UJI VALIDITAS

Uji Validitas Form Terhadap X1

CORRELATIONS
/VARIABLES=Form#1 Form#2 Form#3 Form#4 Form#5 Form#6 Form#7 Form#8 Form#9 Form#10 X1
/PRINT=TWOTAIL NOSIG
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.
Correlations

Form#1 Form#2 Form#3 Form#4 Form#5 Form#6 Form#7 Form#8 Form#9 Form#10 X1

Form#1 Pearson Correlation 1 .229 .259* .196 .317* .259* .387** .518** .304* .259* .597**

Sig. (2-tailed) .079 .045 .134 .014 .045 .002 .000 .018 .045 .000

N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Form#2 Pearson Correlation .229 1 .096 .982** .297* .096 .309* .272* .159 .096 .567**
Sig. (2-tailed) .079 .465 .000 .021 .465 .016 .036 .225 .465 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Form#3 Pearson Correlation .259* .096 1 .091 .132 1.000** .224 .231 .312* 1.000** .700**
Sig. (2-tailed) .045 .465 .489 .315 .000 .085 .076 .015 .000 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Form#4 Pearson Correlation .196 .982** .091 1 .292* .091 .307* .272* .148 .091 .556**
Sig. (2-tailed) .134 .000 .489 .023 .489 .017 .035 .259 .489 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Form#5 Pearson Correlation .317* .297* .132 .292* 1 .132 .511** .390** .164 .132 .559**
Sig. (2-tailed) .014 .021 .315 .023 .315 .000 .002 .211 .315 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Form#6 Pearson Correlation .259* .096 1.000** .091 .132 1 .224 .231 .312* 1.000** .700**
Sig. (2-tailed) .045 .465 .000 .489 .315 .085 .076 .015 .000 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Form#7 Pearson Correlation .387** .309* .224 .307* .511** .224 1 .482** .209 .224 .631**
Sig. (2-tailed) .002 .016 .085 .017 .000 .085 .000 .108 .085 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Form#8 Pearson Correlation .518** .272* .231 .272* .390** .231 .482** 1 .371** .231 .637**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .036 .076 .035 .002 .076 .000 .004 .076 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Form#9 Pearson Correlation .304* .159 .312* .148 .164 .312* .209 .371** 1 .312* .540**
Sig. (2-tailed) .018 .225 .015 .259 .211 .015 .108 .004 .015 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Form#10 Pearson Correlation .259* .096 1.000** .091 .132 1.000** .224 .231 .312* 1 .700**
Sig. (2-tailed) .045 .465 .000 .489 .315 .000 .085 .076 .015 .000
 N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
X1 Pearson Correlation .597** .567** .700** .556** .559** .700** .631** .637** .540** .700** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

RELIABILITY
/VARIABLES=Form#1 Form#2 Form#3 Form#4 Form#5 Form#6 Form#7 Form#8 Form#9 Form#10
/SCALE('ALL VARIABLES') ALL
/MODEL=ALPHA.

Kesimpulan:

Berdasarkan uji validitas diketahui bahwa pengujian form terhadap X1 tidak ada data yang tidak valid, karena nilai r hitung lebih besar dari nilai r
tabel (nilai r tabel adalah 0.05).

UJI VALIDITAS STRATEGI TERHADAP X2

Correlations

Starpro_1 Starpro_2 Starpro_3 Starpro_4 Starpro_5 Starpro_6 Starpro_7 Starpro_8 Starpro_9 Starpro_10 X2

Starpro_1 Pearson
1 .155 .221 .486** .241 .180 .241 .158 .520** .232 .577**
Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed) .236 .089 .000 .064 .170 .064 .227 .000 .075 .000

N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Starpro_2 Pearson
.155 1 .608** .187 .433** .371** .433** .357** .080 .157 .630**
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .236 .000 .153 .001 .003 .001 .005 .544 .230 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Starpro_3 Pearson
.221 .608** 1 .371** .490** .300* .490** .287* .164 .312* .699**
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .089 .000 .004 .000 .020 .000 .026 .211 .015 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Starpro_4 Pearson
.486** .187 .371** 1 .202 .255* .202 .266* .390** .231 .599**
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .153 .004 .121 .049 .121 .040 .002 .076 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Starpro_5 Pearson
.241 .433** .490** .202 1 .272* 1.000** .296* .210 .108 .626**
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .064 .001 .000 .121 .035 .000 .022 .108 .411 .000
 N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Starpro_6 Pearson
.180 .371** .300* .255* .272* 1 .272* .917** .061 .184 .657**
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .170 .003 .020 .049 .035 .035 .000 .642 .159 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Starpro_7 Pearson
.241 .433** .490** .202 1.000** .272* 1 .296* .210 .108 .626**
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .064 .001 .000 .121 .000 .035 .022 .108 .411 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Starpro_8 Pearson
.158 .357** .287* .266* .296* .917** .296* 1 .093 .227 .669**
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .227 .005 .026 .040 .022 .000 .022 .481 .081 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Starpro_9 Pearson
.520** .080 .164 .390** .210 .061 .210 .093 1 .132 .490**
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .544 .211 .002 .108 .642 .108 .481 .315 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Starpro_10 Pearson
.232 .157 .312* .231 .108 .184 .108 .227 .132 1 .462**
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .075 .230 .015 .076 .411 .159 .411 .081 .315 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
X2 Pearson
.577** .630** .699** .599** .626** .657** .626** .669** .490** .462** 1
Correlation

