Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PII: S0013-4686(18)32824-X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.12.114
Reference: EA 33329
Please cite this article as: Tú.S. Ortolani, T.S. Pereira, Mô.H.M.T. Assumpção, F.C. Vicentini, G. Gabriel
de Oliveira, B.C. Janegitz, Electrochemical sensing of purines guanine and adenine using single-
walled carbon nanohorns and nanocellulose, Electrochimica Acta (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.electacta.2018.12.114.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to
our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Electrochemical sensing of purines guanine and adenine using single-
walled carbon nanohorns and nanocellulose
PT
RI
1
Department of Nature Sciences, Mathematics and Education, Federal University of São
SC
Carlos, 13600-970 Araras, SP, Brazil.
U
2
Center of Nature Sciences, Federal University of São Carlos, Rod. Lauri Simões de
AN
Barros km 12, Buri, SP, Brazil.
3
Universidade Federal do Tocantins, Campus Gurupi, 77402-970, Gurupi, TO, Brazil
M
D
TE
EP
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Abstract
and single-walled carbon nanohorns (SWCNH). SWCNH and NC ensure large surface
area, good conductivity, high porosity and chemical stability, becoming attractive for
PT
transform infrared (FTIR), Scanning Electron Micrograph (SEM), Transmission
RI
electron microscopy (TEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS) and zeta potential. Using
XRD and FTIR it was possible to observe particular characteristics of NC and SWCNH.
SC
The presence of dahlia-like assemblies on the NC surface was observed by MEV and
U
showed the excellent results when it was used guanine and adenine, as proof of concept,
AN
by using cyclic and linear sweep voltammetry (LSV). LSV was also employed for
simultaneous detection resulting in limits of detection of 1.7 × 10−7 mol L−1 and
M
1.4 × 10−6 mol L−1, for guanine and adenine, respectively. In addition, the proposed
D
electrode was applied for determination of both bases in synthetic human serum and fish
TE
conducting thin films with SWCNH, and due to simplicity in the preparation and high
EP
conductivity, this new thin film could be extended for others electrochemical purposes
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1. Introduction
Among the various modifiers, carbon nanotubes [1-3], graphene [4, 5], metallic
nanoparticles [6-10] and artificial polymers [11, 12] have been utilized to decorate
PT
(SWCNH) and nanocellulose (NC) have attracted much attention due to their high
RI
surface area [13-15].
SC
graphitic tubes having diameters of 2-5 nm and lengths of 40-50 nm. They are derived
from single walled carbon nanotubes and terminated by a five-pentagon conical cap
U
with a cone opening angle of ~19º and about 2000 of them assemble radially to form a
AN
spherical aggregate with diameters of about 100 nm [13, 16, 17]. SWCNH are cost-
M
effectively produced by direct vaporization of pure graphite without the use of metal
catalysts what result in the absence of metal contamination and consequently no need of
D
purification [14, 18, 19]. This kind of material ensures extremely large surface area,
TE
hydrophobic nature of its surface, chemical stability and fast mass transport. As a result,
EP
SWCNH have been used in many applications such as electrodes [13, 14, 19, 20].
in structural components of the cell wall of green plants. Nanocellulose are cellulose
elements with at least one dimension smaller than 100 nm obtained from renewable
polymers via acid hydrolysis. Hence, NC is a natural fiber which can be extracted from
plant cell wall and it has been successfully isolated from cellulose obtained from
sugarcane [15, 21-25]. NC exhibits high strength, high stiffness, high surface area, good
mechanical and rheological properties and hydroxyl groups. Additionally with low
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
density, lightweight, high porosity, lack of toxicity and biodegradability NC based
materials become high attractive for many applications such as biomedical [15, 21, 22,
25].
PT
and pharmacological studies [11, 26]. DNA encodes genetic information via unique
RI
combinations of four DNA bases: guanine, adenine, thymine and cytosine. Thus,
analyzing individual base composition the DNA can be measured since the mole
SC
percentage of guanine is equal to cytosine and that of adenine is equal to thymine [27].
Therefore, adenine and guanine are two important constituent parts of both
U
deoxyribonucleic acid and ribonucleic acid (RNA) and play key roles in the storage of
AN
genetic information and also in protein biosynthesis [28, 29]. Thus, selective and
M
sensitive detection of these bases provides valuable insights in fundamental fields such
metabolism in cells [28]. Moreover, abnormal changes of DNA bases suggest the
TE
deficiency of the immunity system what could indicate the presence of some diseases
such as cancer, Alzheimer, epilepsy and HIV infection [1, 11, 30].
