Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
1.0 Introduction 01
2.0 Why Dehydrate Gas? 01
3.0 Methods of Dehydration 03
3.1 Dehydration using liquid desiccant (TEG) 03
3.2 Dehydration using solid desiccants. 07
3.3 Twister technology 09
3.4 Membrane technology 10
7.0 References 16
1.0 Introduction
The process of removal of water vapour from natural gas is known as Dehydration.
Natural Gas is naturally occurring at depths well below earth’s surface and because of
presence of water at high temperature (in equilibrium), when it cools at the surface
well head, it is always saturated with water vapour. During transmission to shore
additional cooling of the saturated gas by subsea temperature will cause formation of
free water and hydrates causing serious problems. Besides in presence of moisture the
corrosion in the transmission lines could be very rapid.
Thus Gas Dehydration is therefore absolutely essential to ensure smooth operation of
gas transmission lines.
Free water in the pipeline occupies volume and reduces the line’s gas carrying
capacity. Therefore, it is desirable to dehydrate the entering gas to a water vapour
content that will prevent the formation of free water in the pipeline.
Methanol and Ethylene Glycol are used in an emergency or temporary because they
are not easily recovered for re-use. Ethylene Glycol has been used in some special
applications but its vapour pressure is too high resulting in considerable loss during
regeneration.
Tri-ethylene Glycol (TEG) is the most popularly used glycol for gas dehydrators and
has largely supplanted di-ethylene glycol for this purpose. Because of its higher
decomposition temperature and a lower vapour pressure, it can be easily recommended
to a higher purity resulting in higher dew point depression without incurring
decomposition and losses.
For decades, the most widely used technology for dehydrating natural gas to meet
pipeline specifications has been to absorb the water with a liquid desiccant (solvent)
flowing in counter current inside bubble cap tray columns. Glycols are extensively
used for gas dehydration as they have a high affinity for water. It is absorption based
dehydration. Among the glycols, Tri Ethylene Glycol (TEG) has gained universal
acceptance as the most cost effective choice.
Free Water Knock Out: Wet natural gas containing entrained water and hydrocarbon
particles first enters the knock out drum where these particles are removed.
Gas Dehydration: Saturated gas, free from entrained liquid particles is brought into
counter current contact with concentrated Triethylene glycol (TEG) in the contactor
tower which has bubble cap trays. The TEG absorbs the water vapour from the gas
and passes out from the bottom of the contactor. The dried gas leaves from the top of
the contactor and exchanges heat in two steps. First it cools the lean TEG entering the
contactor and then partially condenses the top product of the glycol still in the Reflux
Condenser. The gas then passes through the overhead scrubber where the entrained
glycol is knocked off. The dried gas is then sent to the launcher.
Glycol Cleaning: The ‘water rich’ TEG from the contactor goes to the Flash Drum
where contaminant hydrocarbons are skimmed off and the dissolved gases flashed and
vented. This vessel also provides adequate TEG hold up to take care of process upsets.
The glycol filters remove the solid gummy particles of particles of polyglycols and
entrapped hydrocarbon droplets. Glycol filters are generally designed to remove solid
particulates below 5 microns. Glycol filters are designed to pass the entire circulated
quantity of glycol. Part of the glycol( 15-30 %) are passed through the activated
carbon filter placed in the rich TEG side downstream of glycol flash drum for
Activated Alumina and silica gel can achieve water dew points of -600F to -900F,
while molecular sieves are capable of -1500F to -3000F. Silica gel is the most widely
used solid desiccant for normal dehydration of natural gas to pipeline specifications (1
to 7 lbs of H2O /mmscf of gas). Molecular sieves are the overwhelming choice for
natural gas dehydration to cryogenic process standards. Molecular sieves are also
excellent for simultaneous removal of H2S and/or CO2. Desiccant life varies from 6
months to over 4 years. Molecular sieves are more susceptible to liquid water,
Institute of oil and gas production technology Page 8
Handbook on
Natural Gas Dehydration system
corrosion inhibitors and heavy hydrocarbons than some of the other desiccants.
Activated alumina is less susceptible to breakage than silica gel.
3.3 Twister technology
Twister is a revolutionary gas conditioning technology. Condensation and separation
at supersonic velocity is the key to some unique benefits like eliminating chemicals
and associated regeneration systems. Twister is a simple reliable static device with no
rotating parts and operates without chemicals, ensures a simple facility with high
availability.
3.3.1 Process description
The device uses static inlet guide vanes to generate high vorticity, concentric swirl. A
laval nozzle is employed to efficiently expand the gas to supersonic velocities, whilst
achieving extreme cooling. The low temperature created by the near isentropic
expansion process causes water and natural gas liquids to condense into a mist type
flow. The induced vorticity generates high centrifugal forces which drives the droplets
to the outside of the tube. The liquids which concentrate on the inner wall of the tube
can now be separated. The resulting dry gas then flows into a diffuser, where the
velocity converts back into pressure. With such a short residence time inside the tube,
hydrates do not form, as the time required for hydrate kinetics in not reached.
Other gas components will permeate through the wall and accumulate in the low
pressure gas leaving the device. The separation of gas mixtures by membrane is
achieved by exploiting the relative differences in permeability of various gases
through the membrane. The more permeable gas, called as ‘fast gas’ present in the
feed gas mixture is enriched on permeate or low pressure side of the membrane. The
less permeable gas, called as ‘slow’ gas is enriched on the feed side or high pressure
side of the membrane. For natural gas separation,’ fast’ gases are H2O,H2S and CO2
and ‘slow’ gases are CH4,C2H6,other hydrocarbons, nitrogen and argon. Membranes
are effective for bulk removal of fast gases. Water vapour being very fast, dehydration
to pipeline specifications can be achieved by membrane systems. The temperature of
feed gas favours high permeation rates of the components through the membrane and
so reduces the overall membrane area requirements. But increase in temperature
reduces the overall purities of product by allowing more unwanted gases. Therefore, it
is necessary to optimize the operating temperature and product purity.
The absolute pressure of feed stream and the pressure differential between feed and
permeate gas streams have a marked effect on separation efficiency. Careful
Institute of oil and gas production technology Page 10
Handbook on
Natural Gas Dehydration system
conditioning of the feed gas is required to prevent membrane degradation. Pre-
treatment typically consist of a two phase separator and coalescing filters upstream of
the membrane modules to remove any entrained aerosols, particulates and
condensates. The permeate stream can be recompressed and recycled to mix with the
inlet feed gas or permeate stream can be routed to mix with other suitable process. The
residue gas is the conditioned product gas which can be routed to the pipeline or
suitable process header. Within the membrane unit, operating conditions are ambient.
Membranes can achieve water pipeline specifications of 1- 5 lbs water/MMSCF. It is
possible to achieve dew point as low –200C.
7.0 References
1. GPSA Engineering Data Book 11th Edition, (1998).
2. Oilfield processing Volume One: Natural Gas, Francis S. Manning, Richard
E. Thompson.
3. Reduction Of Glycol Loss From Gas Dehydration Unit At Offshore Platform
in Bombay Offshore - A Case Study, Arun Gupta, N.A.K.R. Ansari, R. Rai,
A.K. Sah.
4. IOGPT Report-1849