Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DA 2011 Class1 PDF
DA 2011 Class1 PDF
An Introduction
1. Introduction
1.1 Contact
Group 46:
Mick O’Donnell (7 Feb – 23 March)
Modulo VI bis 311 michael.odonnell@uam.es
Laura Hidalgo (30 March – 18 May)
Modulo VI bis 306 laura.hidalgo@uam.es
Course Coordinator:
Coordinator Rachel Whittaker rachel@uam.es
1
1. Introduction
1.2 Units (i)
1. Introduction
1.2 Units (ii)
Teacher: Laura Hidalgo
UNIT 8.The Organization of Discourse Content in English: Topic,
Macrostructures
UNIT 9. Discourse Coherence and the Interpretation of English
Discourse: World Knowledge, Schema Theory
UNIT 10. The Organization of Information Structure in English
Discourse: Given/New Information
UNIT 11. Discourse Unity. Resources for Texture in English: Cohesion
UNIT 12. – 14. Applications of DA in English
DIFFERENT AREAS: Critical Discourse Analysis, DA and gender,
analyzing news genres, discourse analysis in the teaching of EFL,
the advertisement as a genre; advertising language
2
1. Introduction
1.3 Evaluation
1. A portfolio of texts, analyzed for different features of
the discourse during the course.
2. Analysis and interpretation of selection of texts:
presentation to class + print version.
3. Final examination, on prepared texts.
1 + 2 = 40%, 3 = 60%
Final Exam
You are given in advance
3 texts, and weeks to
prepare your analyses.
In the exam, you are
offered 2of the texts,
and need to analyse just
1.
So ideally, prepare 2 of
the 3 texts.
You need to analyse:
• Register (in table form)
• Genre
• Other analyses from
class, those most
appropriate for the given
text.
•Refer to readings.
•Interpret your analysis
3
Cheltenham has been welcoming visitors for three hundred years, ever
since the discovery of the first natural spring led to the
development of the elegant spa town.
Cheltenham is renowned for its Regency architecture, stylish shopping,
colourful parks and floral displays, horse racing, music and
literature festivals.
Fine accommodation combine to make Cheltenham Spa an excellent touring base
and a wide variety of for the Cotswolds.
restaurants
4
1. Introduction
1.4 What is Discourse Analysis?
Discourse Analysis:
• Wikipedia: “a general term for a number of
approaches to analyzing written, spoken, signed
language use or any significant semiotic event.
1. Introduction
1.4 What is Discourse Analysis?
5
1. Introduction
1.8 How does DA relate to Other approaches?
“areas mentioned” their interests their data
1. Introduction
1.4 What is Discourse Analysis?
6
1. Introduction
1.4 What is Discourse Analysis?
1. Introduction
1.4 What is Discourse Analysis?
7
1. Introduction
1.4 What is Discourse Analysis?
Discourse Analysis:
• Concerned with whole texts rather than sentences or
clauses.
• Divides into:
1. Spoken Discourse Analysis: study of conversations,
dialogues, spoken monologues, etc.
2. Written Discourse Analysis: study of written texts, such as
essays, news, political speeches (?), etc.
• More concerned with naturally occurring data than in
made up examples.
• A collection of techniques, rather than a single
analysis.
1. Introduction
1.4 What is Discourse Analysis?
Multimodal Discourse Analysis:
• Discourse Analysis is not just concerned with the text on the
page.
• MDA explores how multiple modalities (text, image, sound,
video) combine to
make meaning.
What is the
meaning of this
“text”?
8
1. Introduction
1.4 What is Discourse Analysis?
Critical Discourse Analysis:
• The use of discourse analysis techniques to reveal ideological
bias, hidden power relations, sexism, racism, etc. in discourse.
• Names: Kress, Fairclough,
van Dijk, Wodak....
1. Introduction
1.5 Why Study Discourse Analysis?
Why do we study Discourse Analysis?
1. As linguists, to find out how language works, to
improve our understanding of an important kind of
human activity
2. As educators, to find out how good texts work, so
that we can focus on teaching our students these
writing/speaking strategies.
3. As critical analists, to discover meanings in the
text which are not obvious on the surface (e.g.,
analysing a politician’s speech to see their
preconceptions).
9
1. Introduction
1.7 How does DA relate to Pragmatics?
• Difficult to answer, since both fields are basically defined by the
set of people who work in the field, and their practices.
• Pragmatics has been a term used to refer all aspects of
linguistics which don’t fit inside semantics, syntax or phonology
• While semantics concerns the relation between language and
the things language refers to, pragmatics is more about the
relationship between language and its users.
• Thus: pragmatics concerns speech-acts, and what people can
infer from language but is not said (implicature, presupositions,
indirect speech acts).
• But generally concerned with choices in individual utterance,
not patterns of choices throughout a discourse.
1. Introduction
1.7 How does DA relate to Pragmatics?
It is plain that discourse analysis has objectives that lie very
close to, if not shared by, those of pragmatics. This is because
discourse is none other than a sequence of sentences in
operation -in other words utterances. But while discourse
analysts explain the interpretation of the elements in question
without going outside language, pragmatics resorts to other
ambits of human activity (beliefs, feelings, knowledge,
intentions…).
10
Approaches to the study of language+ data used
1. Introduction
1.7 How does DA relate to Pragmatics?
BOTH DA and PRAGMATICS TAKE AN EXTERNAL APPROACH
11
12