Maceda vs. ERB

8/18/2018 [G.R. Nos. 95203-05 : December 18, 1990.] 192 SCRA 363 SENATOR ERNESTO MACEDA, Petitioner, vs.
er, vs. ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD (ERB); MARCELO N. FERNANDO, ALEJAN…
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™
Like 1 Tweet Share

Search
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1990 > December 1990 Decisions > [G.R. Nos. 95203-05 :
December 18, 1990.] 192 SCRA 363 SENATOR ERNESTO MACEDA, Petitioner, vs. ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD
(ERB); MARCELO N. FERNANDO, ALEJANDRO B. AFURONG; REX V. TANTIONGCO; and OSCAR E. ALA, in their
collective official capacities as Chairman and Members of the Board (ERB), respectively; CATALINO MACARAIG, in
his quadruple official capacities as Executive Secretary, Chairman of Philippine National Oil Company; Office of
Custom Search the Energy Affairs, and with MANUEL ESTRELLA, in their respective official capacities as Chairman and President
of the Petron Corporation; PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION; with CESAR BUENAVENTURA and REY
Search
GAMBOA as chairman and President, respectively; CALTEX PHILIPPINES with FRANCIS ABLAN, President and
Chief Executive Officer; and the Presidents of Philippine Petroleum Dealer's Association, Caltex Dealer's Co.,
Petron Dealer's Asso., Shell Dealer's Asso. of the Phil., Liquefied Petroleum Gas Institute of the Phils., any and all
concerned gasoline and petrol dealers or stations; and such other persons, officials, and parties, acting for and
on their behalf; or in representation of and/or under their authority, Respondents. [G.R. Nos. 95119-21 :
ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review December 18, 1990.] 192 SCRA 363 OLIVER O. LOZANO, Petitioner, vs. ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD (ERB),
PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, CALTEX (PHIL.), INC., and PETRON CORPORATION, Respondents.:
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1990decemberdecisions.php?id=50 1/30
8/18/2018 [G.R. Nos. 95203-05 : December 18, 1990.] 192 SCRA 363 SENATOR ERNESTO MACEDA, Petitioner, vs. ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD (ERB); MARCELO N. FERNANDO, ALEJAN…
EN BANC
[G.R. Nos. 95203-05 : December 18, 1990.]
192 SCRA 363
SENATOR ERNESTO MACEDA, Petitioner, vs. ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD
(ERB); MARCELO N. FERNANDO, ALEJANDRO B. AFURONG; REX V.
TANTIONGCO; and OSCAR E. ALA, in their collective official capacities as
Chairman and Members of the Board (ERB), respectively; CATALINO
MACARAIG, in his quadruple official capacities as Executive Secretary,
Chairman of Philippine National Oil Company; Office of the Energy Affairs, and
with MANUEL ESTRELLA, in their respective official capacities as Chairman
and President of the Petron Corporation; PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM
CORPORATION; with CESAR BUENAVENTURA and REY GAMBOA as chairman
and President, respectively; CALTEX PHILIPPINES with FRANCIS ABLAN,
President and Chief Executive Officer; and the Presidents of Philippine
Petroleum Dealer's Association, Caltex Dealer's Co., Petron Dealer's Asso.,
Shell Dealer's Asso. of the Phil., Liquefied Petroleum Gas Institute of the
Phils., any and all concerned gasoline and petrol dealers or stations; and such
other persons, officials, and parties, acting for and on their behalf; or in
representation of and/or under their authority, Respondents.
[G.R. Nos. 95119-21 : December 18, 1990.]
DebtKollect Company, Inc.
192 SCRA 363
OLIVER O. LOZANO, Petitioner, vs. ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD (ERB),
PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, CALTEX (PHIL.), INC., and
PETRON CORPORATION, Respondents.
DECISION
SARMIENTO, J.:
The petitioners pray for injunctive relief, to stop the Energy Regulatory Board (Board
hereinafter) from implementing its Order, dated September 21, 1990, mandating a
provisional increase in the prices of petroleum and petroleum products, as follows:
ChanRobles Intellectual Property PRODUCTS IN PESOS PER LITER

Division OPSF
Premium Gasoline 1.7700
Regular Gasoline 1.7700
Avturbo 1.8664
Kerosene 1.2400
Diesel Oil 1.2400

Fuel Oil 1.4900
Feedstock 1.4900
LPG 0.8487
Asphalts 2.7160
Thinners 1.7121 1
It appears that on September 10, 1990, Caltex (Philippines), Inc., Pilipinas Shell
Petroleum Corporation, and Petron Corporation proferred separate applications with
the Board for permission to increase the wholesale posted prices of petroleum
products, as follows:
Caltex P3.2697 per liter
Shell 2.0338 per liter
Petron 2.00 per liter 2
and meanwhile, for provisional authority to increase temporarily such wholesale posted
prices pending further proceedings. :-cralaw
On September 21, 1990, the Board, in a joint (on three applications) Order granted
provisional relief as follows:
WHEREFORE, considering the foregoing, and pursuant to Section 8 of Executive Order
No. 172, this Board hereby grants herein applicants' prayer for provisional relief and,
accordingly, authorizes said applicants a weighted average provisional increase of ONE
PESO AND FORTY-TWO CENTAVOS (P1.42) per liter in the wholesale posted prices of
their various petroleum products enumerated below, refined and/or marketed by them
locally. 3
December-1990 Jurisprudence
The petitioners submit that the above Order had been issued with grave abuse of
discretion, tantamount to lack of jurisdiction, and correctible by Certiorari.
[G.R. No. 32945 : December 3, 1990.] MARIANO T. The petitioner, Senator Ernesto Maceda, 4 also submits that the same was issued
NASSER, Petitioner, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS,
HON. MALCOLM SARMIENTO, in his capacity as
without proper notice and hearing in violation of Section 3, paragraph (e), of Executive
Presiding Judge, Court of First Instance of Pampanga, Order No. 172; that the Board, in decreeing an increase, had created a new source for
Branch I, AURORA RIVERA CANLAS, PATERNO R. the Oil Price Stabilization Fund (OPSF), or otherwise that it had levied a tax, a power
CANLAS, and TOMAS CENTILLAS, Respondents. [G.R.
No. 32946. December 3, 1990.] MARIANO T. NASSER,
vested in the legislature, and/or that it had "re-collected", by an act of taxation, ad
Petitioner, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS, PATERNO R. valorem taxes on oil which Republic Act No. 6965 had abolished.
CANLAS, AURORA RIVERA-CANLAS, TOMAS
CENTILLAS and THE CHIEF OF POLICE OF SAN The petitioner, Atty. Oliver Lozano, 5 likewise argues that the Board's Order was issued
ISIDRO, DAVAO ORIENTAL, Respondents. without notice and hearing, and hence, without due process of law.
[G.R. No. 39430 : December 3, 1990.] FRANCISCO The intervenor, the Trade Union of the Philippines and Allied Services (TUPAS/FSM)-
MANLAPAZ, DELFIN SANGCAP, DOMINGO SANGCAP,
PEDRO CUNANAN, FAUSTO DE LA PENA and
W.F.T.U., 6 argues on the other hand, that the increase cannot be allowed since the
HONORATA DE LA PENA, Petitioners, vs. HON. COURT respondents oil companies had not exhausted their existing oil stock which they had
OF APPEALS, HON. JUDGE LORENZO R. MOSQUEDA, bought at old prices and that they cannot be allowed to charge new rates for stock
HON. JUDGE VIRGILIO CANIVEL, TEODORO RIVERA,
PABLO RIVERA, RENATO RIVERA and BONIFACIO
purchased at such lower rates.
RIVERA, Respondents.
The Court set the cases (in G.R. Nos. 95203-05) for hearing on October 25, 1990, in
[G.R. No. 55466 : December 3, 1990.] MANILA
SURETY & FIDELITY CO., INC., Petitioner, vs. COURT
which Senator Maceda and his counsel, Atty. Alexander Padilla, argued. The Solicitor
OF APPEALS and WILLIAM H. QUASHA, Respondents. General, on behalf of the Board, also presented his arguments, together with Board
Commissioner Rex Tantiangco. Attys. Federico Alikpala, Jr. and Joselia Poblador
[G.R. No. 78778 : December 3, 1990.] 191 SCRA
814 LEONIDA CORONADO, FELIX BUENO, MELANIA
represented the oil firms (Petron and Caltex, respectively).
RETIZOS, BERNARDINO BUENASEDA and JOVITA
MONTEFALCON, Petitioners, vs. THE COURT OF
The parties were thereafter required to submit their memorandums after which, the
APPEALS and JUANA BUENO ALBOVIAS, Respondents. Court considered the cases submitted for resolution.
[G.R. No. 79560 : December 3, 1990.] 191 SCRA On November 20, 1990, the Court ordered these cases consolidated.
823 ANDRES E. DITAN, Petitioner, vs. PHILIPPINE
OVERSEAS EMPLOYMENT ADMINISTRATION On November 27, 1990, we gave due course to both petitions.
ADMINISTRATOR, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION, ASIAWORLD RECRUITMENT, INC., The Court finds no merit in these petitions.
AND/OR INTRACO SALES CORPORATION,
Respondents. Senator Maceda and Atty. Lozano, in questioning the lack of a hearing, have
overlooked the provisions of Section 8 of Executive Order No. 172, which we quote:
830 BALTAZAR, PEDRO, URSULA, and DOMINGO, all "SECTION 8. Authority to Grant Provisional Relief . — The Board may, upon the filing of
surnamed PANTIG, Petitioners, vs. VENANCIO
BALTAZAR, Respondent.
an application, petition or complaint or at any stage thereafter and without prior
hearing, on the basis of supporting papers duly verified or authenticated, grant
[G.R. No. 82115 : December 3, 1990.] 191 SCRA provisional relief on motion of a party in the case or on its own initiative, without
836 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs. ROMEO ORTIZ y BALLARES, Accused-Appellant. prejudice to a final decision after hearing, should the Board find that the pleadings,
together with such affidavits, documents and other evidence which may be submitted
[G.R. No. 84884 : December 3, 1990.] EULALIO M. in support of the motion, substantially support the provisional order: Provided, That
RUIZ and ILUMINADA RUIZ, Petitioners, vs. HON.
DOROTEO N. CANEBA, THE CITY SHERIFF OF MANILA
the Board shall immediately schedule and conduct a hearing thereon within thirty (30)
AND/OR HIS DEPUTIES, ZENAIDA SANGALANG and days thereafter, upon publication and notice to all affected parties. : nad
ADOLFO CRUZ, Respondents.

