Professional Documents
Culture Documents
L. Roca
Abstract
Since the inception of massive open online courses (MOOCs), this platform for learning
has been characterized as having high enrollment rates with high dropout rates. Researchers are
studying this phenomenon at length, but there is no unifying consensus about underlying factors
for high dropout rates in MOOCs. This mixed method research study aims to discover whether
the wide variety of reasons found for dropout rates are connected to instructional design as it
pertains to learners with different types of intelligences. This research study will have a
purposive sampling design with a control group and a treatment group of learners to determine
whether a redesigned MOOC with instructional techniques for learners with different types of
intelligences can improve retention rates and reduce dropout rates. Also, the data may provide
the unifying factor for the wide variety of reasons found for high dropout rates in this type of
MOOCs began in 2008 when professors from the University of Manitoba in Canada
offered the first massive open online 12-week course in which 2,300 students enrolled (Fini,
Wiley & Hilton III, as cited in Gomez-Zermeno & Aleman de la Garza, 2016). Since its
inception, massive open online courses have proliferated worldwide with enrollment in the
hundreds of thousands to millions (Banks & Meinert, 2016; Garcia-Mendoza et al., 2017). For
example, Class Central reports that Coursera, the largest MOOC provider, reached 23 million
registered users followed by edX with 10 million. (Garcia-Mendoza et al., 2017). Even though
MOOC enrollment is very high, studies show that high dropout rates in MOOCs raise concerns
about its effectiveness in education. Balsh (as cited in Khalil & Ebner, 2014, p. 1), affirms that
“although thousands of learners enroll for [MOOCs], a very small proportion finally completes
such courses”.
Many possible reasons for high dropout rates have been identified by researchers,
including structure of the course, lack of tutorials, quality of materials, and limitations on the use
of information technology. (Gomez-Zermeno & de la Garza, 2016, Bayeck, 2016). Other reasons
for high dropout rates have been reported as lack of time, lack of learner motivation, feelings of
isolation, lack of interactivity in MOOCs, and dissatisfaction with inability to interact with
instructors. (Khalil & Ebner, 2014). Although these are valid discoveries, they may not explain
the underlying cause for such reasons for dropout rates. The question is, could most of the
research findings for dropout rates be a symptom of MOOC instructional design as it pertains to
multiple intelligences? Khalil and Ebner (2014, p. 8) argue that “it is widely agreed that it would
be useful to improve the retention rates of MOOCs by finding out why students drop out of
courses and to suggest strategies that can be implemented to increase the retention rate”. A study
on multiple intelligences in relation to MOOC instructional design may uncover a connection for
A STUDY ON MOOC DROPOUT RATES AND MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES 4
the wide number of reasons found for high dropout rates as it relates to the types of intelligences
learners possess.
Review of Literature
As previously stated, since its inception in 2008 (Banks & Meinert, 2016), these courses
have been successful in enrollment numbers, but very unsuccessful in retention rates. MOOC
dropout rates are in the range of 90% to 98% (Breslow et al., as cited in Hendrikx et al.; Belanger
and Thornton, as cited in Henderikx et al., 2017; Meyer, as cited in Khalil & Ebner, 2014). For
example, Duke University found MOOC completion rates of only 2% with dropout rates of 98%
(Belanger and Thornton as cited in Henderikx et al., 2017). MIT, Harvard and Stanford found
completion rates of under 10%, with over 90% dropout rates (Zheng et al., as cited in Banks &
Meinert, 2016).
Khalil & Ebner (2014, p. 1) state that learners “construct their own knowledge and
develop their [own] personal learning network from nodes and connections in the digital
environment”. This is one explanation of the individuality in learners’ intelligences that seek for
meaning and that must be taken under account when studying dropout rates in MOOCs. This
individuality may be represented in the work of Dr. Howard Gardner on multiple intelligences
(Eutopia, 2018). The theory of multiple intelligences may give insight and a better understanding
of MOOC dropout rates in relation to course design. Cherry (2017), argues that the conventional
concepts of intelligence are too narrow and restrictive and IQ measurements often miss out on
how people are individually intelligent (Cherry, 2017; Gordon, 2018). Garrison (as cited in
Henerikx, et al., 2017) argues that research on dropout rates in distance education is too focused
on predictions without taking into account the nature of distance education. Therefore, the
current approach to understanding dropout rates in MOOCs may not be sufficient to fully
The work of Dr. Gardner revolutionized how we view learners. In his book, Frames of
Mind, he outlined his theory of multiple intelligences, and found eight major types of
intelligences, and a ninth intelligence was discovered later in his research (Cherry, 2017;
Gordon, 2018; Madkour et al., 2016). According to Dr. Gardner, humans possess multiple
mental abilities that are a combination of biological and cultural domains (Madkour et al., 2016).
