Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Experiment 3a
Experiment 3a
In Experiment 3a, we used the Sieve Analysis method to assess the particle size
distribution of the given 500 g soil sample. The following soil classifications were
determined: characteristics of soil when load is applied, shape of grain in soil layers,
Total Weight Retained = 1.47 + 23.55 + 73.24 + 22.91 + 95.75 + 134.37 + 71.6 + 56.11 +
25.41 + 7.21
Given:
Solution:
510.15
Cumulative Percent Passing = 511.62 × 100% = 99.71%
Sieve No. 4
Given:
Solution:
486.6
Cumulative Percent Passing = 511.62 × 100% = 95.11%
Answers to Questions
Grain size analysis is a test to determine the particle size classification to test whether
the particle soil sample’s ability to be then a basis of judgments on engineering decisions.
Grading curve is a method to determine soil description based on sizes and percentage
passing. In the horizontal axis, the grain sizes are plotted and on the vertical side,
3. Under what conditions should you use wet sieving instead of dry sieving?
Wet sieve or wet sieving should be used in conditions where there are plastic fines in
soil. Conversely, dry sieving should be used whenever the amount of plastic fines in soil
4. On which basis do you select the number and opening of sieves for the sieve analysis
of a given soil?
The number and opening of sieves can be based on the soil to be tested. It
depends on the preference of the person and as to where the grain sieve analysis would be
applied.
5. A mass of volcanic ashes with highly crushable grains is brought to the laboratory.
What
precaution do you take to determine its grain size distribution?
When the volcanic ashes are brought to the lab, it should first be oven dried so
that the undesired moisture it accumulated would be removed. After drying, the volcanic
The range of particle sizes particularly for sieve analysis can be based on the
Unified Soil Classification System and ASTM D2467–93. Sieve analysis is applicable to
the gradation of soil between sin sieve (75 mm) and 0.075 mm sieve or the No. 200.
Performing a sieve analysis on a sample of clay is not possible since its grain size
is very fine wherein it is lesser than 0.0075mm. Therefore an instrument like the
apparatus: Set of Sieves, Balance, Brush, and Pans. We were given 500 g of soil sample
to sieve. Before doing so, we determined the weight of each sieve with the digital
balance. After which, we placed the 500 g soil sample into the topmost sieve. With the
guidance of our professor, we managed to shake the set of sieves through our “manual
sieve shakers”.
Our professor had put together all the groups’ sieves in order to have uniform data.
After which, we separated the set of sieves and measured the weight of each with its
retained soil. We had the following results – 597.33 g, 542.07 g, 563.46 g, 506.42 g,
547.7 g, 556.3 g, 432.7 g, 470.77 g, 430.12 g and 556.05 g. We then subtracted the
recorded weights of each sieve from the values and added them – 511.62 g. The result
was not equal to 500 g, the original value of soil sample given. The error must be from
the impurities that we weren’t able to brush off from the sieves. Also, the error must be
from inaccurate readings from the digital balance.
Application
Sieve Analysis is one of the oldest methods used in the field of engineering for
classification of soils. It is also applied in various fields like air, roads, earth dams, and
other soil embankment construction. The standard analysis defines the different grain
sizes. Poorly graded soil can cause defects in construction, such as cracks, which may
lead to swell pressure that will eventually damage the pavement. Moreover, Sieve
Analysis will help Civil Engineers guarantee that a certain structure’s foundation is
strong.
References:
Engineering Manual.
2. Thien & Graveel. (October 14, 2002) Laboratory Manual for Soil