Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5.1 Leadership
5.2 Organization Culture and Change
5.3 Values and Work Ethics
5.4 Staff Communication
5.5 Succession Planning
5.6 Occupational Hazards : Health and Safety
5.7 Welfare Programmes and Counseling
5.8 Review Questions
5.1 Leadership
Introduction
Manager and leader are two completely different roles, although we often use the
terms interchangeably. Managers are facilitators of their team members’ success.
They ensure that their people have everything they need to be productive and
successful; that they’re well trained, happy and have minimal roadblocks in their
path; that they’re being groomed for the next level; that they are recognized for great
performance and coached through their challenges.
leadership styles
Not only do the greatest teammates allow different leaders to consistently emerge
based on their strengths, but also they realize that leadership can and should be
situational, depending on the needs of the team. Sometimes a teammate needs a warm
hug. Sometimes the team needs a visionary, a new style of coaching, someone to lead
the way or even, on occasion, a kick in the bike shorts. For that reason, great leaders
choose their leadership style like a golfer chooses his or her club, with a calculated
analysis of the matter at hand, the end goal and the best tool for the job.
six leadership styles Goleman uncovered among the managers he studied, as well as a
brief analysis of the effects of each style on the corporate climate:
172
1. The pacesetting leader expects and models excellence and self-direction. If
this style were summed up in one phrase, it would be “Do as I do, now.” The
pacesetting style works best when the team is already motivated and skilled,
and the leader needs quick results. Used extensively, however, this style can
overwhelm team members and squelch innovation.
2. The authoritative leader mobilizes the team toward a common vision and
focuses on end goals, leaving the means up to each individual. If this style
were summed up in one phrase, it would be “Come with me.” The
authoritative style works best when the team needs a new vision because
circumstances have changed, or when explicit guidance is not required.
Authoritative leaders inspire an entrepreneurial spirit and vibrant enthusiasm
for the mission. It is not the best fit when the leader is working with a team of
experts who know more than him or her.
3. The affiliative leader works to create emotional bonds that bring a feeling of
bonding and belonging to the organization. If this style were summed up in
one phrase, it would be “People come first.” The affinitive style works best in
times of stress, when teammates need to heal from a trauma, or when the team
needs to rebuild trust. This style should not be used exclusively, because a
sole reliance on praise and nurturing can foster mediocre performance and a
lack of direction.
4. The coaching leader develops people for the future. If this style were
summed up in one phrase, it would be “Try this.” The coaching style works
best when the leader wants to help teammates build lasting personal strengths
that make them more successful overall. It is least effective when teammates
are defiant and unwilling to change or learn, or if the leader lacks proficiency.
173
style can also help control a problem teammate when everything else has
failed. However, it should be avoided in almost every other case because it
can alienate people and stifle flexibility and inventiveness.
builds consensus through participation. If this style were summed up in one phrase, it
would be “What do you think?” The democratic style is most effective when the
leader needs the team to buy into or have ownership of a decision, plan, or goal, or if
he or she is uncertain and needs fresh ideas from qualified teammates. It is not the
best choice in an emergency situation, when time is of the essence for another reason
or when teammates are not informed enough to offer sufficient guidance
Ravasi and Schultz (2006) state that organizational culture is a set of shared mental
assumptions that guide interpretation and action in organizations by defining
appropriate behavior for various situations. At the same time although a company
may have their "own unique culture", in larger organizations, there is a diverse and
sometimes conflicting cultures that co-exist due to different characteristics of the
management team. The organizational culture may also have negative and positive
aspects.
174
According to Needle organisational culture represents the collective values, beliefs
and principles of organisational members and is a product of such factors as history,
product, market, technology, and strategy, type of employees, management style, and
national cultures and so on. Corporate culture on the other hand refers to those
cultures deliberately created by management to achieve specific strategic ends.
As a part of organization
When one views organizational culture as a variable, one takes on the perspective that
culture is something possessed by an organization? Culture is just one entity that adds
to the organization as a whole. Culture can be manipulated and altered depending on
leadership and members. This perspective believes in a strong culture where everyone
buys into it
175
organizational communication, as individuals directly or indirectly share knowledge
and meanings.
Strong/weak cultures
Strong culture is said to exist where staff respond to stimulus because of their
alignment to organizational values. In such environments, strong cultures help firms
operate like well-oiled machines, engaging in outstanding execution with only minor
adjustments to existing procedures as needed.
176
internal communications and an acceptance and encouragement of a healthy level of
risk-taking in order to achieve innovation. Additionally, organizational cultures that
explicitly emphasize factors related to the demands placed on them by industry
technology and growth will be better performers in their industries.