EP
and adenine. Among them are mass spectrometry [31], chemiluminescence [32], HPLC
C
AC
[33] and electrophoresis [34]. However, most of these methods involve time-consuming
convenience, excellent sensitivity and selectivity [1, 30]. In fact electrochemical method
has been widely used in the determination of guanine and adenine [6, 27, 29, 30, 35-37]
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
their extremely positive oxidation potentials, weak direct electron transfer capacity and
and reproducibility. In order to overcome these drawbacks, many materials have been
PT
Aiming of thin film for electrochemical purposes, we developed a new
RI
composite by using on NC and SWCNH, which was applied toward guanine and
adenine determinations. It is expected that this material could provide high catalytic
SC
activity and antifouling properties that are of great interest in electroanalysis.
2. Experimental
U
AN
2.1 Reagents and solutions
M
All chemical were of analytical grade and used without any further treatment or
purification. SWCNH, adenine and guanine were purchased from Aldrich as well as
D
adenine and guanine bases. Phosphate buffer, KCl and H2SO4 were purchased from
TE
Synth. For adenine and guanine solutions preparation, the bases were first dissolved in
ultra-pure water at 80 ºC and maintained in a hot bath for 40 minutes. In all prepared
EP
solution ultra-pure water was used as solvent. Sugarcane bagasse was purchased at
The NC preparation was done basing on Teixeira et al [39] and Lee et al [40].
Firstly, 5 g of sugarcane bagasse were washed and dried at 55 ºC until constant weight.
Then, the bagasse was powdered and put in a flask containing 100 mL of NaOH (5
wt%) and 100 mL of hydrogen peroxide (11% (v/v)) solutions, in order to remove lignin
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
and hemicelluloses. This process was taken at 40 ºC and magnetic stirring for 90
minutes. After that, the final solution was filtered and dried at 55 ºC until constant
6 mol L−1 sulfuric acid at 45 ºC and vigorously stirred for 30 min. Next, 500 mL of cold
deionized water (4 oC) were added in order to stop the reaction. Then, the final solution
PT
was centrifuged and the non-reactive sulfate groups removed. The solids obtained were
RI
washed with water until pH reached to 7 and the neutral suspension was then
SC
2.3 Electrode characterization
U
For electrochemical characterization of the prepared electrode it was used
AN
0.1 mol L−1 KCl as supporting electrolyte in the presence of equimolar mixtures of
M
1.0 × 10−3 mol L−1 K3[Fe(CN)6] and 1.0 × 10−3 mol L−1 K4[Fe(CN)6]. For the purines
determinations 0.2 mol L−1 phosphate buffer solution was used as supporting
D
electrolyte.
TE
EP
LLC) of 3 mm as work electrode and an Ag/AgCl (3.0 mol L−1 KCl) as reference
electrode. The work electrodes were prepared by dispersing 1.0 mg of SWCNH in 1.0
mL of the nanocellulose solution. The resultant solution was put in an ultrasonic bath
for 20 min. Thus, 3 µL of this ink was pipetted on the work electrode and dried at room
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
temperature during 2 h. After dry more 3 µL was added and dried for more 2 h. The
PT
using a Tensor II (Bruker) spectrophotometer in the range of 500 a 4000 cm−1. For
RI
dynamic light scattering (DLS) and zeta potential analyses it was employed a Zetasizer
SC
using Scanning Electron Microscope XL-30 FEG Philips® while transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) images were obtained using a Jeol JEM 1200 EX-II. XRD analysis
U
were also obtained and recorded in the range of 2θ = 20° to 90° with a step size of 0.02°
AN
and a scan time of 10 deg/min per step using a Rigaku diffractometer model Miniflex II
M
2.6 Samples
TE
The sperm fish was collected in CEPTA/ICMBio in Pirassununga - São Paulo. This
sample was collected from fish Astyanax Bimaculatus, popularly known as Lambari,
EP
populary found in different areas in Brazil. The 1.0 mL of sample was diluted in 1.0 mL
of 1.0 mol L−1 sulfuric acid and heated to 90°C by 90 min in closed bottle. It was cooled
C
at room temperature and then it was added 1.0 mL of 1.0 mol L−1 sodium hydroxide for
AC
neutralization. Finally, 5.0 mL of 0.2 mol L−1 phosphate buffer (pH 8.6) to perform the
measures. The synthetic serum was also utilized for guanine and adenine detection [41].
