Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Alexis Porter
English 1104
I got a confession to make; a sad one, honestly. I watch Forensic Files and murder
mysteries. Date nights consisted of popcorn, sodas and Forensic Files. I like the way they explain
how they came to solve each murder with the information provided. It makes a great story. I also
wonder why you never see many females within these shows. Watching Forensic Files, nearly
75% of the killers are male and the ones who are female don’t get the interest that they use when
talking about the males. Or better yet, you only hear about the male serial killers. On the news,
you may hear about someone getting killed or shot at, but nothing much about the killer. Or
when a teacher in a class asks you about the newest known serial killer and you throw out the big
names, such as Jeffery Dahmer or Gary Heidnik, who were caught between the 80’s and 90’s.
No one knows much on the idea of the female serial killer. They are seen as non-existent and not
capable of doing such a thing. With the world showing people as able to have dark and
How does the world even come into the knowledge of female serial killers? The world
has hardly any information about these select females and how they roam the world. My
curiosity killed the cat and my mind has wondered into understanding the female serial killers.
Why do they kill? Who in their right mind will tell a female to not just kill once, but multiple
times over and with different methods? I am diving into the world of criminology to gain a better
Porter 2
understanding on just how these women are capable of a task that most of the world foresee
Serial killers are notorious for not having a clear definition. In the 2015 book written by
describe serial homicide as a word without an agreed upon definition. Instead of trying to find a
term to describe it, criminologists from Birmingham City University agree that it is, by far, the
rarest type of crime that is seen anywhere on the world. The Serial Murder Symposium held by
the FBI in 2005 explains that serial homicides are less than 1 percent of all murders committed
within any given year. With these types of homicides being rare, it is astonishing they take up so
much of the public’s time. This comes from Hollywood. Films produced create a different and
more distorted look upon the killers and their victims. In the FBI’s Symposium, it explains
“Much of the general public’s knowledge concerning serial murder is a product of Hollywood
Productions. Story lines are created to heighten the interest of audiences, rather than to
accurately portray serial murder.” It would continue to explain about how the true dynamics of
the killer would be confused or not even portrayed to the audience. Because of these extreme
looks into serial killer’s lives and committed homicides, there are known killers, but only based
demographics despite what the FBI Symposium attendees thought. The attendees all had
different ideas on how to define a serial killer, from age range to types of victims. There was not
one clear definition. In the Harrison et al study, performed to find a way to understand the who,
Porter 3
where and how to female serial killings, female serial killers are often around the age of 30 when
the killing begins and have childhoods showing signs of neglect or abuse (Yardley and Wilson).
In this paper, the serial killer definition is a killer who has killed three or more times with a year
span. Despite the criminological department not having a clear definition as used in this paper,
there is a wide range of serial killer categories. The different categories explain how the victims
were killed and even how the killer related with their victims. Serial killers have more tendencies
to pick people off the street to murder since it leaves no connection between the victim and
themselves. In female serial killers, many chose people close to them, as it is easier access to
murder. In this paper, I plan to use examples of 6 out of the 7 types of serial killer, with using
childhood history, before and after arrest of murders, and finally taking the information to
conclude to why each serial killer began to kill. This paper is to explore and give factual
The first case involves that of the Sexual Predator. This type of female serial kills with a
sexual nature as stated in the Kelleher and Kelleher’s typology of Female Serial killers (qtd in
Yardley). These types of killers include a 1989 hitchhiker prostitute by the name of Aileen
Wournos. She was born to a sex offender father and a mother who disappeared off the face of the
planet. She and her younger brother were sent to live with their grandparents. From there, her
grandparents were strict on the children who would lash out in return. In the Biography (2019)
website and on the All That’s Interesting (2019) website, they state that she would confess to
having a sexually abusive grandfather and a sexual relationship with her brother, Keith. Aileen
