You are on page 1of 7

Differential Diagnosis of Low Back Pain

Elizabeth Huntoon, MD,* and Marc Huntoon, MD†

Low back pain is a symptom affecting millions of adults annually. The etiology of low back
pain may be difficult to determine at times because of the number of diverse anatomic
structures located in or near the low back region. These structures may be causing direct
or referred pain patterns. An accurate diagnosis is essential for both acute and chronic low
back pain conditions. The discussion in this article is extensive but not all-inclusive, and the
clinician should consult other sources for more detailed description of the less common
differential diagnoses.
Semin Pain Med 2:138-144 © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

KEYWORDS low back pain, differential diagnosis, lumbar spine, pathology

L ow back pain (LBP) is an extremely common symptom


affecting millions of people each year and accounts for a
significant number of physician visits in both primary care
cian to investigate more thoroughly. Early intervention may
ultimately reduce resource utilization and costs.
Although this article focuses on the more common disor-
and specialty pain centers across the world. In the United ders that cause LBP, one should consider a broad differential
States, an estimated 90% of adults experience back pain at diagnosis at presentation to avoid missing less frequent
some time in their life.1-3 A growing body of literature sug- sources of symptoms. Patients who do not improve within 3
gests that in such cases, psychosocial factors as well as spe- to 6 weeks of the acute event should be reexamined with
cific behavioral factors related to fear and avoidance may be consideration for further testing to rule out systemic or rheu-
of importance.4-6 matic disorders and to clarify the anatomic cause.
The structural complexities of the back as well as the
possibility of referred pain from other areas often make
precise localization of pain generators difficult. Pain gen- Lumbosacral Radiculopathies
erators may include the vertebral column, surrounding Lumbosacral (LS) radiculopathies are commonly caused by
muscles, tendons, ligaments and fascia, or the neural disc herniations. The term herniation describes displacement
structures. Fortunately, acute LBP usually is benign in of the nucleus, cartilage or annular material beyond the nor-
nature, transient and self-limiting,7 rarely requiring radio- mal intervertebral disc space. It may be further categorized
graphs or other imaging studies.8 A comprehensive history into protrusions, extrusions, or sequestration.9,10 The low
and physical examination can identify the small percent- back pain associated with LS radiculopathies is usually ac-
age of patients with serious conditions that require further companied by unilateral lower extremity pain and paresthe-
investigation. These conditions include malignancy, neu- sias. Often called “sciatica,” it is most commonly caused by an
rologic deficits, infection, and rheumatologic diseases/dis- irritation of the lower lumbar nerve roots as a result of me-
orders. chanical compression and/or chemical irritation by sub-
Table 1 identifies a nonexhaustive list of findings in the stances released from the nucleus pulposus. Other sources of
history and physical examination that should raise suspicion lumbar radiculopathy include degenerative bone processes,
for more serious cases of low back pain, prompting the clini- such as spurring or osteophytes, neoplastic processes, vascu-
lar malformations, or metabolic disorders, such as diabetes.11
The presence of disc herniation does not directly correlate
*Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Roch- with pain, as many individuals will have a disc herniation as
ester, MN. an incidental finding when asymptomatic.12,13 Disc hernia-
†Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, tions can be unilateral, bilateral or centrally located. The
Rochester, MN.
Address reprint requests to Marc Huntoon, MD, Department of Anesthesi-
onset of pain or paresthesias is typically abrupt and often
ology, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 200 First reported as more severe in the leg versus the low back region.
Street, SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail: huntoon.marc@mayo.edu The symptoms may radiate from the low back or buttock

138 1537-5897/04/$-see front matter © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.spmd.2004.08.003
Differential diagnosis of low back pain 139