In the volume of 1.0 mL of this sample was added amounts of guanine and adenine,
which were diluted in electrochemical cell for the electrochemical measurements. When
it was not in use, the prepared samples were kept in refrigerator at 4°C.
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
Fig. 1(a) and (b) shows the DLS analysis. Using this technique, it was possible to
RI
observe that NC nanoparticles are in the range of 32 nm – 160 nm with a non-normal
SC
showed the nanoparticles in the range of 105 nm – 526 nm and a normal distribution.
The zeta potential has been reported as a good indicator of the acid hydrolysis
U
effectiveness and provides information about stable and colloidal suspension.
AN
According to Benini et al [22] generally, values lower than – 15 mV represent the
M
beginning of particle size agglomeration while values higher than – 30 mV mean that
1(c), the obtained value for NC-SWCNH is almost – 30 mV, resulting in a good
TE
agglomerated material. Thus, knowing that the higher zeta potential in suspension the
EP
[22, 42] it is possible to affirm that the addiction of SWCNH increases the NC stability.
C
AC
It is worth noting that SWCNH DLS analysis was not performed since its dispersion
ability in aqueous solution is rather pour due to the strong π–π interaction [42].
Fig. 2 shows FTIR spectra of NC, SWCNH and NC-SWCNH. A broad band in
the region of 3350 cm−1 is observed for all materials. This indicates the stretching
vibration of O-H groups involved in intra and intermolecular hydrogen bonds present in
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
cellulose and also absorbed/adsorbed water molecules [22, 43]. The bands observed
around 2900 cm−1 are associated to C-H stretching vibration in cellulose and
hemicellulose and peaks located at 1427 cm−1 could be related to the C=C stretching
band [15, 21, 22]. It is important to highlight that these bands do not appear on the
PT
SWCNH spectrum. Besides, they appear on the NC-SWCNH, indicating the presence
NC on the SWCNH. Peaks observed at 1030 cm−1 and 896 cm−1 could be associated to
RI
C-O stretching and B-glycosidic links between the glucose units of cellulose,
SC
respectively [21, 22]. Considering SWCNH spectrum, the band observed at 1637 cm−1
U
The morphology of different electrodes was characterized by using SEM and
AN
TEM, which the results are shown on Fig. 3. According to Ferreira et al [44] raw
M
bagasse has relatedly smooth and homogeneous external cell tissues on its surface.
However after treatment some cells can be destroyed leaving to rougher surface what
D
can be related to the partial removal of lignin and hemicellulosed during the NC
TE
preparation (Fig. 3(a) and 3(d)). According to Chen et al [45], SWCNH formed dahlia-
possible to observe globular and highly compact aggregate structure (Fig. 3(b))
nevertheless, considering TEM image (Fig. 3e) dahlia structure is clearly observed.
C
AC
Considering the NC-SWCNH SEM and TEM image (Fig. 3(c) and 3(f)) it is possible to
observe that the NC surface is covered by SWCNH, with the formation of some
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
X-ray diffraction data are disposed on Fig. 4. NC showed two intense peaks at
16º and 22º which represent the typical cellulose structure [21, 22, 47]. The first one at
16º corresponds to crystallographic planes, overlapping (110) and (110) peaks, [21, 22]
while the second one at 22º corresponds to the (200) plane, [21, 22]. The SWCNH
showed a characteristic peak at 26º corresponding to the (022) reflection of graphite and
PT
another one at around 43º which can be attributed to the (002) reflection of graphite as
RI
already observed before [45, 48]. It is important to highlight that the NC-SWCNH
showed the characteristic peak of SWCNH at 26º and the one at 16º and 22º observed
SC
for NC.
and (b) NC-SWCNH/GCE in a 0.1 mol L−1 KCl and 1.0 × 10−3 mol L−1 equimolar
M
mV s−1. In this Figure it is possible to observe a linear increase of both anodic and
TE
cathodic peak current with the increase of the scan rate for both electrodes. By the
this estimation, 0.04 cm2 was achieved for GCE and 0.13 cm2 for NC-SWCNH/GCE, a
C
value higher than obtained for GCE, what can be explained by the high surface area of
AC
NC and SWCNH [13-15]. Additionally, it can be seen that NC-SWCNH showed higher
oxidation and reduction peaks (Fig 5c), but GCE presented a lower peak-to-peak
separation (∆E=76 mV) as compared within the modified electrode (∆E=102 mV).