would end up pregnant at the age of 14 and was sent to a clinic for those who had a child out of
wedlock till she gave birth. This is where she would change her life forever. After being kicked
Porter 4
out of the unwed mother’s home, she left home and began her hitchhiking and prostitution
career. Within a few years after she left, her brother would pass away from cancer and she would
gain his life insurance policy. As she traveled to Florida, she married a elderly fellow named
Lewis Fell. He would sustain her for only nine weeks before he called for annulment and a
restraining order from Aileen beating him with his own cane. She would find Tyria Moore in
By this time, Aileen had begun her killing spree. Her first known victim, as described by
the Florida Department of Corrections (“Aileen”), was a Richard Mallory. He was a 51 year old
electronics shop owner and known sex offender in Volusia County. He was found on the 13th of
December in a wooded area, 12 days after his car was found. He was shot many times two
landed in his left lung. This was only the beginning of the year of terror. Within 1990, more than
six more men were discovered, shot multiple times. The differences start after this. Some of the
victims were nude while others were clothed completely. Her last victim before she was caught
was a 62 year old Walter Antonio. He was found off a logging road in Dixie County, nearly
nude. His car was found 5 days later. By January 1st of 1991, Aileen was arrested with the help
of her lesbian lover, Tyria Moore. In Orlando Sentinel article, Beth Kassab gave the details about
the betrayal of Aileen’s lover. Tyria, in exchange for her freedom, helped the FBI by giving up
all the information to convict Aileen and gained Aileen’s confession over a phone call
(“Aileen”). After she was arrested, she plead guilty to the Mallory case, saying he was trying to
rape her, and she killed in self-defense. Aileen pleaded guilty to another 6 men without the self-
defense claim to her case. Within the court, she insisted on being executed before she would kill
again. In a NewsChannel2000 story, the State Attorney who prosecuted her, John Tanner,
attended her execution and witnessed her final statement, “I’d just like to say I’m sailing with the
Porter 5
rock, and I’ll be back like Independence Day, with Jesus June 6. Like the movie, big mother ship
and all, I’ll be back” (qtd in “Aileen”). In the end, she was executed with a lethal injection on
On top of all of her killings, she was deemed borderline personality disorder by her
defense attorney Billy Nolas in the St. Petersburg Times (“Aileen”). Borderline personality
Order, by definition from the National Institute of Mental Health, is “a mental illness marked by
an ongoing pattern of varying moods, self-image, and behavior. These symptoms often result in
impulsive actions and problems in relationships.” As stated earlier in this section of the paper,
her childhood was not all sunshine and rainbows. She was sexually abused on numerous
accounts by different family members. With Aileen’s childhood in mind, she was traumatized
from young age by exchanges she had between her brother and grandfather. John Tanner, her
prosecutor stated in the NewsChannel2000 that, “She liked to be in control. In fact, these
killings, as much as anything, were acts of ultimate control, and we’ve seen that in serial killer
patterns in the past. She killed these men to bring about the ultimate in control over their lives,
which was to terminate it” (qtd in “Aileen”). When looking into her first victim, Richard
Mallory, he is a known sex offender. Having a sex offender trying to control Aileen through the
sexual endeavors could have sent her into her killing spree, and knowing her grandfather was
part of her traumatized past could explain her desire for killing the middle age men. All of this is
The Profit Killer, by the 1998 Kelleher & Kelleher study, is a female serial killer who
kills for financial gain (Yardley and Wilson). The motive behind these crimes are greed. The
desire of these killers is gaining the money needed that they can not gain from their immediate
Porter 6
means. These types of killers are typically resourceful and poison their victims. One of these
types of killers is Mary Ann Cotton, a British serial killer during the 1800’s. Mary Ann Cotton
was born as Mary Ann Robson in Durham to a coal miner father and stay at home mom. She was
the oldest daughter of three. By the age of 8, according to Blanco (2017) and Yardley (2015), her
father died in a coal mining accident, leaving her mom impoverished and children broken. Her
mother remarried, and Mary began to loath her step father. As a teenager, she became a teacher
at the local Sunday School. In Britannica Encyclopedia, it stated that Mary left home at 16 and
By 20, Mary had married a laborer named William Mowbray and they had a total of four
children. Their first born died not long after her baptism. Her last child with Mowbray, John
Robert, died a year before his father from cases that included symptoms of arsenic poisoning.
