Professional Documents
Culture Documents
POTATO CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
COMPLAINT
same was received by his son, Gian Franco Modica, a person of suitable age
and discretion, as evidenced by his signature at the bottom of said letter.
Photocopies of Demand Letter dated July 17, 2013 and the Affidavit
of Service of plaintiff’s messenger, who served the Demand Letter unto the
defendant, are hereto made as integral parts hereof and marked as
Annexes “G” and “H”.
13. The one year period for the filing of an ejectment case is
reckoned from the date of the last demand;
14. Despite the fact that the defendant is not anymore entitled to
the occupation and possession of the subject Unit by virtue of the
expiration of contract, the non-payment of rentals, and final notice and
demand to vacate the same, defendant refused and continuously fails to
restore plaintiff AFCSC to the possession of the subject Unit;
to institute this suit and engage the services of a counsel for which AFCSC
has to incur attorney’s fees of TWENTY THOUSAND PESOS (Php 20,000.00);
17. To serve as an example for the public good to the end that a
person be discouraged from the unlawful possession of a property to which
he has no more right whatsoever, AFCSC should be awarded exemplary
damages of TWENTY THOUSAND PESOS (Php20,000.00);
3. Costs of suit.
Other reliefs just and equitable under the premises, also prayed for.