However, for purines basis the proposed electrode presented electrocatalytic effect what
is really desired for the purines determination as proposed by Wang et al [1] and
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Electrochemical studies were performed in presence of guanine and adenine
9.9 × 10−5 mol L−1 guanine solution and 0.2 mol L−1 phosphate buffer at a scan rate of
50 mVs−1. Considering this Figure, NC-SWCNH showed the highest peak currents at
PT
0.74 V. This result indicated the electrocatalytic activity of NC-SWCNH toward
RI
guanine oxidation either. This effect can be associated to a synergic effect of NC and
SC
Fig. 6(b) displays cyclic voltammetry profiles obtained for GCE, NC/GCE and
NC-SWCNH/GCE in 2.0 × 10−4 mol L−1 adenine solution and 0.2 mol L−1 buffer
U
phosphate at a scan rate of 50 mVs−1. Once more, NC-SWCNH/GCE showed the
AN
highest peaks current at 1.01 V. This result indicated the electrocatalytic activity of NC-
M
SWCNH toward adenine oxidation what can be explained by a synergic effect between
NC and SWCNH.
D
None process was observed in cathodic direction which means that the charge
TE
transfer process is irreversible for both analytes. Hence, the proposed mechanism for the
oxidation of guanine and adenine according to Abbaspour and Noori [49] is represented
EP
in Scheme 1.
C
AC
guanine and adenine this material was employed toward simultaneous determination of
guanine and adenine. Fig. 6(c) shows cyclic voltammetric profiles obtained for GCE,
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
2.0 × 10−4 mol L−1 adenine solution and 0.2 mol L−1 buffer phosphate at a scan rate of
50 mVs−1. Once again, the NC-SWCNH show better results when compared to pure
GCE and NC/GCE. Thus, NC-SWCNH show a peak of 6 µA at 0.74 V associated to the
It is also possible to affirm that the oxidation of guanine and adenine is irreversible
PT
since there is no peak in the cathodic region.
RI
We also investigated the simultaneous detection of guanine and adenine using
Linear Sweep Voltammetry (LSV). This experiment was conducted using GCE and
SC
NC-SWCNH/GCE in 0.2 mol L−1 phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) solution as supporting
electrolyte in presence of 9.9 × 10−5 mol L−1 guanine solution and 2.0 × 10−4 mol L−1
U
adenine solution. As can be seen in Fig. 7, both analytes presented a well-defined
AN
oxidation process for NC-SWCNH/GCE with anodic peak potentials at 632 mV
M
(guanine) and 969 mV (adenine). For GCE the anodic peak potential were at 698 mV
and 998 mV for guanine and adenine, respectively. In addition, the NC-SWCNH/GCE
D
presented an anodic peak current of 3.0 µA (guanine) and 60.4 µA (adenine) whereas
TE
the GCE the Ipa was 0.3 µA and 6.2 µA for guanine and adenine, respectively, an
increase in the anodic current of 10 (guanine) and 9.7-fold (adenine) higher than the
EP
unmodified sensor. This result demonstrates that the proposed sensor leads to an
C
electrocatalytic effect, since there was a decrease in the anodic potential and an increase
AC
guanine and adenine by LSV scan rate was evaluated in the range from 10 to
300 mV s−1 in the presence of 9.9 × 10−5 mol L−1 guanine solution and
2.0 × 10−4 mol L−1 adenine solution in a 0.2 mol L−1 phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.0).
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
An increase in the analytical signal with increase of scan rate (data not shown) was
observed up to 200 mV s−1. Thus, this scan rate was selected for next studies.
The effect of the pH on the anodic peak current of the NC-SWCNH/GCE was
evaluated in presence of 9.9 × 10−5 mol L−1 guanine solution and 2.0 × 10−4 mol L−1
adenine solution in a 0.2 mol L−1 phosphate buffer solution in a pH range from 4.3 to
PT
8.6. An increase of pH of the solution leads to a shift of the peak potentials to more
RI
negative potentials, in addition, the higher analytical signal was also obtained in basic
medium (pH 8.6). Then phosphate buffer solution (pH 8.6) was selected for further
SC
studies.
Then, the effect of accumulation time was investigated in the range from 30 to
U
180 s. The anodic peak current increased up to 90 s for guanine and up to 60 s for
AN
adenine (data not shown). Since the detection of guanine using the NC-SWCNH/GCE
M
generates a smaller analytical signal, the accumulation time of 90 s was selected for the
simultaneous determination.
