Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Uncanny
Uncanny
INTRODUCTION
Introduction the topic of Gender, and how it plays a role in the film
Looking at Male and Female
Reference info
1960’s male role
The 1960s was known as a decade of change were values and the societal
normal activity began to diverge from the old customs. For the most part
of this decade the roles of men didn’t really change that much compared
to the growing change of the female role in society, the common
proceeded role of men at the time were that they gave a family financial
stability and were expected to ensure a health upbringing of their families.
Reference info
Men’s look
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 3
Women Within Repulsion (1965)
- 1960s Society and Role of Women
“One of the most profound changes was happening in the
bedroom. By the end of the Sixties, more than 80 percent
of wives of childbearing age were using contraception
after the federal government in 1960 approved a birth
control pill. This freed many women from unwanted Contraception changed Britain, unlike the 50s the
pregnancy and gave them many more choices, and contraceptive pill gave women control over their lives in
freedom” terms of unsuspected pregnancies.
It allowed women not to rely on males for contraception,
leading to less marriages. As often once a woman is
pregnant the men would have the obligation to wed. But
with the creation the the pill, marriages for women were
harder to come by.
Although seen as a positive creation, allowing women to
live with more freedom. Some argued it was. Form of
abortion, and would allow the youth to loose the meaning
of love and give in, instead to sexual desires. (R.Cafe (2011))
-(Merriam-Webster.com)
DEFINING ‘THE UNCANNY’.
He states that; uncanny effects can come from the “repetition of the
same thing” – [Freud, 1919]
“the word for “uncanny” is very similar to the word for “familiarity.” For
example, the German word for uncanny, unheimlich, is the opposite of heimlich,
which means “familiar” or “belonging to the home.” – [Goldhill, 2016]
Something that might be scary to us, might also be safe and comforting or
recognisable. Which is what causes ‘The Uncanny.
Figure 1 – Book Cover –’The Uncanny’
THE UNCANNY – MEN IN THE FILM “She did not feel all too
heimlich with him.” “To
destroy the Heimlichkeit
of the home.”
“Something has to be
added to what is novel
and unfamiliar to make
it uncanny”
Figure 2 - Landlord, Repulsion 1965 Figure 3 - Colin, Repulsion 1965
- [Freud, 1919:2-4]
“The subject of the “uncanny” is The men within the film all
a province of this kind. It cause some uncanniness
undoubtedly belongs to all that is for Carole, as they each
terrible—to all that arouses dread display some familiarity
and creeping horror” - [Freud, with her father. Not only
through their gender, but
1919:1]
their attitude towards her.
Throughout, Polanski uses jazz elements, percussive and nerve jangling, which provide a through
line to all of his earlier short films.
COLOUR
• Polanski surely looked to the short when
assembling Repulsion, a film that shares both a
similar basic premise and intense claustrophobic
tone. The visual style is one that gathers
momentum through restrained, simplistic and
powerful beats.
• Polanski here deals in binaries, two polar
opposites with no points between, sane and Fig 1. Carol between sane and insane.
insane, hostile and sedated, and corrupt and
innocent. There was no budgetary demand to
shoot in primitive black and white, and “The use of light and dark is used here to
brilliantly vivid colour stock was becoming signify Carol's psyche as she alternates
increasingly popular at the time, but the simple between the two states of mind”. -Thomas
divide between colours is used to devastating
effect and establishes itself as the film's most
prominent stylistic device.
LIGHT
• The use of light and dark is used here to signify
Carol's psyche as she alternates between the two
states of mind, and she repeatedly weaves
throughout the beams of light to symbolise the
transition. However in previous scenes, we have
also observed it being used to act as a visual
representation of Carol's perspective, most notably Fig. 2; Carol
in the scenes that depict the apparent source of
her trauma.
• The special lighting creates deep shadows and
wide-angle lenses to expand the space of the
apartment the film takes place in, in grotesque
ways.
Fig. 3; Carol and Colin
THE UNCANNY CAMERA
How does the camera contribute to the Uncanny?
