Case Study

asdfgr

Criteria Technology
A1 A2 A3 A4
Environmental (C1) Expert Exp Expert Expert Expert Expert Expert Expert
1 ert 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
C11 Ecological risk M L L L L L H H
C12 Solid wastes H M L L M M M L
C13 Liquid wastes L M L H M L H H
C14 Gaseous H L L L L L M M
Technicalemissions
Feasibility
(C2)
C21 Foot print M L M L L L H H
C22 power H L M H L M L H
C23 consumption
Pollutant M L L L L L L L
C24 removal
Easy of H M L L M M M M
capacity
operationm3/hr
C25 Proven use L M L H M ML H M
capacity
status
C26 Market H L L L L L L L
Cost (C3)availability
C31 Capital (new) H M M L M H H
C32 Ave. $
Operation cost M L L L L M H
Ave.
Health and $ /yr
safety (C4)
C41 Operational M L L M L L L
C42 risk and
accident L M M M M L L
accident
history

Note: All data are assumed for demonstration purpose only. Subjective judgment were assigned based on the performance of
the technology

accident history