Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 2(1B) of Income Tax Act defines „amalgamation‟ as
merger of one or more companies with another company or merger of two or more companies to
from one company in such a manner that:-
1. All the property of the amalgamating company or companies immediately before the
amalgamation becomes the property of the amalgamated company by virtue of the
amalgamation.
2. All the liabilities of the amalgamating company or companies immediately before the
amalgamation becomes the liabilities of the amalgamated company by virtue of the
amalgamation
3. Shareholders holding at least three-fourths in value of the shares in the amalgamating
company or companies (other than shares already held therein immediately before the
amalgamated company or its nominee) becomes the shareholders of the amalgamated
company by virtue of the amalgamation.
(Example: Say, X Ltd merges with Y Ltd in a scheme of amalgamation and immediately
before the amalgamation, Y Ltd held 20% of shares in X Ltd, the above mentioned
condition will be satisfied if shareholders holding not less than 75% in the value of
remaining 80% of shares in X Ltd i.e. 60% thereof, become shareholders in Y Ltd by
virtue of amalgamation)
The motive of giving this definition is that the benefits/concession under Income Tax Act, 1961
shall be available to both amalgamating company and amalgamated company only when all the
conditions, mentioned in the said section, are satisfied. „Amalgamating company‟ means
company which is merging and „amalgamated company‟ means the company with which it
merges or the company which is formed after merger.
However, acquisition of property of one company by another is not „amalgamation‟.
Income Tax Act defines „amalgamation‟ as merger of one or more companies with another
company or merger of two or more companies to from one company. Let us take an example of
X Ltd and Y Ltd. Here following situations may emerge:-
(a) X Ltd Merges with Y Ltd. Thus X Ltd goes out of existence. Here X Ltd is
Amalgamating Company and Y Ltd is Amalgamated Company.
(b) X Ltd and Y Ltd both merges and form a new company say, Z Ltd. Thus both X Ltd
and Y Ltd goes out of existence and form a new company Z Ltd. Here X Ltd and Y
Ltd are Amalgamated Company and Z Ltd is Amalgamated Company.
c) At least twenty-five per cent of the shareholders of the amalgamating foreign company
continue to remain shareholders of the amalgamated foreign company, and
d) Such transfer does not attract tax on capital gains in the country, in which the
amalgamating company is incorporated
a. Exemption from Capital Gains Tax [Sec 47(vii)]: Under section 47(vii) of the Income-
tax Act, capital gains arising from the transfer of shares by a shareholder of the
amalgamating companies are exempt from tax as such transactions will not be regarded
as a transfer for capital gain purpose, if:
The transfer is made in consideration of the allotment to him of shares in the
amalgamated company; and
Amalgamated company is an Indian company.
a) Carry Forward and Set Off of Accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation of the
amalgamating company [Sec. 72A]: Section 72A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 deals
with the mergers of the sick companies with healthy companies and to take advantage of
the carry forward of accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation of the amalgamating
company. But the benefits under this section with respect to unabsorbed depreciation and
carry forward losses are available only if the followings conditions are fulfilled:-
There should be an amalgamation of – (a) a company owning an industrial
undertaking (Note 1) or ship or a hotel with another company, or (b) a banking
company referred in section 5(c) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 with a
specified bankNote 2), or (c) one or more public sector company or companies
engaged in the business of operation of aircraft with one or more public sector
company or companies engaged in similar business.
The amalgamated company should be an Indian Company.
The amalgamating company should be engaged in the business, in which the
accumulated loss occurred or depreciation remains unabsorbed, for 3 years or more.
The amalgamating company should held continuously as on the date of
amalgamation at least three-fourth of the book value of the fixed assets held by it
two years prior to the date of amalgamation.
The amalgamated company holds continuously for a minimum period of five years
from the date of amalgamation at least three-fourths in the book value of fixed assets
of the amalgamating company acquired in a scheme of amalgamation
The amalgamated company continues the business of the amalgamating company
for a minimum period of five years from the date of amalgamation.
