Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Decontamination of Water Polluted With Oil PDF
Decontamination of Water Polluted With Oil PDF
Abstract: Sorption by natural organic substrates, inorganic materials or synthetic fibers is one of the most popular meth-
ods used for the separation of oily wastes from contaminated water. In this work, the ability of chrome shavings (CS) and
of buffing dusts of crust leather (BDCL) to remove motor oils and oily wastes from demineralised water and natural sea-
water has been studied. Tannery solid wastes are formed mainly by proteins and have a highly organized structure in the
form of fibers (F: 100 nm). These wastes have a high oil sorption capacity. Tanned solid wastes are capable of absorbing
many times their weight in oil (6.5–7.6 and 12.8–14.5 g/g dry substrate, respectively, for ground CS and BDCL). The
sorption capacity depends strongly of sorbent nature. The removal of oils from the water surface is a quasi-instantaneous
process. After use, the saturated waste floats and can be removed in an efficient and easy manner. The results look fairly
promising as to possibilities of using tanned wastes to remove oils from industrial effluents and from contaminated coastal
areas.
Key words: tannery, solid wastes, chrome shavings, buffing dusts, oils, sorption.
Résumé : L’absorption par des substrats organiques naturels, des matériaux inorganiques ou des fibres synthétiques est
l’une des méthodes les plus employées pour la séparation des déchets huileux de l’eau contaminée. Dans ce travail, la ca-
pacité des dérayures de cuir chromé et des poussières de ponçage du cuir en stain, issues de la tannerie, à enlever des huiles
pour moteurs et des déchets huileux de l’eau déminéralisée et de l’eau de mer naturelle a été étudiée. Les déchets solides
de tannerie sont constitués essentiellement de protéines et ils ont une structure fibreuse très organisée (K : 100 nm). Ces
déchets ont une grande capacité d’absorption des huiles. Les déchets solides de peau tannée peuvent absorber plusieurs
fois leur poids en huile (6,5 – 7,6 et 12,8 – 14,5 g/g de substrat sec respectivement pour les dérayures broyées de
cuir chromé et les poussières de ponçage). La capacité d’absorption dépend fortement de la nature de l’absorbant.
L’élimination des huiles de la surface de l’eau est un processus quasi-instantané. Après utilisation, les déchets saturés
flottent et peuvent être facilement collectés. Les résultats permettront d’envisager la possibilité d’employer les déchets
de peau tannée pour enlever les huiles des effluents industriels et des zones côtières contaminées.
Mots-clés : tannerie, déchets solides, dérayures de cuir chromé, poussières de ponçage, huiles, absorption.
[Traduit par la Rédaction]
Introduction be used for municipal water supply, for industry, nor for ir-
Used or spent oils are toxic for the microflora used in the rigation (Blumer 1969). Contamination of coastal areas due
biological degradation of organic substances contained in ef- to oil spills is a tragic event. Under favorable conditions, oil
fluents. This can be explained by the formation of a layer on may continue to spread over the water surface and form a
the water surface limiting energy, heat, moisture, and oxy- thin layer. As a result, marine life is seriously threatened,
gen exchange between the water reservoir and the atmos- beaches are polluted and tourism and the fishing industry
phere (Lee et al. 1999; Pushkarev et al. 1983; Haussard et gravely suffer the effects.
al. 2001). Consequently, the efficiency of microorganisms Sorption by natural organic substrates (wood, cotton fi-
for the degradation of organic matter in wastewater treat- bers, bark, wool, milkweed, etc.) or inorganic materials (ac-
ment will be decreased. The spilled oil also contributes to tivated carbon, charcoal, exfoliated graphite, flyash, etc.) or
an undesirable taste and odor to drinking water and causes synthetic fibers (acetylated cellulose, polypropylene, poly-
severe environmental damage. Contaminated water cannot ethylene terephtalate, polyhexamethylene adipamide, etc.) is
Received 23 November 2005. Revision accepted 5 January 2007. Published on the NRC Research Press Web site at jees.nrc.ca on
30 August 2007.
A. Gammoun and M. Azzi. Faculté des Sciences, Université Hassan II– Aı̈n Chock, Casablanca, Maroc.
S. Tahiri.1 Faculté des Sciences El Jadida, Département de Chimie, Université Chouaib Doukkali, B.P.20, El Jadida, Maroc.
A. Albizane. Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Université Hassan II, Mohammedia, Maroc.
M. de laGuardia. Departamento de Quimica Analitica, Edificio de Investigacion, Universidad de Valencia, Spain.
Written discussion of this article is welcomed and will be received by the Editor until 31 January 2008.
1Corresponding author (e-mail: t_soufiane@yahoo.fr).
Fig. 2. Scanning electron micrograph of wastes. (a) chrome shavings (b) buffing dusts.
Oil/waste (g/g)
Oil type Waste type Raw waste Dry waste
Diesel motor oil Ground chrome shavings 5.74 7.00
Chrome shavings 4.06 3.73
Buffing dusts of crust leather 13.00 14.43
Premium motor oil Ground chrome shavings 6.48 6.54
Chrome shavings 2.60 3.81
Buffing dusts of crust leather 12.91 14.55
Used oil Ground chrome shavings 5.28 7.60
Chrome shavings 3.43 3.82
Buffing dusts of crust leather 12.08 12.80
dried at 100 8C for 4 h. In the case of chrome shavings, raw to 3 g. Tests were carried out, respectively, without and
material and fibers with 2–5 mm of length were used. It is with stirring. In the case of stirring, the beakers were placed
difficult to define a constant granulometry for raw chrome on a shaker, and then shaken for 10 min at 60 r/min.
shavings because these wastes have no regular fiber size. In At the end of the experiments, the solid–liquid phases
a 100 mL beaker, 80 mL of oil was placed and 1 g of sorb- were separated and the sorbent was left to drip for 1 h. The
ent was immersed in the bath for 4 h. Material was then re- amount of residual oil in water and that retained by the
covered and left to drip for 1 h and the amount of oil sorbed tanned wastes were determined. Residual oil in water was
was determined by subtracting the initial sorbent weight extracted with petroleum ether. The solvent extractor was
from the total weight of the wetted sorbent. Tanned wastes evaporated and the residual oil was weighed. The amount
sorption capacity (SC, weight of pollutant picked by one of oil sorbed on wastes was calculated by subtracting the
gram of sorbent) was thus quantified. All of the sorption ex- amount of residual oil in water from the initial mass of oil
periments were carried out at room temperature (20 ± 2 8C). added to beakers containing water.
Table 3. Oils sorption of solid wastes in demineralised water baths containing various amounts of oil.
buffing dusts have a significantly higher amount of fat of buffing dusts. The chrome shavings fibers are more paral-
(7.77%) than chrome shavings (1.57%); this can be ex- lel and very tight to each other.
plained by the use of greases in the fat-liquoring process.
The bulk density of chrome shavings and buffing dust are Determination of oil sorption capacity
0.1 and 0.05 gcm–3, respectively. This low density indi- The tests were conducted on oils in their pure form. Ta-
cates that these wastes occupy a large volume as compared ble 2 groups the sorption capacity (SC) of ground chrome
to other solid wastes. This causes problems in the handling shavings (GCS), raw chrome shavings (RCS) and buffing
of high amounts of tanned wastes generated in the leather dusts of crust leather (BDCL). The sorption capacity was
industry. The specific surface area of chrome shavings and calculated for raw and dry wastes. The SC of these wastes
of buffing dusts is 1.12 and 12.11 m2/g, respectively. is very strong: about 6.5–7.6, 3.7–3.8, and 12.8–14.5 g/g
dry substrate, respectively, for GCS, RCS, and BDCL. As
Scanning electron micrographs of chrome shavings and can be seen, sorption capacity depends strongly of the nature
buffing dusts of sorbent. The results indicate that the investigated oil sam-
The scanning electron microscopic method is a good tech- ples showed relatively similar sorption trends since they
nique for showing structure and morphology of solids. The have relatively similar densities and similar viscosities. For
resulting micrographs (Fig. 2) reveal that the studied wastes example, in the case of dry ground chrome shavings the
have a highly organized structure in the form of fibers (F = sorption capacity is about 7.00, 6.54, and 7.60 g/g for diesel
100 nm). The fibers seem to be more separated in the case motor oil, premium motor oil, and used motor oil, respec-
# 2007 NRC Canada
Gammoun et al. 557
Table 4. Oils sorption of solid wastes in natural seawater baths containing various amounts of oil.
tively. Moisture content relatively decreased the waste’s and 3 g of sorbent/500 mL. A study was carried out for
ability to absorb oils. Buffing dust showed better sorption demineralised water and natural seawater, without stirring
properties than chrome shavings for all investigated oils. and using a stirring velocity of 60 r/min. Results show that
This is due to the morphology of wastes: the fibers seem to the removal efficiency value is very significant. Tanned
be more separated in the case of BDCL and consequently solid wastes have a high selective affinity for oils in aque-
allow the penetration of a greater amount of oils into the ous medium. The removal efficiency of the oils from a syn-
sorbent. On the other hand, the density of BDCL thetic oil–water mixture exceeds 90% (ranging from 90 to
(0.05 gcm–3) is lower than that of chrome shavings 100%). Observation shows that oils are removed only in the
(0.1 gcm–3). BDCL occupy a large volume as compared to zones that are in contact with the sorbent. Thus, the removal
chrome shavings and consequently a large amount of oils efficiency (RE) of oil is a direct function of the surface ex-
could be sorbed by dusts of tanned hides. posed to the oil–water interface. No significant difference
For chrome shavings, reduction in fibre size contributed between the sorption in demineralised water and that in nat-
to the change in sorption capacity. When the wastes are ural seawater bath was observed.
ground up (2–5 mm) the retention capacity increases. The high oil affinity of tested sorbents is mainly due to
the diffusion phenomenon. The pollutant penetrates into the
Sorption study in a water bath sorbent by capillary action and then fibers form aggregates
Tables 3 and 4 show the variation of removal efficiency that can be removed easily from the water surface. The sorp-
(RE) value of the tanned solid assayed in water using 1, 2, tion of water is negligible and clearly lower than the oil
# 2007 NRC Canada
558 J. Environ. Eng. Sci. Vol. 6, 2007
Taylor, M.M., Cabeza, L.F., DiMaio, G.L., Brown, E.M., Marmer, Toyoda, M., and Inagaki, M. 2000. Heavy oil sorption using exfo-
W.N., Carrio, R., Celma, P.J., and Cot, J. 1998. Processing of liated graphite. New application of exfoliated graphite to protect
leather waste: Pilot scale studies on chrome shavings. Part I. Iso- heavy oil pollution. Carbon, 38: 199–210. doi:10.1016/S0008-
lation and characterization of protein products and separation of 6223(99)00174-8.
chrome cake. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc. 93: 61–82.