Filing # 80745948 E-Filed 11/13/2018 04:49:43 PM
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT,
IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA
BONFIGLIO, JIM
Plaintiff(s),
vs. CASE NO. 2018 CA 002408
DETZNER IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF STATE,
KEN
Defendant(s) .
ORDER ON CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, ORDER SUSPENDING
CERTAIN DEADLINES AND ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE
THIS CAUSE came before the Court on November 13,
2018 for a case management conference in this high
priority election involving the House District 89
contest. Attorneys Ufferman, Blank, Cato, Hinkle,
Anstead, Mitchell, Hall and Fernandez were present, as
was plaintiff Bonfiglio. The Court having hearing from
counsel and the parties, and the pending intervenors
and potential intervenors, and being otherwise fully
advised in the premises, makes the following findings
and conclusions of law:
1. The task at hand is to address the statutory
provisions relating to machine and manual recounts for
eFiled by GTEVERS, KAREN A on BM Neb Date (SigningDate}certain election contests, and the reporting and
certification of the election results when the
limitation of resources - in this case, the machines
needed for the machine recounts - makes impossible the
compliance with certain time frames.
The Unique Palm Beach County Situation
2. According to counsel, Palm Beach County
Supervisor of Elections Bucher has eight machines [at
most] that can be used for the machine recounts to be
done. Reportedly unique among Florida's 67 supervisors,
Supervisor Bucher has available to her machines that
are 11 years old and can only count ballots for one
contest at a time, while the machines available in the
other 66 counties can perform machine recounts of more
than one contest at a time.
3. According to those present, there has never been
a machine recount for a statewide contest, something
required if the vote difference is less than 0.5%. This
year, three statewide contests [U.S. Senate, Governorand Agriculture Commissioner] concluded the initial
calculation with vote differentials in the less than
0.5% range, triggering a need for a statewide machine
recount in each of those three contests.
4. Here, the contest between candidates Bonfiglio
and Caruso ended with merely 37 votes separating the
candidates, out of the more than 80,000 votes cast in
the contest for House District 89, clearly within the
0.5% margin.
5. Florida's election laws are compartmentalized
and are somewhat inconsistent. The statutes do not seem
to contemplate a situation, such as here, where close
results trigger the need for multiple recounts.
6. For example, mailed ballots can be counted if
received before the polls close on election day, unless
they are received from persons overseas or on active
duty in the military, in which event the Supervisors of
Elections must count them as long as they are received
before midnight ten days after the election, i.e., by