• Therefore 'Repulsion' frequently breaks the rules in order to withhold some of that
information from us, to generate an uncanny atmosphere.
A few ways the Camera is used to create an uncanny
atmosphere in ‘Repulsion’
One; The Camera simulates the human eye
The human eye is a camera, and can be talked about using the same optical terminology used to describe camera lenses. However, in
most Film, a wide variety of lenses are used to prevent distortion, and most of the time wider angle lenses are used to help the picture
feel large and enveloping.
"The film combines the use of natural perspective and extended takes, which has the effect of limiting
our gaze to what is being observed from the point of view of a notional (but invisible and ineffectual)
observer…”
Caputo, D. (2012)
Lenses in Repulsion tend to be narrower angle, especially around Carole. This has the opposite effect to wide angle lenses; giving the film
a more claustrophobic feeling, and restricting the information on screen only to what a single person might actually be able to see at any
particular moment.
In a sense, this withholds information from the viewer, making us feel somewhat blind, and vulnerable to what might be just out of
frame, in our ‘peripheral vision’.
Polanski (The director), avoids frequent cuts, and tends to prefer smooth camera movement in long shots. This helps immerse us in the
idea that we are watching from the perspective of a real person.
"Carole's nose and lips seem disproportionately large, an effect that comes as the result of using of a 'normal' lens at
close range, which distorts the dimensions of the face, much like the human eye does at this distance. A more
'flattering' choice would have been to use a 100mm lens with the camera twice the distance away, which would have
filled the frame with Carole's head equally well..." Caputo, D. (2012)
Fig. 1 Fig. 2
The chosen lens not only simulates human field of vision, but also the focal length of the eye. Focal length is a strange attribute of all
lenses which can change the apparent ‘flatness’ of an image, and how close we feel the subject.
In close up shots for many Films, a camera with a longer focal distance placed further away is preferred, because it distorts the actors
faces less. Above, you can see how lenses placed at the same distance from a subject distort features based on their focal length.
(See https://i.imgur.com/XBIOEvZ.gifv)
Fig. 3
In ‘Repulsion’, Polanski frequently uses a lens with a short focal distance, similar to that of the human eye, for close up shots of Carole.
This not only distorts her features in an unflattering and uncomfortable manner, it also contributes to the impression that the camera
represents the perspective of a real person.
In the shot pictured above, not only does the camera move fluidly towards the bed and appear to ‘mount’ Carole, we truly feel as if it
represents someone’s face pressed up uncomfortably close against hers.
…With the camera placed at the same distance from the action as this voyeur and by using a lens with a principal
focal length that approximates the human visual field, the perspective of the human eye at that distance is mimicked.
The goal is simply to limit as much as possible the work done by the brain to make sense of the image by furnishing it
with the type of perspective that it expects" Caputo, D. (2012)
Caputo; a film psychologist, theories that these factors greatly enhance the immersion of the film by feeding the brain images it expects
to come directly from the eye. Putting the viewer in the film alongside Carole, and limiting what we can see generates a powerful feeling
of vulnerability and suspense.
Two; The camera stays within Caroles narrative reach
Inside both of their narrative reach
Fig. 4
Outside Outside
Black Spy’s white Spy’s
narrative narrative
reach reach
"At times the camera seems to adopt Carole's exact POV, but normally it retains its observational stance. For the
most part, the camera (and thus the spectator) is tethered to Carole's narrative reach." Caputo, D. (2012)
'Narrative reach' here refers to all of the things within narrative that a character knows about; it’s the incomplete puzzle of the whole
narrative that they have inside their head.
In other films, the camera may be placed in a position that shows us events, people or objects that the shots ‘focus character’ does not
see or know about, because often the director wants the audience to know things that this character does not.
Repulsion does not do this. Whist we do see other characters in their own scenes, when the film is following Carole, the camera stays
within her narrative reach. We never get to peak around a corner before her, or see something scurry behind her in the background that
she doesn’t notice. What we are seeing is a true representation of the world from Carole’s perspective, and there is no invisible narrator
behind the camera giving us visual hints.