According to Kotter and Heskett (1992 organizations with adaptive cultures perform
much better than organizations with unadaptive cultures. An adaptive culture
translates into organizational success; it is characterized by managers paying close
attention to all of their constituencies, especially customers, initiating change when
needed, and taking risks. An unadaptive culture can significantly reduce a firm's
effectiveness, disabling the firm from pursuing all its competitive/operational options.
Power culture: concentrates power among a small group or a central figure and its
control is radiating from its center like a web. Power cultures need only a few rules
and little bureaucracy but swift in decisions can ensue.
Role culture: authorities are delegated as such within a highly defined structure.
These organizations form hierarchical bureaucracies, where power derives from
the personal position and rarely from an expert power. Control is made by
procedures (which are highly valued), strict roles descriptions and authority
definitions. These organizations have consistent systems and are very predictable.
This culture is often represented by a "Roman Building" having pillars. These
pillars represent the functional departments.
Task culture: teams are formed to solve particular problems. Power is derived
from the team with the expertise to execute against a task. This culture uses a
small team approach, where people are highly skilled and specialized in their own
area of expertise. Additionally, these cultures often feature the multiple reporting
lines seen in a matrix structure.
177
Person culture: formed where all individuals believe themselves superior to the
organization. It can become difficult for such organizations to continue to operate,
since the concept of an organization suggests that a group of like-minded
individuals pursue organizational goals. However some professional partnerships
operate well as person cultures, because each partner brings a particular expertise
and clientele to the firm.
Constructive cultures
178
3. Affinitive: treat people as more valuable than things (cooperate with others) -
Reflects an interest in developing and sustaining pleasant relationships. People
high in this style share their thoughts and feelings, are friendly and
cooperative and make others feel a part of things.
Passive/defensive cultures
Norms that reflect expectations for members to interact with people in ways that will
not threaten their own security are in the Passive/Defensive Cluster.
• Approval
• Conventional
• Dependent
• Avoidance
179
unresolved conflict and turnover, and organizational members report lower levels of
motivation and satisfaction.
Aggressive/defensive cultures
This style is characterized with more emphasis on task than people. Because of the
very nature of this style, people tend to focus on their own individual needs at the
expense of the success of the group. The aggressive/defensive style is very stressful,
and people using this style tend to make decisions based on status as opposed to
expertise.
1. Oppositional - This cultural norm is based on the idea that a need for security
that takes the form of being very critical and cynical at times. People who use
this style are more likely to question others work; however, asking those
tough question often leads to a better product. Nonetheless, those who use this
style may be overly-critical toward others, using irrelevant or trivial flaws to
put others down.
2. Power - This cultural norm is based on the idea that there is a need for
prestige and influence. Those who use this style often equate their own self-
worth with controlling others. Those who use this style have a tendency to
dictate others opposing to guiding others’ actions.
3. Competitive - This cultural norm is based on the idea of a need to protect
one’s status. Those who use this style protect their own status by comparing
themselves to other individuals and outperforming them. Those who use this
style are seekers of appraisal and recognition from others.
4. Perfectionist - This cultural norm is based on the need to attain flawless
results. Those who often use this style equate their self-worth with the
attainment of extremely high standards. Those who often use this style are
always focused on details and place excessive demands on themselves and
others.
180
Organizations with aggressive/defensive cultures encourage or require members to
appear competent, controlled, and superior. Members who seek assistance, admit
shortcomings, or concede their position are viewed as incompetent or weak. These
organizations emphasize finding errors, weeding out "mistakes" and encouraging
members to compete against each other rather than competitors. The short-term gains
associated with these strategies are often at the expense of long-term growth.
Stephen McGuire (2003) defined and validated a model of organizational culture that
predicts revenue from new sources. An Entrepreneurial Organizational Culture (EOC)
is a system of shared values, beliefs and norms of members of an organization,
including valuing creativity and tolerance of creative people, believing that
innovating and seizing market opportunities are appropriate behaviors to deal with
problems of survival and prosperity, environmental uncertainty, and competitors'
threats, and expecting organizational members to behave accordingly.
Elements
One of the biggest obstacles in the way of the merging of two organizations is
organizational culture. Each organization has its own unique culture and most often,
when brought together, these cultures clash. When mergers fail employees point to
issues such as identity, communication problems, human resources problems, ego
181
clashes, and inter-group conflicts, which all fall under the category of "cultural
differences".
