Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FOCUS ON
• Why did Canada take part
in World War II?
• What effect did the war
have on Canada's
economy?
• What were the main
campaigns in World War II?
• What role did Canadian
armed forces play in the
war?
• How did the war change
Canadians' perception of
themselves?
Counterpoints Issue
• Is the use of weapons of
mass destruction ever
justified?
many Canadians. That war had deeply divided Quebec. "I am authorized by my colleagues in the
Canada on the issue of conscription. King knew cabinet from Quebec," he informed Parliament,
that if he imposed conscription in this war, he "to say that we will never agree to conscription
and the Liberal Party would lose support in and will never be members or supporters of a gov-
Quebec. Besides, Canada was just starting to ernment that will try to enforce it."
come out of the dark years of the Depression. The King assured Parliament, and Quebec, that
economy was slowly improving, and King didn't "So long as this government may be in power, no
want the country plunged back into debt. such measure [conscription] shall he enacted."
But on September 1, Germany invaded King's position on joining the war was supported
Poland. Two days later, Britain and France de- by the opposition Conservative Party. Only J.S.
clared war on Germany. In World War I, when Woodsworth, leader of the Commonwealth
Britain declared war on Germany, Canada was Cooperative Federation (CCF), argued against
automatically at war with Germany, as well. Now. going to war. On September 10, Canada declared
Canada was an independent country, and had to war on Germany.
decide for itself whether it would go to war again.
King knew that once Britain become involved in
such a major conflict, Canada would not stand
Mobilizing Canada's Resources
by idly. Still, it was important that the decision to Despite its willingness to join the war, Canada
join the war be a Canadian one, decided by was not prepared for it in 1939. Army, air force,
Canada's Parliament. and navy troops were small in number, and most
On September 8, Prime. Minister King called of Canada's equipment was outdated and unfit
a special session of Parliament to decide Canada's for combat. For example, the army had only 4500
response. King gave a strong speech in favour of troops, a few dozen anti-tank guns, sixteen tanks,
declaring war. His minister of justice, Ernest and no modem artillery. The air force and the navy
Lapointe from Quebec, also spoke in favour of also had outdated equipment and only a small
the war, which helped convince Quebec voters number of recruits.
that Canada's involvement in the war was neces- Unlike World War 1, there were no crowds
sary. But Lapointe spoke bluntly about what con- cheering on the streets when Canada declared
scription would do to Liberal supporters in war on Germany. Many Canadians remembered
Total War
With the declaration of war, the Canadian gov-
ernment immediately became much more involved
in the planning and control of the economy. In
April 1940, the government established the
Department of Munitions and Supplies, and King
appointed C.D. Howe as its minister. Howe was
given extraordinary authority to do whatever it
Figure 5-4 Troops departing from Winnipeg. took to gear up the economy to meet wartime de-
Using evidence From this photograph, how do you mands. He told industries what to produce and
think most Canadians felt about going to war? how to produce it. In his direct, impatient manner,
Consider the feelings of those who were staying he convinced business leaders to manufacture
home, as well as those who were going to fight. goods they had never made before. Soon
Vancouver was building ships for the navy.
4.1
rm ••61 min
•••1-1. S SIMS ACTIVITIES
1,4 11
3•••••• .1.1.••• •mr
arm 1.On.. sm. cm
1.What assurance did Mackenzie King give Canadians
thins Up! Thumbs
during the debate on Canada's involvement in the
GIVE A? fill' GUN war? Why did he do this?
Developing
understanding What
is the likely target in
this photo? Where
could people find
protection from such
attacks?
e
Movement of Allied Irons
es planned
LNO. 3 COMMANDO ptl
ri ca
N?,I
„,.•••
ROYAL HAMILTON UGHT INFANTRY
Proposed perimeter
ESSEX SCOTTISH
F/"N.
Barbed wire
Landing forces, August 19,1942
FUSIUERS MONT-ROYAL
ROYAL MARINE "A" COMMANDO T-1
Movements of Allied troops
14Th CANADIAN ARMY TANK REST. (CALGARY REGT.I Y.'- ..- Pent
Serneva I
Cilfcarried 0111,
August 19, 1942 ROYAL REGIMENT
wgEpcH OF CANADA
Movements of Gorman
reserve s. Au g ust 19. 1942
E.
TANKS OAl VE/1412,E -
PROMENADE' '-
SOUTH SASKATCHEWAN REGIMENT
CAMERON HIGHLANDERS OF CANADA
PENETRATION
INTO DIEPPE
TIM .0'
BY SMALL
NO. 4 COMMANDO PASTIES
,FGRA NGE\
ORANGE II BEACH Gaw4
_ • Vauterivel, CLIFFS
Yerensedle •
sur•Mer
# .0
• •
14'217.L
NW*
Steps in Reading a Historical Map 1.What is this map about? What are the six pieces of
information given in the legend?
1.Look at the title and legend of the map. These should
tell you the historical period of the map, its main pur- 2.The cartographer (map maker) has shown a limited
pose, and the other kinds of information that the number of cities. How would you explain the choice
map is meant to convey. of Dunkirk, Stalingrad, and Palermo?
