Seleksi model loglinier Data fundamentalism, sex and opinion on the death penalty obtained from

the 1994 Administration of the general social survey (GSS)

Crosstabs

Sex * Death_penalty * Fundamentalism Crosstabulation

Count

Death_penalty

Fundamentalism favor oppose Total

fundamentalist Sex male 128 32 160

female 123 73 196

Total 251 105 356

moderate Sex male 182 56 238
female 168 105 273
Total 350 161 511
liberal Sex male 119 49 168
female 111 70 181
Total 230 119 349
Total Sex male 429 137 566

female 402 248 650

Total 831 385 1216

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Fundamentalism Value df sided) sided) sided)
fundamentalist Pearson Chi-Square 12,597c 1 ,000

Continuity Correctionb 11,782 1 ,001

Likelihood Ratio 12,896 1 ,000

Fisher's Exact Test ,000 ,000

Linear-by-Linear Association 12,562 1 ,000

N of Valid Cases 356

moderate Pearson Chi-Square 13,137d 1 ,000
Continuity Correctionb 12,455 1 ,000
Likelihood Ratio 13,313 1 ,000
Fisher's Exact Test ,000 ,000
Linear-by-Linear Association 13,112 1 ,000
N of Valid Cases 511
liberal Pearson Chi-Square 3,505e 1 ,061
Continuity Correctionb 3,094 1 ,079
Likelihood Ratio 3,519 1 ,061
Fisher's Exact Test ,071 ,039
Linear-by-Linear Association 3,495 1 ,062
N of Valid Cases 349
Total Pearson Chi-Square 27,207a 1 ,000

Continuity Correctionb 26,566 1 ,000

Likelihood Ratio 27,532 1 ,000

Fisher's Exact Test ,000 ,000

Linear-by-Linear Association 27,185 1 ,000

N of Valid Cases 1216

a. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 179,20.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
c. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 47,19.
d. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 74,99.
e. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 57,28.

Model Parameter Deviance Jumlah Df

Parameter
Saturated 𝜇+𝜆𝑖𝑋+𝜆𝑗𝑌+𝜆𝑘𝑍+𝜆𝑖𝑘𝑋𝑍+𝜆𝑗𝑘𝑌𝑍+𝜆i𝑗X𝑌+𝜆i𝑗𝑘X𝑌𝑍 0 18 0

Goodness-of-Fit Tests

Chi-Square df Sig.

Likelihood Ratio ,000 0 .

Pearson ,000 0 .

K-Way and Higher-Order Effects

Likelihood Ratio Pearson Number of

K df Chi-Square Sig. Chi-Square Sig. Iterations

K-way and Higher Order 1 11 245,361 ,000 236,217 ,000 0

Effectsa 2 7 32,185 ,000 30,942 ,000 2

3 2 1,798 ,407 1,799 ,407 3

K-way Effectsb 1 4 213,176 ,000 205,275 ,000 0

2 5 30,387 ,000 29,143 ,000 0

3 2 1,798 ,407 1,799 ,407 0

a. Tests that k-way and higher order effects are zero.

b. Tests that k-way effects are zero.

Output K-way and Higher order effect

K=1
H0 : efek order ke satu atau lebih sama dengan nol
H1 : efek order ke satu atau lebih tidak sama dengan nol
G2 = 245,361 > X211 – tolak H0
K=2
H0 : efek order ke satu atau lebih sama dengan nol
H1 : efek order ke satu atau lebih tidak sama dengan nol
G2 = 32,185 > X27 – tolak H0
K=3
H0 : efek order ke satu atau lebih sama dengan nol
H1 : efek order ke satu atau lebih tidak sama dengan nol
G2 = 1,798 < X22 – gagal tolak H0
- Efek order ke tiga tidak signifikan

Backward Elimination Statistics

Step Summary

Chi- Number of
Stepa Effects Squarec df Sig. Iterations

0 Generating Classb Fundamentalism*Se

,000 0 .
x*Death_penalty

Deleted Effect 1 Fundamentalism*Se

1,798 2 ,407 3
x*Death_penalty
1 Generating Classb Fundamentalism*Se
x,
Fundamentalism*De 1,798 2 ,407
ath_penalty,
Sex*Death_penalty
Deleted Effect 1 Fundamentalism*Se
1,122 2 ,571 2
x
2 Fundamentalism*De
2,132 2 ,344 2
ath_penalty
3 Sex*Death_penalty 27,931 1 ,000 2
2 Generating Classb Fundamentalism*De
ath_penalty, 2,920 4 ,571
Sex*Death_penalty
 Deleted Effect 1 Fundamentalism*De
1,733 2 ,420 2
ath_penalty
2 Sex*Death_penalty 27,532 1 ,000 2
3 Generating Classb Sex*Death_penalty,
4,653 6 ,589
Fundamentalism
Deleted Effect 1 Sex*Death_penalty 27,532 1 ,000 2
2 Fundamentalism 39,906 2 ,000 2
4 Generating Classb Sex*Death_penalty,
4,653 6 ,589
Fundamentalism

a. At each step, the effect with the largest significance level for the Likelihood Ratio Change is deleted, provided the
significance level is larger than ,050.
b. Statistics are displayed for the best model at each step after step 0.
c. For 'Deleted Effect', this is the change in the Chi-Square after the effect is deleted from the model.

Backward elimination statistics

Pada step 0 model Fundamentalism*Sex*Death_penalty p-value > alfa sehingga tidak signifikan dan
dihilangkan

Pada step 1 diuji hubungan antar dua variabel dari ke tiga variabel, p-value signifikan pada hubungan
Sex*Death_penalty

Pada step 2 p-value signifikan pada hubungan variabel Sex*Death_penalty

Step 3 p-value siginifikan pada variabel fundamentalism dan hubungan variabel Sex*Death_penalty

Goodness-of-Fit Tests

Chi-Square df Sig.

Likelihood Ratio 4,653 6 ,589

Pearson 4,704 6 ,582

Model Parameter Deviance Jumlah Df

Parameter
(Z,XY) 𝜇+𝜆𝑖𝑋+𝜆𝑗𝑌+𝜆𝑘𝑍+𝜆𝑖j𝑋Y 0 6 12

H0 : model saturated adalah model terbaik

H1 : model (Z,XY) adalah model terbaik
Statistik uji
G2 = 4,653-0 = 4,653 – tolak H0 jika G2 > X2alfa, df = 12,592 (alfa=5%)
Keputusan : G2 < X2alfa, df -- gagal tolak H0
Kesimpulan : model (Z,XY) adalah model terbaik

Parameter Estimatesb,c

95% Confidence Interval

Parameter Estimate Std. Error Z Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

Constant 4,265 ,078 54,722 ,000 4,112 4,418

[X = 1] -,593 ,106 -5,576 ,000 -,802 -,385
[X = 2] 0a . . . . .
[Y = 1] ,483 ,081 5,982 ,000 ,325 ,641
[Y = 2] 0a . . . . .
[Z = 1] ,020 ,075 ,264 ,792 -,128 ,167
[Z = 2] ,381 ,069 5,491 ,000 ,245 ,517
[Z = 3] 0a . . . . .
[X = 1] * [Y = 1] ,658 ,127 5,182 ,000 ,409 ,908
[X = 1] * [Y = 2] 0a . . . . .
[X = 2] * [Y = 1] 0a . . . . .
[X = 2] * [Y = 2] 0a . . . . .

a. This parameter is set to zero because it is redundant.

b. Model: Poisson
c. Design: Constant + X + Y + Z + X * Y

λxy11 = 0,658 , e0,658 = 1,9309

Interpretasi : tanpa memperhatikan level fundamentalism, seseorang laki-laki setuju hukuman
mati bagi pembunuh cenderung 1,9309 kali dibandingkan seseorang perempuan.