A critique of B.

R Kapoor Vs State Of
Tamil Nadu
A rough draft submitted in the partial fulfillment of the course
Constitutional Law-II, semester VI during the academic year 2018-19.

SUBMITTED BY:- SUBMITTED TO:-

Name- SHAURYA KASHYAP Dr. Anirudha Prasad

Roll No- 1645 Professor of Constitutional law
BBA LLB

CHANAKYA NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY,

PATNA

Month Of Submission – February

 INTRODUCTION

The Chief Minister is appointed by the governor. Art. 164 of the

Constitution provides that there shall be a Council of Ministers with
the Chief Minister at its hand to aid and advise the governor.

Once the election to the Legislative Assembly is over the task of

forming the government begins. The party with the majority in the
Legislative Assembly (Vidhan Sabha) is entitled to form the
government. It is upon his recommendation that ministers are
appointed.

OBJECTIVE

The main aim of this project is to know about the appointment of CM

and to do the critical analysis of the case.
 HYPOTHESIS

1. Once the Chief Minister is elected, he can’t be disqualified.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Researcher will follow the doctrinal methods of research for this

project topic.

SOURCES OF DATA

The researcher will gather information from primary and secondary

sources that include judgments, internet, law books, journal and
papers.
 TENATIVE CHAPTERISATION

1. INTRODUCTION
2. APPOINTED, POWER, DUTIES OF CM
3. B.R KAPOOR Vs STATE OF TN
4. ISSUES AND JUDGEMENTS
5. CONCLUSION & SUGGESTION
6. BIBLIOGRAPHY

BIBLIOGRAPHY
In making of this project, I have taken help from various sites and
books

 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com
 The Constitution of India , 1950
 V.N Shukla’s Constitution of India(M.P Jain ed.)
 M P Jain, Indian Constitutional Law, 8th edition, Lexis Nexi,2