2 views

Uploaded by Ahsan Mubeen

dsfdsf

- Credit Appraisal_Project Risk
- Henna
- Class Case 5_the Dilemma at Day-pro
- FM NOTES.pdf
- What is a Project
- Capital Budgeting Assignment
- project appraisal
- Types of Project Selection Models.pptx
- Capital Budgeting
- Chapter 8 - Profitability Analysys
- FINAL ASSIGNMENT OF ADMT
- Introduction to to Finance
- Fianance 422
- Capital Budgeting
- Cost Benefit Analysis Toolkit
- 9. Pet Food.doc
- Bus 635 Report
- Session 2&3 Capital Budgeting
- With the Data on the Difference in Net Height and Discharge
- Management of Cost and Risk

You are on page 1of 9

what defines a project to each company depends on the length of time capital is invested in

a project relative to the company’s other investments. Some companies’ main function is to

invest in long-term projects, whilst others – particularly manufacturing companies – tend

to invest in day-to-day capital items. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the difference

between different forms of expenditure: revenue, working capital, and capital.

Expenditure

Revenue Expenditure: for day-to-day items that are consumed quickly i.e. within one accounting

period.

Capital Expenditure: for investments that will bring long term benefits i.e. it increases the value

of the company. Examples of capital expenditure include, but are not limited to:

Takeovers

Setting up a new subsidiary

Buying a new machine

Developing a new product

Spending on advertising/sponsorship

Capital expenditure often involves large amounts funding on irregular projects. As long-term

projects are not as common as short-term projects, it is vital that a company fully assesses each

potential project and makes the correct decision as to which project to take, as making an

incorrect decision could have catastrophic consequences for the company. To do so, companies

should have a robust investment appraisal system which carries out these analytical functions in

order to provide management with useful information which will help their decision-making

process regarding which project(s) to take.

Capital investment is crucial to the success of the company – it is what creates the additional

wealth for shareholders on top of the wealth generated from its every day operations. Capital

investment creates profitability at such a level that the company could not reach simply through

its own operations.

Firms usually have a formal capital budgeting process, such as the following structure which I

have generated into a schematic diagram:

Types of Cash Flows

These cash flows are expressed as the amount of money actually expected to be received/paid.

They are the rates that are quoted in the newspapers, by banks etc. and include and element of

inflation.

If the rate was 10%, part of that would cover inflation and the rest would be the return which

would be compensation for the risk involved and for time preference.

These cash flows are expressed in terms of today’s purchasing power (i.e. the amount required to

compensate for risk and time preference and exclude the inflation element, thus they are smaller

money rates.

The relationship between real and money returns was shown by Fisher 1930.

Rates example:

If the money rate is 12% and inflation 3%, calculate the real rate:

Inflation

Prices usually rise over time due to inflation, and therefore if a project is going to take place over

several years, the effect of inflation on the cash flows needs to be considered during the

investment analysis.

Types of inflation:

General inflation: the rate of inflation on a ‘basket’ of goods and is usually referred to as

the general price index.

Investment Appraisal

At stages 3 and 4 in the appraisal process, companies must decide which projects will meet their

objectives (which may be a prescribed set of criteria), and thus which projects should taken, and

which should be rejected.

Although various advantages and disadvantages to all, there are a number of techniques available

to do this and they are known as Investment Appraisal Techniques (IATs). For the purposes of

this article, we will look at the four most common IATs:

Accounting Rate of Return

Net Present Value

Internal Rate of Return

The payback period is the length of time it takes for a project to pay back its initial capital

investment. It may be shown in either years or months e.g. 2.5 years or 2 year 6 months. The

decision rule for this technique is:

Advantages:

It favours the project with the quickest return, which minimizes risk and maximizes

liquidity.

Limitations:

It ignores the time value of money.

It ignores the timing of cash flows.

It ignores the cash flows after the payback period, so it ignores profitability.

The basic payback period calculation ignores the time value of money. The discounted payback

period calculates the payback period using discounted cash flows. Therefore, this payback period

will be longer than basic payback, however, all the criticisms (less ignoring time value of money)

for the basic payback period apply to this calculation as well.

The accounting rate of return is a return on capital employed (ROCE) ratio and there are several

ways of calculating it:

*Average annual accounting profit is after depreciation but before interest and tax.

Advantages:

Limitations:

It is based on profits which are affected by accounting policies (e.g. depreciation), and

can be manipulated.

It ignores the time value of money.

It ignores the timing of cash flows.

Condition 1

((20,000 + 50,000 + 60,000 + 30,000) – 100,000) / 4 = £15,000

Condition 2

The NPV is the sum of the present values of all relevant cash flows discounted at the opportunity

cost of capital (or WACC). This decision rule for this technique is:

In order to calculate the NPV, we need to know which cash flows are relevant:

Include:

Opportunity costs – e.g. using a building for one project means that building cant be used

for another project.

Incidental effects – e.g. sales of the new project may affect those of the old one.

Project specific overheads

Don’t include:

Sunk costs – money has already been allocated/spent, so it doesn’t affect the decision

making process.

Depreciation – this is not a cash flow item.

Interest – the cost of debt is taken into account when cash flows are discounted.

Allocated overheads

A net present value of zero means that the project is just earning enough to cover the costs of the

funds (debt and equity). A positive NPV is therefore a surplus, as debt holders have a fixed

return. The whole of this surplus accrues to the ordinary shareholders – the greater the surplus,

the greater shareholder wealth is maximised. This shows that NPV therefore has a direct link to

shareholder wealth.

Advantages:

It provides a direct link to shareholder wealth.

It considers the time value of money.

It uses all cash flows.

Limitations:

It requires a cost of capital percentage.

NPV example:

The internal rate of return is the discount rate that gives a net present value of 0. It is the annual

rate of return earned by the project. The decision rule for this technique is:

✓ Accept if the internal rate of return is greater than the opportunity cost of capital, reject if less.

The process is to find an internal rate of return that gives a negative net present value, as the rate

that gives 0% will lie between the accounting rate of return and this internal rate. This is called

interpolation.

Interpolation:

Advantages:

Uses cash flows.

Outcome is a percentage, which is easier to understand and compare.

Limitations:

o Conventional cash flow: – + + + + = inflow, – = outflow.

o Unconventional cash flow: – + + + –

Every time the sign changes, there is a new IRR.

It may provide an incorrect ranking for mutually exclusive projects, which

may mean that shareholder wealth is not maximized.

Numerical example:

o The IRR would suggest taking project B, however project A will maximize

shareholder wealth. This is because NPV is an absolute figure, whereas IRR is

relative to the amount invested.

It is complicated.

IRR example:

The cash flows that have been used in the investment appraisal techniques above are estimates,

and different cash flows are likely to actually be achieved. If cash flows change considerably,

then the project may become unviable. Therefore, the company needs to test how a change in the

cash flow will affect the net present value of the project.

Sensitivity Analysis

Sensitivity analysis looks at how sensitive the net present value is to changes in cash flows. If

sensitivity analysis is carried out on each component of the cash flows, then it can clearly be seen

which items of the project are most sensitive. This enables managers to concentrate on these

items, however it doesn’t show the likelihood of these items changing, for example, the project

may be very sensitive to changes in the selling price, however if the project is on a signed

contract, then this may not be as worrying a factor as it first appears.

Viewing the figures without considering the likelihood of them changing can be misleading, as it

doesn’t account for other factors or situations. Sensitivity analysis views changes to the

components in isolation i.e. one figure changes at a time, however, in reality this is rarely the

case, for example, generally when material costs increase, selling price increases to make up for

the loss in profit margin.

Unequal Lives

If two projects are mutually exclusive, only one project can be chosen. Normally, the project

with the highest net present value (NPV rule) would be chosen as this maximises shareholder

wealth. However, there are several techniques which can be used to make investments more

comparable.

The ‘Lowest Common Multiple’ (LCM) method is used to find the lowest common multiple of

the projects lives, and calculates the NPV of each project over that time, assuming each project is

taken more than once.

Project A has an estimated life of 2 years, yielding a positive NPV of £10,000. Alternatively, the

company could take Project B which is expected to have a life of 3 years, and a NPV of £14,000.

As project A is higher (£30,000 > £28,500), the company should take project A over project B.

The ‘Terminal Value‘ method involves using an explicit forecast horizon, which for mutually

exclusive projects is usually taken as the short of the projects life spans. The NPV is cut off at

this point in time, and calculated proportionately (for the longer project).

Using the above information, project A has the shorter life of the two projects, thus the

forecasting horizon should be set at 2 years. The NPVs of the two projects should therefore be

£10,000 for project A, and £9,500 ((£14,250 / 3) x 2) for project B. As the NPV of project A is

greater over the same time period, the company would be advised to invest in project A.

- Credit Appraisal_Project RiskUploaded bysabetali
- HennaUploaded bySukhjeet Madaan
- Class Case 5_the Dilemma at Day-proUploaded byHannahPojaFeria
- FM NOTES.pdfUploaded byPrajwal Bhatt
- What is a ProjectUploaded bytufailking
- Capital Budgeting AssignmentUploaded byAdnan Sethi
- project appraisalUploaded bysagarlakra
- Types of Project Selection Models.pptxUploaded byasif
- Capital BudgetingUploaded bySankalp Gahlot
- Chapter 8 - Profitability AnalysysUploaded byMXR-3
- FINAL ASSIGNMENT OF ADMTUploaded byTanvir Ahmed
- Introduction to to FinanceUploaded byAzeemAhmed
- Fianance 422Uploaded byNoehmi Carvalos
- Capital BudgetingUploaded byPranshu Chaudhary
- Cost Benefit Analysis ToolkitUploaded byAmila Kulathunga
- 9. Pet Food.docUploaded byabel_kayel
- Bus 635 ReportUploaded bySyed Nawaz
- Session 2&3 Capital BudgetingUploaded byNIkhil
- With the Data on the Difference in Net Height and DischargeUploaded byPagindhu Yudha
- Management of Cost and RiskUploaded bytechnicalvijay
- 72.WaterFilterCandlesUploaded byAddisuBantayehu
- Capital BudgetingUploaded byLuiz Bertolo
- Capital BudgetingUploaded byAzrul Kechik
- Ground Nut OilUploaded bymssarwar9
- 6.MineralLicksUploaded byAhmad Daood
- investment appraisal 2Uploaded byapi-246907195
- Investment AppraisalUploaded bydeepkandel
- 26. Hats and Head GearsUploaded byabel_kayel
- chhhapter9Uploaded byYixing Xing
- Capital Budegeting FinallUploaded byNitesh Singh

- Laudon_MIS13_ch01.pptUploaded byRaman Mac
- mis final (1)Uploaded byAhsan Mubeen
- ayesha awan s.mUploaded byAhsan Mubeen
- 6 Bhushan KapoorUploaded byKelvin Liew
- Assignment 2 MisUploaded byAhsan Mubeen
- 111Uploaded byAhsan Mubeen
- Texitalia Versus Az Textiles the Deadlock in NegotiationsUploaded byacservomotor
- 1260.Full Notes of EntrepreneurshipUploaded byKhushbu Kaushik
- Bi in BankingUploaded byLokesh Kumar
- Question 2Uploaded byAhsan Mubeen
- Question 2Uploaded byAhsan Mubeen
- Ahsan's PartUploaded byAhsan Mubeen
- mis01.pptUploaded byVictorSamuel Quinto
- The Challenges of Globalization and the Role of Human ResourcesUploaded byChibi Kozako
- jjhkjlUploaded byAhsan Mubeen
- 06 QualityUploaded bymarione john c. seto
- assignmnt 1Uploaded byAhsan Mubeen
- Final Fort is Entrepreneurship Dna Talk v 2Uploaded byAhsan Mubeen
- New Microsoft PowerPoint PresentationUploaded byAhsan Mubeen
- Assignment 1 Mezan BankUploaded byAhsan Mubeen
- 14ddd.pptxUploaded byAhsan Mubeen
- SssUploaded byAhsan Mubeen
- 2a.pptxUploaded byAhsan Mubeen
- 15Uploaded byAhsan Mubeen
- 14Uploaded byAhsan Mubeen
- 464-1-986-1-10-20150301Uploaded byAhsan Mubeen
- 22.pptxUploaded byAhsan Mubeen
- Entrepreneurship NotesUploaded bydypdbm
- 22Uploaded byAhsan Mubeen

- The Evolving Global Trade ArchitectureUploaded bySanjay Kumar
- India Vision 2050Uploaded bymijung park
- Enterprise Risk Management Encyclopedia EntryUploaded bycerlay
- Tax OutlineUploaded byjerhjasdbhfa
- F7-03 Substance Over FormUploaded byPai
- POST QUALIFICATION.docUploaded byqueeneil sagpang
- DMM5836-Ass1-2018Uploaded byShenal Fernando
- TCF-ICEE Credit Application 11 081Uploaded byjasonparker80
- SFAC 6Uploaded byRaymond Parmonangan Hutahaean
- InsightsIAS 1 Year Test Series Schedule 1Uploaded byShashidhar BA
- Thirteenth Month Pay (P.D. No. 851) Report.docxUploaded byEmmarlone96
- Refining MDG targets and indicators for the urban poor: Some provocative thoughts - paperUploaded byADB Poverty Reduction
- RegisterUploaded bykoolarjun123
- Ian Senior-Corruption, The World's Big C_ Cases, Causes, Consquences, Cures-Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA) (2006)Uploaded byDeepak Meena
- Pd3 May16 External Pm ReportUploaded byNyeko Francis
- Professional Services BrandingUploaded bykoph
- Project Accountant or Staff Accountant or Financial AnalystUploaded byapi-121379052
- GuidanceonPPPContractualProvisions2017edition.pdfUploaded byjunaid112
- Total Factor Productivity Growth in Indian Manufacturing_A Biennial Malmquist AnalysisUploaded byDavid Adeabah Osafo
- Management Cheat SheetUploaded byHoàng Nam
- BORKER - Economic Growth and Cultural Value Analysis in Six Emerging Economies CopyUploaded byJoseph Glowitz
- Jon E DeGuilio Financial Disclosure Report for DeGuilio, Jon EUploaded byJudicial Watch, Inc.
- 12e_TB_Chap_13Uploaded bypoopyguy12345678
- 224181060-IEP-Investor-Presentation.pdfUploaded byioannisram
- 10 Innovations and Challenges in Msme SectorUploaded byShukla Suyash
- Brochure for Khpal Kor New Plot Allotment_1Uploaded byabrar
- Fibonacci Supports - ResistancesUploaded byAkindynos Alvanos
- jdi form 2018 mcnaughton submittedUploaded byapi-354102255
- Solar Family Compensation PlanUploaded byDavid Levine
- Kristen CookiesUploaded byBusyairi Alfan Ramadhan