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Kesimpulan:

Berdasarkan uji validitas diketahui bahwa pengujian item strategi prioritas terhadap X2 tidak ada data yang tidak valid, karena nilai r hitung lebih
besar dari nilai r tabel (nilai r tabel adalah 0.05).
UJI VALIDITAS INOVASI TERHADAP Y

Correlations

Inov_1 Inov_2 Inov_3 Inov_4 Inov_5 Inov_6 Inov_7 Inov_8 Inov_9 Inov_10 Y

Inov_1 Pearson Correlation 1 .387** .133 .247 .361** .073 -.093 .387** .268* .304* .521**

Sig. (2-tailed) .002 .311 .057 .005 .580 .479 .002 .038 .018 .000

N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Inov_2 Pearson Correlation .387** 1 .341** .110 .522** .165 .043 1.000** .187 .866** .707**
Sig. (2-tailed) .002 .008 .401 .000 .209 .743 .000 .152 .000 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Inov_3 Pearson Correlation .133 .341** 1 .391** .135 .370** .401** .341** .350** .222 .679**
Sig. (2-tailed) .311 .008 .002 .304 .004 .002 .008 .006 .089 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Inov_4 Pearson Correlation .247 .110 .391** 1 -.133 .331** -.003 .110 .242 .111 .442**
Sig. (2-tailed) .057 .401 .002 .311 .010 .983 .401 .062 .398 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Inov_5 Pearson Correlation .361** .522** .135 -.133 1 .139 .118 .522** .160 .445** .543**
Sig. (2-tailed) .005 .000 .304 .311 .291 .370 .000 .221 .000 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
** ** * **
Inov_6 Pearson Correlation .073 .165 .370 .331 .139 1 .327 .165 .348 .019 .581**
Sig. (2-tailed) .580 .209 .004 .010 .291 .011 .209 .006 .883 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Inov_7 Pearson Correlation -.093 .043 .401** -.003 .118 .327* 1 .043 .197 .042 .425**
Sig. (2-tailed) .479 .743 .002 .983 .370 .011 .743 .131 .749 .001
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Inov_8 Pearson Correlation .387** 1.000** .341** .110 .522** .165 .043 1 .187 .866** .707**
Sig. (2-tailed) .002 .000 .008 .401 .000 .209 .743 .152 .000 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Inov_9 Pearson Correlation .268* .187 .350** .242 .160 .348** .197 .187 1 .202 .555**
Sig. (2-tailed) .038 .152 .006 .062 .221 .006 .131 .152 .121 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Inov_10 Pearson Correlation .304* .866** .222 .111 .445** .019 .042 .866** .202 1 .598**
Sig. (2-tailed) .018 .000 .089 .398 .000 .883 .749 .000 .121 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Y Pearson Correlation .521** .707** .679** .442** .543** .581** .425** .707** .555** .598** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .001 .000 .000 .000

N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Kesimpulan:

Berdasarkan uji validitas diketahui bahwa pengujian data inovasi terhadap Y tidak ada data yang tidak valid, karena nilai r hitung lebih besar dari
nilai r tabel (nilai r tabel adalah 0.05).

Uji Reliability

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 60 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 60 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.818 10

Kesimpulan :
Diketahui dari data diatas pernyatan dapat dikatakan reliable karena Cronbach’s Alpha sebesar 0,818 lebih besar dari 0,60. Karena seluruh data
telah dinyatakn valid dan reliable maka dapat dilanjutkan pengujian selanjutnya.
Regression

Variables Entered/Removeda

Variables Variables
Model Entered Removed Method

1 kepuasan kerja,
pengembangan . Enter
karirb

a. Dependent Variable: kinerja karyawan

b. All requested variables entered.

Model Summaryb

Adjusted R Std. Error of the

Model R R Square Square Estimate

1 .741a .549 .534 2.691

a. Predictors: (Constant), kepuasan kerja, pengembangan karir

b. Dependent Variable: kinerja karyawan

ANOVAa

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 503.247 2 251.624 34.754 .000b

Residual 412.686 57 7.240

Total 915.933 59

a. Dependent Variable: kinerja karyawan

b. Predictors: (Constant), kepuasan kerja, pengembangan karir

Coefficientsa

Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients

Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.

1 (Constant) 11.842 3.570 3.317 .002

pengembangan karir -.001 .128 -.001 -.008 .994

kepuasan kerja .722 .137 .742 5.266 .000

a. Dependent Variable: kinerja karyawan
 Residuals Statisticsa

Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation N

Predicted Value 32.74 47.88 40.37 2.921 60

Std. Predicted Value -2.610 2.571 .000 1.000 60
Standard Error of Predicted
.351 1.140 .570 .195 60
Value
Adjusted Predicted Value 31.81 47.86 40.33 2.945 60
Residual -12.668 4.257 .000 2.645 60
Std. Residual -4.708 1.582 .000 .983 60
Stud. Residual -4.751 1.747 .007 1.005 60
Deleted Residual -12.900 5.189 .037 2.768 60
Stud. Deleted Residual -6.059 1.780 -.015 1.121 60
Mahal. Distance .022 9.605 1.967 2.205 60
Cook's Distance .000 .222 .016 .036 60
Centered Leverage Value .000 .163 .033 .037 60

a. Dependent Variable: kinerja karyawan

REGRESSION
/MISSING LISTWISE
/STATISTICS COEFF OUTS R ANOVA
/CRITERIA=PIN(.05) POUT(.10)
/NOORIGIN
/DEPENDENT Y
/METHOD=ENTER X1 X2
/SCATTERPLOT=(*ZPRED ,*SRESID)
/RESIDUALS HISTOGRAM(ZRESID) NORMPROB(ZRESID)
/SAVE PRED RESID.

Regression
 Variables Entered/Removeda

Variables Variables
Model Entered Removed Method

1 kepuasan kerja,
pengembangan . Enter
karirb

a. Dependent Variable: kinerja karyawan

b. All requested variables entered.

Model Summaryb

Adjusted R Std. Error of the

Model R R Square Square Estimate

1 .741a .549 .534 2.691

a. Predictors: (Constant), kepuasan kerja, pengembangan karir

b. Dependent Variable: kinerja karyawan

ANOVAa

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 503.247 2 251.624 34.754 .000b

Residual 412.686 57 7.240

Total 915.933 59

a. Dependent Variable: kinerja karyawan

b. Predictors: (Constant), kepuasan kerja, pengembangan karir

Coefficientsa

Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients

Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.

1 (Constant) 11.842 3.570 3.317 .002

pengembangan karir -.001 .128 -.001 -.008 .994

kepuasan kerja .722 .137 .742 5.266 .000

a. Dependent Variable: kinerja karyawan

Residuals Statisticsa
 Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation N

Predicted Value 32.74 47.88 40.37 2.921 60

Std. Predicted Value -2.610 2.571 .000 1.000 60
Standard Error of Predicted
.351 1.140 .570 .195 60
Value
Adjusted Predicted Value 31.81 47.86 40.33 2.945 60
Residual -12.668 4.257 .000 2.645 60
Std. Residual -4.708 1.582 .000 .983 60
Stud. Residual -4.751 1.747 .007 1.005 60
Deleted Residual -12.900 5.189 .037 2.768 60
Stud. Deleted Residual -6.059 1.780 -.015 1.121 60
Mahal. Distance .022 9.605 1.967 2.205 60
Cook's Distance .000 .222 .016 .036 60
Centered Leverage Value .000 .163 .033 .037 60

a. Dependent Variable: kinerja karyawan

Kesimpulan :
Berdasarkan uji normalitas dilihat dari table Pada grafik Normal P-Plot. Sebaran data mengikuti garis diagonal. Hal ini menunjukan bahwa model
regresi tersebut berdistribusi tidak normal.
Correlations

Correlations

Strapro#1 Strapro#2 Strapro#3 Strapro#4 Strapro#5 Strapro#6 Strapro#7 Strapro#8 Strapro#9 Strapro#10 kepuasan k