As the Order itself indicates, the authority for provisional increase falls within the
[G.R. No. 87264 : December 3, 1990.] MARIANO above provision.
DINGLASAN and FELICIDAD DINGLASAN, Petitioners,
vs. THE HON. MARIA ALICIA M. AUSTRIA, Presiding There is no merit in the Senator's contention that the "applicable" provision is Section
Judge of Branch 159, Regional Trial Court, Pasig,
Metro Manila, National Capital Judicial Region, The
3, paragraph (e) of the Executive Order, which we quote:
GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM, and
CONCEPCION T. TINIO, Respondents.
(e) Whenever the Board has determined that there is a shortage of any petroleum
product, or when public interest so requires, it may take such steps as it may consider
[G.R. No. 89545 : December 3, 1990.] SPOUSES necessary, including the temporary adjustment of the levels of prices of petroleum
ROLANDO DOLORFINO and MONINA FULE,
Petitioners, vs. THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS,
products and the payment to the Oil Price Stabilization Fund created under Presidential
SEVERO ALCOS and EFIGENIA DE LUNA-ALCOS, Decree No. 1956 by persons or entities engaged in the petroleum industry of such
Respondents. amounts as may be determined by the Board, which will enable the importer to
[UDK No. 9864 : December 3, 1990.] RUFINA VDA.
recover its cost of importation.
DE TANGUB, Petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS,
PRESIDING JUDGE of the [CAR] RTC, Branch 4, Iligan
What must be stressed is that while under Executive Order No. 172, a hearing is
City, and SPOUSES DOMINGO and EUGENIA MARTIL, indispensable, it does not preclude the Board from ordering, ex parte, a provisional
Respondents. increase, as it did here, subject to its final disposition of whether or not: (1) to make it
[G.R. No. 58668 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 1
permanent; (2) to reduce or increase it further; or (3) to deny the application. Section
SANTIAGO ESCARTE, JR., ERNESTO VILLANUEVA, 37 paragraph (e) is akin to a temporary restraining order or a writ of preliminary
FELIXBERTO VILLANUEVA, and LOURDES attachment issued by the courts, which are given ex parte, and which are subject to
VILLANUEVA, Petitioners, vs. OFFICE OF THE
PRESIDENT OF THE PHILIPPINES and TEODORO the resolution of the main case.
MEDINA, Respondents.
Section 3, paragraph (e) and Section 8 do not negate each other, or otherwise, operate
[G.R. No. 71929 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 9 exclusively of the other, in that the Board may resort to one but not to both at the
ALITALIA, Petitioner, vs. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE same time. Section 3(e) outlines the jurisdiction of the Board and the grounds for
COURT and FELIPA E. PABLO, Respondents. which it may decree a price adjustment, subject to the requirements of notice and
192 SCRA 21 CONSOLACION VILLANUEVA,
hearing. Pending that, however, it may order, under Section 8, an authority to increase
Petitioner, vs. THE INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE provisionally, without need of a hearing, subject to the final outcome of the
COURT, JESUS BERNAS and REMEDIOS Q. BERNAS, proceeding. The Board, of course, is not prevented from conducting a hearing on the
Respondents.
grant of provisional authority — which is of course, the better procedure — however, it
[G.R. No. 80505 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 28 cannot be stigmatized later if it failed to conduct one. As we held in Citizens' Alliance
THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, for Consumer Protection v. Energy Regulatory Board. 7
vs. MARIO TANDOY y LIM, Defendant-Appellant.
In the light of Section 8 quoted above, public respondent Board need not even have
PEOPLE'S FINANCING CORP. and ENRIQUE V.
conducted formal hearings in these cases prior to issuance of its Order of 14 August
ARCENAS, Petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS 1987 granting a provisional increase of prices. The Board, upon its own discretion and
(Sixteenth Division), GAUDIOSO MANLIGUEZ and on the basis of documents and evidence submitted by private respondents, could have
PURIFICACION MANLIGUEZ, Respondents.
issued an order granting provisional relief immediately upon filing by private
[G.R. No. 86586 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 42 respondents of their respective applications. In this respect, the Court considers the
NATIONAL IRRIGATION ADMINISTRATION, evidence presented by private respondents in support of their applications — i.e.,
Petitioner, vs. HONORABLE TEODORO P. REGINO,
PRESIDING JUDGE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH
evidence showing that importation costs of petroleum products had gone up; that the
84, QUEZON CITY and CONSTRUCTION SERVICES OF peso had depreciated in value; and that the Oil Price Stabilization Fund (OPSF) had by
AUSTRALIA-PHILIPPINES INC., Respondents. then been depleted — as substantial and hence constitutive of at least prima facie
basis for issuance by the Board of a provisional relief order granting an increase in the
LUZ FARMS, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE prices of petroleum products. 8
SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN
REFORM, Respondent. We do not therefore find the challenged action of the Board to have been done in
violation of the due process clause. The petitioners may contest however, the
DOLORES A. PAREDES, Petitioner, vs. CIVIL SERVICE
applications at the hearings proper.
COMMISSION AND REMEDIOS A. AMOR, Respondents.
Senator Maceda's attack on the Order in question on premises that it constitutes an
DOLORES A. PAREDES, Petitioner, vs. CIVIL SERVICE act of taxation or that it negates the effects of Republic Act No. 6965, cannot prosper.
COMMISSION, MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD Republic Act No. 6965 operated to lower taxes on petroleum and petroleum products
AND REMEDIOS A. AMOR, Respondents.
by imposing specific taxes rather than ad valorem taxes thereon; it is, not, however,
[G.R. No. 93054 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA an insurance against an "oil hike", whenever warranted, or is it a price control
100 Cordillera Regional Assembly Member mechanism on petroleum and petroleum products. The statute had possibly forestalled
ALEXANDER P. ORDILLO, (Banaue), Ifugao Provincial
Board Member CORAZON MONTINIG, (Mayoyao),
a larger hike, but it operated no more. : nad
Former Vice-Mayor MARTIN UDAN (Banaue),