She moved away with her 35 pound life insurance and two remaining daughters. She met a
Joseph Nattrass, who left Mary for his future wife. Her youngest daughter died from typhus fever
and her remaining daughter was sent to her mother while she went on to her next victim, George
Ward. With her new infirmary job, she met and later married Ward. Due to his sickness, he was
not able to return to work and he died from typhus fever and cholera. Off she went to her next
job. Her new job included being a housekeep to a James Robinson who was widowed. Not long
after her move-in, his youngest died from typhus fever. Returning home, Mary cared for her sick
mother. Within a few weeks, Mary’s mother died, and Mary returned to Robinson pregnant with
his child. They got married and later split due to Mary stealing from him and demanding from
him to get life insurance. Mary moved on. From there, others would fall into her spell and her
bed. She became pregnant from multiple of her lovers and ended up killing off her children if
they became a hassle to handle. When she had offered up one of her husband’s child, Charles
Porter 7
Edward, to a grocer, Thomas Riley, suspension grew on her motives. In the book written by
Yardley and Wilson (2015) about Mary Ann Cotton, Riley declined the child unless she worked
too. After his encounter with May, He found out that the child was dead along with many of her
lodgers. Riley alerted the police and the body of Charles was exhumed. The contains of his
stomach included arsenic poisoning. The police ordered for other exhumations of her past to find
all of them including arsenic poisoning. She was arrested July 18th, 1872, Cotton was pregnant
with her lover’s, Mr. Mann, child. She gave birth to a daughter before she was executed in
Durham County.
Mary Ann was a woman of greed during her time. Many women of her time only were
able to work if unmarried or widowed. Once married, they became the property of their husbands
and weren’t able to legally leave their husbands unless death came to them first. During this
time, arsenic poisoning was a common household item, but also a common measure for murder.
It was undetectable unless an autopsy was performed. When looking into Mary Ann herself, her
childhood was not one of a typically serial killer. She was not abused in any way that is stated in
any of her history. Her father passed away at a young age and her mother’s remarriage may have
caused an issue for Mary. When it comes to her life, she was not able to support herself on her
own. She witnessed her mom have to remarry in order to provide for her siblings, which may
have caused the greed motive for money. In total, she could only explain why she decided to kill
My next case is the one at the baby farmer. The Angel of Death is one who kills those
dependent on the killer, explained in the Yardley and Wilson’s book. These victims can include
those in nursing homes or young children. Amelia Dyer was the notorious baby farmer of the
Porter 8
19th century. She didn’t start poor in anyway, being the daughter of a master shoemaker. Her
privileged life allowed her to read and write, but her mother was dying of typhus. Her mother
dead not long after. According to Blanco’s background information (2017), she moved in with an
aunt before becoming a apprentice for a corset maker. She married a George Thomas, who was
greatly older than she was. They lied on the marriage certificate in order to avoid suspicion. She
became a nurse during her marriage. Within her time, she gained useful skills for becoming a
baby farmer. As for her husband, no documentation was found to if he ever lived with her during
During this time, baby farming was not hard to find. For unwed mothers or illegitimate
children, it could take the burden off the hands of the mother for a fee. The farmer helped the
family by giving them up for adoption, or in the case of Amelia, killing them for money. Many
of the time, the mothers stayed with the farmer until she has given birth, for when the mother
returned to their normal lives and the baby disappeared. Amelia insured the mother’s trust with
every helping hand. When she first started, she allowed the baby to starve to death. She calmed
the child down with an opium laced syrup so that they stopped screaming for food. Soon, she
advanced to making deaths faster for better profit. According to Crime Museum (2017), she
gained the suspension of a doctor who wrote her death certificates. She was only charged 6
months of hard labor for her crimes. She was released and with new lessons learned. She did not
go to doctors and got rid of the children herself. She knew of the attention she had gained before
and from unwanted parents seeking their babies back, so her family and her continuously moved
from area to area. In Blanco’s article, her downfall occurred after a package was found in the
Thames. It contained a baby girl and a faded name of Mrs. Thomas, Amelia’s married name. It
led the police to Amelia and would help lead to her arrest. When they cleaned the Thames, they
Porter 9
found more bodies with the white tape around their necks. Amelia would call this “how you
could tell it was one of mine” (qtd in Blanco). She was placed on trial in early March of 1896,
using insanity as her defense. According to Crime Museum (2017), within five minutes she was
convicted of one murder, although the numbers were between 200-400 murders. On June 10,
Amelia’s past may have contributed to her rise to baby farming. Her family was torn
apart by her mother’s illness. Being the caregiver to her mother, she saw the effects that sickness
had on just one person and those around her. When it comes to money, many women in the
Victorian Era were trying to support themselves if they were not married. Once they were
married, all the owned was the husband’s and they would obtain the role of caregiver. With
Amelia married, money would become her husband’s to play with. There is not factual evidence
that states her husband died or they divorced, but she does become independent. With her greed
for money and mental health state already gone, stated in Blanco’s article (2017), baby farming
became her item of money. Although the belief is she killed for money, she could tell us why she
The team killer are the groups of killers. In Kelleher and Kelleher’s 1998 study, these
groups can be “male/female, all female or family in composition” (qtd in Yardley). The motives
vary on the couple, with a common male/female couple being sexual motived. One team is the
Fred and Rosemary West case. For this study, the focus is on Rosemary primarily instead of
Fred. Rosemary West was born to a Schizophrenic father and depressive mother as stated in the
Crime Investigation (2018). Her parents eventually split when she was a teenager and she lived
with her mother for some time before staying with her father at 16. Blanco’s article (2017)
Porter 10
explains that while Rose was living with her father, she was both sexually and physically abused.
