Feletti and Maniac contrast

In the first still images of Feletti we represented the journalist who was interviewing a
person and there was a camera filming, while the Maniac should have an absurd disguise.
For the second one, in order to show that she was credible and woman, all the men were
emphatizing the figure of the stupid man as should do the Maniac, highlightin the foolish.
To indicate she was serious, while three of us were laughing, she was the only one who
had a severe face, the Maniac should laugh too, to contrast. To show her dress talked
about her political party, we used a red cape. For the maniac, on the other hand, all false
part in one single character must make him as a puppet and he should do exaggerated
movements. For the fifth image we make her bring a bag and look at the watch. The
Maniac, by contrast, should bring a bag too, but this one has his disguises instead of the
professional bag of Feletti. And finally, for the last image, to display that she wants to find
the truth, we made her look at details such as the bruises of the anarchist body. While
Feletti is always serious, the Maniac should always make the public laugh.
To demonstrate the difference between her and the maniac in the posture I reckon that
she could be very rigid and strick, maybe she could have heels, so her pace would remind
to the toughness of the army. The maniac, instead, should move freely, using a lot of space
in the stage, maybe passing also in between of the public. Feletti’s appereance, of course,
should look absolutely serious, wearing black clothes and a white shirt, while the maniac
should wear all different colour clothes, maybe a costume inspired by Arlecchino. The
voice of Feletti should be monotone, serious, dull and boring, and she should have a
northern accent. On the other hand, the Maniac should have a fickle, strong and he should
have a southern accent.