Municipal Councilors MARTIN GANO, (Lagawe), and
The Board Order authorizing the proceeds generated by the increase to be deposited
TEODORO HEWE, (Hingyon), Barangay Councilman to the OPSF is not an act of taxation. It is authorized by Presidential Decree No. 1956,
PEDRO W. DULAG (Lamut); Aguinaldo residents as amended by Executive Order No. 137, as follows:
SANDY B. CHANGIWAN, and DONATO TIMAGO; Lamut
resident REY ANTONIO; Kiangan residents ORLANDO SECTION 8. There is hereby created a Trust Account in the books of accounts of the
PUGUON, and REYNAND DULDULAO; Lagawe
residents TOMAS KIMAYONG, GREGORIO DANGO,
Ministry of Energy to be designated as Oil Price Stabilization Fund (OPSF) for the
GEORGE B. BAYWONG, and VICENTE LUNAG; Hingyon purpose of minimizing frequent price changes brought about by exchange rate
residents PABLO M. DULNUAN and CONSTANCIO adjustments and/or changes in world market prices of crude oil and imported
GANO; Mayoyao residents PEDRO M. BAOANG,
LEONARDO IGADNA, and MAXIMO IGADNA; and
petroleum products. The Oil Price Stabilization Fund (OPSF) may be sourced from any
Banaue residents PUMA-A CULHI, LATAYON BUTTIG, of the following:
MIGUEL PUMELBAN, ANDRES ORDILLO, FEDERICO
MARIANO, SANDY BINOMNGA, GABRIEL LIMMANG, a) Any increase in the tax collection from ad valorem tax or customs duty imposed on
ROMEO TONGALI, RUBEN BAHATAN, MHOMDY petroleum products subject to tax under this Decree arising from exchange rate
GABRIEL, and NADRES GHAMANG, Petitioners, vs. THE
COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS; The Honorable
adjustment, as may be determined by the Minister of Finance in consultation with the
FRANKLIN M. DRILON, Secretary of Justice; Hon. Board of Energy;
CATALINO MACARAIG, Executive Secretary; The
Cabinet Officer for Regional Development; Hon. b) Any increase in the tax collection as a result of the lifting of tax exemptions of
GUILLERMO CARAGUE, Secretary of Budget and government corporations, as may be determined by the Minister of Finance in
Management; and Hon. ROSALINA S. CAJUCOM, OIC, consultation with the Board of Energy;
National Treasurer, Respondents.
c) Any additional amount to be imposed on petroleum products to augment the
110 EUFRACIO D. ROJAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs.
resources of the Fund through an appropriate Order that may be issued by the Board
CONSTANCIO B. MAGLANA, Defendant-Appellee. of Energy requiring payment by persons or companies engaged in the business of
importing, manufacturing and/or marketing petroleum products;
[G.R. No. 36827 : December 10, 1990.] THE
DIRECTOR OF FOREST ADMINISTRATION, THE d) Any resulting peso cost differentials in case the actual peso costs paid by oil
DIRECTOR OF LANDS and THE REPUBLIC OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Petitioners, vs. HON. RAMON C.
companies in the importation of crude oil and petroleum products is less than the peso
FERNANDEZ, HERMOGENES CONCEPCION, JR., and costs computed using the reference foreign exchange rates as fixed by the Board of
EMILIO A. GANCAYCO, ET AL., Respondents. [G.R. No. Energy.
56622 : December 10, 1990.] THE DIRECTOR OF
LANDS and THE DIRECTOR OF FOREST DEVELOPMENT, Anent claims that oil companies cannot charge new prices for oil purchased at old
Petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS (Ninth Division),
GREGORIO A. LEGASPI and VALENTINA CERVANIA, rates, suffice it to say that the increase in question was not prompted alone by the
Respondents. [G.R. No. 70076 : December 10, 1990.] increase in world oil prices arising from tension in the Persian Gulf. What the Court
REYNALDA ESPEJO, BENITA GARLITOS and gathers from the pleadings as well as events of which it takes judicial notice, is that:
ENRIQUETA OXCIANO, Petitioners, vs. INTERMEDIATE
APPELLATE COURT, HON. ANTONIO M. BELEN, as
(1) as of June 30, 1990, the OPSF has incurred a deficit of P6.1 Billion; (2) the
Judge of the Regional Trial Court of Lingayen, exchange rate has fallen to P28.00 to $1.00; (3) the country's balance of payments is
Pangasinan Branch XXXVIII and ASTERIO SAURA, expected to reach $1 Billion; (4) our trade deficit is at $2.855 Billion as of the first nine
Respondents.
months of the year.
Evidently, authorities have been unable to collect enough taxes necessary to replenish
vs. MELVIN GIRON y SANTOS, Accused-Appellant. the OPSF as provided by Presidential Decree No. 1956, and hence, there was no
available alternative but to hike existing prices.
151 RUBEN DELFIN, BENITO DOLOSA, CORNELIO The OPSF, as the Court held in the aforecited CACP cases, must not be understood to
AGUILAR, ANASTACIO GORDOLA, CESAR PANALIGAN,
LUIS VIESCA, VICENTE GUADAMOR, JUAN CAGATIN,
be a funding designed to guarantee oil firms' profits although as a subsidy, or a trust
SIMEON CHICA, REYNALDO CINCO, WILFREDO IPAS, account, the Court has no doubt that oil firms make money from it. As we held there,
SIMEON TAGAYONA, FLORENCIO SINAMBAN, however, the OPSF was established precisely to protect the consuming public from the
FERMINIO DIEGO, POLICARPIO DILE, EDDIE DE
CASTRO, AQUILINO CABILITASAN, CRISOGONO
erratic movement of oil prices and to preclude oil companies from taking advantage of
CANTERO, GUALBERTO REBUSTER, RODOLFO fluctuations occurring every so often. As a buffer mechanism, it stabilizes domestic
GATCHALIAN, ANGELITO DOMINGO, FERNANDO prices by bringing about a uniform rate rather than leaving pricing to the caprices of
JOVER, RAFAEL SALCEDO, SIMON DIANA, BENJAMIN
GONZALES, JR., BENIGNO ROJA, DEMETRIO SIMEON,
the market.
JOSE TELAN, HILARIO VILLANUEVA, NICK
FRANCISCO, PACIFICO DALIPE, EUPEMIO DALITE,
In all likelihood, therefore, an oil hike would have probably been imminent, with or
ARTEMIO DE CASTRO, ISABELO RASTICA, ANECITO without trouble in the Gulf, although trouble would have probably aggravated it. : nad
RASTICA, LAMBERTO NIETO, ESMERALDO TATEL,