D
LSV was employed for the individual determination of guanine and adenine
TE
using a NC-SWCNH/GCE, taking into account the linear range, sensitivity, and limit of
detection. The analytical curves were carried out by adding different concentrations of
EP
the standard solutions to the 0.2 mol L–1 phosphate buffer (pH 8.6) solution.
and adenine, individually. The analytical curve for guanine was linear from 7.4 × 10−7
AC
to 6.4 × 10−6 mol L–1 with the following equation: Ip (µA) = −2.91 × 10−6 + 0.061
[guanine] (µmol L–1) (r = 0.998), with limit of detection of 1.5 × 10−7 mol L–1, as
the slope of the analytical curve. The obtained linear range for adenine was from 7.4 ×
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
10−6 to 2.1 × 10−4 mol L–1 with the following equation: Ip (µA) = 1.39 × 10−4 + 2.65 ×
10−5 log[adenine] (µmol L–1) (r = 0.994), with limit of detection of 1.9 × 10−7 mol L–1.
Then, the proposed NC-SWCNH/GCE using LSV was applied for the
voltammograms obtained and the respective analytical curves (inset). For guanine, the
PT
analytical signal increases from 7.4 × 10−7 to 6.4 × 10−6 mol L–1 and the obtained
equation was Ip (µA) = − 6.27 × 10−7 + 1.68 [guanine] (µmol L–1) (r = 0.999). The
RI
anodic current increases from 7.4 × 10−6 to 2.1 × 10−4 mol L–1 for adenine, the equation
SC
obtained was Ip (µA) = 3.11 × 10−4 + 6.33 × 10−5 log[adenine] (µmol L–1) (r =
0.937).The limits of detection were 1.7 × 10−7 and 1.4 × 10−6 mol L−1, for guanine and
U
adenine, respectively. The proposed electrode was applied for the determination of the
AN
purine bases in synthetic serum and fish sperm, which it was obtained recuperation
M
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
%
RI
Guanine Adenine Guanine proposed Adenine proposed % recovery
Sample recovery
[added] (µmol L−1) [added] (µmol L−1) electrode (µmol L−1) electrode (µmol L−1) Adenine
Guanine
U SC
Synthetic 4.00 12.5 3.70 12.2 92.5 97.6
AN
Serum 4.40 11.3 3.69 12.2 83.9 108
M
sperm
D
TE
C EP
AC
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
similar limit of detection than proposed by Wang et al.[6], Fan et al. [35] and Ensafi et
al. [37], a lower limit of detection than sensors proposed by Yari et al. [50, 51] and
higher than proposed by other works [28-30, 36, 38, 52] used in the simultaneous
PT
detection of purines. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the proposed method for guanine
RI
determination is higher than those of [6, 28-30, 35, 37, 38, 50, 51] and lower than [36,
52], however, the electrodes developed by Wu et al. [36] and Shahrokhian et al.[52] had
SC
a shorter linear range. It was not possible to compare the sensitivity of the proposed
method for the adenine determination because the analytical curve was linearized by the
applied for other carbon materials immobilization. In addition, the proposed electrode it
is easy to prepare/use and has high stability attributed to the compatibility of NC-
D
SWCNH.
TE
C EP
AC
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 2: Comparisons of various electroanalytical methods proposed for simultaneous detection of guanine and adenine
Linear range (µmol L−1) Limit of detection (µmol L−1) Sensitivity (A mol−1 L)
PT
Sensor Reference
guanine adenine guanine adenine guanine adenine
RI
Cu@Ni-MWCNTs/GCE(a) 1.0–180 2.0–150 0.17 0.33 0.419 0.438 Wang et al., 2018 [6]
SC
Chit-CNF/GCE(b) 0.2–50 0.2–50 0.046 0.074 0.014 0.005 Thangaraj et al., 2014 [28]
PPyox-GR/GCE(c)
U
0.04–100 0.06–100 0.01 0.02 0.137 0.119 Gao et al., 2014 [29]
AN
MoxC@C/GCE(d) 0.03–122 0.02–122 0.0085 0.008 0.11 0.10 Zhang et al., 2018 [30]
TiO2-G/GCE(f) 0.5–200 0.5–200 0.15 0.10 0.115 0.108 Fan et al., 2011[35]
M
GS/GCE(g) 0.025–2.5 0.05–2.5 0.01 0.01 5.9 6.6 Wu et al., 2015 [36]
D
[PW11NiO39]5−/PDDA@CNTs/GCE(h) 0.4–76 0.4–136 0.1 0.24 0.696 0.581 Ensafi et al., 2015 [37]
BDDE(e) 0.3–19
TE
0.3–19 0.037 0.019 0.019 0.045 Švorc et al., 2014[38]
EP
Fe3O4NPs/MWCNT(i) 0.05–8 0.01–10 0.001 0.005 3.31 3.17 Shahrokhian et al., 2012[52]
C
TAN-AgNP-PANT/CPE(j) 0.9–140 1.0–200 3.00 2.8 0.021 0.044 Yari et al., 2016 [50]
AC
MWNCNT-Fe3O4@PDA-Ag/CPE(k) 8–130 10–120 1.47 5.66 0.300 0.438 Yari et al., 2016[51]
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
(a)
copper-nickel nanoparticles-multiwalled carbon nanotubes modified GCE.