Table 1 “Red Flags” for Low Back Pain or ligamentous hypertrophy.15 Stenosis may be congenital or
History of trauma more commonly acquired.
Bowel or bladder incontinence or retention Clinical manifestations vary depending on the structures
History of prior cancer involved. Neurogenic claudication, unilateral, or bilateral
Unexplained weight loss pain in the low back, buttocks, or lower extremities are com-
History of intravenous drug use mon. Symptoms are produced or worsened with standing or
Systemic illness or infection walking and are reduced with sitting or forward flexion at the
Low back pain with fever
waist.16 There may be numbness, paresthesias, or weakness.
Constant progressive pain at night
Prolonged systemic steroid use
If the condition is severe, the patient may complain of bowel
Advanced age or bladder incontinence.
Saddle anesthesia Cauda equina syndrome (CES) may present as low back
pain, saddle anesthesia, bilateral sciatica, motor weakness of
the lower extremities, and bladder dysfunction. Along with
the compressive etiology of spinal stenosis, disc herniations
region to the anterior thigh, posterior thigh, or the postero- or spinal neoplasms, CES may be caused by noncompressive
lateral distal leg, depending on the level involved. Rarely conditions, such as ischemic insults, infectious or inflamma-
there is bowel and bladder incontinence or urinary retention. tory conditions, and spinal arachnoiditis.17
The patient may have increased pain or paresthesias with
cough or sneeze.
Physical Examination Findings
Physical Examination Findings Neurologic deficits, if present, are mild, unless the condition
is severely compressive or involves the cauda equina. An
The clinician may find muscle spasm in the lumbar paraspi-
absence or decrease is noted in muscle stretch reflexes (MSR)
nal region along with truncal shift to one side. The patient
and SLR may be normal; with lateral recess stenosis, there
may exhibit decreased truncal range of motion, a positive
may be little or no LBP. Neurological signs may be unmasked
straight leg raising test (SLR), and crossed SLR (positive sci-
by ambulation with the spine in extension until leg symp-
atic pain on the affected side induced by contralateral hip
toms appear. The neurological examination then may reveal
flexion). One should not confuse hamstring tightness with
neural tension pain. With passive movement of the leg, the abnormal MSRs, motor or sensory deficits.18
seated patient may lean backwards with the leg elevated (pos-
itive flip sign). Upper lumbar nerve root involvement (L2-4) Diagnostic Studies
may produce pain when the patient is placed in the prone Plain films may demonstrate posterior osteophytes, facet hy-
position and the knee flexed (femoral stretch test). Dimin- pertrophy, or segmental instability but are not sufficiently
ished reflexes, localized motor weakness, or sensory deficit sensitive. These changes can be better visualized with CT;9
may be found in specific myotomal or dermatomal distribu- however, MRI is the best test for radiologic confirmation of
tions. Table 2 lists typical clinical features seen with LS radic- the diagnosis.19
ulopathies.

Diagnostic Testing Spondylolisthesis


Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is very useful for confirm-
ing the diagnosis as well as to determine the etiology. Elec- Spondylolisthesis is a common, painful condition that exists
tromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction studies (NCS) when there is shifting or slippage of a superior vertebral body
are also useful for confirming the diagnosis as well as level of in relation to the one below, usually from failure of the pos-
involvement and for differentiating a multiple root from a terior vertebral elements.20 It also can be incidental radio-
plexus lesion11 and for assessing the severity of the nerve graphic finding in asymptomatic person. When symptom-
injury. The EMG has a high specificity and will rarely be atic, the amount of low back pain and disability does not
abnormal in asymptomatic individuals14 but is usually not always correlate with the degree of slippage.21,22
performed until at least 3 weeks after the onset of symptoms. Degenerative spondylolisthesis is more common in indi-
CT myelography is also considered an important tool for viduals over the age of 40. The lamina and pars interarticu-
identifying herniated discs. laris often are intact, but degenerative changes in the facet
joints and intervertebral disks allow slippage to occur. Spon-
dylolisthesis also may occur as a result of bilateral pars inter-
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis articularis defects (called spondylosis).
Spinal stenosis describes a syndrome in which the spinal Patients may present with dull, achy back pain that may
cord, cauda equina, and nerve root structures are compro- radiate posteriorly to or below the knees, especially if the
mised. The condition generally is idiopathic in nature. De- hamstrings are tight. The pain is worse with prolonged stand-
generative changes cause encroachment on the central canal, ing, walking, or extension of the spine. Sleeping disturbances
lateral recess, or foramina by disc bulge, herniation, osseous, and back stiffness also are commonly reported symptoms.22
140 E. Huntoon and M. Huntoon