PASCUAL BATOCTOY, ESMENIO PATRICIO, ARMANDO The Court is not to be understood as having prejudged the justness of an oil price
DE GUZMAN, JESUS MALLARI, JOSE MALLARI, increase amid the above premises. What the Court is saying is that it thinks that based
SULPICIO MALLARI, GENEROSO COS, AGAPITO
ESPINOSA, VIRGILIO SEVA�ES, RICARDO MANZAN,
thereon, the Government has made out a prima facie case to justify the provisional
OSCAR BENSOL, PABLO DIAGSAY, EMILIO DIAGSAY, increase in question. Let the Court therefore make clear that these findings are not
PAULINO COMETA, MATERO COREA, BENJAMIN final; the burden, however, is on the petitioners' shoulders to demonstrate the fact
LACANARIA, GAUDY TIU, JOVENCIO AGUILAR,
ROMULO POSADA, RICARDO POSIC, ALFONSO that the present economic picture does not warrant a permanent increase.
SALGADO, RICARDO TAGANAP, ARMANDO RAMIREZ,
FELIPE RAMIRES, EDELBERTO BERNARDO, PONCIANO
There is no doubt that the increase in oil prices in question (not to mention another
MONTILLA, JUAN MONTILLA, IGNACIO PANCHITO, one impending, which the Court understands has been under consideration by policy-
JEORGE SERRAN, VICTOR IGNIS, LUCAS IGAT, makers) spells hard(er) times for the Filipino people. The Court can not, however,
BARTOLOME MAGDAEL, AUGUSTO ROSALINAS,
RAFAEL SOCITO, JORGE CO, LUCINO WAGAN, CELSO
debate the wisdom of policy or the logic behind it (unless it is otherwise arbitrary), not
BARADA, WINSTON DIENZO, PAULINO SANCHEZ, because the Court agrees with policy, but because the Court is not the suitable forum
ELESEO SANCHES, CONRADO SANCHES, GENEROSO for debate. It is a question best judged by the political leadership which after all,
ANTONIO, AGUSTIN LOPEZ, RUDY SOCITO, SEGUNDO
SOCITO, JOAQUIN PARAS, DOMINADOR BUTAHON,
GERMOGENES GINGCO, HONORIO DETOITO, ELIGIO determines policy, and ultimately, by the electorate, that stands to be better for it or
MENDOZA, RUBEN QUITORIANO, LEON DELA CRUZ,
PACITO SALES, ANTONIO CEMANES, IRENEO
worse off, either in the short or long run.
LUBUGIN, FORTUNATO MATO, ROMEO MERIC,
ALBERTO GALLO, MELCHOR SALGADO, SIMEON
At this point, the Court shares the indignation of the people over the conspiracy of
QUIJANO, ANTONIO CARAAN, CARLITO GUZMAN, events and regrets its own powerlessness, if by this Decision it has been powerless.
ALBERTO SALMON, FELIMON TAN, FERNANDO The constitutional scheme of things has simply left it with no choice.
FAUSTINO, CONRADO DAVID, REYNALDO NOLASCO,
ANTONIO NIETO, JAIME CAMACHO, ALBERTO In fine, we find no grave abuse of discretion committed by the respondent Board in
PANGLAO, ROSAURO GANAC, ALFREDO ARCABIO,
PEDRO MANASALA, VICENTE BELARMINO, ROMULO
issuing its questioned Order.
SIOCO, SEVERINO ATIENZA, JR., RUFO ABALOS,
JESUS POSADA, ALBINO BACARRO, ERNESTO DAJAY,
WHEREFORE, these petitions are DISMISSED. No costs.
WILFREDO VILLALON, CELESTINO BACARRO, MANUEL
TOLENTINO, ERNESTO ANTONIO, OSCAR ABUNDIO,
SO ORDERED.
ZOSIMO IJARES, RUBEN ARISTORENAS, GAUDENCIO
CASTILLO, DOMINGO DELA TORRE, DANILO
Narvasa, Gutierrez, Jr ., Cruz, Gancayco, Bidin, Griño Aquino, Medialdea and
RONCADA, RAFEL PUPA, ALFONSO SAPINORO, Regalado, JJ., concur.
LUISITO JACRIQUE, MARCELINO BESA, ANSELMO
DATELES, ALBERTO PALCULAN, BIENVENIDO Fernan, C.J., Melencio-Herrera and Padilla, JJ., no part.
FUENSALIDA AND JOSE ORZAL, Petitioners, vs. THE
HON. AMADO G. INCIONG in his capacity as Deputy Feliciano, J., is on leave.
Minister of Labor; NLRC Commissioners DIEGO
ATIENZA, CLETO VILLATUYA and GERONIMO
QUADRA; ATLANTIC CONTAINER CORPORATION;
INLAND INDUSTRIES, INC., LAZARO ARRIOLA, Separate Opinions
BIENVENIDO KATALBAS, AURORA JEREZA, GOSHI DE
YULO AND PAZ YULO AND ROBERTO JACINTO, PARAS, J., dissenting:
Respondents.
I dissent.
163 SPOUSES TEOFILO ERCILLO and TERESITA In fixing the oil prices complained of, the Energy Regulatory Board (ERB) gravely
ERCILLO, Petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and abused its discretion —
SPOUSES LUTGARDA CIFRA and BENJAMIN CIFRA,
SR., represented by their son and attorney-in-fact, (1) in approving the prices without due process of law, and
BENJAMIN CIFRA, JR., and HON. JOSE P. CASTRO,
Respondents. (2) in exercising the taxing power in gross violation of the 1987 Constitution which
vests such power only in Congress. : nad
169 ERNESTO DICHOSO, Petitioner, vs. The

HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS and TEODOLFO
With respect to due process, it will be noted that it is Sec. 3(e) (and not Sec. 8) of Ex.
RAMOS, Respondents. Order No. 172 which should apply to the instant case (and therefore a hearing is
essential) 1 for it is Sec. 3(e) that refers to "the temporary adjustment of the levels of
177 FILIPINAS MILLS, INC., BUENAVENTURA TAN and
prices of petroleum products" or instances "when public interest so requires." Sec. 8,
VIRGINIA DUMLAO-TAN, Petitioners, vs. HON. which is relied upon by the majority opinion, does NOT speak of price increases.
ABELARDO M. DAYRlT, in his capacity as Presiding Additionally it is clear that in the instant case, "public interest" [also mentioned in Sec.
Judge of the Court of First Instance of Manila, Branch
II, ASSOCIATED CITIZENS BANK and OSCAR V.
3 (e)] necessitated a prior hearing.
ATAYDE, in his capacity as the Deputy Sheriff of the
CFI-Manila, Branch II, Respondents.
Anent the unconstitutional use of the taxing power, the decision of the majority says
that "the Board Order authorizing the proceeds generated by the increases" is
[G.R. No. 69863-65 : December 10, 1990.] 192 "authorized by Presidential Decree No. 1456, as amended by Executive Order No. 137"
SCRA 183 LINO BROCKA, BENJAMIN CERVANTES,
COSME GARCIA, RODOLFO SANTOS, VALENTINO
(See Decision, pp. 7-8). Assuming that such is authorized by law, still a law, no matter
SALIPSIP, RICARDO VEGA, ERIC MARIANO, JOSE how imperative, cannot prevail over the Constitution which grants only to Congress the
EMMANUEL OYALES, RONNIE MATTA, ALFREDO VIAJE, power to tax. And indeed, there can be no denying the fact that when revenue is
RUBEN EUGENIO, REYNALDO ORTIZ, ORLANDO
ORTIZ, NOEL REYES, EDUARDO IMPERIAL, NESTOR
earned by the government from the consuming public (except when only licenses are
SARMIENTO, FRANCO PALISOC, VIRGILIO DE concerned) there is an exercise of the taxing power.
GUZMAN, ALBERTO REYES, JESSIE PINILI, ROMULO
AUGUIS, DOMINADOR RESURRECION III, RONNIE I am of course aware of the dangerous economic quagmire to which our country has
LAYGO, ROSAURO ROQUE, CLARENCE SORIANO, been plunged by the sadism precipitating the Middle East crisis, but certainly one error
OCTAVO DEPAWA, CARLITO LA TORRE, SEVERNO cannot be corrected by another error. Besides there are more significant and clear-cut
ILANO, JR., DOMINGO CAJIPE, ALAN ALEGRE, RAMON
MARTINEZ, MA. GILDA HERNANDEZ, EDNA P.
reasons for our economic crisis: namely, the intentional depreciation (actually, a
VILLANUEVA, DOLLY S. CANU, MELQUIADES C. devaluation) of our already demeaned currency, our unfortunate liberalization of
ATIENZA, ELIGIO P. VERA CRUZ, ROGER C. BAGAN, imports, and our slavish subservience to the dictates of the IMF. :-cralaw
ABUNDIO M. CALISTE, Petitioners, vs. JUAN PONCE

ENRILE, MAJ. GENERAL FIDEL V. RAMOS, BRIG.
GENERAL PEDRO BALBANERO, COL. ABAD, COL.
DAWIS, SERGIO APOSTOL, P/LT, RODOLFO M. Endnotes
GARCIA and JUDGE RICARDO TENSUAN, Respondents.
1. Rollo, 45.
191 COMMERCIAL MOTORS CORPORATION, 2. Id., 32.
Petitioner, vs. COMMISSIONERS, SECOND DIVISION,
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, and 3. Id., 44-45.
PEDRO UMLAS, Respondents.
4. He is the petitioner in G.R. Nos. 95203-05.
199 ANGELINA P. SANTIAGO, Petitioner, vs. The 5. He is the other petitioner in G.R. Nos. 95119-21.
Honorable DEPUTY EXECUTIVE SECRETARY and HI-
CEMENT CORPORATION, Respondents. 6. It is the intervenor in G.R. Nos. 95203-05.
[G.R. No. 79962 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA 7. Nos. 78888-90, 79501-03, 79590-92, June 23, 1988, 162 SCRA 521.
209 LUCIO R. CRUZ, Petitioner, vs. COURT OF
APPEALS AND CONRADO Q. SALONGA, Respondents.
8. Supra, at 535.

