You are on page 1of 2

Date Printed:04/05/2019 Page 1

Company: JACE Ltd. Tel: 07890 278110 DESIGN OF PILES BASED ON LOAD
Address: Turners Yard, School Street, Farsley CAPACITY
LEEDS, West Yorks, UK LS28 5EX Made by Date Page No Checked Revision Job No
Project: J.J.MAC December 12, 2004 1 A
Client: Element:
Design Input Value
1. Pile 700.00
Pile type Boared
Shaft Dia. or width 450 mm
600.00 Load
Base Dia. or width 450 mm
Vs
Shape Round Embedded Length
Design Load 635 kN 500.00

2. Design Criteria
400.00
gf (Bearing) 2.50
Load (kN)
Ulimate Base Load
gf (Shaft) 2.50 Ultimate Shaft Load
gf (Overall) 2.50 300.00
Allowable Total
3. Soil Load
Bulk unit weight 18 kN/m³
200.00 Design Load
Depth to water table 3.00 m
Starting depth of: 0.80 m
Depth increments of: 0.50 m 100.00
Total Length of Pile: 7.30 m
0.00
0 1 2 3Depth (m) 4 5 6 7
4. Computation Table
Type
L=Loosee Critical
Friction Vertical Bearing Ultimate
iv
ohes
M=Mediu Depth
Coefficient Effective Capacity Shaft
Nonm-CD=Dense (m) F Stress Factor Nc Ultimate Friction Total No. of
Ultimate Ultimate Design
Base Allowable Piles
Undrained Embedmen Adhesion Bearing Ultimate Base Load Shaft Load Capacity
Pressure Load Required
esive
CohShear t Ratio Coefficient Capacity Shaft
Effective Depth Strength (ZL) a Max Nc Factor Nq Adhesion
L Non-Cohesive L, M, D (m) fb fs Qb Qs Qall
(m) Cohesive Su (kN/m²) ZL - (kPa) (kPa) (kPa) (kPa) (kN) (kN) (kN) - (kN)
0 Cohesive 10 0.00 1.00 9.000 #VALUE! #VALUE! 10.00 #VALUE! 0.00 #VALUE! #VALUE! 635 kN
0.50 Cohesive 10 1.11 1.00 9.000 7.68 76.78 10.00 12.21 7.07 7.71 83 635 kN
1.00 Non-Cohesive l 2.70 0.30 18.000 25.00 450.00 5.40 71.57 10.89 32.98 20 635 kN
1.50 Non-Cohesive l 2.70 0.30 27.000 25.00 675.00 8.10 107.35 16.61 49.59 13 635 kN
2.00 Non-Cohesive l 2.70 0.30 36.000 25.00 900.00 10.80 143.14 24.25 66.95 10 635 kN
2.50 Non-Cohesive l 2.70 0.30 45.000 25.00 1125.00 13.50 178.92 33.79 85.08 8 635 kN
3.00 Non-Cohesive l 2.70 0.30 54.000 25.00 1215.00 14.58 193.24 44.09 94.93 7 635 kN
3.50 Cohesive 40 7.78 1.00 9.000 9.00 360.00 40.00 57.26 72.37 51.85 13 635 kN
4.00 Non-Cohesive l 2.70 0.30 62.000 25.00 1215.00 14.58 193.24 82.67 110.36 6 635 kN
4.50 Non-Cohesive l 2.70 0.30 66.000 25.00 1215.00 14.58 193.24 92.98 114.49 6 635 kN
5.00 Non-Cohesive l 2.70 0.30 70.000 25.00 1215.00 14.58 193.24 103.29 118.61 6 635 kN
5.50 Non-Cohesive l 2.70 0.30 74.000 25.00 1215.00 14.58 193.24 113.59 122.73 6 635 kN
6.00 Non-Cohesive l 2.70 0.30 78.000 25.00 1215.00 14.58 193.24 123.90 126.85 6 635 kN
6.50 Non-Cohesive l 2.70 0.30 82.000 25.00 1215.00 14.58 193.24 134.20 130.98 5 635 kN
Note: Greyed cells represent user input
This program considers the following cases:
1. Uniform pile type (bored or driven),
2. One type of soil (cohesive or cohesionless), but properties may vary with depth. It computes the variation of pile capacity with length and size.

File: 415322482.xls Tab: Calculations Load Distribution Beneath a Rigid Pile Cap
Non-Cohesive Soils

End-bearing Shaft Friction


qb=s'vbNq fs=s'vbF
Nq=fn(sand & pile types) F=fn(sand & pile Types)

Sand zl/d Nq Sand zl/d F


Driven Bored Driven Bored
Loose 6 60 25 Loose 6 0.8 0.3
Medium 8 100 60 Medium 8 1 0.5
Dense 15 180 100 Dense 15 1.5 0.8

Cohesive Soils

End-bearing Shaft Adhesion


qe=9Su if L/d>4 fs=aSu
qe=NcSu if L/d<=4 a = fn(Su)

L/d Nc su a
0 6.3 0 1
1 7.6 10 1
2 8.3 20 1
3 8.8 30 1
4 9 40 1
50 0.912
60 0.783
70 0.702
80 0.621
90 0.564
100 0.516
110 0.477
120 0.443
130 0.413
140 0.388
150 0.37
160 0.354
170 0.339
180 0.33