Estolas vs. Fabricator, G.R. No.

224308-09, 27 September 2017

Based on NLRC computation of complainant’s monetary award, the time when
complainant Estolas was reinstated up to complainant’s resignation were
included in the computation of the final claim. Complainant was able to receive
her salary during those period.
Since respondent Fabricator already filed a manifestation with motion for
reconsideration of the computation made by the NLRC last 28 March 2019, then
let’s wait first for the resolution of the motion. Respondent Fabricator may opt
to avail the following remedies:
1.) If the motion is denied, Extraordinary Remedy under Rule XII of 2011
NLRC Rules of Procedure can be availed of; or
2.) Once the writ of execution is released, a motion to quash can be filed, then
if denied, avail the Extraordinary Remedy.