224 S & A GAISANO INCORPORATED, CANUTO CUPIN,
represented by his son Salvador P. Cupin as Attorney-
PARAS, J., dissenting:
in-Fact; VICENTE CUPIN; EVARISTO CUPIN,
1. The majority opinion itself concedes that when See. 3(e) is applicable, a hearing is
represented by his wife Marites R. Cupin as Attorney-
in-Fact; RAMON CUPIN; FE CUPIN and indispensable (See Decision, p. 6).
BUENAVENTURA CUPIN, both represented by their
brother Ramon Cupin as Attorney-in-Fact, Petitioners,
vs. HON. VICENTE A. HIDALGO, Executive and
Presiding Judge of Regional Trial Court of Butuan City
and Agusan del Norte; Branch V, Region X; VICTOR
CHAN; ATTY. ARTURO RICAFORTE, in his capacity as Back to Home | Back to Main
Register of Deeds of Butuan City; CITY ENGINEER
VICTORIOSO GO, in his capacity as National Building
Official of Butuan City, Respondents.
QUICK SEARCH
232 ANTIPAZ PRESCO y PARAS, ANTONIO AMORES y
PARAS, and ANSELMA PARAS, Petitioners, vs. HON.
COURT OF APPEALS, HON. MARIANO UMALI, Judge of
the Regional Trial Court of Cavite, Branch 25, Trece 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908
Martires City, HON. EDWINA P. MENDOZA, Judge of 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916
the Municipal Trial Court of General Trias, Cavite,
MODESTO PARAS, and SIMPLICIO SANCHEZ, 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924
Respondents. 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932
[G.R. No. 82374 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940
242 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948
vs. ERNESTO AVILA y MENDOZA AND JOHN DOE,
Accused-Appellant. 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956
1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964
246 ALLIED BANKING CORPORATION, Petitioner, vs. 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972
HON. SECRETARY SEDFREY ORDO�EZ (Public 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
Respondent) and ALFREDO CHING (Private
Respondent), Respondents. 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
[G.R. Nos. 84132-33 : December 10, 1990.] 192 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
SCRA 257 NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND
NEW AGRIX, INC., Petitioners, vs. PHILIPPINE
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
VETERANS BANK, THE EX-OFFICIO SHERIFF and 2013 2014 2015 2016
GODOFREDO QUILING, in his capacity as Deputy
Sheriff of Calamba, Laguna, Respondents.

vs. AMANDO TASARRA and ABELARDO TASARRA,
Accused-Appellants. Main Indices of the Library ---> Go!
vs. LYDIA RAMA, Defendant-Appellant.

277 JOSE A. SADDUL, JR., Petitioner, vs. THE HON.
COURT OF APPEALS and THE PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Respondents.
[A.M. No. P-86-32 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA

288 ALFREDO LLANES, complainant, vs. GAUDIOSO
BORJA, DEPUTY SHERIFF, RTC, BRANCH 19, NAGA
CITY, Respondent.

296 DIRECTOR OF LANDS, DIRECTOR OF FORESTRY
and REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioners, vs.
HON. JUAN P. AQUINO, as Judge of the Court of First
Instance of Abra, Second Judicial District and ABRA
INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION, Respondents.

305 TRADERS ROYAL BANK, Petitioner, vs. HON.
INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT and HON.
GREGORIO S. CENDA�A, in his capacity as DIRECTOR
OF THE NATIONAL MEDIA PRODUCTION CENTER
(NMPC), Respondents

315 CAGAYAN DE ORO COLISEUM, INC., Petitioner, vs.
OFFICE OF THE MINISTER OF LABOR AND
EMPLOYMENT, represented by Deputy Minister
VICENTE LEOGARDO, JR. and ANGEL CHAVES,
Respondents.

320 DIRECTOR OF LANDS, Petitioner, vs. SPOUSES
FRANCISCO K. REDOR and ANGELITA CASTRO, and
HON. SALVADOR P. DE GUZMAN, JR., Presiding Judge
of the Regional Trial Court, Branch XXVII, Sta. Cruz,
Laguna, Respondents.

326 DR. OFELIA P. TRISTE, Petitioner, vs. LEYTE
STATE COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, namely: Hon.
Lourdes R. Quisumbing, Secretary of the Department
of Education, Culture and Sports and Chairman of the
Board and/or Dr. Minda C. Sutaria as the authorized
representative; Dr. Purificacion M. Flores, President of
the Leyte State College and Vice-Chairman of the
Board; Director Venancio Baclagon, National
Economic and Development Authority, Regional Office
No. VIII and Member of the Board; HON. SEDFREY A.
ORDO�EZ, Secretary of Justice and Chairman of the
Review Committee under Executive Order No. 17; and
DR. CRES V. CHAN-GONZAGA, Respondents.

342 CRISTITO AUSTRIA y RODIS, Petitioner-
Appellant, vs. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES and THE
HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, Respondents-
Appellees.

358 SIXTO S. BRILLANTES, JR., Petitioner, vs.
HAYDEE B. YORAC, in her capacity as ACTING
CHAIRPERSON of the COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS,
Respondent.
[G.R. Nos. 95203-05 : December 18, 1990.] 192

SCRA 363 SENATOR ERNESTO MACEDA, Petitioner, vs.
ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD (ERB); MARCELO N.
FERNANDO, ALEJANDRO B. AFURONG; REX V.
TANTIONGCO; and OSCAR E. ALA, in their collective
official capacities as Chairman and Members of the
Board (ERB), respectively; CATALINO MACARAIG, in
his quadruple official capacities as Executive
Secretary, Chairman of Philippine National Oil
Company; Office of the Energy Affairs, and with
MANUEL ESTRELLA, in their respective official
capacities as Chairman and President of the Petron
Corporation; PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM
CORPORATION; with CESAR BUENAVENTURA and REY
GAMBOA as chairman and President, respectively;
CALTEX PHILIPPINES with FRANCIS ABLAN, President
and Chief Executive Officer; and the Presidents of
Philippine Petroleum Dealer's Association, Caltex
Dealer's Co., Petron Dealer's Asso., Shell Dealer's
Asso. of the Phil., Liquefied Petroleum Gas Institute
of the Phils., any and all concerned gasoline and
petrol dealers or stations; and such other persons,
officials, and parties, acting for and on their behalf; or
in representation of and/or under their authority,
Respondents. [G.R. Nos. 95119-21 : December 18,
1990.] 192 SCRA 363 OLIVER O. LOZANO, Petitioner,
vs. ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD (ERB), PILIPINAS
SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, CALTEX (PHIL.),
INC., and PETRON CORPORATION, Respondents.

vs. JUVENAL KYAMKO, Accused-Appellant.
[A.C. No. 2756 : December 18, 1990.] 192 SCRA

381 PRUDENTIAL BANK, Petitioner, vs. BENJAMIN M.
GRECIA, Respondent.

388 JULITA FRANCISCO and her husband,
HERMENEGILDO TANKENKO, and RESTITUTO
FRANCISCO and his wife, FELISA ABEJO, Petitioners,
vs. CRISPIN V. BAUTISTA, Judge of the Court of First
Instance of Bulacan; FRANCISCA FRANCISCO,
MAXIMA FRANCISCO and FRANCISCO FRANCISCO,
Respondents.
[G.R. Nos. 88710-13 : December 19, 1990.] 192

SCRA 396 UNION OF FILIPRO EMPLOYEES (UFE),
MANUEL L. SARMIENTO, BENJAMIN M. ALTAREJOS,
RODOLFO D. PAGLINAWAN, CARMELITA G. NUQUI,
CORAZON Y SAZON, RODRIGO P. LUCAS, RUDOLPH C.
ARMAS, EDUARDO A. ABELLA, ANGEL A. CANETE,
JUANITO T. CAPILI, ADOLFO S. CASTILLO, JR.,
PONCIANO A. CARINGAL, ERIBERTO S. LEONARDO,
ADELAIDA B. MIRA, EUGENIA C. NU�EZ, PAZ B. SAN
JOSE, VENUSITO S. SOLIS, EMMANUEL S. VILLENA,
ALFONSO R. RICAFRENTE, MELANIO C. LANTIN,
AMADOR M. MONTOJO, RODOLFO M. MUNSOD,
RENATO P. DIAZ, RODRIGO M. URGELLES, CARLOS B.
SAN JOSE, EUSTAQUIO E. BUNYI, NELSON P.
CENTENO, SOTERO A. GACUTAN, GUILLERMO G. DE
BORJA, DIONISIO H. NIPALES, EUGENIO S. SAN
PEDRO, MANUEL DELA FUENTE, CARLO MEDINA,
CESAR B. PONCE, JORGE B. CASTRO, JR., RICARDO
AREVALO, REY M. BEO, FELIX ESGUERRA, REYNALDO
ALMENANZA, MELITON C. ROXAS (as represented by
his surviving spouse, MA. CORAZON ROXAS), ROMEO
A. ARANDELA, ISIDRO A. NATIVIDAD, EMILIANO M.
SAYAO, CELSO J. CENIDO, PAUL C. MEJARES,
SILVERIO C. PAMPANG, DIONISIO S. CANLOBO,
GILBERT C. NOBLE, RODOLFO D. CALONG-CALONG,
SR., PEPITO Q. QUITLONG, DIONISIO C. COMPLETO,
ANTONIO T. AVELINO, ANGELITO PAYABYAB, ISAIAS
A. RIEZA, DEODITO M. BELARMINO, QUEZON G.
MATEO, CARLITO PRE, CIPRIANO P. LUPEBA, EFREN
P. DINSAY, WILDON C. BARROS, SUSAN A. BERRO,
MANUEL A. LAVIN, ROY U. BACONGUIS, JEROME T.
FIEL, ANASTACIO G. CABALLERO, JR., ROGELIO E.
RAIZ, JOSE T. ISIDTO, ANGELITO M. ANICIETE, RAUL
ROBERTO C. NANQUIL, LIZA T. VILLANUEVA, CESAR S.
CRUZ, REYNALDO L. CALIGUIA, ERNESTO M.
SOLOMON, OSCAR G. AGUINALDO, DIEGO P. OLIVA,
JAIME D. NILLAS, ELPIDIO A. HERMOCILLA, DANTE L.
ESCOSURA, FEDERICO P. CONTEMPRATO, LAURO C.
MAKILING, RENATO O. MINDANAO, RAFAEL C. TURA
AND QUINTIN J. PEDRIDO, JR., Petitioners, vs.
NESTL� PHILIPPINES, INC., NATIONAL LABOR
RELATIONS COMMISSION, HON. EDUARDO G. MAGNO,
HON. ZOSIMO T. VASALLO and HON. EVANGELINE S.
LUBATON, Respondents.