Table 2 Clinical Features of Lumbosacral Radiculopathies


Distribution of Paresthesias or Decreased or
Root Pain Sensory Loss Weakness Absent Reflexes
L1 Lower abdomen, Lower abdomen, inguinal Iliopsoas (ⴞ) Hypogastric and
groin, or upper region cremasteric
anterior medial
thigh
L2 Groin, anterior or Anterior and medial thigh Iliopsoas or adductors of
medial thigh thigh or both
L3 Anterior thigh or knee Anterior thigh and knee Quadriceps and thigh Quadriceps
adductors
L4 Can extend below Inner leg Quadriceps and thigh Quadriceps and
knee, often to inner adductors and tibialis medial hamstring
leg or medial anterior (ⴞ)
malleolus
L5 Posterolateral thigh, Outer leg and dorsum of Tibialis anterior, toe Medial hamstring;
lateral calf to foot to great toe extensors, and extensor ankle jerk often
dorsum of foot hallucis longus normal, sometimes
(therefore, impaired decreased but not
heel-walking), absent because
hamstrings, perinei, and only L5 root lesion
tibialis posterior,
gluteus medius
S1 Posterior thigh, calf, Posterior leg, lateral foot, Gastrocnemius-soleus Ankle jerk and lateral
and lateral last two toes and toe flexors hamstring
malleolus (therefore, impaired toe-
walking), hamstring,
gluteus maximus
S2 Posterior thigh and Variable posterior thigh Intrinsic foot muscles (ⴞ), Anal
occasionally calf and saddle area rectal sphincter (ⴞ)
S3 to S4 Buttock and upper Saddle and perineal area, Rectal sphincter Anal
posterior thigh or perianal area
perianal region
Abbreviation: ⴞ, weakness may or may not be present due to variability of innervation.
From Mokri B, Sinaki M: Lumbar disk syndrome, lumbosacral radiculopathies, lumbar spondylosis and stenosis, spondylolisthesis, in Sinaki M
(ed): Basic Clinical Rehabilitation Medicine (ed 2). St Louis, MO, Mosby-Year Book, 1993, pp 503-513. Reprinted by permission of Mayo
Foundation for Medical Education and Research. All rights reserved.

Physical Examination Findings dylolysis or spondylolisthesis. Bone scan imaging, particu-


The clinician may find diminished or increased lumbar lor- larly SPECT scans, as well as CT scans are useful for confirm-
dosis. Lumbosacral tenderness, reduced lateral bending, and ing symptomatic pars defects.23 However, no single imaging
hamstring tightness are common findings.22 The single-leg technique is capable of visualizing all stages of pars defects,
hyperextension test may be positive. This useful provocative and a combination of imaging methods are commonly used24
test is performed with the patient standing on one leg while in individuals at high risk.
simultaneously extending the low back. The test should pro-
duce pain on the side of the standing leg in a patient with a Facet (Zygapophyseal) Joint Pain
symptomatic ipsilateral spondylolytic lesion.20 If instability is The facet joints are a frequent cause of low back, buttock,
present in the lumbar spine, there may be pain with either groin and leg pain. They form part of the posterior elements
forward flexion or extension. Palpation of the spinous pro- of the spine, and are true synovial lined joints. Each vertebra
cess may reveal a “step-off” deformity, which represents a has an inferior (IAP) and superior articular process (SAP),
relative prominence of the lower vertebral body spinous pro- with the inferior process emanating from the vertebra above
cess in relation to the one above. Hamstring tightness may the joint, and the superior articular process from the vertebra
alter the patient’s gait pattern. Tight hamstring muscles also below the joint.
may cause low back and posterior leg pain with straight leg Although radiologic abnormalities are frequent, including
raising and should be differentiated from true neural tension. facet hypotrophy, joint space narrowing, sclerosis, and oth-
ers, the appearance of these radiologic markers does not nec-
Diagnostic Studies essarily imply the joint is a pain generator. Clinical signs of
Radiographs in AP, lateral, and especially oblique views are exacerbation of pain with back extension, “loading” of the
usually adequate to identify degenerative or traumatic spon- facets by extension and ipsilateral rotation, and characteristic
Differential diagnosis of low back pain 141

pain patterns with absence of radicular findings, morning Vertebral


stiffness, pain relief with flexion of the spine, and confine-
ment of pain to the low back, hips, buttocks and posterior
Compression Fractures
legs above the knee are common. As facet joint arthropathy is Vertebral compression fractures are a common cause of LBP,
a precursor of spinal stenosis, many patients will have a especially in the elderly. Relevant historical details include
mixed picture with some element of neural claudication pain the age of the patient and history of steroid use or osteopo-
and dynamic radicular features. Precise diagnosis by facet rosis. History of trama is helpful but not necessary, as many
joint injections and/or medial branch blocks with small vol- elderly patients may experience fragility fractures with little
umes of injectate has been advocated by some.25,26 or no trauma. Benign osteoporotic compression fractures
may be asymptomatic.31

