Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Text Final Version Portfolio 1
Project Text Final Version Portfolio 1
Benigno Pedroza
Professor Ditch
English 115
5 November 2018
The state of happiness is not always easily achieved. For some people it can be more
difficult than others due to the different circumstances they might face. For example, the people
that lived during world war two had a harder time to be happy because of all the suffering they
experienced. The epistolary novel “The Guernsey Literary Potato Peel Pie Society” written by
Mary Ann Shaffer and Annie Barrows, takes place after the end of world war 2. The main
character Juliet Ashton begins a correspondence with Dawsey Adams because she is interested to
learn more about a literary society he is in; since she is writing an article on the benefits of
literature. Remy Giraud was in a concentration camp during world war two when she met
Elizabeth Mckenna, who was part of this literary society. Despite experiencing difficult life
experiences Juliet Ashton is able to attain happiness by creating new friends in contrast to Remy
Giraud, who although heals from physical suffering, does not achieve true happiness because she
was deeply scarred from the suffering she endured to the point where she could no longer heal.
In the beginning of the novel Juliet seems unhappy despite her book being successful and
having read her book to an audience. In a letter she says, “You know how I love talking about
books, and you know how I adore receiving compliments. I should be thrilled. But the truth is
that I’m gloomy gloomier than I ever was during the war. Everything is so broken,…” At first
Juliet is unhappy because everything around her is broken, due to the damages caused by the
Pedroza2
war. If Juliet would’ve been able to see her situation in a different way, like being happy that her
book was successful, she might’ve been at least somewhat happy and not gloomy. This leads to
the article “The Sources of Happiness,” in it His Holiness the Dalai Lama and Howard Cutler
speak on many ways to achieve happiness. They both explain that the happiness of a person is
determined by their perspective, and external events can decrease your happiness if you’re
unable to see any good. Specifically, that “happiness is determined more by one’s state of mind
than by external events.” (The Dalai Lama and Cutler 22) It is not easy for a person to see the
good in their situation if there is a lot of negativity surrounding them, but if they are able to
change their perspective in a more positive way they can return to their normal state of
happiness. “Success may result in a temporary feeling of elation, or tragedy may send us into a
period of depression, but sooner or later our overall level of happiness tends to migrate back to a
certain baseline.” (The Dalai Lama and Cutler 22) Cutler is saying that sometimes we are
extremely happy or depressed, but after some time we will return to our normal level of
happiness. Similarly, Juliet felt “gloomy” at first, but when she began writing to the members of
the literary society it was her way of changing her perceptive into a more positive way causing
Throughout the novel Juliet maintains a correspondence with the members in the literary
society. Eventually she becomes friends with them and after some time Juliet visits Guernsey to
meet these people, which makes her happy. Juliet finally meets her friends that she has only
known through letters and she seems to cheer up and is no longer gloomy. In a letter Juliet
writes, “Isola reached me first by leaping over a crate of lobsters and grabbed me up in a fierce
hug that swung me off my feet…. The others came toward me more quietly, but with no less
warmth.” (Shaffer and Barrows 160) These people gave Juliet a warm welcome demonstrating
Pedroza3
that they were friends of hers and that is exactly what she needed to feel happy. The kinds of
relationships a person has with others has a great impact on their amount of happiness. In the
article, “The Anatomy of Friendship” by Robin Ian MacDonald Dunbar, who is a British
anthropologist, he claims that, “the friendships we have are closely tied with one’s happiness and
health.” (Dunbar) In other words the amount of happiness and good health a person has in their
lives is determined by the kinds of friendships they have. This relates closely back to the
situation Juliet has, when she finally meets her friends on Guernsey her happiness and health
begin to improve. The first evidence Dunbar provides to back this claim is a diagram that shows
the path analysis of data from a UK stratified national survey, in which two thousand adults were
studied to show that “having more close friends and eating more meals with other people have
has many close friends and they spend time together then that will have a positive effect on their
lives. If what Dunbar is saying is true then Juliet’s decision to go to Guernsey and meet all these
people, and more importantly make them her friends, was the best thing she could have done for
Some would argue that Juliet is not happy because her relationship with Mark was not very
positive and it made her unhappy. Juliet was together with Mark for two months when he asked
her to marry him. She wasn’t ready to say yes because she felt like they hadn’t known each other
long enough. “It’s not long enough for me to be certain that we should spend the rest of our lives
together, even if you are.” (Shaffer and Barrows 131) After some time, Juliet and Mark lose
contact, and with it their relationship. Here it would seem that Juliet is unhappy, but her leaving
Mark actually led to her being with a man that she loved and could make her happy. In one of the
notes written by Isola, she talks about the time she heard Juliet ask Dawsey to marry her. “Would
Pedroza4
you like to marry me?” “I’m in love with you, so I thought I’d ask.” After some silence Dawsey
answered, “My God, yes.” (Shaffer and Barrows 273) The act of Juliet asking Dawsey to marry
her is proof that she felt he would make her happy. Juliet achieves true happiness because of her
new friends.