414 UNION OF FILIPRO EMPLOYEES, Petitioner, vs.
THE HONORABLE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION and NESTLE PHILIPPINES, INC.,
Respondents.

430 EDUARDO ACOP, ROGER ALMENDAREZ,
BIENVENIDO AMBRAY, BENITO ARELLANO, WILLIAM
ARMENDARES, HERMINIO ARREZA, TEODORO
ARREZA, PEREGRINO BANGUIS, MOISES BARENG,
HIPOLITO BONGGOT, RAMON BUCALON, MELITO
BUENAVIDES, FELIX CAGONG, LORENZO CALIWATAN,
ANGEL CALUMBA, HENRY CARIAGA, GEORGE CASANO,
REYNALDO CAPUTOLAN, FELOMENO CHATO, JULIETO
CONGSIGNA, REYMUNDO CUADRA, EUFRONIO
CUBERO, BIENVENIDO CURAYAG, RUDICASTRO
CURAYAG, JOVENCIO DARAY, DAVID DE LEON,
NELSON ECHIN, ROLANDO ESCATRON, BERTINO
ESPINOLA, CRESENCIO FRANCIS, MATEO FRIAS,
RODOLFO FUENTES, BENEDICTO GALLOGO, HERMANO
GALOPE, JORGE GALVE, ERNESTO GONABO, VIRGILIO
GRUMO, JEMELITO GUBAL, RICARDO GUILLEN,
GENEROSO HERNANDEZ, JR., NELSON JABAY, EMILIO
JACINTO, EMELIANO JALA, JR., IGNACIO JURALBAR,
ALFREDO LOMOLJO, CELESTINO LOMOLJO, EDUARDO
LOPEZ, LUCIO LOPIO, SAMUEL LOREDO, NORBERTO
LORIA, MARCOS LOSIS, MARIO LUENGAS, NICOLAS
MAGHINAY, ROGELIO MATILDO, FLORANTE MIRANDA,
ANACLETO MONTON, NARCISO MONTON, ERNESTO
OROZCO, CHARLITO ORQUITA, MERLCHOR PANTO,
CASIMIRO PEREGRINO, EDUARDO PLAZA, NELSON
PLAZA, PAQUITO PLAZA, PEDRO PLAZA, FREDIOMIO
QUI�ONES, PEPE RAMIREZ, JOEL REMEDIO,
EDUARDO REVELLEZA, GERALDO ROSIL, JR.,
TEMESTOCLES RUBENAL, REMEGIO SABUSIDO, ROGER
SOTES, BELTRANO SULLANO, JAIME SULLANO, ERNIE
TACUGDOY, WENIFREDO TOCMO, SR., PAQUITO
TRUGILLO, ANIOLITO URBIZTONDO, ROMARICO
URIARTE DARIO ORQUIZA, BERTINO VALLEJO,
FRANCISCO VEGA, CRESENCIO YPARRAGUIRRE, RUDY
YPARUAGUIRRI and EDUARDO SACRAGON, SR.,
Petitioners, vs. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION, (Fifth Division), SURIGAO
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (SUDECOR) and RET.
GEN. REYNALDO G. DILAN, Vice President for Field
Operations & Administration, Respondents.
[A.M. No. RTJ-89-380 : December 19, 1990.] 192

SCRA 434 EFREN JAVIER and PEDRO JAVIER,
Complainants, vs. JUDGE SALVADOR P. DE GUZMAN,
JR., Respondent.

445 DOMINGO REYES, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE
JUDGE SERAFIN

454 LILIA AGUIRRE, GENATO AGUIRRE and BENITO
AGRAVA, Petitioners, vs. THE HONORABLE COURT OF
FIRST INSTANCE OF LEYTE, BRANCH III, EDUARDO
TAMPIL and LETICIA A. TAMPIL, Respondents.

459 WORLD MACHINE ENTERPRISES, Petitioner, vs.
INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT AND J.R.
LITHOPLATES, Respondents.

469 ROMEO J. ORDO�EZ, Petitioner, vs. THE HON.
ALFREDO J. GUSTILO, in his capacity as presiding
judge of Regional Trial Court of Cavite, Branch XVI,
Cavite City, Municipality of Rosario, Cavite, former
Mayor Calixto D. Enriquez of Rosario, Cavite, and
Valeriano Espiritu of Mabolo, Bacoor, Cavite,
Respondents.
vs. FRANCISCO DE GUZMAN y DE DIOS, Accused-
Appellant.
[G.R. Nos. 86492-94 : December 20, 1990.] 192

SCRA 483 THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-
Appellee, vs. LEOPOLDO MONTANTE, Defendant-
Appellant.

492 PENTAGON SECURITY and INVESTIGATION
AGENCY, Petitioner, vs. VICENTE T. JIMENEZ, ET AL.,
and NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION,
SECOND DIVISION, Respondents.

496 HON. RAUL S. MANGLAPUS, in his capacity as
Secretary of Foreign Affairs, Petitioner, vs. HON.
ANDRES E. MATIAS, Judge of the Regional Trial Court
of Manila (Branch 45) and GAVINO P. ABAYA,
Respondents.
[G.R. Nos. 92029-30 : December 20, 1990.] 192

SCRA 507 NICANOR G. DE GUZMAN, JR., Petitioner,
vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, Former Fifth Division,
HON. REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, National Capital
Judicial Region, Br. 48, Manila, and ENRIQUE KP. TAN,
Respondents.

514 FNCB FINANCE, Petitioner, vs. NAPOLEON
ESTAVILLO, Respondent.

521 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, vs.
HON. FELICIDAD CARANDANG VILLALON and
FEDERICO DE GUZMAN, Respondents.
[G.R. Nos. 48535-36 : December 21, 1990.] 192

SCRA 533 KOH TIECK HENG, Petitioner, vs. PEOPLE OF
THE PHILIPPINES and COURT OF APPEALS,
Respondents.

548 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Appellant, vs.
SALVADOR MONTEIRO, Appellee.

554 DIONG BI CHU, alias PATRICK CHANG, CHANG KA
HEE and LU LIONG CORPORATION, Petitioners, vs.
THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS, HON. GREGORIO G.
PINEDA, as Presiding Judge, Court of First Instance of
Rizal, Branch XXI; JAIME NAVOA and MILAGROS DE
LEOS, Respondents.
[G.R. No. 63753-54 : December 21, 1990.] 192

SCRA 561 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-
Appellee, vs. GREGORIO BERINGUEL, ARTURO
DEVARAS, ARTEMIO TULANG (at large), and RUFINO
CAMINONG (at large), accused. GREGORIO
BERINGUEL and ARTURO DEVARAS, Accused-
Appellants.

575 TIMOTEO POJAS, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE
MERCEDES GOZO-DALOLE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
JUDGE, CITY OF TAGBILARAN, IRENEA POJAS,
CESARIA LAGROSA and CORNELIA BETINOL,
Respondents.
[G.R. Nos. 78551-52 : December 21, 1990.] 192

Appellee, vs. ROLANDO MARCEDONIO y VILLANUEVA
and ANTONIO MARCEDONIO y VILLANUEVA, Accused-
Appellants.

vs. SALVADOR V. LUTA�EZ alias "Jun Plementero",
Defendant-Appellant.

598 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE TRADE
UNIONS (NAFTU), Petitioner, vs. MAINIT LUMBER
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY WORKERS UNION-UNITED
LUMBER AND GENERAL WORKERS OF THE
PHILIPPINES. (MALDECOWU-ULGWP), Respondents.

