Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project:
Revision:
Date:
+
Correlations
Positive +
Negative −
No Correlation
Relationships
Strong ●
Moderate ○
Weak ▽
Direction of Improvement
Maximize ▲
Target ◇
+
Minimize ▼
+
Column # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Adjustable Height on the knee joints and the strap
Direction of Improvement ▼ ▼ ▼ Customer Competitive Assesment
Requirements
Functional
Width of adjustable knee joint
number of component (pieces)
Number of Spring used
Competitor #10: Product Name
Thickness of knee joint
Competitor #2: Product Name
Competitor #4: Product Name
Competitor #9: Product Name
Competitor #1: Product Name
Competitor #3: Product Name
Competitor #5: Product Name
Competitor #6: Product Name
Competitor #7: Product Name
Competitor #8: Product Name
Strength of spring
Type of Material
Number of Strap
Factor of Safety
Maximum Relationship
Complexity
Mechanism
Weight (N)
Durability
Customer Importance
Relative Weight
Weight Chart
Customer
Our Product
Requirements
(Explicit and
Row #
Row #
Implicit) 0 1 2 3 4 5
4 0% 0 9 Cormfortability ● ○ ● ● ▽ ▽ ○ ▽ ○ ○ ● ▽ ● 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
5 0% 9 User friendly ● ● ○ ○ ○ ○ ● ● ○ ○ ● ● ● 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
6 0% 9 Attractive ▽ ○ ● ○ ▽ ▽ ○ ○ ○ ○ ● ▽ ▽ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
7 0% 9 Reliability ○ ● ● ● ● ● ● ○ ▽ ○ ○ ▽ ▽ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
8 0% 9 Cost Of Production ○ ● ● ● ○ ● ● 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
9 0% 9 Convenient ● ○ ○ ○ ● ○ ○ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9
10 0% 9 Portability ● ▽ ○ ● ○ ▽ ○ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
Our Product
11 0% 9 Stillness ○ ● ● ● ○ ▽ ▽ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Competitor #1: Product Name
11
Target for Functional
Target for Functional
Target for Functional
Target for Functional
Target for Functional
Target for Functional
Target for Functional
Target for Functional
Target for Functional
Target for Functional
Target for Functional
Target for Functional
Target for Functional
Target for Functional
Target for Functional
Requirement #13
Requirement #14
Requirement #10
Requirement #11
Requirement #12
Requirement #15
Requirement #16
Requirement #3
Requirement #4
Requirement #5
Requirement #6
Requirement #8
Requirement #9
Requirement #1
Requirement #2
Requirement #7
Target
Max Relationship 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 3 3 9 9 9
Technical Importance Rating 750 600 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Weight Chart
|||||||
Our Product 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Competitor #1: Product Name 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Competitor #2: Product Name 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Competitor #3: Product Name 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Competitor #4: Product Name 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Competitor #5: Product Name 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Technical Competitive Assesment
Competitor #6: Product Name 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Competitor #7: Product Name 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Competitor #8: Product Name 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Competitor #9: Product Name 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Competitor #10: Product Name 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5
4
3
2
Competitor #3: Product Na me Competitor #4: Product Name Competitor #5: Product Na me
Competitor #6: Product Na me Competitor #7: Product Name Competitor #8: Product Na me
Competitor #9: Product Na me Competitor #10: Product Na me
0
Template Revision: 0.9 Date: 4/23/2010
Column # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Christopher Battles