A one-way ANOVA was conducted to examine differences in mean scores between 4 treatment groups: ambient, +2 degrees, +5 degrees, and +7 degrees. The ANOVA revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups (F(3,28)=21.329, p<.001). Post-hoc analyses showed the +2 degrees group (M=2.6657, SD=.68782) had a significantly higher mean score than the other groups.
A one-way ANOVA was conducted to examine differences in mean scores between 4 treatment groups: ambient, +2 degrees, +5 degrees, and +7 degrees. The ANOVA revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups (F(3,28)=21.329, p<.001). Post-hoc analyses showed the +2 degrees group (M=2.6657, SD=.68782) had a significantly higher mean score than the other groups.
A one-way ANOVA was conducted to examine differences in mean scores between 4 treatment groups: ambient, +2 degrees, +5 degrees, and +7 degrees. The ANOVA revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups (F(3,28)=21.329, p<.001). Post-hoc analyses showed the +2 degrees group (M=2.6657, SD=.68782) had a significantly higher mean score than the other groups.
* The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
A one-way between-groups analysis of variance was applied to see the difference
between 4 treatments. Treatments were divided into 4 groups according to their category (Group 1: Ambient; Group 2: + 2 Degrees; Group 3: + 5 Degrees; Group 4: + 7 Degrees). There was a statistically significant difference at the p < .05 level in scores for the 4 groups: F (3, 28) = 21.329, p = .001. Despite reaching statistical significance, the actual difference in mean scores between the groups was large. MEM
3.00
2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
Ambient + 2 Degrees + 5 Degrees + 7 Degrees
Category
Means plot shows the treatments effects. Higher meanpot of +2 degree inferred that this treatment had effected more than other treatments.