Strapro#1 Pearson Correlation 1 .155 .221 .486** .241 .180 .241 .158 .520** .232

Sig. (2-tailed) .236 .089 .000 .064 .170 .064 .227 .000 .075

N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Strapro#2 Pearson Correlation .155 1 .608** .187 .433** .371** .433** .357** .080 .157
Sig. (2-tailed) .236 .000 .153 .001 .003 .001 .005 .544 .230
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Strapro#3 Pearson Correlation .221 .608** 1 .371** .490** .300* .490** .287* .164 .312*
Sig. (2-tailed) .089 .000 .004 .000 .020 .000 .026 .211 .015
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Strapro#4 Pearson Correlation .486** .187 .371** 1 .202 .255* .202 .266* .390** .231
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .153 .004 .121 .049 .121 .040 .002 .076
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Strapro#5 Pearson Correlation .241 .433** .490** .202 1 .272* 1.000** .296* .210 .108
Sig. (2-tailed) .064 .001 .000 .121 .035 .000 .022 .108 .411
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
** * * * * **
Strapro#6 Pearson Correlation .180 .371 .300 .255 .272 1 .272 .917 .061 .184
Sig. (2-tailed) .170 .003 .020 .049 .035 .035 .000 .642 .159
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Strapro#7 Pearson Correlation .241 .433** .490** .202 1.000** .272* 1 .296* .210 .108
Sig. (2-tailed) .064 .001 .000 .121 .000 .035 .022 .108 .411
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Strapro#8 Pearson Correlation .158 .357** .287* .266* .296* .917** .296* 1 .093 .227
Sig. (2-tailed) .227 .005 .026 .040 .022 .000 .022 .481 .081
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Strapro#9 Pearson Correlation .520** .080 .164 .390** .210 .061 .210 .093 1 .132
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .544 .211 .002 .108 .642 .108 .481 .315
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Strapro#10 Pearson Correlation .232 .157 .312* .231 .108 .184 .108 .227 .132 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .075 .230 .015 .076 .411 .159 .411 .081 .315
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
kepuasan kerja Pearson Correlation .577** .630** .699** .599** .626** .657** .626** .669** .490** .462**
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Reliability

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %

Cases Valid 60 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 60 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.793 10

Kesimpulan :

Diketahui dari data diatas pernyatan dapat dikatakan reliable karena Cronbach’s Alpha sebesar 0,793 lebih besar dari 0,60. Karena seluruh data
telah dinyatakn valid dan reliable maka dapat dilanjutkan pengujian selanjutnya.

Correlations

Correlations

Inov#1 Inov#2 Inov#3 Inov#4 Inov#5 Inov#6 Inov#7 Inov#8 Inov#9 Inov#10 kinerja karyawan

Inov#1 Pearson Correlation 1 .387** .133 .247 .361** .073 -.093 .387** .268* .304* .521**

Sig. (2-tailed) .002 .311 .057 .005 .580 .479 .002 .038 .018 .000

N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Inov#2 Pearson Correlation .387** 1 .341** .110 .522** .165 .043 1.000** .187 .866** .707**
Sig. (2-tailed) .002 .008 .401 .000 .209 .743 .000 .152 .000 .000
 N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Inov#3 Pearson Correlation .133 .341** 1 .391** .135 .370** .401** .341** .350** .222 .679**
Sig. (2-tailed) .311 .008 .002 .304 .004 .002 .008 .006 .089 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Inov#4 Pearson Correlation .247 .110 .391** 1 -.133 .331** -.003 .110 .242 .111 .442**
Sig. (2-tailed) .057 .401 .002 .311 .010 .983 .401 .062 .398 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Inov#5 Pearson Correlation .361** .522** .135 -.133 1 .139 .118 .522** .160 .445** .543**
Sig. (2-tailed) .005 .000 .304 .311 .291 .370 .000 .221 .000 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Inov#6 Pearson Correlation .073 .165 .370** .331** .139 1 .327* .165 .348** .019 .581**
Sig. (2-tailed) .580 .209 .004 .010 .291 .011 .209 .006 .883 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Inov#7 Pearson Correlation -.093 .043 .401** -.003 .118 .327* 1 .043 .197 .042 .425**
Sig. (2-tailed) .479 .743 .002 .983 .370 .011 .743 .131 .749 .001
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Inov#8 Pearson Correlation .387** 1.000** .341** .110 .522** .165 .043 1 .187 .866** .707**
Sig. (2-tailed) .002 .000 .008 .401 .000 .209 .743 .152 .000 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Inov#9 Pearson Correlation .268* .187 .350** .242 .160 .348** .197 .187 1 .202 .555**
Sig. (2-tailed) .038 .152 .006 .062 .221 .006 .131 .152 .121 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
Inov#10 Pearson Correlation .304* .866** .222 .111 .445** .019 .042 .866** .202 1 .598**
Sig. (2-tailed) .018 .000 .089 .398 .000 .883 .749 .000 .121 .000
N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60
kinerja karyawan Pearson Correlation .521** .707** .679** .442** .543** .581** .425** .707** .555** .598** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .001 .000 .000 .000

N 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Reliability

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %
Cases Valid 60 100.0

Excludeda 0 .0

Total 60 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics

Cronbach's Alpha N of Items

.747 10

Kesimpulan:
Diketahui dari data diatas pernyatan dapat dikatakan reliable karena Cronbach’s Alpha sebesar 0,747 lebih besar dari 0,60. Karena seluruh data
telah dinyatakn valid dan reliable maka dapat dilanjutkan pengujian selanjutnya.