About this time, a much older Fred West started seeing Rose and her father disapproved highly.
Before long, Rose moved in with Fred, and by 1970, pregnant with their first.
Rose and her husband began their trouble in 1971. Fred West’s oldest daughter from
another marriage, Charmaine, was thought to be killed by Rose during one of her outbursts. In
the article found on Biography (2016), Fred was arrested and serving time when this happened.
Charmaine was hidden by Rose until her husband came home, and he dismember her. When
Fred’s first wife would come to see his daughter, Rose would end up killing her and Fred
dismembered her as well. Eventually the killing went outside of the family. A nanny and
schoolgirls went missing by the hands of the West family and sexually abused, murdered and
dismembered. The children knew about the murders and abuses and said nothing to anyone,
excluding one. According to Biography (2018) and Blanco (2017), Heather, one of Fred’s
daughters, became the center of Fred’s sexual attention after Anna Marie left home. Heather
pushed away and rejected the actions and was the first one to reach out for help from her friends.
When Fred found out, Rose and Fred killed and dismembered her. Not long after, police came
knocking on the door. On Express (2019), the British tabloid who covered the information of the
West Documentary, stated that she was arrested in 1994 for the raping of a 11 year old and
assault of an 8 year old. She was later tried for the murders tied to her husband, although there
was only circumstantial evidence to tie her to any of the 10 murders. She was put on trial only
nine months after her husband would commit suicide in prison. According to Blanco (2017),
originally, she spent 25 years of prison for the 10 separate murder trials, but she was sentenced to
life in prison in 1997 by Home Secretary Jack Straw. She still maintains her innocence and
Porter 11
announced her attention to appeal. In Biography, she appealed in 1996 but was rejected. She
Rosemary West, AKA Rose, was a truly disturbed woman. Her past explains that her
family history of depression and schizophrenia. Her father would sexually abuse her, and her
husband was not any better. Taken in the idea that she could be easily sucked into her husband’s
lifestyle, it opens up the idea that she wants to feel accepted into their lives. It is a wonder for her
to still think she is innocent, despite what her husband and her had done to those girls. Not all is
what it seems to be in these cases. In the end, she is still alive. Maybe we can ask why she did
those horrendous acts; was it love or lust? Or was it wanting to be part of a family?
Revenge killers are, as the name states, those who have a sore spot for someone. By
Kelleher and Kelleher, these females have a traumatizing issue with someone in their life and
push it out on others. This case is of Juana Barraza, a Mexican professional wrestler. She was
born to an alcoholic mother, exchanged her for three beers to an older man. According to Blanco
(2017), this man sexually abused her and later, become the father to her baby boy. She had a
total of four children, where one of them died in a mugging. She became a female professional
wrestler by the name of La Dama del Silencio or the Silent Lady. She fought in the form of lucha
Juana took her first victim while doing her day job as a maid. Feggy Ostrosky, the
director of the National Institute of Neurobiology, would explain that Juana would kill Anna
Maria de los Reyes with a stethoscope, while arguing about her payrate (Cervantes). This was
her first victim. All of her victims were elderly women, about 60 and over, and most lived alone.