2.Examine the names (or symbols) closely. Look for 3.What ideas does this map convey about:
patterns in the information. Why, for example, are a)the importance of the success of the North
some names bigger or bolder than others? Certain African campaign to the Allies?
colours may be used to illustrate similarities in or dif- b)the role of the USSR in the defeat of Germany?
ferences between regions.
c)the problems of the Allies in establishing a second
3.Now read the map by analysing the information. Ask front in Western Europe?
yourself: What is this map about? How is the infor-
dl the importance of supremacy in naval forces for
mation being communicated? What conclusions can
the Allies?
be drawn from this map?
e) the importance of an effective air force?
• Leningrad
1
(4. Moscow
NORTH
SEA
,. GREAT
IREIAJW ~' BRITAIN
SOVIET UNION
Stalingrad
London
ATLANTIC •
OCEAN
1944
NORMANDY pans
Bay[ FRANCE
ROMANIA
YUGOSLAVIA
BULGARIA
SPAIN
ALBANIA
TURKEY
Palermo
0 10 20 km I /
/ .
-•
----• D-Day objectives
:•'....14B8V011X • 2'
American forces
—6. British forces
Canadian forces St.. •
• Caen
• Small towns
and villages
Emden
a a
ti Lnridon Wilhelmshaven
AN D a Amsterdam Oldenburg a
Cover ar The Hague
<(.11' C Bremen a
a Rotterdam
Calais Flushing
ENLiLiL,ri
a opunkirk • o o Arnhem
Boulogne I Bruges
CHANNEL
-
Ghent al Antwerp Hanover
0-Day Landing a
a Brussels
a Le Havre a Dieppe
O
Dusseldorf
°Caen Moose B
0 Rouen
a Falaise G E R M ANY
FR A N GE
Canadian army
Paris
Figure 5-18
Celebrating the
liberation of the
Netherlands by
Canadian troops in the
Dutch city of Delden,
April 1945,
While the Allies invaded Germany from the Tonight I am a different man. I have spent the last
west, the Soviet Union attacked from the east. two days in Belsen concentration camp, the most
Facing certain defeat, Germany surrendered on horrible festering scab there has ever been on the
May 7. 1945. Earlier, Hitler, together with his face of humanity.... It makes me sick to my stom-
wife Eva Braun, had committed suicide in a ach even to imagine the smell, and I want to weep
bunker in Berlin rather than submit to the Allies.
were named and presidential approval received, Many nations have agreed to treaties that limit the
we were to deliver the weapons as expeditiously as testing of nuclear weapons. The Strategic Arms
possible, consistent with good tactics. The objective Limitation Treaty (SALT) between the United States and
was to stop the fighting, thereby saving further the Soviet Union was ratified in 1972. A second treaty
loss of life on both sides. The urgency of the situ- on arms limitation was signed in 1979, although it was
ation demanded that we use the weapons first— never ratified. Other agreements to reduce the arsenal
before the technology could be used against us. of nuclear weapons were signed: one in 1988 between
the United States and the Soviet Union, and another in
Source: Statement on accepting Air Force
1991 between the United States and the Soviet Union.
Sergeants Association's Freedom Award,
Despite these various agreements, both the United
<www.glue.umd.edui-enola/vetsitibbets.html›.
States and Russia still have the capability of destroying
For almost 200 years, war strategists (planners of the world several times over.
war) have been influenced by the writings of Karl von In spite of international agreements that ban the
Clausewitz, a Prussian general who supported the idea use of biological and chemical weapons, there is strong
of total war. He believed a country's entire resources evidence that Iraq used chemical weapons on its
had to be used to ensure victory: Kurdish population in 1988, according to the interna-
tional human rights organization Human Rights Watch.
To introduce into a philosophy of war a principle of It is also conceivable that such weapons could be used
moderation would be an absurdity. War is an act by a rogue state—a country that ignores international
of violence pushed to its utmost bounds. agreements and takes actions for its own gain to the
detriment of other nations.
Source: Karl von Clausewitz, 1819; quoted by
Gwynne Dyer, War(New York: Crown Publishers,
Analysing the Issue
1985), 75.
1.What reasons did Admiral Leahy give against using
Once scientists discovered how to make atomic the atomic bomb?
weapons, however, von Clausewitz's theory of total war 2.What three arguments did Colonel Paul Tibbets give
had to be re-evaluated. Suddenly, weapons existed that to support the use of the atomic bomb on Japan?
could destroy all of humanity. Since the end of World
3.What do you think Robert Oppenheimer meant when
War II. nuclear weapons have been built that are a hun-
he said, "We knew the world would not be the
dred times more powerful than the bombs dropped on
same"?
Japan. Biological weapons that spread deadly micro-
4.Do you think there are any circumstances in which
organisms, such as anthrax and smallpox, have also
been developed, as well as deadly chemical weapons weapons of mass destruction could ever be justi-
such as nerve gas. Von Clausewitz could never have fied? Explain your answer.
envisioned destruction on such a scale.
EUR
•WHCCIKED THE TRAIN
1 500 000
1 200 000
900 000
Figure 5-21 The Canadian government used posters
1 Goo 000. to remind Canadians of the need for everyone to play
a part in the war effort, including being aware of
300 000 possible spies.
Identifying viewpoint How serious does the danger
a of spying and sabotage appear to be from this
1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 poster? What course of action does it suggest
citizens take? What techniques does it use to create
Figure 5-20 Women with jobs, 1939-1945. an impact on the viewer?