Dr. Gardner’s nine intelligences are: (1) Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence – Handle objects
skillfully, use the body to express ideas and feelings, (2) Existential Intelligence – Can
contemplate questions beyond sensory data, can understand questions about life and the
Mathematical Intelligence – Can deal with logic, abstractions, reasoning in numbers, can
appreciate, distinguish, compose and perform in musical forms; (7) Naturalistic Intelligence –
Ability to understand and interact with natural surroundings; (8) Verbal-Linguistic Intelligence –
Ability to create and use the spoken or written language; (9) Visual-Spatial Intelligence – Ability
to do activities which require spatial judgment, and ability to see an image and visualize with the
mind’s eye (Madkour et al., 2016). If learners are this diverse in their intelligences, this may
There is indication that the current approach to MOOC instructional design may be a
factor that is affecting learners with different types of intelligences. For example, Bayeck (2016,
p. 223) affirms that “MOOCs seem not diverse enough to include students from diverse
backgrounds”. Chang, Hung, and Lin (as cited in Garcia-Mendoza, et al., 2017) revealed that
A STUDY ON MOOC DROPOUT RATES AND MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES 6
learners with high reflective learning styles had low probability of enrolling in a MOOC.
Although Chang’s opinion may pertain to styles of learning, this may indicate the possibility that
multiple intelligences are also a factor for MOOC dropout rates. For example, Chang, Hung, and
Lin (as cited in Bayeck, 2016) suggest that creating groups and establishing interactions within
MOOCs can promote an environment where learners can develop their own ideas, express
collaboration that can motivate them to participate in a MOOC. This finding could correlate
with the need of learners with interpersonal intelligences to connect with others.
This research study is significant in that: (1) It may provide the unifying factor for the
wide number of reasons found for dropout rates, (2) Offer insight on the needs of students with
multiple intelligences as it pertains to MOOC instructional design, and (3) Provide information
that can equip MOOC instructional designers to create enriching learning environments in which
learners with different types of intelligences can thrive, thus potentially improving dropout rates
in MOOCs.
Research Question
Research Questions: (1) Are multiple intelligences, in relation to course design, the
underlying or main factor for MOOC dropout rates? (2) Do redesigned MOOCs with strategies
Research Setting
This study will take place in an online learning platform such as Coursera. A MOOC will
be selected for the study, and permissions will be obtained to offer the MOOC in two versions:
(1) A MOOC as it is currently offered, and (2) a redesigned MOOC with instructional techniques
for the most predominant types of intelligences among the sample. Some of the techniques
included in the redesigned MOOD may include dual coding, visual cues, completing logic
A STUDY ON MOOC DROPOUT RATES AND MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES 7
problems, constructing a model, inventing a game, giving feedback on what participants would
like to learn, and presentations using at least one of the intelligences (Douglas et. al, 2008).
Participants
Participants are students registered in the selected MOOC. The research study will
randomly select 100 to 200 participants. The participants will be male and female, ranging
between the age of 18 and 50. The participants will have a High School diploma up to a
bachelor’s degree. The study may be repeated by extending it to participants with master’s and
post-doctoral degrees.
Data Generation/Collection
Participants will take the McKenzie Multiple Intelligences Inventory Test (Edutopia,
2018) to determine types of intelligences in the sample. Participants will be assigned to a control
group or a treatment group in equivalent percentages according to their types of intelligences and
gender. The Control Group will enroll in the MOOC as it is currently offered, and the treatment
group will enroll in the redesigned MOOC. Each group of participants will answer one of two
types of surveys: (1) A dropout survey, or (2) a course completion survey. A survey will be
supplied to all participants from the control and the treatment group, depending on whether they
dropped out or completed the course. All survey instruments will be designed with a
combination of scales such as Likert rating scales, statements with tick boxes, and open-ended
items (Boynton, Greenhalgh, 2004). The aim is to receive survey responses from all participants.
Data Analysis
Based on responses from the McKenzie Multiple Intelligences Test, and the surveys, data
will be generated on types of intelligences per gender in relation to dropout rates and course
completion rates for each version of the MOOC. Based on survey responses, qualitative and
quantitative data will be generated to establish causal relationships between learners’ types of
A STUDY ON MOOC DROPOUT RATES AND MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES 8
intelligences and MOOC instructional design. Data will be further broken down per gender to
determine possible differences between males and females. The results will be presented in
written and visual form. Qualitative and quantitative data will be analyzed to determine a
correlation between dropout and completion rates among participants in the control group versus
the treatment group. Responses will be coded to generate numerical data that will be presented in
charts and graphs to illustrate statistical relationships. Statistical data for each version of the
MOOC will be divided into: (1) dropout rates per type of intelligence, and (2) course completion
rates per type of intelligence. Data will also be broken down per gender to illustrate
relationships between MOOC instructional design and type of intelligence within each gender
and illustrated possible statistical differences between males and females in the control group
This mixed method research study will have a purposive sampling design in which
participant responses will provide answers to the research questions in relation to their type of
intelligence and dropout rates, and any possible differences between genders.
Collected data from participants will go through credibility strategies based on Lincoln
and Guba’s evaluative criteria (Korstjens & Moser, 2017). This strategy will be utilized to ensure
validity of the data and it will include: (1) Persistent observation, (2) peer review, (3) number
checks, (4) triangulation, and audit of the data (Korstjens & Moser, 2017). Additionally, to
establish further validity of survey instruments, a panel of experts in the field of multiple
intelligences will rate and review all surveys utilized in the study. A test-Retest method may be
applied to the same group of participants to establish reliability of survey instruments. The
research study may be repeated with a different group of participants, such as students with
A STUDY ON MOOC DROPOUT RATES AND MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES 9
Anticipated Results
The result of the study will show evidence of better participation, better retention rates,
and lower dropout rates among participants that enrolled in the re-designed MOOC. Research
results will indicate that MOOC instructional design that targets the needs of participants with
different types of intelligences is the underlying or main factor that explains the wide variety of
reasons found for lower dropout rates. The study results will indicate that both genders equally
Conclusion
nature of learners and their adoption of online education is crucial to the success of any MOOC
provision, especially those in which learners are expected to be self-motivated and self-directed
in their learning”. In this new era of online education, it is important for designers of MOOCs to
investigate avenues for improving this form of online instruction. Part of that investigation
should include understanding how learners are intelligent. This study will provide such insights
that can be applied to the development educational strategies according to how learners are
intelligent and potentially produce enriching online learning experiences for students culminating
References
https://libproxy.library.unt.edu:3086/?q=MOOC+degree+versus+employment&ft=on&id
=ED571496.
Bayeck, R. Y. (2016). Exploratory study of MOOC learners’ demographics and motivation: The
A STUDY ON MOOC DROPOUT RATES AND MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES 10
case of students involved in groups. 8(3). 223-233. ERIC: EJ1112529. Retrieved from:
https://libproxy.library.unt.edu:3232/fulltext/EJ1112529.pdf.
Boynton, P. M., Greenhalgh, T. (2004). Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC420179/.
https://www.verywell.com/howard-gardner-biography-279511.
Douglas, O., Smith Burton, K, Reese-Durham, N. 2008. The effects of the multiple intelligence
teaching strategy on the academic achievement of eight grad math students. North
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234613535.
https://www.edutopia.org/multiple-intelligences-assessment.
Garcia-Mendoza, G.; Jung, I.; & Kobayashi, S. (2017). A review of empirical studies of MOOC
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318226133_A_Review_of_Empirical_Studies_
on_MOOC
Adoption_Applying_the_Unified_Theory_of_Acceptance_and_Use_of_Technology.
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1097222.
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Howard-Gardner.
Henderikx, M. A, Kreijns, K., & Kalz, M. (2017). Refining success and dropout in massive open
online courses based on the intention-behavior gap. Distance Education. 38(3). 353-368.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1369006
Khalil, H., Ebner, M. (2014). MOOCs Completion rates and possible methods to improve
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263348990_MOOCs_Completion_Rates_and_
Possible_Methods_to_Improve_Retention_-_A_Literature_Review.
Korstjens, I., Moser A. (2017). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4:
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092.
Madkour, M; Rafik, A.A.; & Mohamed M., (2016). Identifying college students’ intelligence to
enhance motivation and language proficiency. English Language Teaching. 9(6). 92-107.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1101228.pdf.