Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AMS 2017 Brousse Poster Draft PDF
AMS 2017 Brousse Poster Draft PDF
net/publication/314119100
New Cities' Parameterization for Urban Climate Modelling. A Sensitivity test to Local Climate Zones parameters in WRF over Vienna using WUDAPT
CITATION READS
1 337
6 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Oscar Brousse on 01 March 2017.
O. Brousse ,
1 B. Bechtel ,
2 K. Hammerberg ,
3 A. Martilli ,
4 M. Demuzere ,
1,5 N.P.M. van Lipzig1
1. Motivation 2. Setup
LCZ LCZ
10
Following the World Urban Database and Access Portal Tool (WUDAPT) 9
project, very few studies have investigated the potential of Local Climate 8
Zones (LCZ) for urban climate studies. 7
The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model using the Building 6
5
Effect Parameterization coupled with the Building Energy Model (BEP-BEM) 4
urban canopy models (UCM) is suitable for the study of models' sensitivity to 3
LCZs' parameters. 2
urban climate modelling guidance in area lacking of data and for further
LCZ map from the city of Vienna following WUDAPT to WRF (W2W).
improvements of the WUDAPT framework.
Two hot summer days during July 2015 with 6 hours’ spin up.
3. Methodology
Parameters LCZ 1 LCZ 2 LCZ 3 LCZ 4 LCZ 5 LCZ 6 LCZ 7 LCZ 8 LCZ 9 LCZ 10
Albedo 0.10 – 0.20 0.10 – 0.20 0.10 – 0.20 0.12 – 0.25 0.12 – 0.25 0.12 – 0.25 0.15 – 035 0.15 – 0.25 0.12 – 0.25 0.12 – 0.20
Variables
Building Heights
25 – 45 10 – 25 5 – 10 25 – 45 10 – 25 5 – 10 5 5 – 10 5 – 10 5 – 15
(BUILD H), meters
Urban Fraction
0.9 – 1.0 0.8 – 1.0 0.7 – 1.0 0.6 – 0.7 0.6 – 0.8 0.4 – 0.7 0.7 – 1.0 0.8 – 1.0 0.2 – 0.4 0.5 – 0.6
(UFRAC)
Building Width 15 17,5 9 32 25 10.5 7 28.8 10 23.8
Fixed
Comparison of daily mean air temperatures between extreme values of LCZ parameters simulations using BEP-BEM. Building and Road width are fixed.
4. Sensitivity Test Results on Daily Mean Temperature
T (ºC)
ALBEDO MIN – ALBEDO MAX BUILD H MAX – BUILD H MIN UFRAC MAX – UFRAC MIN
Overall the model was more sensible to the urban fraction variations. Per LCZs parameters’ impact varies greatly (ie. open and industrial areas).
5. Conclusions 6. References
Using WUDAPT mid values of ranges is suitable for urban climate modelling. Yet, Bechtel, B., Alexander, P., Böhner, J., Ching, J., Conrad, O., Feddema, J., Mills, G.,
See, L. and Stewart, I. 2015. Mapping local climate zones for a worldwide
morphological and physical definition of a typical European city impacts the results with a database of form and function of cities. International Journal of Geographic
substantial margin of error for summer case studies . Information, 4(1), 199-219. doi:10.3390/ijgi4010199.
Brousse, O., Martilli, A., Foley, M., Mills, G., & Bechtel, B. (2016). WUDAPT, an
Depending on the Local Climate Zone, each parameter has a varying importance in local efficient land use producing data tool for mesoscale models? Integration of
climate assumption. In this study, the urban fraction, hence changing the impervious surface urban LCZ in WRF over Madrid. Urban Climate, 17, 116-134.
Hammerberg, K., Brousse, O., & Mahdavi, A. (2016). Investigating the suitability
coverage, appears to have the highest uncertainty rate. of the WRF model for improving urban climate boundary conditions. Submitted
The WUDAPT project should focus on defining a technique to better assume urban to the 3rd IBPSA-Italy Conference, Building Simulations Applications 2017.
Martilli, A. (2002). Numerical study of urban impact on boundary layer structure:
morphological parameters. Also further sensitivity tests need to be done on H/W variations Sensitivity to wind speed, urban morphology, and rural soil moisture. Journal of
impact on climate. Applied Meteorology, 41(12), 1247-1266.