Porter 12
She, explained in the Cervantes paper (2010), dressed like a nurse or government worker to help
the elderly women. They allowed her in, and she attacked. She took one trinket from each
murder, many turning out to be religious trinkets. This occurred for over three years before she
was caught. Because of her bulky figure, investigators looked for a man who wore women’s
clothes. In the New York Times special article on Juana (2006), she followed the same pattern for
each murder, with the offering of help and then killing. Her dying light was, “In 2006, Barraza
strangled an 89 year-old women with a stethoscope.” (qtd in Redd). A witness came to find the
elderly woman died, and Juana running away. The police detained Juana. When fingerprinted,
she left prints at over 10 murder scenes, helping convict her. She is currently serving a 759 year
sentence.
Juana Barraza is an interesting case of revenge. Her revenge stems from her mother
which is not uncommon for most people. Her revenge came out differently. She came off as a
caring woman, helping these elderly ladies who did nothing to her. The thing with revenge
killers are they take out their anger on people who remind them of their specific traumatizing
person. Considering her mother’s selling her off and the man sexually abusing her, her desire to
hurt those reminding her of her mother in anyway could have been her way to find peace of
mind.
Conclusion
With all research done, from newspapers to online resources from criminology reporters
and professors, all that led me to a conclusion of why they kill. Each killer’s category for what
and why they kill is established by the study performed by Kelleher and Kelleher. For Mary Ann
Cotton, her killings were more financial, and freedom based while Juana Barraza was revenge
based. Those categories only give half of the picture. The other half deals with the pasts of these
Porter 13
women. Their pasts affect how, who and why they target certain people. With this view now, it
sheds to light on they can chose their victims. Although this is an opinionated conclusion based
on research, it does create a better understanding on how a past can affect a murderous mind like
Work Cited
“Alieen Carol Wournos.” Clarkprosecutor.org. Office of the Clark County Prosecuting Attorney.
24 Mar. 2019.
https://www.crimemuseum.org/crime-library/serial-killers/amelia-dyer/. Accessed 26
Mar 2019.
“Borderline Personality Disorder” National Institute of Mental Health, U.S Department of Health
Cervantes, Susana. “Performing mexicanidad: Criminality and lucha libre” Crime, Media,
Culture: An International Journal, vol. 6, no.2, Sage Publications, Aug. 2010, pp. 185-
Mar 2019.
Harrison, Marissa. “Female Serial Killers in the United States: means, motives, and makings”,
Lee, Sarah. “Amelia Dyer: The Victorian Nurse who Strangled Babies” BBC News,
McKinley, James. “Woman Held in Mexico City Serial Killings” New York Times, 26 Jan 2006,
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/26/world/americas/woman-held-in-mexico-city-serial-
Mitchell, Molli. “Fred and Rose West documentary: Who are Fred and Rosemary West? Who
radio/1090457/Fred-and-Rose-west-documentary-itv-who-are-Fred-Rosemary-West-
Randell, Louise. “House of Horrors monster Rose West distraught after pet guinea pig murdered-
Convicted killer Rose West accused two female inmates of poisoning her pet in prison.”
com.librarylink.uncc.edu/apps/news/document-
view?p=WORLDNEWS&t=&sort=YMD_date%3AD&fld-base-
0=alltext&maxresults=20&val-base-
0=%22Female%20Serial%20Killers%22&docref=news/171BFE19F7264940. Accessed
11 Mar. 2019.
Redd, Wyatt. “By Day, Juana Barraza was A Pro Wrestler, By Night She Murdered Old Ladies”
Stockton, Richard. “How Aileen Wuornos Became History’s Most Terrifying Female Serial
Yardley, Elizabeth, and Wilson, David. “Female Serial Killers in social context: Criminological
institutionalism and the case of Mary Ann Cotton.”1st ed., Bristol University Press and
Zimmerman, Jean. “Lady Killers: Cherchez La Femme Fatale.” NPR, 14 Oct. 2017,
http://www.npr.org/2017/10/14/555690824/lady-killers-cherchez-la-femme-fatale.