The amalgamated company fulfils such other conditions as may be prescribed to
ensure the revival of the business of the amalgamating company or to ensure that the
amalgamation is for genuine business purpose.
g) Treatment of bad debts [Sec. 36(1)(vii)]: When due to amalgamation debts of the
amalgamating company has been taken over by amalgamated company, and subsequently,
such debts turn out to be bad, it shall be allowed as deduction to the amalgamated
company.
To finance the welfare and the administrative expenditure, governments around the world
impose certain taxes on their subjects.
In cases, where cross country economic activity is carried out, it is a tricky affair to identify and
justify the appropriate jurisdiction of tax authorities. In order to mitigate the hardships of
multiple jurisdictions, the Governments enter into bilateral arrangements, which are commonly
denoted as “Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements”
Indian Government is actively pushing DTAA negotiations with several countries to help its
residents in understanding their tax jurisdictions and accountability towards the appropriate
authorities. So far India has signed DTAA with 81 countries and discussion is on with many
others. The natures of DTAA‟s entered by India are greatly diverse in their nature and contents.
Objectives
DTAA treaties must help in avoiding and alleviating the burden of double taxation prevailing in
the international arena. The tax treaties must clarify the taxpayer to know with certainty of his
potential tax liability in the country, where he is carrying on economic activities. Tax Treaties
must ensure that there is no prejudice between foreign tax payers who has permanent enterprise
in the source countries and domestic tax payers of such countries. Treaties are made with the aim
of allocation of taxes between treaty nations and the prevention of tax avoidance. The treaties
must also ensure that equal and fair treatment of tax payers having different residential status,
resolving differences in taxing the income and exchange of information and other details among
treaty partners.
Classification
Double taxation avoidance agreements may be classified into comprehensive agreements and
limited agreements based on the scope of such agreements. Comprehensive Double Taxation
Avoidance Agreements provide for taxes on income, capital gains and capital investments
whereas Limited Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements denote income from shipping and air
transport or legacy and gifts. Comprehensive agreements ensure that the taxpayers in both the
countries would be treated on equitable manner in respect of the issues relating to double
taxation.
Bilateral Relief
Bilateral relief is provided in section 90 and 90A of the Indian Income Tax Act. Bilateral relief is
provided through following methods:
(i) Exemption Method
One method of avoiding double taxation is for the residence country to altogether exclude
foreign income from its tax base. The country of source is then given exclusive right to tax such
incomes. This is known as complete exemption method and is sometimes followed in respect of
profits attributable to foreign permanent establishments or income from immovable property.
Indian tax treaties with Denmark, Norway and Sweden embody with respect to certain incomes.
(ii) Credit Method
This method reflects the underline concept that the resident remains liable in the country of
residence on its global income, however as far the quantum of tax liabilities is concerned credit
for tax paid in the source country is given by the residence country against its domestic tax as if
the foreign tax were paid to the country of residence itself.
(iii) Tax Sparing
One of the aims of the Indian Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements is to stimulate foreign
investment flows in India from foreign developed countries. One way to achieve this aim is to let
the investor to preserve to himself/itself benefits of tax incentives available in India for such
investments. This is done through “Tax Sparing”. Here the tax credit is allowed by the country of
its residence, not only in respect of taxes actually paid by it in India but also in respect of those
taxes India forgoes due to its fiscal incentive provisions under the Indian Income Tax Act.
Unilateral Relief
Unilateral Relief is provided in section 91 of the Income Tax Act. The aforesaid method is
depending on bilateral activity of both the countries. However, no country will have such an
agreement with every country in the world. In order to avoid double taxation in such cases,
country of residence itself may provide relief on unilateral basis.
Apart from relief to persons of a country where India has entered in Double Taxation Avoidance
Agreement, there is relief given even in cases where the Government of India has not entered
into DTA agreement with any foreign country. In such cases if any resident Indian produces
evidences to show that, he has paid any tax in any country with which the Government of India
has not entered into a DTA agreement, tax relief on that part of his income which suffered
taxation in the foreign country, to the extent of tax so paid in such foreign country, or the tax
leviable in India under the Income Tax Act on such income whichever is less shall be allowed as
deduction u/s 91 while calculating his tax liabilities on such income.
Government Policy
The Government of India‟s policy on foreign private investment is based mainly on the
Approach adopted in 1949. The basic policy is to welcome foreign private investment on a
selective basis in areas advantageous to the Indian economy. The conditions under which foreign
capital is welcome are as follows:
a) All undertakings (Indian or foreign) have to conform to the general requirements of the
Government‟s Industrial Policy.
b) Foreign enterprises are to be treated at par with their Indian counterparts.
c) Foreign enterprises would have the freedom to remit profits and repatriate capital subject to
foreign exchange considerations.
The Industrial Policy 1991, is based on the view that while freeing Indian Industry from official
controls, opportunities for promoting foreign investments in India should also be fully exploited.
It is felt that foreign investment would bring attendant advantages of technology transfer,
marketing expertise, introduction of modern managerial techniques and new possibilities for
promotion of exports.
Technical Collaboration
The Industrial Policy, 1991, also provides that equity collaboration need not necessarily be
accompanied with technical collaborations. The salient features of the Policy relating to Foreign
Technology Agreements are outlined below:
Management decision should be based on careful consideration of all the factors, including
implication as regard to tax liability. Keeping view various tax implications that are relevant
while taking some specific management decision under different provision of Income tax Act
have dealt with:
Make or Buy:
One of the vital investment subject to the influence of tax factor is “Make or buy decision”. Most
of the companies have to decide sometimes or the other whether they should buy a part from a
market and stop making it themselves or whether they should stop buying it and start making it.
There are various consideration affecting this decision, chief of which is cost. In other words, in
making this sort of decision the various cost of making the product or part component of product
is compared with its purchase price in market. A host of other consideration such as capacity
utilization, supply position of the article to be bought, terms of purchase, ill effect of layoffs etc.
are kept in view while taking such decision. Tax planning can be helpful in decision as regards
making or buying a particular product, component etc.
The decision ‘to make or buy’ is a costing decision and is also influenced by many general
factors which are as follows:
What are the cost involved in buying of a part from outside agency:
Buying cost
Inventory cost
Comparision of both the cost shall determine which decision the company shall follow,
therefore tax saved in both the cases are same.
Tax Consideration
Establishing a new unit: If the decision to manufacture a part or a component involves
a setting up separate industrial unit than tax incentives available u/s 10a,10b, 32, 80 IA,80
IB should be considered.
Export: If “Make or Buy” decision is taken for exporting goods then tax incentives
available under section 80 HHC depends upon whether goods manufactured by tax player
himself are exported or goods manufactured by others are exported by tax players.
Sale of plant and machinery: If buying is cheaper than manufacturing and the assessee
decides to buy parts or components for a long period of time, he may like sell the existing
plant and machinery. Tax implications as specified by section 50 has to be considered.
If the decision is taken to produce a part, then any other industrial unit to be established. When a
separate industrial unit is established then the company may get tax benefits and also deductions
under various sections to a company which decides to produce a part, are:
1. Deduction in respect of profits and gains from newly established small scale
undertakings in rural area (Sec 80 HHA)
A tax players deriving a profits and gains from a new small scale industries undertaking
set up in rural area will entitled to deduction of an amount equal to 20% of such profits
and gains. The deduction will be admissible for a period of 10 previous years in which
the small scale industrial undertaking commences production of any article.
2. Deduction in respect of profits and gains from industrial undertaking (Ship or Hotel
etc.): (Sec 80-1)
Under sction-80-1, a deduction will be allowed in respect of profits and gain derived
from industrial undertakings, ship or hotel established after a certain date. The deduction
will be of an amount equal to 30% of such industrial undertakings or Ship or Hotel, If its
company and 25% in categories of assesses.
3. Deduction in respect of profits and gains from newly established small scale
undertakings or Hotel business in Backward area (Sec 80 HHA)
All assesses are entitled to a deduction of 20% of the profit derived by them for new
industrial undertakings and Hotel setup in backward area. The deduction will be allowed
in respect of the ten assessment year relevant to previous year in which the industrial
undertaking begins to manufacture or produce articles.
4. Depreciation Allowance
A company which produces a part or a component will be allowed an allowance in
respect of depreciation of buildings, machinery, plant or furniture owned and used the
assesee for the purpose of business and profession.
Two primary factors which have a decisive influence on the choice of make or buy are
the cost and availability of production capacity. Facilities are made available and other
things being equal cost consideration assumes primacy. If the cost of making an item in-
house is going to be higher than the cost of acquiring it from an outside supplier, the
choice is to buy it. On the other hand, if the cost of making the item in ones own plant is
cheaper than buying it from the supplier, the choice is to make it. A good make-or-buy
decision, nevertheless, requires the evaluation of several less tangible factors in addition
to the two basics ones.
Considerations which favor making the parts are:
1. Cost considerations less expensive to make the part
2. Desire to integrate plan operations
3. Productive use of excess plant capacity to help absorb fixed overheads.
4. Needs to exert direct control over production and/or quality
5. Design secrecy.
6. Unreliable suppliers.
7. No suitable supplier quotation
8. Desire to maintain a stable workforce in periods of declining sales
Considerations which favor buying the part:
1. Cost considerations less expensive to buy the part
2. Suppliers research and specialized know-how
3. Small volume requirements
4. Limited production facilities
5. Desire to maintain stable workforce in periods of rising sales.
6. Desire to maintain multiple source policy.
7. Government policy favoring ancillary industries.
8. Monopoly items which are rationed by the government and on which, the buyer has no
option.
Other Factors
Some companies, by tradition, prefer to make almost every component of their products. Others
prefer to buy as much as possible from outside suppliers. In general, an aggressive company in
an industry that is expanding rapidly with many technological changes (e.g. electronics), will
prefer to buy many of its components from outside suppliers. In such industries, the company has
many opportunities to employ its capital profitably through horizontal diversification, expanding
its line of finished products.
If a business house/company decides to make a product/part instead of buying it and the making
of product involves setting up of new industrial undertaking then a business house should make a
detailed analysis of following tax incentives available to new industrial undertaking under
Income-Tax Act:
With the concept of leasing gaining immense popularity in recent times, any business
management is faced with the choice to purchase assets or to go in for leasing the asset. One
must resolve this issue on economic consideration taking into account the different tax shield
effects.
If asset is purchased, the assessee can claim depreciation. Besides interest n capital is borrowed
to finance investment in plant and machinery can also claim as deduction. If, however, asset is
obtained on lease, deductions can be claimed in respect of lease rentals and lease management
fees.
INSTALMENT VS HIRE
If an asset is purchased by instalments, then the taxpayer claim depreciation under section 32.
Besides interest payable on unpaid purchase price can also be claimed as deduction. In the case
of obtaining an asset n hire, deduction can be claimed in respect of hire charges. By comparing
present value of cash outflows a correct decision can be taken.
TRANSFER PRICING
The existence of different tax rates in different countries offers a potential incentive to
multinational enterprises to manipulate their transfer prices to recognize lower profit in countries
with higher taxes and vice versa.
In order to monitor transfer prices for goods, facilities and services, transfer pricing regulations
were introduces in the form of sections 92 and 92A to 92F.
The basic intention underlying the transfer pricing regulations is to prevent shifting out of profits
by manipulating prices charged or paid in international transactions, thereby eroding the
country‟s tax base.
Deemed associated enterprises: two enterprises are deemed to be associated enterprises. If,
at any time during the PY, -
a) One holds, directly or indirectly shares carrying 26% or more of voting power in other
enterprise.
b) Any person holds, directly or indirectly shares carrying 26% or more voting power in both
of them.
c) A loan advanced by one to the other constitutes 51% or more of BV of total assets of
other.
d) One enterprise guarantees 10% or more of the total borrowings of the other enterprise.
e) One appoints more than half of board of directors or one or more executive directors of
the other.
f) Any person appoints more than half board of directors or one or more executive directors
of both.
g) Manufacture/ processing of goods or business carried on by one is fully dependent on use
of know how, patents, copyright, etc. owned by the other, or in respect of which other has
exclusive rights.
h) 90% or more of RM required by one are supplied by the other or by persons specified by
other, and prices and other conditions relating to the supply are influenced by the other
enterprise.
i) Goods manufactured/ processed by one are sold to the other enterprise or to persons
specified by other, and the prices and other conditions relating thereto are influenced by
such other enterprise.
j) Where one enterprise is controlled by an individual/HUF, the other enterprise is also
controlled by such individual/ HUF or his relatives or jointly by such individual/HUF and
such relative.
k) One enterprise is a firm/AOP/BOI and other enterprise holds 10% or more interest in such
firm/AOP/BOI.
l) There exists between the two enterprises, any relationship of mutual interest, as may be
prescribed.
ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE
Assessment of income relating to one PY starts in the succeeding financial year, which is
called AY. Assessment procedure begins when an assessee files his return of income to the income
tax department.
TYPES OF ASSESSMENT
1. Self assessment [Sec 140A]
When a return is furnished the assessee will have to pay tax, if any payable on the basis of
return. He has also to pay interest up to the date of filing the return along with self-assessment of
tax. The return of income is to be accompanied by proof of payment of both tax and interest.
Assessing officer may make an enquiry for getting full information in respect of assesse’s income.
The assessee shall be given an opportunity of being heard in respect of any material gathered on
the basis of any enquiry so made. The assessing authority may also direct the assessee to get his
accounts audited by an accountant nominated by chief commissioner, even if the accounts of the
assessee have been audited under nay other provision.
2. Summery assessment [Sec 143(1)]
If on the basis of return filed, any tax or interest is due the A.O shall send intimation to the
assessee specifying the sum so payable. If any refund is due on the basis of such return it shall be
granted to the assessee. Such intimation shall be deemed to be a notice of demand. Such an
intimation should be send before the expiry of 2 years from the end of the AY in which income was
first assessable
3. Assessment in response to an order [Sec 143(2)]
Assessment of income after receiving a notice from income tax authorities is called
assessment in response to an order. A.O can send notice if he considers it necessary to ensure that
the assessee has not understated the income or has not underpaid tax. After hearing such evidence
as the assessee may produce in response to the notice and after taking into account all relevant
materials, which the A.O has gathered, he shall pass an assessment order in writing determining the
total income of the assessee and the sum payable or refund due to the assessee on the basis of such
assessment order.
4. Best Judgment Assessment [Sec 144]
In the following situation the A.O can make a best judgment assessment after considering all
relevant materials, which he has gathered.
a. if the assessee has not filed a return or a belated return or a revised return
b. if he fails to comply with the terms of the notice or fails to comply with the direction to get
his account audited
c. if he fails to comply with the terms of the notice requiring the presence or production of
evidence and documents
d. if the A.O is not satisfied with the correctness or completeness of the accounts of the
assessee
The best judgment assessment can be made only after giving the assessee a reasonable
opportunity of being heard. Assessee has a right to file an appeal or to make an application
for revision to the commissioner.
The provisions of the Income Tax Act relating to “Tax Deduction at source (TDS)” are of very
important in the present scenario when TDS collections contribute almost 39% of total collection
of Direct Taxes. The Income Tax Act also provides for penalty & prosecution for any default in
respect of deduction of tax at source or deposit of the deducted amount in the Government
account. Thus, the Tax Deductors need to be well conversant with the provisions relating to Tax
Deduction at Source as provided in sections 192 to 198 of the Income Tax Act.
The Indian Income Tax Act provides for chargeability of tax on the total income of a person on
an annual basis. The quantum of tax determined as per the statutory provisions is payable as:
a) Advance Tax
b) Self Assessment Tax
c) Tax Deducted at Source (TDS)
d) Tax Collected at Source (TCS)
Tax deducted at source (TDS), as name imply aims at collection of revenue at the very source of
income. It is an indirect method of collecting tax with the concepts of “collect as it is being
earned.” Its significance to the government lies in the fact that it pre-pones the collection of tax
& to ensures a regular source of revenue.
The concept of TDS requires that the person, on whom responsibility has been cast, is to deduct
tax at the appropriate rates, from payments of specific nature which are being made to a specified
recipient. The deducted sum is required to be deposited to the credit of the Central Government.
The recipient from whose income, tax has been deducted at source, gets the credit of the amount
deducted in his personal assessment.