Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/261517802
CITATION READS
1 330
4 authors, including:
3 PUBLICATIONS 8 CITATIONS
vyws dental college amravati
3 PUBLICATIONS 2 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Ranjit Suresh Mandwe on 26 February 2015.
Case Report
Maintenance of Increased Mouth Opening in Oral Submucous
Fibrosis Patient Treated with Nasolabial Flap Technique
Copyright © 2014 Milind Naphade et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) is an insidious chronic disease affecting any part of the oral cavity and sometimes the pharynx with
epithelial atrophy leading to stiffness of the oral mucosa, causing trismus and inability to eat. However, a more serious complication
of this disease is the risk of the development of oral carcinoma. A case of OSMF reported with initial interincisal mouth opening;
8 mm which was treated surgically with nasolabial flap technique followed by active mouth opening exercises for 6 months with
Hister’s jaw exerciser. The patient could maintain mouth opening of 32 mm at the end of 18-months followup. The patient was
observed closely for any malignant changes in the oral cavity.
from the corner of mouth to the soft palate at a level Figure 4: Flap sutured.
of the linea alba, avoiding injury to the duct of parotid
gland. Fiberotomy of the bands was done. The coronoid
processes were approached through the same incision and
a bilateral coronoidectomy was carried out. The maxillary
and mandibular third molars were extracted. Intraoperative
interincisal distance was recorded (Figure 2). Nasolabial flaps prevent any tension across the suture line (Figure 5). A soft
were raised (Figure 3) bilaterally in the plane of superficial temporomandibular joint trainer was placed in the oral cavity
muscular aponeurotic system from both terminal points to for 7 days postoperatively to prevent occlusal trauma induced
the region of the central pedicle. The pedicle was 1 cm lateral dehiscence of the flap. Postoperatively, the patient received
to the corner of mouth and the diameter of the pedicle was prophylactic antibiotics and nasogastric feeding for 1 week.
roughly 1 cm. The flap was transposed intraorally through The oral physiotherapy was started after 48 hours with
a small transbuccal tunnel near the commissure of mouth the help of wooden spatulas for 1 week followed by a Hister’s
with no tension. The inferior wing of the flap was sutured jaw exerciser to prevent contracture and relapse. The patient
to the anterior edge of the defect, while the superior wing was instructed and motivated to do physiotherapy himself for
was sutured to the posterior edge of defect (Figure 4). up to 6 months. The mouth opening could be maintained to
The extraoral defect was closed primarily in layers after 32 mm by the end of 18 months (Figure 6) and was followed
liberal undermining of the skin in the subcutaneous plane to closely to notice any malignant changes in oral cavity.
Case Reports in Dentistry 3
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests
regarding the publication of this paper.
References
Figure 6: Postoperative mouth opening after 18 months.
[1] R. Pillai, P. Balaram, and K. S. Reddiar, “Pathogenesis of oral
submucous fibrosis: relationship to risk factors associated with
oral cancer,” Cancer, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 2011–2020, 1992.
3. Discussion [2] V. V. Shevale and R. D. Kalra, “Management of oral sub-mucous
fibrosis: a review,” Indian Journal of Dental Sciences, vol. 4, no.
OSMF is multifactorial in origin affecting 5 million people in 2, 2012.
India alone (0.5% of the Indian population) [2]. Prevalence [3] R. M. Borle, P. V. Nimonkar, and R. Rajan, “Extended nasolabial
of OSMF in Maharashtra (India) is 21.9/1000. Male predomi- flaps in the management of oral submucous fibrosis,” British
nates with the ratio of 4.9 : 1 [7]. OSMF is poorly understood Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 382–
and unsatisfactorily treated disease. However, a more serious 385, 2009.
complication of this disease is the risk of the development of [4] P. U. Dijkstra, M. W. Sterken, R. Pater, F. K. L. Spijkervet, and
oral carcinoma. The precancerous nature of OSMF has been J. L. N. Roodenburg, “Exercise therapy for trismus in head and
observed with development of slowly growing squamous cell neck cancer,” Oral Oncology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 389–394, 2007.
carcinoma in one-third of OSMF patients [2, 7]. [5] P. V. Le and M. Gornitsky, “Oral stent as treatment adjunct
Various treatment modalities like medical and/or surgi- for oral submucous fibrosis,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral
cal tried to improve the patient condition [2, 8]. Medical Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, vol. 81, no. 2, pp.
treatment is palliative therapy which is not going to reverse 148–150, 1996.
the condition completely. Surgical treatment modality has its [6] M. D. Stubblefield, L. Manfield, and E. R. Riedel, “A prelimi-
own advantage and disadvantage. nary report on the efficacy of a dynamic jaw opening device
4 Case Reports in Dentistry