604 HYDRO RESOURCES CONTRACTORS
CORPORATION, Petitioner, vs. THE COURT OF TAX
APPEALS and THE HON. DEPUTY MINISTER OF
FINANCE, ALFREDO PIO DE RODA, Respondents.
[G.R. No. 83257-58 : December 21, 1990.] 192

SCRA 612 OSIAS ACADEMY and MONICA R. DE
CASTRO, Petitioners, vs. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
AND EMPLOYMENT, CONCHITA MERCADO, NECITAS
GACIS, EVELYN B. GARAIS, ESTRELLA GATON, EVA L.
CAYETANO, TERESA G. BILAZON, SUSAN G. FUELLAS,
ELVIRA D. GACIS, LOURDES CORREA, JULIETA A.
MANALO, NILA G. GABELO and TEODORO GUANIZO,
Respondents.

621 THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-
Appellee, vs. DANTE BARTULAY Accused-Appellant.

vs. ED FERNANDEZ AVILA, Defendant-Appellant.

Appellee, vs. ISAGANI DESLATE and ROMY
FRANCISCO alias "Romeo Francisco", Accused,
ISAGANI DESLATE, Appellant.

Appellee, vs. ISABELO SANCHEZ y PANDILI, Accused-
Appellant.
[G.R. Nos. 89682-83 : December 21, 1990.] 192

Appellee, vs. BENJAMIN HERICO, Defendant-
Appellant.

Appellee, vs. GERONIMO GOLES, Defendant-Appellant.

674 ATTY. TEODORO V. CABILAN & ALEJANDRO A.
PARALISAN, Petitioners, vs. HON. JUDGE JOSE R.
RAMOLETE & PROVINCIAL/CITY JAIL WARDEN of
Cebu City, Respondents.

680 RICARDO VILLAFLOR, Petitioner, vs. COURT OF
APPEALS and PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,**
Respondents.

691 VICENTE GERARDO, VALENTINA GERARDO,
CORNELIO GERARDO, BENJAMIN GERARDO, ANGEL
GERARDO, & CONSTANTE GERARDO, Petitioners, vs.
HON. FLORENTINO DE LA PE�A, Presiding Judge,
Branch VI, Court of First Instance of Ilocos Norte,
TERESA ANTONIO BELZA, VISITACION ANTONIO
ADINA, ILUMINADA PASCUA ANTONIO, FELICIDAD
BATACAN MATA, POLICARPO BATACAN, BASILIO
BATACAN, ISABEL BANGLOY, IRINEO BANGLOY,
EDUARDO BANGLOY, DIONICIO BANGLOY, DOMINGA
BANGLOY, and ERMINIO BANGLOY, Respondents.

vs. MARIO ABLAO, ISAGANI SACOP, LEOPOLDO DE
GUZMAN, PEDRO LADIANA, ZENON SAMONTE,
ALFREDO DEL MUNDO, BRUNO ABLAO, ISIDORO
GALEMA, DANILO MERCADO, RUSTICO LIWANAG,
FRANCISCO BALDEMECA, HECTOR SAMONTE and
DAVID ABLAO, accused, MARIO ABLAO, ISAGANI
SACOP, LEOPOLDO DE GUZMAN, PEDRO LADIANA,
ZENON SAMONTE, and ALFREDO DEL MUNDO,
Accused-Appellants.

709 SPOUSES EUFRACIO ROJAS AND CONCEPCION
ROJAS, Petitioners, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS,
AND SPOUSES FELIX E. MEDALLA AND DIONISIA
PACATAN MEDALLA, Respondents.

725 INVESTMENT AND UNDERWRITING
CORPORATION OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioners, vs.
COMPTRONICS PHILIPPINES, INC. and GENE V.
TAMESIS, Respondents.

735 FRANCISCO JOSE, ANTONIO, ERLINDA, JOVITA,
ARACELI, DOLORES, VIRGINIA, MARTA, LEDINIA, and
ANITA, all surnamed RAMON JAO, Petitioners, vs.
COURT OF APPEALS and LAUREANA C. VDA. DE
BAIRAN, as administratrix of the Estate of Pablo
Bairan, Respondents.
743 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, vs.
THE HONORABLE SANDIGANBAYAN (FIRST
DIVISION), Respondents.

768 JOSE ORDA and IMELDA LOZADA, Petitioners, vs.
THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS and GIL
GALANG Respondents.
G.R. No. 32945 December 3, 1990 - MARIANO T.

NASSER v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 39430 December 3, 1990 - FRANCISCO

MANLAPAZ, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 55466 December 3, 1990 - MANILA

SURETY & FIDELITY CO., INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS,
ET AL.
G.R. No. 78778 December 3, 1990 - LEONIDA

CORONADO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 79560 December 3, 1990 - ANDRES E.

DITAN v. PHILIPPINE OVERSEAS EMPLOYMENT
ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATOR, ET AL.
G.R. No. 80904 December 3, 1990 - BALTAZAR

PANTIG, ET AL. v. VENANCIO BALTAZAR
G.R. No. 82115 December 3, 1990 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHIL. v. ROMEO B. ORTIZ
G.R. No. 84884 December 3, 1990 - EULALIO M.

RUIZ, ET AL. v. DOROTEO N. CANEBA, ET AL.
G.R. No. 87264 December 3, 1990 - MARIANO

DINGLASAN, ET AL. v. MARIA ALICIA M. AUSTRIA, ET
AL.
G.R. No. 89545 December 3, 1990 - ROLANDO

DOLORFINO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
UDK No. 9864 December 3, 1990 - RUFINA VDA. DE

TANGUB v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 58668 December 4, 1990 - SANTIAGO

ESCARTE, JR., ET AL. v. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF
THE PHIL., ET AL.
G.R. No. 71929 December 4, 1990 - ALITALIA v.

INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.
G.R. No. 74577 December 4, 1990 - CONSOLACION

VILLANUEVA v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET
AL.

PHIL. v. MARIO L. TANDOY
G.R. No. 80791 December 4, 1990 - PEOPLE’S

FINANCING CORP., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET
AL.
G.R. No. 86586 December 4, 1990 - NATIONAL

IRRIGATION ADMINISTRATION v. TEODORO P.
REGINO, ET AL.
G.R. No. 86889 December 4, 1990 - LUZ FARMS v.

SEC. OF THE DEPT. OF AGRARIAN REFORM
G.R. No. 88177 December 4, 1990 - DOLORES A.

PAREDES v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.
G.R. No. 93054 December 4, 1990 - ALEXANDER P.

ORDILLO, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET
AL.
G.R. No. 30616 December 10, 1990 - EUFRACIO D.

ROJAS v. CONSTANCIO B. MAGLANA
G.R. No. 36827 December 10, 1990 - DIRECTOR OF

FOREST ADMINISTRATION, ET AL. v. RAMON C.
FERNANDEZ, ET AL.
G.R. No. 44749 December 10, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. MELVIN S. GIRON
G.R. No. 50661 December 10, 1990 - RUBEN

DELFIN, ET AL. v. AMADO G. INCIONG, ET AL.
G.R. No. 55361 December 10, 1990 - TEOFILO

ERCILLO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 55613 December 10, 1990 - ERNESTO

DICHOSO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 56620 December 10, 1990 - FILIPINAS

MILLS, INC., ET AL. v. ABELARDO M. DAYRlT, ET AL.
G.R. No. 69863-65 December 10, 1990 - LINO

BROCKA, ET AL. v. JUAN PONCE ENRILE, ET AL.
G.R. No. 74762 December 10, 1990 - COMMERCIAL

MOTORS CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONERS, NLRC,
SECOND DIVISION
G.R. No. 78163 December 10, 1990 - ANGELINA P.

SANTIAGO v. DEPUTY EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, ET AL.
G.R. No. 79962 December 10, 1990 - LUCIO R.

CRUZ v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 80397 December 10, 1990 - S & A

GAISANO INC., ET AL. v. VICENTE A. HIDALGO, ET AL.
G.R. No. 82215 December 10, 1990 - ANTIPAZ P.

PRESCO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

THE PHIL. v. ERNESTO M. AVILA, ET AL.
G.R. No. 82495 December 10, 1990 - ALLIED

BANKING CORPORATION v. SEDFREY ORDOÑEZ
G.R. Nos. 84132-33 December 10, 1990 -
NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, ET AL. v.
PHILIPPINE VETERANS BANK, ET AL.

THE PHIL. v. AMANDO TASARRA, ET AL.

THE PHIL. v. LYDIA RAMA
G.R. No. 91041 December 10, 1990 - JOSE A.

SADDUL, JR. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
A.M. No. P-86-32 December 10, 1990 - ALFREDO

LLANES v. GAUDIOSO BORJA, ET AL.

LANDS, ET AL. v. JUAN P. AQUINO, ET AL.
G.R. No. 68514 December 17, 1990 - TRADERS

ROYAL BANK v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT,
ET AL.
G.R. No. 71589 December 17, 1990 - CAGAYAN DE

ORO COLISEUM, INC. v. MINISTER OF LABOR AND
EMPLOYMENT, ET AL.

LANDS v. FRANCISCO K. REDOR, ET AL.
G.R. No. 78623 December 17, 1990 - OFELIA P.

TRISTE v. LEYTE STATE COLLEGE BOARD OF
TRUSTEES, ET AL.
G.R. No. 83530 December 18, 1990 - CRISTITO R.

AUSTRIA v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.
G.R. No. 93867 December 18, 1990 - SIXTO S.

BRILLANTES, JR. v. HAYDEE B. YORAC
G.R. Nos. 95203-05 December 18, 1990 - ERNESTO

MACEDA v. ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD, ET AL.

THE PHIL. v. JUVENAL KYAMKO
A.C. No. 2756 December 18, 1990 - PRUDENTIAL

BANK v. BENJAMIN M. GRECIA
G.R. No. 44167 December 19, 1990 - JULITA

FRANCISCO, ET AL. v. CRISPIN V. BAUTISTA, ET AL.
G.R. Nos. 88710-13 December 19, 1990 - UNION OF

FILIPRO EMPLOYEES, ET AL. v. NESTLE PHILIPPINES,
INC., ET AL.
G.R. No. 91025 December 19, 1990 - UNION OF

FILIPRO EMPLOYEES v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION, ET AL.
G.R. No. 95478 December 19, 1990 - EDUARDO

ACOP, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION, ET AL.
A.M. No. RTJ-89-380 December 19, 1990 - EFREN

JAVIER, ET AL. v. SALVADOR P. DE GUZMAN, JR.
G.R. No. 46198 December 20, 1990 - DOMINGO

REYES v. SERAFIN E. CAMILON, ET AL.
G.R. No. 53556 December 20, 1990 - LILIA

AGUIRRE, ET AL. v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF
LEYTE, ET AL.
G.R. No. 72019 December 20, 1990 - WORLD

MACHINE ENTERPRISES v. INTERMEDIATE
APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.
G.R. No. 81835 December 20, 1990 - ROMEO J.

ORDOÑEZ v. ALFREDO J. GUSTILO, ET AL.

THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO DE GUZMAN
G.R. Nos. 86492-94 December 20, 1990 - PEOPLE

OF THE PHIL. v. LEOPOLDO MONTANTE
G.R. No. 88114 December 20, 1990 - PENTAGON

SECURITY, ET AL. v. VICENTE T. JIMENEZ, ET AL.
G.R. No. 89618 December 20, 1990 - RAUL S.

MANGLAPUS v. ANDRES E. MATIAS, ET AL.
G.R. Nos. 92029-30 December 20, 1990 - NICANOR

G. DE GUZMAN, JR. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 93394 December 20, 1990 - FNCB

FINANCE v. NAPOLEON ESTAVILLO

THE PHIL. v. FELICIDAD CARANDANG VILLALON, ET
AL.
G.R. Nos. 48535-36 December 21, 1990 - KOH

TIECK HENG v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

THE PHIL. v. SALVADOR MONTEIRO
G.R. No. 49588 December 21, 1990 - DIONG BI

CHU, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 63753-54 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. GREGORIO BERINGUEL, ET AL.
G.R. No. 76519 December 21, 1990 - TIMOTEO

POJAS v. MERCEDES GOZO-DALOLE, ET AL.

OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO MARCEDONIO

THE PHIL. v. SALVADOR V. LUTAÑEZ

ASSO. OF FREE TRADE UNIONS v. MAINIT LUMBER
DEVT. COMPANY WORKERS
G.R. No. 80276 December 21, 1990 - HYDRO

RESOURCES CONTRACTORS CORPORATION v. COURT
OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 83257-58 December 21, 1990 - OSIAS

ACADEMY, ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND
EMPLOYMENT, ET AL.

THE PHIL. v. DANTE BARTULAY

THE PHIL. v. ED FERNANDEZ AVILA

THE PHIL. v. ISAGANI DESLATE, ET AL.

THE PHIL. v. ISABELO P. SANCHEZ

OF THE PHIL. v. BENJAMIN HERICO

THE PHIL. v. GERONIMO GOLES
G.R. No. 43491 December 26, 1990 - TEODORO V.

CABILAN, ET AL. v. JOSE R. RAMOLETE, ET AL.
G.R. No. 46210 December 26, 1990 - RICARDO

VILLAFLOR v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 61527 December 26, 1990 - VICENTE

GERARDO, ET AL. v. FLORENTINO DE LA PEÑA, ET AL.

THE PHIL. v. MARIO ABLAO, ET AL.
G.R. No. 77668 December 26, 1990 - EUFRACIO

ROJAS, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 81039 December 26, 1990 - INVESTMENT

AND UNDERWRITING CORP. OF THE PHIL. v.
COMPTRONICS PHILIPPINES, INC., ET AL.

JOSE, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 88336 December 26, 1990 - REPUBLIC OF

THE PHIL. v. SANDIGANBAYAN
G.R. No. 92625 December 26, 1990 - JOSE ORDA,

ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.


ET AL.






AL.



THE PHIL., ET AL.


AL.


AL.

REGINO, ET AL.



AL.

FERNANDEZ, ET AL.







SECOND DIVISION


G.R. No. 80397 December 10, 1990 - S & A




G.R. Nos. 84132-33 December 10, 1990 -






ET AL.

EMPLOYMENT, ET AL.


TRUSTEES, ET AL.







INC., ET AL.

COMMISSION, ET AL.

COMMISSION, ET AL.



LEYTE, ET AL.








AL.










EMPLOYMENT, ET AL.


















ET AL.






AL.



THE PHIL., ET AL.


AL.


AL.

REGINO, ET AL.



AL.


FERNANDEZ, ET AL.






SECOND DIVISION


G.R. No. 80397 December 10, 1990 - S & A




G.R. Nos. 84132-33 December 10, 1990 -







ET AL.

EMPLOYMENT, ET AL.


TRUSTEES, ET AL.







INC., ET AL.

COMMISSION, ET AL.

COMMISSION, ET AL.



LEYTE, ET AL.









AL.










EMPLOYMENT, ET AL.














Copyright © 1998 - 2018 ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™ RED

Maceda vs. ERB

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Maceda vs. ERB

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

8/18/2018 [G.R. Nos. 95203-05 : December 18, 1990.] 192 SCRA 363 SENATOR ERNESTO MACEDA, Petitioner, vs.

er, vs. ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD (ERB); MARCELO N. FERNANDO, ALEJAN…

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™

Like 1 Tweet Share

ChanRobles Intellectual Property PRODUCTS IN PESOS PER LITER

Diesel Oil 1.2400

ADOLFO CRUZ, Respondents.

Former Vice-Mayor MARTIN UDAN (Banaue),

RASTICA, LAMBERTO NIETO, ESMERALDO TATEL,

169 ERNESTO DICHOSO, Petitioner, vs. The

ABUNDIO M. CALISTE, Petitioners, vs. JUAN PONCE

[G.R. No. 80397 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 85531 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 91041 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[A.M. No. P-86-32 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 31688 : December 17, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 68514 : December 17, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 71589 : December 17, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 76303 : December 17, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 78623 : December 17, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 83530 : December 18, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 93867 : December 18, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. Nos. 95203-05 : December 18, 1990.] 192

[G.R. No. 95263 : December 18, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[A.C. No. 2756 : December 18, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 44167 : December 19, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. Nos. 88710-13 : December 19, 1990.] 192

[G.R. No. 91025 : December 19, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 95478 : December 19, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[A.M. No. RTJ-89-380 : December 19, 1990.] 192

[G.R. No. 46198 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 53556 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 72019 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 81835 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. Nos. 86492-94 : December 20, 1990.] 192

[G.R. No. 88114 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 89618 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. Nos. 92029-30 : December 20, 1990.] 192

[G.R. No. 93394 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 43659 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. Nos. 48535-36 : December 21, 1990.] 192

[G.R. No. 49454 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 49588 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 63753-54 : December 21, 1990.] 192

[G.R. No. 76519 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. Nos. 78551-52 : December 21, 1990.] 192

[G.R. No. 78854 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 79526 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 80276 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 83257-58 : December 21, 1990.] 192

[G.R. No. 83696 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 84918 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 87807 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 89407 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. Nos. 89682-83 : December 21, 1990.] 192

[G.R. No. 91513 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 43491 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 46210 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 61527 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 70556 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 77668 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 81039 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 85157 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 92625 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA