 2 S

∂CL −1

= (14)

∂ρ ρCD

∂CL −2

= (15)

∂v Cl V

r

∂CL ∂CL ∂CL

UCL = ( ∂N )2 + ( ∂α)2 + ( ∂A)2 = 0.013636562 (16)

∂N ∂α ∂A

∂CD 2

= (17)

∂L ρV 2 S

∂CD −1

= (18)

∂ρ ρCD

∂CD −2

= (19)

∂v CD V

r

∂CD ∂CD ∂CD

UCD = ( ∂N )2 + ( ∂α)2 + ( ∂A)2 = 0.001790313 (20)

∂N ∂α ∂A

B. B. Calculation Table

The entire calculation table was done excel sheet. Excel sheet was not compatible for entire readings, hence

a separate file is attached with this report.

9 of 9

VIII. Acknowledgements

We would like to thank our supervisor, Prof. Manoj T. Nair and Prof. Pradeep Kumar P., for the

patient guidance, encouragement. We would like to thank lab Assistants Mr. Nasaruddeen sir and especially

Navneet from M.tech for guiding us in carrying out and verifying experiments results.

References

1 Abbott, I. H., and von Doenhoff, A. E., Theory of wing sections, including a summary of Airfoil data, McGraw-Hill, 1949.

2 Anderson, J. D., Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, 5th edition, Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 2010.

3 The flight demonstration wind tunnel, Users Manual.

4 http://www.xflr5.com/xflr5.htm

5 http://web.mit.edu/drela/Public/web/xfoil/

10 of 9

- 8580789 Aero eBook Design of Low Speed AircraftUploaded bybadulescu florentina
- Finalreport Newton JasonUploaded byJason Newton
- Aerodynamic Modeling of a Membrane WingUploaded bymatthew_6
- Fluent12 Workshop 02 AirfoilUploaded bySheikh Nasir Wahid
- Sheet 1Uploaded byAlejandro Pedraza Aguirre
- R/C Soaring Digest - Nov 2002Uploaded byAviation/Space History Library
- Gurney FlapUploaded byBruno Alves
- 10004_001Uploaded byAbdulrazzak Aman
- Jou KowskiUploaded byRamesh Santana
- BERNOULIEUploaded byNikhil Chordiya
- 2 AerodynamicsUploaded bySuraj Pillai
- Control Surfaces and in Flapping Foil Propulsion.Uploaded byncharala
- THEORY OF FLIGHT-1Uploaded byদেবাশীষ দেব
- Lectures on Wind TunnelUploaded bynd1977
- 2D numerical modelling of the unsteady flow in the achard turbines mounted in hydropower farmsUploaded byPrabal Negi
- Aerodynamic TheoryUploaded byajayj001
- Design and Analysis of Marine Propeller with Leading-Edge ProtuberancesUploaded byIJRASETPublications
- 19930092272_1993092272Uploaded bybambsoe
- Simulation Lab 1_aircraft Modelling (1)Uploaded byAbhay Srinivas
- 11-Exercícios-MAN-PNA-RES_PROP_CTR-GABARITOUploaded byandersondido
- AE6412-Uploaded byamns99
- 11889_2018_00_PRO_05_NONCLEANPOLAR.pdfUploaded byAndreu Gimenez
- IJETT-V32P221Uploaded byAstro Badhusha
- Lecture+7Uploaded byKaySwiss11
- Abstract MousamUploaded byAnshul Khandelwal
- DiscussionUploaded byHou Hon
- The Mathematical Secret of FlightUploaded bysorinproiecte
- Aerofoil DataUploaded byNandha kumar
- PIPELINE ON.docxUploaded bySaid Ahmed Salem
- Aerodynamic Analysis and Optimisation of a Servo-Controlled AileronUploaded byChrisDanger2

- Flow RegimesUploaded byAppeal Matthew
- Compressible flowUploaded byChetanPrajapati
- 46 CFR 56Uploaded bypkitchen25
- 4 AdaptorsUploaded byjovicasur
- Unfired HRSGs for Solar TurbinesUploaded byhermit44535
- Catalog Fukui SL SeriesUploaded byFilipe Simoes Oliveira
- IAT0953 Doc3Uploaded byAnonymous 5YMOxVQ
- Knowledge Sharing Session, Rev 1Uploaded bySticker Bomber
- Line List-2203 PrasadUploaded byavaisharma
- Danfoss price list for 2012Uploaded byArbee Aquino
- SECTION 2.2 CH I REGEN CYCLE.docxUploaded byAjay Kumar Debnath
- Chapter 3_Hydraulics and Hole Cleaning 2015Uploaded byShalihan Mustafa
- Type_HPUploaded byAmiroucheBenlakehal
- Pipe FormulasUploaded bypandiangv
- Chapter_4.docxUploaded byWin Min Oo
- Petro ValveUploaded bymohamedfiroz
- The Applications and PerformanceUploaded byRia de Haan
- Water Pipes and PumpsUploaded byAyman Esa
- Valves in LNG ServiceUploaded byPasquale Cutri
- Cyclone SeparatorUploaded bySuresh Subramaniyam
- Gland Seal System / monirujjaman, BUETUploaded byBUET ENGINEER
- CFD Approach for Design Optimization and Validation ForUploaded bySubrahmanyam Dharmana
- WeldFit Energy BrochureUploaded byIng Raymundo Alarcon
- Enmienda a MSC.1-Circ.1432 (en Vigor a Día 10-05-2017)Uploaded byAbian
- 73-00Uploaded byareli_valeria
- 45Kg Cylinder & Valve Assembly PN.81-100067-002Uploaded bymax_power
- V3188EN_inhaltUploaded bykdsessions
- Fluid Mechanics Lab 1Uploaded byBillu Rocx
- Delta wingUploaded byirctcsbt6bimblikipil
- Design for Pressure Surge in FlowmasterUploaded byRoozbeh P