(b)
chitosan-carbon nanofiber modified GCE.
(c)
PT
overoxidized polypyrrole-graphene modified GCE.
(d)
molybdenum carbide nanosphere modified GCE.
(e)
BDDE boron-doped diamond electrode.
RI
(f)
TiO2 nanoparticles-graphene nanocomposite modified GCE.
SC
(g)
graphene nanosheets modified GCE.
(h)
polyoxometalate modified poly diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride-multiwalled carbon nanotubes modified GCE.
(i)
Fe3O4 nanoparticles-multiwalled carbon nanotubes modified GCE.
U
(j)
1,3,5-Trithiane Ag nanoparticles- polyaniline nanofibers modified carbon paste electrode.
AN
(k)
Multiwalled carbon nanotubes-Ag nanoparticles modified carbon paste electrode.
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
The stability studies were performed by using one thin film for 5 consecutive
days (one measurement per day) in the presence of of 1.8 × 10−6 mol L–1 guanine
solution and 1.8 × 10−5 mol L–1 adenine solution in a 0.2 mol L–1 phosphate buffer (pH
8.6) solution. For guanine the response decreased 27% and for adenine the response
decreased 12% after this period (see Fig. S1, in the Supplementary Material). However,
PT
it is important to highlight the proposed thin film is easy to prepare and could be
RI
replaced before each measurement. The repeatability studies of the NC-SWCNH/GCE
was investigated using concentrations of 9.9 × 10−5 mol L–1 guanine solution and 2.0 ×
SC
10−4 mol L–1 adenine solution in a 0.2 mol L–1 phosphate buffer (pH 8.6) solution.
U
The RSD values obtained for intra-day studies were 2.2% for guanine and 3.5% for
AN
adenine; in addition, for inter-day experiments the obtained RSD values were 2.6% and
M
4.7% for guanine and adenine, respectively. A high repeatability of the proposed
4. Conclusions
adenine determinations. The prepared electrode showed highly sensitive and high
with other electrodes used in the simultaneous detection of purines. In addition, the
proposed electrode is easy to prepare, presented great repeatability and utilize NC, a
renewable material.
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Acknowledgements
PT
References
RI
[1] P. Wang, H. Wu, Z. Dai, X. Zou, Simultaneous detection of guanine, adenine,
SC
film, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 26 (2011) 3339-3345.
[2] B.C. Janegitz, L.C.S. Figueiredo-Filho, F.C. Vicentini, M.F.M. Ribeiro, W.T.
U
Suarez, O. Fatibello-Filho, J.P. Metters, C.E. Banks, Development of a carbon nanotube
AN
paste electrode modified with zinc phosphate for captopril determination in
M
[3] F.C. Vicentini, A. Elisa Ravanini, T.A. Silva, B.C. Janegitz, V. Zucolotto, O.
D
(2014) 3961-3967.
EP
5613.
[5] M. Baccarin, F.A. Santos, F.C. Vicentini, V. Zucolotto, B.C. Janegitz, O. Fatibello-
436-443.
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[6] D. Wang, B. Huang, J. Liu, X. Guo, G. Abudukeyoumu, Y. Zhang, B.-C. Ye, Y. Li,
(2018) 389-395.
[7] M.H.M.T. Assumpção, S.G. da Silva, R.F.B. De Souza, G.S. Buzzo, E.V. Spinacé,
PT
M.C. Santos, A.O. Neto, J.C.M. Silva, Investigation of PdIr/C electrocatalysts as anode
RI
on the performance of direct ammonia fuel cell, Journal of Power Sources, 268 (2014)
129-136.