This adds to the films Uncanny atmosphere; the information being withheld here being a greater perspective on the narrative that we
often feel intitled to as an audience. But without this advantage, we are without the knowledge to predict or understand the events
unfolding in front of us, and like Carole we are left vulnerable, confused and without warning as to when something frightening might
happen.
Three; The disobedient camera
"Whist speaking to her sister, for example, Carole stares off screen, presumably at the kitchen wall or ceiling, and
nonchalantly states that 'they must get this crack mended'. The camera does not comply with our wish to see the crack she
is referring to, nor does her sister seem to register what Carole has said. At that moment, we, like Helene, do not know what
to make of this seemingly random statement. It is only in retrospect that we wonder whether the crack was there at all."
Caputo, D. (2012)
Again, in many films, it’s a simple principle that if the focus of the dialog changes to an object or person within the scene, the camera
changes or moves to frame that object.
In Repulsion, the camera does not always do this. A prominent example is when Carole mentions the crack in the wall to her sister. You
might expect the camera to cut or move to show us what she is referring to, but it stays put.
At the time, this statement seems random, and particularly ‘off’ since the camera refuses to show us what Carole is referring to. But in
retrospect, with the knowledge that the physical aspects of the apartment can become distorted through Carole's perspective, we realise
that this was likely the first hint of the presumably imaginary cracks that haunt Carole around the apartment later in the film.
It’s perhaps important that Helene is also in the room, as when other characters enter the scene with Carole, the distortions tend to
become less, as if the Camera is briefly influenced by a more grounded person and takes on a perspective closer to reality. So we can
expect that if the camera were to pan over to the kitchen wall, according to Helene, the crack would not be there.
It’s almost as if the camera is paralyzed in this instant, where two conflicting perspectives are being portrayed simultaneously, and if when
prompted by Carole, it were to move and reveal whether the crack was there or not, this ambiguous perspective would collapse into
either one of the two characters. So it stubbornly stays put, refusing to give us a clear indicator as to who’s perspective we are meant to
be understanding the world from; more-so keeping events in the scene ambiguous, and confusing us further as to what’s real and what’s
Carole's delusions.
Conclusion
Polanski uses the Camera in ‘Repulsion’ to command careful control over information available to the audience
throughout the film. By limiting us to a human perspective, and not allowing us to see outside of the narrative
reach of characters, the direction of the film is left ambiguous and there’s a strong sense of not having a grander
perspective on the narrative as we might come to expect in other films.
Like Carrol, we are left vulnerable to the wrath of her delusions at any moment, and unable to effectively
distinguish between reality and her slowly encroaching madness.
1960s was a revolutionary era for women due to the creation of the contraceptive pill and the increase of liberation
of clothing which is then translated through the characters from the film Repulsion, including Helen who represents
a more 1960s idealised woman while Carole represents the 1950s idealised version of women.
The term Uncanny was developed by Freud and is described as a familiar event that caused discomfort.
The audio, colour and lighting used in the film boosts the feeling of uncanniness.
Illustration List:
• Figure 1 – Sigmund Freud, “ The Uncanny” [book]. Available at: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Uncanny-Penguin-M odern-Classics/dp/0141182377
Last Assessed on: 22 nd November 2018
• Figure 2 – Landlord, Repulsion 1965 [image] Available at http://basementrejects.com/review/repulsion-1965/ Last Assessed: 22 nd November
2018
• Figure 3 – Colin, Repulsion 1965 [image] Available at: https://lassothemovies.wordpress.com/2012/10/10/repulsion-1965/ Last Assessed: 22 nd
November 2018
• Figure 4 – M ichael, Repulsion 1965 [image] Available at: deeperintomovies.net/journal/archives/9423 Last Assessed: 22 nd November 2018
• Figure 5 – Repulsion 1965, Nun scene [image]. Available at: http://storiesforghosts.com/a-look-back-at-repulsion-on-its-50th-anniversary/ Last
Assessed: 22 nd November 2018
• Fig. 1; Carol between sane and insane (2015), at http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-eCiAsCqM Nkw/VdD-
cy1OrYI/AAAAAAAAArI/ZyJoyw12CIo/s1600/Repulsion%2B2.jpg (Accessed on 22.11.2018)
• Fig. 2; Carol (2015), at http://storiesforghosts.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/1786_repulsion.jpg (Accessed on 22.11.2018)
• Fig. 3, Caron and Colin (2014), at https://elgabinetedeldoctormabuse.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/repulsion-8.jpg?w=620&h=338 (Accessed on
22.11.2018)
Vintagedancer.com. (2018). 1960s M enswear Outfits | 60s Fashion for Guys. [online] Available at: https://vintagedancer.com/1960s/1960s-
menswear-clothing-fashion-ideas/ [Accessed 22 Nov. 2018]. Fig 1: https://petapixel.com/2011/11/07/a-striking-look-at-how-focal-length-affect-head-
shots/
Fig 2: https://www.dentalphotomaster.com/macro-lens-60mm-or-100mm-which-one-is-better/
Fig 3: (‘Repulsion’)
Fig 4: https://steamiowacity.org/event/spy-camp-spy-vs-spy/2018-08-13/
Harvard Illustrations List
Figure 1- Women of 1960s Britain (1963) - M . Rawi. (2012). W hat a difference a decade makes: The fashion images that show how British women moved out of the
1950s and into the Swinging Sixties. Available: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2088993/W hat-difference-decade-makes-The-fashion-images-British-
women-moved-1950s-Swinging-Sixties.html Last accessed 22/11/2018.
Figure 2- 1950s Women’s Fashion - C. Leaper. (2017). The biggest 1950s fashion style moments that defined the decade Read more at
https://www.marieclaire.co.uk/fashion/1950s-fashion-icons-fifties-style-moments-in-pictures-81397#7xHvxbJYTM xkpTM 4.99. Available:
https://www.marieclaire.co.uk/fashion/1950s-fashion-icons-fifties-style-moments-in-pictures-81397 Last accessed 22/11/2018.
Figure 3- M iniskirts in 1960s Britian Culture. (2016). How The Invention Of The M ini Skirt Shook Up The 1960s. Available: http://groovyhistory.com/how-the-
invention-of-the-mini-skirt-shook-up-the-1960s/1 Last accessed 22/11/2018.
Figure 4- 1960’s Contraceptive Pill C. Early. (2017). December 4, 1961: Birth control pill becomes available on the NHS for first time. Available:
http://home.bt.com/news/on-this-day/december-4-1961-birth-control-pill-becomes-available-on-the-nhs-for-first-time-11363947767084. Last accessed
22/11/2018.
Figure 5- Carole and Helen Repulsion (1965) - Alum M edia Ltd.. (N/A). Yvonne Fumeaux and Catherine Deneuve in Repulsion directed by Roman Polanski,
1965. Available: https://flashbak.com/lower-east-upper-west-new-york-city-street-photographs-jonathan-brand-1957-1968-396229/yvonne-fumeaux-and-catherine-
deneuve-in-repulsion-directed-by-roman-polanski-1965/ Last accessed 22/11/2018.
Figure 6- Helen Repulsion (1965) N. Hendry. (2015). Repulsion (1965) 50th Anniversary – Part 2 – Catherine Deneuve + Ian Hendry + John Fraser + Yvonne Furneaux
(dir. Roman Polanski). Available: https://ianhendry.com/repulsion-1965-50th-anniversary-part-2-catherine-deneuve-ian-hendry-john-fraser-yvonne-furneaux-dir-
roman-polanski/ Last accessed 22/11/2018.
Figure 8- M ales watching Carol (1965) J. Ipcar. (2013). Repulsion at Catherine Deneuve and Roman Polanski.Available: http://www.back-
row.com/home/2018/3/7/repulsion-at-catherine-deneuve-and-roman-polanski. Last accessed 22/11/2018.
Bibliography
• En.wikipedia.org. (n.d.). Uncanny. [online] Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny [Accessed 22 Nov. 2018].
• En.wikipedia.org. (n.d.). Taboo. [online] Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taboo [Accessed 22 Nov. 2018].
• Goldwill, O. (2016). A Freudian theory, now backed up by neuroscience, explains why so many fear clowns. [online] Quartz. Available at:
https://qz.com/804497/freud-on-why-so-many-people-have-a-fear-of-clowns/ [Accessed 22 Nov. 2018].
• YourDictionary. (n.d.). Examples of Taboo. [online] Available at: https://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-taboo.html [Accessed 22 Nov.
2018].
• Bill Horrigan (2009), Repulsion: Eye of the Storm, The criterion collection – July 2009, [online] at https://www.criterion.com/current/posts/1207-
repulsion-eye-of-the-storm (Accessed on 22.11.2018)
• Kristofer Thomas (2016), Scene Dissection: Repulsion (Roman Polanski, 1966), The four oh five –January 2016, [online] at
https://www.thefourohfive.com/film/article/repulsion-roman-polanski-1966-145 (Accessed on 22.11.2018)
• prezi.com. (2018). The Gender Roles of the 1960s. [online] Available at: https://prezi.com/n9vnofi8jvlv/the-gender-roles-of-the-1960s/ [Accessed
22 Nov. 2018].
• Davide Caputo, Polanski and Perception: The Psychology of Seeing and the Cinema of Roman Polanski, Intellect Books, 2012 pages 98-103 (Book)
Bibliography
BBC Bitesize. (2008). The changing role of women in the 1960s.Available: https://www.bbc.com/bitesize/clips/zr37pv4 Last accessed 22/11/2018.
Culture. (2016). How The Invention Of The Mini Skirt Shook Up The 1960s. Available: http://groovyhistory.com/how-the-invention-of-the-mini-skirt-shook-up-the-1960s/1 Last accessed
22/11/2018.
Delproductions. (2013). GENDER REPRESENTATION IN THE THRILLER GENRE- FEMALES. Available: https://delproductions.wordpress.com/2013/11/20/gender-representation-in-the-thriller-genr
females/ Last accessed 22/11/2018.
E. Moore. (2016). Sexual Violence and Female Experience in Roman Polanski’s Apartment Trilogy: Repulsion, Rosemary’s Baby, The Tenant.Available: https://brightlightsfilm.com/wp-
content/cache/all/sexual-violence-female-experience-roman-polanskis-apartment-trilogy-repulsion-rosemarys-baby-tenant/#.W_ZjnDj7TIU Last accessed 22/11/2018.
G. Cwik. (2015). 50 years ago, Repulsion pioneered a new genre of gendered horror. Available: https://film.avclub.com/50-years-ago-repulsion-pioneered-a-new-genre-of-gender-1798285951 L
accessed 22/11/2018.
I.Hendry. (2013). Repulsion (1965) | Documentary Short - Interview w/ Dir. Roman Polanski -Ian Hendry. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGISoIwm3Mw Last accessed 22/11/201
K. Hagen. (2016). 31 Days of Feminist Horror Films: ROSEMARY’S BABY + REPULSION. Available: https://blog.blcklst.com/31-days-of-feminist-horror-films-rosemarys-baby-repulsion-156ebb671c
Last accessed 22/11/2018.
K.Watson. (2016). The 1960s The Decade that Shook Britain.Available: https://www.historic-uk.com/CultureUK/The-1960s-The-Decade-that-Shook-Britain/ Last accessed 22/11/2018.
K.T. Walsh. (2010). The 1960s: A Decade of Change for Women.Available: https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2010/03/12/the-1960s-a-decade-of-change-for-women Last accessed
22/11/2018.
M. Rawi. (2012). What a difference a decade makes: The fashion images that show how British women moved out of the 1950s and into the Swinging Sixties. Available:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2088993/What-difference-decade-makes-The-fashion-images-British-women-moved-1950s-Swinging-Sixties.html Last accessed 22/11/2018.
R. Cafe. (2011). How the contraceptive pill changed Britain. Available: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15984258 Last accessed 22/11/2018.