Degenerative Disc Disease and Lumbar


Physical Examination Findings
Sprains/Strains Kyphosis in the upper back may be evident as a result of
The disc is a nociceptively innervated structure capable of anterior wedge compression fractures in the thoracic spine;
pain generation. Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a de- point tenderness is common in early fractures and often is
generative process starting as early as the first or second associated with muscle spasm. The neurologic examination is
decade of life27,28 with a higher prevalence in athletes.29 normal unless the fracture impinges on the neural elements.
Lumbar pain that radiates into one or both buttocks is
common, although the association between DDD and LBP Diagnostic Studies
is controversial. The pain is considered “mechanical” in
Radiographs with a lateral view and CT are helpful for assess-
nature, as it tends to be aggravated by movements such as
ing vertebral body height but are of little benefit in the ab-
bending, twisting, or lifting. Many patients with DDD re- sence of gross destruction. MRI is used to confirm the degree
port decreased discomfort with lumbar extension and of compression and to assess for neural compromise as well
deny neurologic symptoms. Patients may report LB stiff- as to classify vertebral compression fractures as benign or
ness after sitting. malignant.9 Bone scanning also is useful to determine or con-
The disc is one of several structures potentially involved firm subtle changes or to assess the chronicity of the fracture.
with low back sprain; tendons, ligaments, muscles, and the
joint capsule also may be injured in a sprain. Sprains occur as
a result of subcatastrophic stretching of fibers, while main- Ankylosing Spondylitis
taining their structural integrity. Acute pain from a sprain can Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is one of the seronegative rheu-
occur early if the injury is severe or within days with a more matic spondyloarthropathies that affects both skeletal and
gradual onset. Strains occur by disruption of muscle fibers or extraskeletal tissues.32 It involves inflammation of the enthe-
the musculotendinous junction. Acute pain is most intense sis and synovium. There is a genetic association with the
24 to 48 hours after the injury and often is associated with HLA-B27 histocompatability antigen found in over 80% of
muscle spasm.20 Transitional lumbar vertebrae are not con- AS patients.32 Sacroiliitis is usually the first manifestation,
sidered to be associated with LBP, but were associated with presenting as unilateral or bilateral LBP of insidious onset.33
increased risk of degenerative changes in the disc above, in The patient may complain of progressive morning stiffness
young healthy men, and decreased risk in the disc below, and worsening posture or decreased truncal range of motion.
among middle-aged male volunteers.30 There may be improvement in symptoms with exercise.

Physical Examination Findings Physical Examination Findings


The physical examination often reveals a few findings. There Decreased spine mobility as measured by fingertip-to-floor
may be generalized or local muscle spasm and tenderness distance, occiput-to-wall distance, and chest expansion mea-
over the low back and buttocks. The patient may exhibit surements.34 Gaenslen’s test may be positive. This test is per-
formed with the patient supine and the test leg extended over
signs of stiffness on arising from the seated position. Neuro-
the edge of the table. The nontested leg is held by the patient
logical examination is normal.
with the knee flexed. Pain in the SI joint indicates a positive
test. Neurological testing is normal. Tendon and ligament
Diagnostic Studies attachment sites may be painful and swollen.
While not necessary,8 AP and lateral radiographs in patients
suspected as having DDD may show disc space narrowing, Diagnostic Studies
anterior osteophytes, and other degenerative changes. There Standard AP and lateral radiographs of the spine reveal sac-
may be small amounts of gas within the disc that can be roiliitis with bony erosions, sclerosis leading to subsequent
visualized on plain films as well.9 MRI shows moderately fusion of the SI joint. There is ossification of the spinal liga-
diminished T2 signal within the disc. Sprains and strains ments with eventual ankylosis, described by some as a “bam-
usually are not evaluated with diagnostic studies. boo spine.” HLA-B27 may be positive; rheumatoid and ANA
142 E. Huntoon and M. Huntoon