SC
[8] M.H.M.T. Assumpção, R.M. Piasentin, P. Hammer, R.F.B. De Souza, G.S. Buzzo,
M.C. Santos, E.V. Spinacé, A.O. Neto, J.C.M. Silva, Oxidation of ammonia using
U
PtRh/C electrocatalysts: Fuel cell and electrochemical evaluation, Applied Catalysis B:
AN
Environmental, 174-175 (2015) 136-144.
M
[9] P.A. Raymundo-Pereira, A.M. Campos, F.C. Vicentini, B.C. Janegitz, C.D.
Mendonça, L.N. Furini, N.V. Boas, M.L. Calegaro, C.J.L. Constantino, S.A.S.
D
Machado, O.N. Oliveira, Sensitive detection of estriol hormone in creek water using a
TE
sensor platform based on carbon black and silver nanoparticles, Talanta, 174 (2017)
652-659.
EP
[12] N.B. Simioni, G.G. Oliveira, F.C. Vicentini, M.R.V. Lanza, B.C. Janegitz, O.
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
electrochemical study and quantification of codeine in biological and pharmaceutical
PT
[14] F. Agresti, S. Barison, A. Famengo, C. Pagura, L. Fedele, S. Rossi, S. Bobbo, M.
RI
Rancan, M. Fabrizio, Surface oxidation of single wall carbon nanohorns for the
SC
514 (2018) 528-533.
U
A. Abudula, G. Guan, Fabrication and evaluation of nanocellulose sponge for oil/water
AN
separation, Carbohydrate Polymers, 190 (2018) 184-189.
M
Castagnola, L. Fadiga, D. Ricci, Single walled carbon nanohorns composite for neural
sensing and stimulation, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 271 (2018) 280-288.
[19] X. Liu, L. Shi, W. Niu, H. Li, G. Xu, Amperometric glucose biosensor based on
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[20] C. Termvidchakorn, K. Faungnawakij, S. Kuboon, T. Butburee, N. Sano, T.
PT
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 109 (2018) 832-836.
RI
[22] K.C.C.d.C. Benini, H.J.C. Voorwald, M.O.H. Cioffi, M.C. Rezende, V. Arantes,
SC
Carbohydrate Polymers, 192 (2018) 337-346.
U
Nanocellulose-montmorillonite composites of low water vapour permeability, Colloids
AN
and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 540 (2018) 233-241.
M
[24] R.K. Mishra, A. Sabu, S.K. Tiwari, Materials chemistry and the futurist eco-
[26] F.Q. Yang, J. Guan, S.P. Li, Fast simultaneous determination of 14 nucleosides and
C
AC
[27] K.L. Ng, S.M. Khor, Graphite-Based Nanocomposite Electrochemical Sensor for
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[28] R. Thangaraj, S. Nellaiappan, R. Sudhakaran, A.S. Kumar, A flow injection
analysis coupled dual electrochemical detector for selective and simultaneous detection
[29] Y.-S. Gao, J.-K. Xu, L.-M. Lu, L.-P. Wu, K.-X. Zhang, T. Nie, X.-F. Zhu, Y. Wu,
PT
performance as novel electrode material for the detection of adenine and guanine,
RI
Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 62 (2014) 261-267.
SC
charming electrode material for highly sensitive simultaneous detection of guanine and
U
[31] C. Stentoft, M. Vestergaard, P. Løvendahl, N.B. Kristensen, J.M. Moorby, S.K.
AN
Jensen, Simultaneous quantification of purine and pyrimidine bases, nucleosides and
M
197-210.
TE
of guanine and its nucleosides and nucleotides using phenylglyoxal, Analytica Chimica
EP
[33] P.G. del Moral, M.J. Arín, J.A. Resines, M.T. Díez, Simultaneous determination of
C
AC
[34] Y.-C. Jang, S.K. Jha, R. Chand, K. Islam, Y.-S. Kim, Capillary electrophoresis
(2011) 913-919.
24
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[35] Y. Fan, K.-J. Huang, D.-J. Niu, C.-P. Yang, Q.-S. Jing, TiO2-graphene
PT
nanosheets-modified electrode, Electrochimica Acta, 166 (2015) 285-292.
RI
[37] A.A. Ensafi, M. Gorgabi-Khorzoughi, B. Rezaei, M. Jafari-Asl, Electrochemical
SC
MWCNTs: A highly selective electrochemical sensor for determination of guanine and
U
[38] Ľ. Švorc, K. Kalcher, Modification-free electrochemical approach for sensitive
AN
monitoring of purine DNA bases: Simultaneous determination of guanine and adenine
M
[39] E.d.M. Teixeira, T.J. Bondancia, K.B.R. Teodoro, A.C. Corrêa, J.M. Marconcini,
TE
[40] H.V. Lee, S.B.A. Hamid, S.K. Zain, Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to
Nanocellulose: Structure and Chemical Process, The Scientific World Journal, 2014
C
AC
(2014) 20.