INTRODUCTION
Values and ethics are central to any organization; those operating in the national
security arena are no exception. What exactly do we mean by values and ethics? Both
are extremely broad terms, and we need to focus in on the aspects most relevant for
strategic leaders and decision makers. What we will first discuss is the distinctive
nature of ethics for public officials; second, the forces which influence the ethical
behavior of individuals in organizations; and third, explore the actions strategic
leaders can take to build ethical climates in their organizations.
182
Values can be defined as those things that are important to or valued by someone.
That someone can be an individual or, collectively, an organization. One place where
values are important is in relation to vision. One of the imperatives for organizational
vision is that it must be based on and consistent with the organization's core values. In
one example of a vision statement we'll look at later, the organization's core values -
in this case, integrity, professionalism, caring, teamwork, and stewardship- were
deemed important enough to be included with the statement of the organization's
vision. Dr. John Johns, in an article entitled "The Ethical Dimensions of National
Security," mentions honesty and loyalty as values that are the ingredients of integrity.
When values are shared by all members of an organization, they are extraordinarily
important tools for making judgments, assessing probable outcomes of contemplated
actions, and choosing among alternatives. Perhaps more important, they put all
members "on the same sheet of music" with regard to what all members as a body
consider important.
The Army, in 1986, had as the theme for the year "values," and listed four
organizational values-loyalties, duty, selfless service, and integrity-and four
individual values- commitment, competence, candor, and courage. A Department of
the Army pamphlet entitled Values: the Bedrock of Our Profession spent some time
talking about the importance of values, and included this definition:
Values are what we, as a profession, judge to be right. They are more than words-they
are the moral, ethical, and professional attributes of character . . . there are certain
core values that must be instilled in members of the U.S. Army-civilian and
uniformed soldier alike. These are not the only values that should determine our
character, but they are ones that are central to our profession and should guide our
lives as we serve our Nation.
Values are the embodiment of what an organization stands for, and should be the
basis for the behavior of its members. However, what if members of the organization
do not share and have not internalized the organization's values? Obviously, a
disconnect between individual and organizational values will be dysfunctional.
183
Additionally, an organization may publish one set of values, perhaps in an effort to
push forward a positive image, while the values that really guide organizational
behavior are very different. When there is a disconnect between stated and operating
values, it may be difficult to determine what is "acceptable." For example, two of the
INDIVIDUAL
GROUP
• GROUPTHINK
• PRESENCE OF IDEALOGUES
• NEGATIVE ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSE TO DISSENT
ETHICS IN PRACTICE
Kenneth R. Andrews, in "Ethics in Practice," contends that there are three aspects to
ethical behavior in organizations: the development of the individual as an ethical
person, the effect of the organization as an ethical or unethical environment, and the
actions or procedures developed by the organization to encourage ethical behavior
and discourage unethical behavior.
184
Most of an individual's ethical development occurs before entering an organization.
The influence of family, church, community, and school will determine individual
values. The organization, to a large extent, is dealing with individuals whose value
base has been established. This might imply that ethical organizations are those
fortunate enough to bring in ethical individuals, while unethical organizations brought
in unethical people. But it is not that simple. While the internalized values of
individuals are important, the organization has a major impact on the behavior of its
members, and can have a positive or negative influence on their values.
185
• Dealing with conflict - Dealing with and managing conflicts or disagreements
between employees effectively is a key management skill.
186
5.5 SUCCESSION PLANNING
Introduction
Succession planning is not an issue that many organizations address in any systematic
way. Because many nonprofits are small (with fewer than 10 employees) and because
they may be facing other organizational challenges, thinking about who the next
executive director might be or what would happen if the director of finance suddenly
left is not high on their priority list.
There are many reasons why organizations need to be thinking about succession
planning. The most important reason, of course, is that we rely on staff to carry out
our missions, provide services and meet our organization's goals. We need to think
about what would happen to those services or our ability to fulfill our mission if a key
staff member left.
• Baby boomer retirements are on the rise just at the time when the economy is
growing and increasing the demand for senior management expertise
187
• Many organizations eliminated middle manager positions during restructuring
in the 1980s and 90s and no longer have this group as a source to fill senior
level vacancies
With careful planning and preparation, organizations can manage the changes that
result from a generational transfer of leadership as well as the ongoing changes that
occur regularly when key employees leave an organization.
Although the type and extent of planning will be different, organizations both large
and small need to have some sort of succession plan. Effective succession planning
supports organizational stability and sustainability by ensuring there is an established
process to meet staffing requirements. Boards and executive directors can
demonstrate leadership by having the strategies and processes in place to ensure that
these transitions occur smoothly, with little disruption to the organization.
188
• A commitment to developing career paths for employees which will facilitate
your organization's ability to recruit and retain top-performing employees and
volunteers
Introduction
Occupational safety and health can be important for moral, legal, and financial
reasons. All organisations have a duty of care to ensure that employees and any other
person who may be affected by the companies undertaking remain safe at all times.[
Moral obligations would involve the protection of employee's lives and health. Legal
reasons for OSH practices relate to the preventative, punitive and compensatory
effects of laws that protect worker's safety and health. OSH can also reduce employee
189
injury and illness related costs, including medical care, sick leave and disability
benefit costs.
Definition
"Occupational health should aim at: the promotion and maintenance of the highest
degree of physical, mental and social well-being of workers in all occupations; the
prevention amongst workers of departures from health caused by their working
conditions; the protection of workers in their employment from risks resulting from
factors adverse to health; the placing and maintenance of the worker in an
occupational environment adapted to his physiological and psychological capabilities;
and, to summarize, the adaptation of work to man and of each man to his job.
"The main focus in occupational health is on three different objectives: (i) the
maintenance and promotion of workers’ health and working capacity; (ii) the
improvement of working environment and work to become conducive to safety and
health and (iii) development of work organizations and working cultures in a
direction which supports health and safety at work and in doing so also promotes a
positive social climate and smooth operation and may enhance productivity of the
undertakings. The concept of working culture is intended in this context to mean a
reflection of the essential value systems adopted by the undertaking concerned. Such
a culture is reflected in practice in the managerial systems, personnel policy,
principles for participation, training policies and quality management of the
undertaking."
Psychosocial hazards
190
Employers in most OECD countries have an obligation not only to protect the
physical health of their employees but also the psychological health. Therefore as part
of a risk management framework psychological or psychosocial hazards (risk factors)
need to be identified and controlled for in the workplace. Psychosocial hazards are
related to the way work is designed, organised and managed, as well as the economic
and social contexts of work and are associated with psychiatric, psychological and/or
physical injury or illness. Linked to psychosocial risks are issues such as occupational
stress and workplace violence which are recognized internationally as major
challenges to occupational health and safety According to a survey by the European
Agency for Safety and Health at Work, the most important emerging psychosocial
risks are:
Specific occupational safety and health risk factors vary depending on the specific
sector and industry. Construction workers might be particularly at risk of falls, for
instance, whereas fishermen might be particularly at risk of drowning. The United
States Bureau of Labor Statistics identifies the fishing, aviation, lumber,
metalworking, agriculture, mining and transportation industries as among some of the
more dangerous for workers.[23]Similarly psychosocial risks such as workplace
191
violence are more pronounced in certain occupational groups such as health care
employees, correctional officers and teachers.[24]
WELFAREPROGRAMMES
1. Drinking Water: At all the working places safe hygienic drinking water
should be provided.
3. First aid appliances: First aid appliances are to be provided and should be
readily assessable so that in case of any minor accident initial medication
can be provided to the needed employee.
192
be provided in the office and factory premises and are also to be
maintained in a neat and clean condition.
6. Spittoons: In every work place, such as ware houses, store places, in the
dock area and office premises spittoons are to be provided in convenient
places and same are to be maintained in a hygienic condition.
10. Rest rooms: Adequate numbers of restrooms are provided to the workers
193
with provisions of water supply, wash basins, toilets, bathrooms, etc.
NONSTATUTORYSCHEMES
Many non statutory welfare schemes may include the following schemes:
194
As a business, you have to provide various benefits to ensure your employees'
welfare. While this may increase your business expense and negatively affect your
bottom line, looking after your employees will benefit you in other ways.
Compliance:
As an owner, you are required by law to provide certain benefits for the welfare of
your employees. You may have to match the Social Security taxes your employees
pay and obtain a worker's compensation insurance policy. If you terminate an
employee, you may have to funds to extend his health insurance.
Employees Motivation:
By providing a plan that's good for employees' welfare, you show them that you value
them. This can help make them feel welcome and happy in your company, motivating
them to work harder. If your health plan has wellness coverage and preventative care,
employees are more likely to stay healthy, cutting down on absenteeism and sick
days.
Employees' Well-Being:
For companies that have a large base of employees working under stressful conditions
or living away from family, it is important to look at fostering personal happiness and
professional growth. Investing in employees pays dividends in terms of higher
productivity and greater loyalty
Company Image:
Providing a good employee welfare plan reflects well on your business, building a
good company image. It may even earn you some press coverage, giving you free
195
publicity to improve awareness among potential customers. This may boost your sales
and increase your profits.
196
Welfare Measures in India
In the early 1990s, the process of economic reforms was set in motion when
the government introduced a series of measures to reduce control on industries,
particularly large industries. The workers have opposed economic liberalization
policy for fear of unemployment while entrepreneurs have welcomed it in the hope of
new opportunities to improve Indian industries. The new economic policy has directly
affected industrial relations in the country, because the government has to play a dual
role, one of protecting the interest of the workers, and second to allow a free interplay
of the market forces. Economic reforms, by removing barriers to entry, have created
competitive markets. Fiscal stabilization has resulted in drastic reduction in budgetary
support to the public sector commercial enterprises while exposing these enterprises
to increased competition from private sector.
Labour and Labour Welfare sub-sector consists of six main programmes viz.
Labour Administration, Rehabilitation of bonded labour, Assistance to Labour
Cooperatives, Craftsmen training programmed, Apprenticeship training programme,
Employment Services and Sanjay Gandhi Swavalamban Yojana.
197
Many researches has been done in the following themes, such as
1) Explain leadership
2) Explain Organization Culture and Change
3) Explain Values and Work Ethics
4) Explain Staff Communication
5) Explain Succession Planning
6) Discuss Occupational Hazards
7) Explain Welfare Programmes and Counselling
198
References
1. G Mejia, D.B. Balkin and R.L. Cardy, Managing Human Resources, Pearson
Education, New Delhi, 2003.
2. R.W Mondy, R.M. Noe and S.R. Premeaux, Human Resource Management,
Prentice Hall International Editions, New Jersey, 1999.
3. N.G. Nair and Latha Nair, Personnel Management and Industrial Relations,
S. Chand Publications, New Delhi, 1999.
4. Ian Beardwell and Len Holden, Human Resource Management – A
contemporary Perspective, Macmillan India Ltd, New Delhi, 1995
5. V.S.P. Rao, Human Resource Management – Text and Cases Excel Books,
New Delhi, 2000.
6. M.S. Saiyadain, Human Resources Management, Tata McGraw-Hill
Publishing Company ltd, New Delhi, 2003.
7. Wilbert. E. Scheer Personnel Administration Handbook, Dartnell Chicago,
1985.
8. M.N. Mishra Organizational Behavior, Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi,
2001.
9. Y.K. Shetty and V.M. Buehler, Productivity and Quality through people:
Practices of Well-Managed Companies, Quorum Books, Connecticut, 1985.
10. Kirkpatrick, D.L., Techniques for Evaluating Training Programs, Journal of
American Society of Training Directors, 1959.
11. JIT Chandran, Organizational Behavior, Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi,
1998.
12. Gareth. R. Jones, Organizational Theory: Text and Cases, Addison-Wesley
Publications, Asia, 2000.
13. A.M. Sheikh, Human Resource Development and Management, S.Chand,
New Delhi, 1999.
14. Madhurendra K. Varma, Nurturing Change through Your Human Assets:
Optimizing Organizational Challenges in the new Millennium, Response
Books, New Delhi, 2000.
199
15. Rao, T,V. Human Resource Development Audit, Sage Publications, Response
Books New Delhi, 2000.
16. Stephen. P. Robbins Management, Fourth Edition, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
1994.
17. Robert A. Baron, Behavior in Organizations, Prentice-Hall India, New Delhi,
1999.
18. Uma Sekaran, Organizational Behavior: Text and Cases, Tata McGraw-Hill
Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi. 1989.
19. Fred Luthans, Organizational Behavior (8th Edition) McGraw – Hill
International Edition, New York, 1998.
20. C.S. Venkata Raman, Personnel Management and Human Resource, Tata
McGraw Hill, New Delhi.
21. C.B. Gupta, Human Resource Management, Sultan Chand & Sons, New
Delhi.
22. V.P. Michael, Human Resource Management and Industrial Relations,
Himalaya Publishing house, Mumbai.
23. A.M. Sharma, Personnel Management and Human Resource Management,
Himalaya Publishing House, Mumbai.
24. K. Ashwathappa, Human Resource Management, Tata McGraw Hill, New
Delhi.
25. P. Subba Rao, Human Resource Management & Industrial Relations,
Himalayan Publishing House
26. Peter Drucker, The Practice of Management, Allied Publishers Pvt Ltd., New
Delhi, 2002.
27. M.N. Mishra Organizational Behavior, Vikas Publishing House, New Delhi,
2001
28. Y.K. Shetty and V.M. Buehler, Productivity and Quality through people:
Practices of Well-Managed Companies, Quorum Books, Connecticut, 1985.
200
29. S.K.Singh, Productivity of Industrial Workers, Vohra Publishers, New Delhi,
1988.
201