are negative. C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimenta- nosis should be considered in patients with fever of unknown
tion rate levels correlate with disease activity.32 origin (FUO) and recurrent low back pain who have recently
had spinal interventions, trauma, or systemic infection.40,41
The physical examination often is unrevealing; CRP, leuko-
Referred Pain cytosis, and fever are common. The diagnosis can be con-
From the Pelvic Girdle firmed with abdominal ultrasound or MRI. Repeat imaging
Hip osteoarthritis, trochanteric bursitis, ischial bursitis, sac- may be necessary when initial imaging results are not com-
roiliac (SI) dysfunction, piriformis syndrome, and osteitis patible with the clinical presentation of psoas abscess.42
condensans ilii are examples of conditions that will refer pain Arachnoiditis is another often overlooked cause of LBP.
to the low back. Hip-joint pathology and bursitis of the Patients present with back pain and sometimes lower extrem-
greater trochanter (GT) can mimic mechanical or radicular ity pain without a clearly defined clinical pattern.43 There
LBP both in its onset and symptoms.35 Sacroiliac dysfunction may be a burning sensation in the low back, legs, ankles, or
arises with disruption in the mechanics of the SI joint, which feet, unexplained skin rashes or itching, or neurologic defi-
can occur as an aging or degenerative process, through cits.44 Arachnoiditis may develop after contamination of the
trauma, or childbirth.36 The cause of GT bursitis often is spinal cord and membranes with spinal interventions such as
idiopathic but may develop as a result of hip osteoarthritis, injection, myelograms, or surgery45,46 and may develop
tightness of the iliotibial band, or leg length discrepancy. months to years after the initial injury.
Ischial tuberosity bursitis is associated with local trauma, This condition is caused by an inflammatory process of the
hamstring tightness, or is idiopathic. arachnoid membrane triggering fibrinous exudate, which re-
Piriformis syndrome is caused by spasm or dysfunction of sult in the nerve roots adhering to themselves or surrounding
the piriformis muscle. A sciatic nerve entrapment may occur structures. The constant flow of cerebrospinal fluid is
causing sciatica symptoms. The patient may complain of a thought to interfere with healing because it washes away the
dull ache in the low back and mid-buttock region, pain with phagocytes and enzymes that prevent the formation of the
walking up stairs, prolonged sitting, or walking. Osteitis con- scar tissue precipitated by inflammation.44
densans ilii is a benign cause of LBP, usually found in post-
partum women and is thought to develop as a result of me- Diagnostic Studies
chanical strain placed on the SI joint during pregnancy. Diagnosis of arachnitis commonly is made with MRI or less
commonly with CT.
Physical Examination Findings
Limited internal rotation of the hip, antalgic gait, or groin Discitis and
pain have been identified as being the best predictors of iden-
tifying hip disorders.37 Pain in the groin or hip with single leg Vertebral Osteomyelitis
stance, Patrick’s test (also known as FABER’s test— hip flex- Discitis is an infection occurring in or around the interverte-
ion, abduction, and external rotation), along with the pres- bral disk space. Vertebral osteomyelitis refers to an infection
ence of a leg length discrepancy are useful for detecting an in the vertebral body. Both can occur at any level in the spine
underlying hip disorder, SI dysfunction, or GT bursitis. Hip but most commonly occur in the low thoracic and lumbar
internal rotation also can cause increased LBP in patients with regions. These infections are more common in intravenous
piriformis syndrome by placing this muscle on stretch. The drug users, diabetics, immunocompromised patients,47 and
pain often is ameliorated by external rotation of the hip in this in patients with systemic diseases such as lupus48 and as a
condition. The clinician also may find abductor weakness. complication of discography,49 spinal injections,50 and intra-
The physical examination for condensans ilii is unreveal- discal electrothermal therapy (IDET).51
ing except for localized pain in the low back.38 The most common infectious agent is Staphylococcus au-
reus, but other organisms, especially Gram-negative bacteria
Diagnostic Studies and fungal agents, have been implicated.52 Common sources
Radiographs of the hip or pelvis may reveal the presence of of infection are recent or concurrent urinary tract infection,
osteoarthritis or joint pathology at the hip or sacroiliac joint. pneumonia, and cutaneous infections or dental abscess, al-
If bursitis has been chronic, calcifications may be seen over though in many cases, the source is not apparent. The infec-
the greater trochanter. With osteitis condensans ilii, radio- tion is thought to occur through contiguous location, hema-
graphic images reveal sclerotic changes to the iliac side of the togenous spread, or lymphatic seeding from remote sites.
SI joint with no evidence of erosions.39 Clinical symptoms often are subtle with gradual onset of
LBP and rarely fever or malaise in the adult population. There
can also be an abrupt onset of pain in certain populations,
Psoas Abscess particularly after recent surgery.52
and Arachnoiditis
Psoas abscess formation is an uncommon and often over- Physical Examination Findings
looked cause of low back pain, with accurate diagnosis often Percussion or palpation tenderness over the affected segment
difficult to achieve because of atypical symptoms. This diag- may be evident. SLR may also be positive. Truncal range of
Differential diagnosis of low back pain 143

motion usually is normal with forward flexion being the pre- Physical Examination Findings
ferred position. Neurological examination is usually normal. Inspection of the back may reveal pelvic obliquity, one-sided
protrusion of the lumbar paraspinal musculature, or an ob-
Diagnostic Studies vious curvature. Forward flexion of the trunk may produce a
MRI is the preferred imaging modality for the evaluation of unilateral thoracolumbar “hump.” Palpation often reveals
discitis, providing greater than 90% sensitivity and specificity muscle spasm in the low back. Neurogenic claudication
in disease detection and critical anatomic information;9 how- symptoms may be reported by some patients and differs from
ever, MRI and radiographic abnormalities may lag behind the vascular claudication in that symptoms of leg or back pain
clinical syndrome. Radiographic findings include narrowing usually resolve quickly with sitting or spinal flexion. If radic-
of the disc space, destruction of the cortical margins at the ulopathy is present, the physical examination should detect
vertebral bodies adjacent to the disc, bone loss, and vertebral appropriate sensory and motor involvement.
body collapse. Lateral view radiographs are more helpful for
detecting irregularities and erosions of the vertebral end Diagnostic Studies
plates. A bone scan is usually, but not always, positive early in Imaging evaluation of scoliosis is primarily performed with
the infectious process. Gallium scanning is considered an plain radiographs and MR imaging.59
excellent choice for evaluating resolution of the infection.9
An elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive pro-
tein, and leukocytosis often are found. Blood cultures are Cancer Pain
positive in many, but not all, proven cases. Metastatic disease from breast, prostate, lung, thyroid, and
kidney account for the preponderance of bone metastasis,
and are often painful.60 In many patients, however, pain may
Diffuse Idiopathic not be present at all or presents as a late symptom. Of the
Skeletal Hyperostosis hematological malignancies, multiple myeloma commonly is
Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH), also known associated with significant bone pain.
as ankylosing hyperostosis, is an idiopathic ossifying disease Bone turnover as evidenced by osteoclast activation is per-
that affects the anterior and lateral spinal ligament attach- turbed, with pain mechanisms including periosteal disten-
ments to the vertebral bones.53 Nonradicular unilateral or sion, increased bone pressure, fractures, cytokine or chemi-
bilateral back pain is the most common symptom. Patients cal mediator release, neural or soft tissue inflammation/
may report early morning and evening stiffness. Other distortion, muscle spasm or epidural compression from
weight-bearing joints may be painful, but spinal pain is the ingrowth of vertebral metastasis are common. Secondary
principal symptom. Patients may report long-standing symp- syndromes such as hypercalcemia, epidural spinal cord com-
toms (years) without significant functional impairment.54 pression, neurological abnormalities, and bone marrow in-
volvement may signal a malignant cause of pain.61 The pain
character often is a well-defined, aching, constant pain that is
Physical Examination Findings present at unusual times such as resting supine or nocturnal.
Physical examination findings are nonspecific but may in- The most likely site of spinal skeletal metastasis is thoracic,62
clude decreased truncal range of motion or muscle spasm. and since nonmalignant thoracic pain is less common, pain
in this location should arouse clinical suspicion.
Diagnosis should be confirmed with MRI or CT myelogra-
Diagnostic Studies
phy, as both are sensitive for spinal invasion by metastasis.
Radiographs show confluent, excessive anterior or lateral os-
teophyte formation spanning three or more intervertebral
discs, most commonly in the thoracic and thoracolumbar Acknowledgments
spine. The authors thank Alan Carlson, Pam Darcy, and Jennifer
Homewood for their assistance in the preparation of the
manuscript.
Scoliosis
Degenerative or adult idiopathic scoliosis is not directly References
1. Frymoyer JD: Back pain and sciatica. N Engl J Med 318:291-300, 1988
linked to low back pain, but several studies have found lum-
2. Deyo RA, Cherkin D, Conrad D, et al: Cost, controversy, crisis: Low
bar or thoracolumbar spinal curvatures ⬎36°55 or right-sided back pain and the health of the public. Annu Rev Public Health 12:141-
curvatures56 were associated with increased incidence of LBP. 156, 1991
In patients with scoliosis and degenerative lumbar spinal ste- 3. Snook SH: The costs of back pain in industry. Occup Med 3:1-5, 1988
nosis, nerve root compression was found most often at the L4 4. Klenerman L, Slade PD, Stanley IM, et al: The prediction of chronicity
and L5 levels and usually seen on the concave side of the in patients with an acute attack of low back pain in a general practice
setting. Spine 20:478-484, 1995
scoliosis.57 When severe, degenerative scoliosis may cause 5. Linton SJ: Early identification and intervention in the prevention of
neurogenic claudication or radiculopathy, particularly in the musculoskeletal pain. Am J Ind Med 41(5):433-442, 2002
elderly.58 6. Hoogendoorn WE, Bongers PM, deVet HE, et al: Psychosocial work
144 E. Huntoon and M. Huntoon

characteristics and psychological strain in relation to low back pain. 33. Calin A, Porta J, Fried JF, et al: Clinical history as a screening test for
Scand J Work Environ Health 27(4):258-267, 2001 ankylosing spondylitis. JAMA 237:2613-2614, 1977
7. Patel AT, Ogle AA: Diagnosis and management of acute low back pain. 34. Dalyan A, Guner A, Tuncer S, et al: Disability in ankylosing spondylitis.
Am Fam Phys 61:1779-1790, 2000 Disability Rehabilitation 21:74-79, 1999
8. Anderson RE: Acute low back pain—Radiculopathy. American College 35. Bewyer DC, Bewyer KJ: Rationale for treatment of hip abductor pain
of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria. Radiology 215:479-485, syndrome. Iowa Orthop J 23:57-60, 2003
2000 (suppl) 36. Don Tigny RL: Anterior dysfunction of the sacroiliac joint as a major
9. Maus T: Imaging of the spine and nerve roots. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N factor in the etiology of idiopathic low back pain syndrome. J Phys Ther
Am 13:487-544, 2002 70:250-255, 1990
10. Masaryk TJ, Ross JS, Modic MT et al: High resolution MR imaging of 37. Differential diagnosis of hip disease versus spine disease. Clin Or-
sequestered lumbar intervertebral disks. Am J Roentgenol 150:1155- thoped 419:280-284, 2004
62, 1988 38. Oliveri I, Gemigrani G, Camerini E, et al: Differential diagnosis between
11. Sinaki M, Mokri B: Low back pain and disorders of the lumbar spine, in osteitis condensans i/ii and sacroiliitis. J Rheumatol 17:1504-1512,
Braddom RL (ed): Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Philadelphia, 1990
PA, WB Saunders, 1996, pp 813-850 39. Loncragan R, Archer K, Perry A, et al: Scintigraphy in osteitis conden-
12. Jenson MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowsk N, et al: Magnetic reso- sans ilii. Clin Nucl Med 29:320-321, 2004
nance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl 40. Qureshi NH, O’Brien DP, Allcutt DA: Psoas abscess secondary to dis-
J Med 33:69-73, 1994 citis: A case report of conservative management. Spinal Disord 13:73-
13. Boden SD, Davis DO, et al: Abnormal magnetic resonance scans of the 76, 2000
lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:403- 41. Hanson P, Delaere B, Nisolle J, et al: Pyrexia due to pyogenic sacroiliitis
408, 1990 with iliopsoas abscess after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord [Epub ahead
14. Robinson, LR: Electromyography, magnetic resonance imaging and of print] April 27, 2004
radiculopathy: It’s time to focus on specifics. Muscle Nerve 22:149- 42. Yin HP, Tsia YA, Liao SF, et al: The challenge of diagnosing psoas
150, 1999 abscess. J Chin Med Assoc 67:156-159, 2004
15. Alvarez JA, Hardy RH: Lumbar spine stenosis: A common cause of back 43. Petty PG, Hudgson P, Hare WS: Symptomatic lumbar spinal arachnoid-
and leg pain. Am Fam Physician 57:1825-1834, 1998 itis: Fact or fallacy? J Clin Neurosci 7:395-399, 2000
16. Porter RW: Spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication. Spine 21: 44. Wright MH, Denny LC: A comprehensive review of spinal arachnoid-
2046-2052, 1996 itis. Orthop Nurs 22:215-219, 2003
17. Orendacora J, Cizkova D, Kafka J, et al: Cauda equina syndrome. Prog 45. Follett KA, Rosenquist R: Arachnoiditis associated with intrathecal an-
Neurobiol 64:613-637, 2001 algesic administration. Pain Med 2:241-242, 2001
18. Dyck P: The stoop-test in lumbar entrapment radiculopathy. Spine 46. Rice I, Wee MY, Thompson K: Obstetric epidurals and chronic adhe-
4:89-92, 1979 sive arachnoiditis. Br J Anaesth 92:109-120, 2004
19. Fritz JM, Delillo A, Welch WC et al: Lumbar spinal stenosis: A review of 47. Griffiths HE, Jones DM: Pyogenic infection of the spine: A review of 28
current concepts in evaluation, management, and outcome measure- cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 53:383-391, 1971
ments. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79:700-708, 1998 48. Wu KC, Yao TC, Yeh KW, et al: Osteomyelitis in patients with systemic
20. Bono C: Low back pain in athletes. J Bone Joint Surg 86:382-396, 2004 lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 31:1340-1343, 2004
21. Frennered K: Isthmus spondylolisthesis among patients receiving dis- 49. Guyer RD, Collier R, Stith WJ, et al: Discitis after discography. Spine
ability pension under the diagnosis of chronic low back pain syn- 13:1352-1354, 1988
dromes. Spine 19:2766-2769, 1994 50. Yue WM, Tan SB: Distant skip level discitis and vertebral osteomyelitis
22. Moller H, Sundin A, Hedlund R: Symptoms, signs, and functional after caudal epidural injection: A case report of a rare complication of
disability in adult spondylolisthesis. Spine 25:683-690, 2000 epidural injection. Spine 28:E209-E211, 2003
23. Collier BD, Johnson RP, Carrera GF, et al: Painful spondylolysis and 51. Davis TT, Delamar RB, Rick B, et al: The IDET procedure for chronic
spondylolisthesis studied by single photon emission computerized to- discogenic low back pain. Spine 29:752-756, 2004
mography. Radiography 154:207-211, 1985 52. Lam KS, Webb JK: Discitis. Hosp Med 65:280-286, 2004
24. Standaert CJ, Herring SA: Spondylolysis: :a critical review. Br J Sports 53. Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, in Snider RK (ed): The Essen-
Med 34:415-422, 2000 tials of Musculoskeletal Care. Rosemont, IL, American Academy of
25. Bogduk,, N: Management of chronic low back pain. Med J Aust 180: Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1997, pp 24-25
79-83, 2004 54. Utsinger PD, Resnick D, Shapiro R: Diffuse skeletal abnormalities in
26. Borenstein DG, Wiesel SW, Boden SD (eds): Low Back and Neck Pain Foresteir disease. Arch Intern Med 136:763-765, 1976
(ed 3). Philadelphia, PA, Saunders, 2004, pp 196-197 55. Schwab FJ et al:Adult scoliosis: A quantitative radiographic and clinical
27. Feldman DS, Hedden DM, Wright JG: The use of bone scan to investi- analysis. Spine 27:387-392, 2002
gate back pain in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 20:790- 56. Steinberg EL, Luger E, Arbel R, et al: A comparative roetgenographic
795, 2000 analysis of the lumbar spine in male army recruits with and without
28. Salmiren JJ, Erkintalo MO, Pentti J, et al: Recurrent low back pain and lower back pain. Clin Radiol 58:985-989, 2003
early disc degeneration in the young. Spine 24:1316-1321, 1999 57. Liu H, Ishihara H, Kanamori G, et al: Characteristics of nerve root
29. Boos N, Weissbach S, Rohrbach H et al:Classification of age-related compression caused by degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J
changes in lumbar intervertebral discs: 2002 Volvo award in basic 3:586-589, 2003
science. Spine 27:2631-2644, 2002 58. Benoist M: Natural history of the aging spine. Eur Spine J 12:586-589,
30. Luoma K, Vehmas T, Rainiko R, et al: Lumbosacral transitional verte- 2003 (suppl 2)
bra: relation to disc degeneration and low back pain. Spine 29:200- 59. Jaramillo O, Poussaint TY, Grottkau BE: Scoliosis: Evidence-based di-
205, 2004 agnostic evaluation. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 13:335-341, 2003
31. Matkovic V, Colachis SC, Ilich JZ: Osteoporosis: Its prevention and 60. Galasko CSB. Skeletal metastasis. Clin Orthoped 210:18-30, 1986
treatment, in Braddom R (ed): Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 61. Mercadante S. Malignant bone pain: Pathophysiology and treatment.
Philadelphia, PA, WB Saunders, 1996, pp 862-863 Pain 69:1-18, 1997
32. Klippel JH: Primer on rheumatic disease. Atlanta, GA, Arthritis Foun- 62. Bruera ED, Portenoy RK (eds): Cancer Pain. Cambridge, UK, Cam-
dation, 1999, pp 189-193 bridge University Press, 2003, p 94

You might also like