[41] T. dos Santos Pereira, G.C. Mauruto de Oliveira, F.A. Santos, P.A. Raymundo-
Pereira, O.N. Oliveira, B.C. Janegitz, Use of zein microspheres to anchor carbon black
25
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[42] L. Yang, X. Ran, L. Cai, Y. Li, H. Zhao, C.-P. Li, Calix[8]arene functionalized
347-352.
PT
P. Fornasiero, H2O2 sensing enhancement by mutual integration of single walled carbon
RI
nanohorns with metal oxide catalysts: The CeO2 case, Sensors and Actuators B:
SC
[44] F.V. Ferreira, M. Mariano, S.C. Rabelo, R.F. Gouveia, L.M.F. Lona, Isolation and
U
micro- to a nano-scale view, Applied Surface Science, 436 (2018) 1113-1122.
AN
[45] J. Chen, P. He, H. Bai, H. Lei, K. Liu, F. Dong, X. Zhang, Novel phosphomolybdic
M
[46] A.M. Youssef, M.A. El-Samahy, M.H. Abdel Rehim, Preparation of conductive
TE
(2018) 11095-11100.
single wall carbon nanohorns, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 645 (2015) S485-
S489.
26
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[49] A. Abbaspour, A. Noori, Electrochemical studies on the oxidation of guanine and
PT
[51] A. Yari, S. Derki, New MWCNT-Fe3O4@PDA-Ag nanocomposite as a novel
RI
sensing element of an electrochemical sensor for determination of guanine and adenine
SC
[52] S. Shahrokhian, S. Rastgar, M.K. Amini, M. Adeli, Fabrication of a modified
U
determination of guanine and adenine in DNA, Bioelectrochemistry, 86 (2012) 78-86.
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
27
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Legend of figures
Fig. 1: Size distribution obtained by DLS for (a) NC, (b) NC-SWCNH and (c) Zeta
PT
Fig. 3: SEM images with 1 µm of scale for (a) NC, (b) SWCNH and (c) NC-SWCNH
RI
and TEM images with different magnitudes for (d) NC, (e), SWCNH and (f) NC-
SWCNH.
SC
Fig. 4: XRD patterns for NC, SWCNH and NC-SWCNH.
Fig. 5: Cyclic voltammetry profiles obtained for (a) GCE and (b) NC-SWCNH/GCE in
U
0.1 mol L−1 KCl and 1.0 × 10−3 mol L−1 [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− equimolar and different scan
AN
rates. (c) Comparison between GCE (blue) and NC-SWCNH/GCE (orange) in 0.1 mol
L−1 KCl and 1.0 × 10−3 mol L−1 [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− equimolar at scan rate of 50 mV s-1.
M
GCE (blue curve), NC/GCE (black curve) and NC-SWCNH/GCE (red curve) in 0.2 mol
TE
L−1 phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) solution as support electrolyte in presence of (a) 9.9 ×
10−5 mol L−1 guanine solution, (b) 2.0 × 10−4 mol L−1 adenine solution and (c) 9.9 ×
EP
10−5 mol L−1 guanine solution and 2.0 × 10−4 mol L−1 adenine solution. v = 50 mVs−1.
Fig. 7. Linear sweep voltammograms obtained for GCE (black curve) and NC-
C
SWCNH/GCE (red curve) in 0.2 mol L−1 phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) solution as support
AC
electrolyte in presence of 9.9 × 10−5 mol L−1 guanine solution and 2.0 × 10−4 mol L−1
concentrations of guanine (a-e: 7.64 × 10−7; 1.22 × 10−6; 2.10 × 10−6; 3.46 × 10−6; 6.35 ×
10−6 mol L–1) and adenine (f-j: 7.40 × 10−6; 1.84 × 10−5; 3.68 × 10−5; 7.32 × 10−5; 2.10 ×
28
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
10−4 mol L–1) and supporting electrolyte: 0.2 mol L–1 phosphate buffer (pH 8.6). v = 200
mV s−1. Accumulation time = 90s. Inset: analytical curves obtained for (i) guanine and
(b) adenine.
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
29
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC