Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This paper basically attempts to assess the various business models that
are operational both domestically and internationally and the legal framework
within which these institutions operate. Further, international regulatory
practices on crowd funding and P2P lending available in public domain were
also examined to get an understanding of the regulatory approaches adopted by
different jurisdictions.
The interest rates can be set by lenders who compete for the lowest rate
on the reverse auction model or fixed by the intermediary company on the basis
of an analysis of the borrower's credit. The lender's investment in the loan is not
normally protected by any government guarantee. On some services, lenders
mitigate the risk of bad debt by choosing which borrowers to lend to, and
mitigate total risk by diversifying their investments among different borrowers.
Other models involve the P2P lending company maintaining a separate, ring
fenced fund, such as Rate Setter's Provision Fund, which pays lenders back in
If any Small Scale & Micro Level Business not started properly due
to lack of Investment, most of the investment company provide investment in
any Business or any Micro level Business want to invest in any Investment
Company are not Profitable investment due to Intermediate take a higher
charges for Investment and also charge a higher interest for a return such
investment because of this the Margin of profit reduce and the Budget of a
Small Scale Business become higher, the Risk factor are always remain constant
in any stage of Business.
Respondents of this study were collected from Thai people who always
use Internet banking, online transaction or had experience with using online P2P
lending during August to October 2017. All 312 responses were collected. After
screened out invalid responses, a total of 234 response were obtained for using
analysis. The demographic information of respondents is summarized in Table
1. To ensure content validity of measures, this study adapted from previous
researches in context of online P2P lending and e-commerce. Meanwhile, pilot
testwas tested for reliability and Kaiser-MayerOlkin(KMO) and Bartlett's test to
ensure the appropriateness of the research instrument. Pilot test collected 50
respondents for testing instrument. The reliability was evaluated by calculating
Cronbach’s alpha. All of Cronbach’s alpha of this study are greater than 0.7,
suggesting acceptable reliability (Hair et al., 1998). KaiserMeyer-Olkin(KMO)
test is a measure of sampling adequacy for each variable. The KMO varies
between 0 and 1
Frequency Percent
Gender Male 78 33.33
Female 156 66.7
Age 25-35 40 17.1
36-45 30 12.8
46-55 70 29.9
56-65 73 31.2
More than 65 21 90
Education High School or Below 5 21
Bachelor Degree 125 53.4
Master Degree 97 41.5
Doctor Degree 7 3
Income Less than 20000 20 8.5
20000-40000 97 41.5
40000-60000 75 32.1
60000-80000 16 6.8
80000-100000 14 6
More than 100000 12 5.1
Frequency Less than 1 time 69 29.5
1-5 times 43 18.4
6-10 times 29 12.4
11-15 times 22 9.4
16-20 times 15 6.4
Aware Percentage
Yes 60
No 40
Total 100
40
Yes
No
60
INTERPRETATION
From the above graph it is clear that the 60% Peoples aware the Short
term credit and 40% not aware the short term credit.
Opinion Percentage
Bank-CC, OD 30
Seller 20
Credit Card 20
Hand loan from friends & relatives 30
Total 100%
30 30 Bank - CC, OD
Seller
Credit Card
20 20
INTERPRETATION
From the above graph it is clear that the 30% Source of Short term
credit in Bank CC, OD, 20% Seller and Credit Card and 30% are Hand
Loan from Friends & Relatives.
Opinion Percentage
Flexibility 30
Rate of Interest 40
Legal Formalities 30
Total 100%
30 30
Flexibility
Rate of Interest
Legal Formalities
40
INTERPRETATION
From the above graph it is clear that the 30% Flexibility of availing
loan for short Term, 40% rate of Interest in Short Term and 30% Legal
formalities in availing loan.
Aware Percentage
Yes 60
No 40
Total 100
40
Yes
No
60
INTERPRETATION
From the above graph it is clear that the 60% Peoples aware the Heard
about P2P Leanding and 40% Not Heard about P2P Leanding
Opinion Percentage
Google 30
Wikipedia 30
peertopeerleanding 40
Total 100%
30
40 Google
wikipedia
Peertopeerleanding
30
INTERPRETATION
From the above graph it is clear that the 30% peoples visit the google
site, 30% peoples visit Wikipedia and 40% Peoples visit the site in Peer to
Peer leanding site.
Aware Percentage
Yes 40
No 60
Total 100
40
Yes
No
60
INTERPRETATION
From the above graph it is clear that the 40% like to pay interest for short
term borrowing and 60% not like to pay interest for short term borrowing.
a) Less than 1%
b) 1-2%
c) 2-3%
d) More than 3%
Opinion Percentage
Less than 1% 30
1–2% 30
More than 3% 40
Total 100%
e)
30
40
Less than 1%
1-2%
More than 3%
30
INTERPRETATION
From the above graph it is clear that the 30% interest will be
willing to pay form short term in Less than 1% and 1 – 2% loan,
40% are More than 3%.
Reference :-
[1] Chen, Dongyu, Hao Lou, and Craig Van Slyke. "Toward an understanding of
online lending intentions: Evidence from a survey in China." CAIS 36 (2015):
17.
[4] Galak, Jeff, Deborah Small, and Andrew T. Stephen. "Microfinance decision
making: A field study of prosocial lending." Journal of Marketing Research
48.SPL (2011): S130-S137.
[6] Rotter, Julian B. "A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust."
Journal of personality 35.4 (1967): 651-665.
[7] Mayer, Roger C., James H. Davis, and F. David Schoorman. "An integrative
model of organizational trust." Academy of management review 20.3 (1995):
709-734.
[8] Kim, Dan J., Donald L. Ferrin, and H. Raghav Rao. "A trust-based
consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust,
perceived risk, and their antecedents." Decision support systems 44.2 (2008):
544-564.
www.google.com
www.wikipedia.com
www.peertopeerlending.com
3. Rate the following Criteria for availing loan for Short term?
a) Flexibility
b) Rate of Interest
c) Legal Formalities
7. What interest will you be willing to pay for short term loan?
f) Less than 1%
g) 1-2%
h) 2-3%
i) More than 3%