In The Guernsey Literary Potato Peel Pie Society, one individual that has suffered the most
out of all the characters, which leads to them being unhappy, is Remy Giraud. She was in a
concentration camp during the war, and during her time as a prisoner she met Elizabeth. After
the war, she wrote a letter to the literary society explaining how German soldiers had executed
Elizabeth. Along with Remy’s letter a nurse sent her own with it, in her letter she spoke of
Remy’s health when she was released from the concentration camp. “After several days, Remy’s
legs and body were so swollen with famine edema, she could not continue to walk. So, she just
laid herself down in the road to die.” (Shaffer and Barrows 182) The things Remy experienced
during and after her time as a prisoner caused her to suffer physically and mentally. Suffering
can hurt people in many ways and sometimes if a person suffers enough they never recover. In
the article What Suffering Does David brooks says that “Recovering from suffering is not like
recovering from a disease. Many people don’t come out healed; they come out different.”
(Brooks 287) This applies to Remy because she never seems to recover from her past suffering
even after she heals physically she still wasn’t happy, maybe because she had not healed
mentally. According to Brooks after enough suffering some people, “Try as they might, they just
can’t tell themselves to stop feeling pain, or to stop missing the one who has died or is gone….
when grief eases, it is not clear where the relief comes from.” (Brooks 286) Remy was unable to
stop suffering because she didn’t know how to stop. After some time, Remy goes to Guernsey to
Pedroza5
live with the others, and even then, she never seems to be happy despite having so many friends
The society a person lives in can also be the reason that they and many others suffer. The
political decisions a government makes can sometimes create wars between other countries,
which leads to death and suffering. An article, “The Role of Relevancy and Social Suffering in
“Generativity” Among Older Post-Soviet Women Immigrants” written by: Kate de Medeiros,
Robert Rubinstein, and Polina Ermoshkina explain that generativity is a disease caused by social
suffering, that makes people feel a need to nurture and guide younger people and contribute to
the next generation. More importantly in their article they claim that social suffering is “an
assemblage of human problems that have their origins and consequences in the devastating
injuries that social forces can inflict on human experience.” (Medeiros et al. p.528) Meaning that
social suffering happens when many people share the same pain that originates from the same
place; This is caused by the social forces they live in. Similarly, this happens to Remy Giraud.
When Remy was taken as a prisoner because of the war she and many other women were
affected by the same origin of pain, that being the concentration camp they were in. Since Remy
and the women that she was prisoners with all suffered from the same experiences their social
suffering made it even harder to recover from so much pain. If anything, it made their situation
look and feel much worse because when Remy was in the camp all the prisoners were suffering
and that only added negativity to their lives, making it harder to ever recover and achieve
happiness. In Remy’s letter to the literary society she writes about the things she saw as a
prisoner. She saw women suffer from poor hygiene, it was so bad that even when some women
would menstruate they would not be given any provisions. She even mentions when a woman
overseer during roll call “began to rage at a bleeding girl. Rage at her and threaten her with her
Pedroza6
upraised rod. Then she began to beat the girl.” (Shaffer and Barrows 181) Seeing things like this
happen to others can also cause suffering even if it’s not happening to you. The war affected all
of them and that made their suffering even harder to overcome. Seeing yourself and others
suffering because of the same reason can make it difficult to ever be happy. Remy was not happy
because of all the things she experienced and saw others go through.
Although it would be very difficult to argue that Remy is happy in the story some would still
say that she is. Some would argue that Remy being liberated after the war would be more than
enough reason for her to be happy, but she isn’t. Even after she goes to Guernsey to stay she
never seems to fully recover from the war. Even Juliet says, “Remy seems stronger now that she
was last month, but she is very frail yet…She must be around people cheerful people, if
possible.” (Shaffer and Barrows 218) Juliet and her friends from the literary society try their best
to make Remy happy and help her forget about the war but it wasn’t enough. Remy never
Both Juliet Ashton and Remy Giraud were affected by the war making them feel unhappy
due to the suffering they experienced. Although both characters suffered only Juliet was able to
achieve true happiness after some time. Juliet was able to achieve happiness because she didn’t
suffer very much, and she still had a positive mentality that allowed her to take full advantage of
her friends and achieve happiness. On the other hand, Remy suffered much more than Juliet and
thus it was much more difficult for her to recover. It was so difficult for Remy to see her life in a
positive way after the war that she didn’t want her friends to help her recover and that’s why she
Works Cited
Shaffer, Mary Ann and Barrows, Annie. The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society.
His Holiness the Dalai Lama and Cutler, Howard. “The Sources of Happiness.” Pursuing
Happiness: A Bedford Spotlight Reader, created by Matthew Parfitt & Dawn Skorczewski,
Dunbar, R.I.M. “The Anatomy of Friendship.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 22, no. 1,
Brooks, David. “What Suffering Does.” Pursuing Happiness: A Bedford Spotlight Reader,
De Medeiros, Kate, et al. “The Role of Relevancy and Social Suffering in “Generativity” Among
Older Post-Soviet Women Immigrants.” The Gerontologist, vol. 55, no. 4, 2015, pp. 526–
536.