Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/jfoodeng
Abstract
Ohmic heating is an alternative fast heating method for food products. In this study, the tylose samples having different salt con-
centrations and minced beef samples having different fat contents were heated at five different voltage gradients in the range of 10–
50 V/cm. The electrical conductivity–temperature relationships were observed to be linear below 55–60 °C for all voltage gradients
applied. It was found that the tylose samples having 0.5% and 0.67% salt contents gave similar ohmic heating rates and the electrical
conductivity variations with the minced beef samples having higher and lower fat contents, respectively. The system performance
coefficients for tylose samples were in the range of 0.41–0.53, and those of the minced beef samples were in the range of 0.36–
0.48. The predictions of the mathematical model for the system performance coefficient were found to be very accurate (P < 0.01).
Ó 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0260-8774/$ - see front matter Ó 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.07.011
68 F. Icier, C. Ilicali / Journal of Food Engineering 69 (2005) 67–77
Nomenclature
Yongsawatdigul, Park, and Kolbe (1995) found that ohmic heating of meat samples and electrical conductiv-
the electrical conductivity of surimi was dependent on ity changes in model foods are limited.
the amount of added salt. They reported that low ap- Tylose (sodium carboxy methyl cellulose) has been
plied voltage gradients between 3.3 and 13.3 V/cm did used as a food model for lean beef in freezing and thaw-
not effect the electrical conductivity. Similarly, Wu, ing research by many researchers since it has similar
Kolbe, Flugstad, Park, and Yongsawatdigul (1998) thermo-physical properties to lean beef having a 74%
showed that electrical conductivity was dependent on moisture content (Abdalla & Singh, 1985; Becker &
the salt content and the temperature of surimi at the Fricke, 1999; Cleland, Cleland, Earle, & Bryne, 1987;
frequencies of 30 Hz to 1 MHz. Park, Lin, and Yon- Dolan, Singh, & Heldman, 1987; Hung & Thompson,
gsawatdigul (1997) and Park, Yongsawatdigul, and 1983; Pham, 1996; Sanz, Ramos, & Mascheroni, 1996;
Kolbe (1998) reported that the ohmic heating method Sheen & Hayakawa, 1991; Succar & Hayakawa, 1983,
was used in industrial scale surimi preparation because 1984, 1986).
it gave good gelling properties to the surimi. Yaser In this study, the ohmic heating of tylose and minced
and Kolbe (2000) reported that ohmic heating of surimi beef samples using different voltage gradients was inves-
paste at 1200 V/cm was 11 times faster than the conven- tigated. Electrical conductivity versus temperature rela-
tional heating performed at 90 °C in a water bath. tionships were obtained. The compositions of the
Piette and Jacques (1996) described a fat analyzer tylose samples giving similar electrical properties and
having a working principle of ohmic heating and used ohmic heating curves were determined. The system per-
this analyzer in fat content determination of ground beef formances of ohmic heating runs were investigated.
samples. Bellmer, Tilahun, and Achour (1999) studied
the effect of fat content and particle size on the electrical
conductivity of ground beef samples. Yun, Lee, and 2. Materials and methods
Park (1998) also used ohmic heating to thaw meat
blocks. They showed that ohmic thawing using 60– 2.1. Experimental set-up
120 V at 60 Hz–60 kHz frequencies resulted in less drip
loss and higher water binding capacity for meat blocks. The experimental device consisted of a power supply,
Ohmic heating can be an alternative heating method an isolating transformer, a variable transformer and a
for fish and meat samples. Studies on the modelling of microprocessor board as shown schematically in
F. Icier, C. Ilicali / Journal of Food Engineering 69 (2005) 67–77 69
Table 1
The compositions of the minced beef samples prepared
Property (%) The minced beef sample The minced beef sample
having lower fat content (mbl) having higher fat content (mbh)
Total moisture 70.1 ± 0.1 65.7 ± 0.1
Protein 18.6 ± 0.05 16.9 ± 0.07
Fat 9.6 ± 0.02 16.1 ± 0.04
Ash 1.2 ± 0.2 0.9 ± 0.2
Others 0.5 ± 0.2 0.4 ± 0.1
2.3. Model & De Witt, 1993, App. A) and the measured temperature
rise in the test cell. However, this term was estimated to be
For the steady state case, the voltage distribution only 1.2–10% of the energy given to the system.
within a conductor developed by combining Ohms The heat loss to the surroundings by natural convec-
law and the continuity equation for electric current is tion was calculated from the following equation;
rðrrV Þ ¼ 0 ð2Þ Qnc ¼ hAðT w T amb ÞDt ð8Þ
The average heat transfer coefficient was calculated from
which can be solved for a liquid (Sastry & Salengke, the following simplified equation given for the appropri-
1998). The average voltage gradient assuming that the ate Gr Æ Pr number range (Geankoplis, 1993);
voltage only changes in the axial direction can be written
1=4
as
h ¼ 1:32 DT ð9Þ
DV D
rV ¼ ð3Þ
L where DT was the average temperature driving force cal-
For a stationary medium, with negligible internal culated from the initial and final outer wall temperatures
heat conduction resistance, the energy balance may be and the ambient temperature. The calculated natural con-
written as vection heat transfer coefficients were small, roughly
4–6 W/m2 K. The temperature rise in the test cell at the
k o oT oT E_ loss
r þ DV 2 r=ðK c vÞ ¼ qC p þ ð4Þ end of the ohmic heating experiments was between 4 °C
r or or ot v and 32 °C. The heat transfer area was also small. Due to
The E_ loss term in Eq. (4) represents the heat required to these reasons, the heat loss to the surroundings was small
heat the test cell, the electrodes etc., the heat loss to the and could be neglected without any loss in accuracy.
surroundings by natural convection and the portion of Experimental data obtained in this research suggested
the generated heat used for purposes other than heating that the Eloss given in Eq. (7) could be accounted for by
the liquid, i.e. chemical reactions, phase change. the heat and electrical losses in the system and the heat
The energy given to the system was calculated by required to heat the test cell. The electrical energy might
using the current and voltage values recorded during have also caused some chemical and physical changes in
the heating experiments; the system (Assiry, Sastry, & Samaranayake, 2003).
X Since low Eloss would indicate a system with a high per-
Egiven ¼ DV It ð5Þ formance, a system performance coefficient, SPC, was
The heat required to heat the sample to a prescribed defined as;
temperature was calculated as; Qtaken
SPC ¼ ð10Þ
Qtaken ¼ mC p ðT f T i Þ ð6Þ Egiven
The specific heat capacities of the samples were assumed For a system with zero Eloss, SPC will be equal to 1.
to be independent of temperature. The energy given to If the system performance coefficient is assumed to be
the system will be equal to the energy required to heat constant and the appropriate electrical conductivity
the sample plus the energy loss relations are taken, the energy balance during heating
becomes
Egiven ¼ Qtaken þ Eloss ð7Þ
The energy loss term in Eq. (7) is the sum of the heat re- k o oT oT
r þ SPC DV 2 r=ðK c vÞ ¼ qC p ð11Þ
quired to heat up the test cell, the heat loss to the sur- r or or ot
roundings by natural convection and the electrical where Kc is the cell constant, L/A.
energy which has not been converted into heat. The heat Eq. (11) was solved numerically by the forward finite
required to heat up the test cell was calculated from the difference method. The time step used in the computa-
mass of the test cell, the specific heat of Pyrex (Incropera tions was 0.01 s. The physical properties used in the
F. Icier, C. Ilicali / Journal of Food Engineering 69 (2005) 67–77 71
Table 2
The parameters and properties used in model calculations
Property or parameter (unit) Sample Value
3
Density (kg/m ) The minced beef (mbl) 1070
The minced beef (mbh) 1070
Tylose 1070
Specific heat (J/kg K)a The minced beef (mbl) 3411
The minced beef (mbh) 3411
Tylose 3710
Thermal conductivity (W/m K)a The minced beef (mbl) 0.51
The minced beef (mbh) 0.51
Tylose 0.51
The diameter of the electrodes (m) 0.025
The distance between electrodes (m) 0.030
a
From Succar and Hayakawa (1983).
computations and the experimental parameters are the tylose samples (Fig. 3), the electrical conductivity
given in Table 2. Specific heat capacity of the samples values increased as the temperature increased up to
was taken as constant for the given temperature range 60 °C.
during ohmic heating. Statistical analyses were per- For the minced beef samples, it is thought that electri-
formed by using the SPSS Statistical Package (1999). cal conductivity may be decreased as a result of chemical
reactions induced by the effect of increase in temperature
and the electrical current. In particular, the denaturation
3. Results and discussion of the proteins may cause changes in the ionic move-
ments and decrease the electrical conductivity. Huang,
The cylindrical minced beef samples were heated in Chen, and Morrissey (1997) applied ohmic heating to
the ohmic heating test cell by using five different voltage frozen fish mince wash water up to different tempera-
gradients. As shown in Fig. 2, as the temperature in- tures and investigated the coagulation of the fish pro-
creased the electrical conductivity of the minced beef teins. They found that the coagulation started at 50 °C
samples increased up to a critical temperature of 45– and increased as the temperature increased. Park et al.
50 °C and then the rate decreased. The lower critical (1998) studied the gelatinization of fish proteins by oh-
temperature values were obtained at the high-voltage mic heating. They reported that gelatinization started
gradients for the minced beef samples. However, for
1.3
Electrical conductivity (S/m)
Electrical conductivity (S/m)
1.2 1.2
1.15
1.1
1.1
1.05 1
1 0.9
0.95
0.8
0.9
0.85 0.7
0.8 0.6
0.75
0.5
0.7
25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
(a) Temperature (°C)
(a) Temperature (°C)
1.1 1.7
Electrical conductivity (S/m)
Electrical conductivity (S/m)
1 1.5
0.9 1.3
0.8 1.1
0.7 0.9
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
(b) 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
Temperature (°C) (b) Temperature (°C)
Fig. 2. Electrical conductivity changes of the minced beef samples Fig. 3. Electrical conductivity changes of the tylose samples during
during ohmic heating: (a) lower fat content (mbl) and (b) higher fat ohmic heating: (a) 0.5% salt content (tyl05), (b) 0.67% salt content
content (mbh). () 10 V/cm, () 20 V/cm, (þ) 30 V/cm, (s) 40 V/cm, (tyl067). () 10 V/cm, () 20 V/cm, (þ) 30 V/cm, (s) 40 V/cm, (n)
(n) 50 V/cm. 50 V/cm.
72 F. Icier, C. Ilicali / Journal of Food Engineering 69 (2005) 67–77
Temperature (°C)
55
heated samples.
50
Wang and Sastry (1997) reported that the electrical 45
conductivity of corn and potato starches decreased after 40
gelatinization. They also concluded that the decrease in 35
the electrical conductivity was caused by a decrease in 30
25
the free moisture content in the samples. Chaiwanichsiri,
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Ohnishi, Suzuki, Takai, and Miyawaki (2001) studied (a)
Time (s)
electrical conductivity changes during gelatinization.
They reported that the electrical conductivity could be 65
enhancing by the ionic movement of the samples. 60
Temperature (°C)
55
In this study, the electrical conductivity of the tylose
50
samples increased as the temperature increased up to 45
60 °C (Fig. 3). Some of the water in the minced beef sam- 40
ples was observed to drip at approximately 50 °C and 35
from the tylose samples above 60 °C and collect at the 30
25
bottom of the test cell. The water-soluble ionic compo- 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
nents may also be removed from the sample by this (b) Time (s)
water loss. It is thought that the textural changes in
the samples occurred as a result of physical and chemical Fig. 4. Ohmic heating curves of the minced beef samples at five
reactions. Especially at high-voltage gradients the water different voltage gradients: (a) lower fat content (mbl) and (b) higher
fat content(mbh). (––) 10 V/cm, ( ) 20 V/cm, ( ) 30 V/cm,
loss from the samples was observed to increase. The gel ( ) 40 V/cm, ( ) 50 V/cm.
form was therefore broken as a result of the water re-
moved. However, the effect of these changes must be
further studied in detail.
Since the gel form of the tylose samples was broken 65
above 60 °C, only the experimental data for tempera- 60
Temperature (°C)
55
tures between 30 °C and 60 °C was used in the compari- 50
son of the results. 45
Bellmer et al. (1999) developed a commercial ohmic 40
35
heating system for ground beef products. They reported 30
that electrical conductivity of ground beef samples de- 25
pended on the drained fat content during ohmic heating. 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
However, the voltage gradient applied and the effect of (a) Time (s)
voltage gradient were not discussed. 65
In this research, minced beef samples having two dif- 60
ferent fat contents were heated using voltage gradients
Temperature (°C)
55
in the range of 10–50 V/cm. The effect of voltage gradi- 50
45
ent on the ohmic heating times were found to be statis-
40
tically significant (P < 0.05). As the voltage gradient 35
increased the heating times to reach the prescribed tem- 30
perature decreased, as shown in Figs. 4 and 5. Although 25
at a voltage gradient of 50 V/cm the minced beef samples 0 50 100 150 200 250
Table 3
The experimental data and the linear electrical conductivity–temperature relationships of the samples during ohmic heating
Voltage gradient (V/cm) B (Eq. (12)) C (Eq. (12)) R2a Ti (°C) Tf (°C)
The minced beef samples having lower fat content (mbl)
10 0.0118 0.4880 0.975 31.1 60.1
20 0.0164 0.2698 0.961 32.9 60.0
30 0.0159 0.2816 0.973 30.5 61.2
40 0.0173 0.3339 0.957 29.5 54.4
50 0.0153 0.4200 0.914 32.6 60.4
The minced beef samples having higher fat content (mbh)
10 0.0133 0.2598 0.971 29.6 60.0
20 0.0117 0.2675 0.953 30.9 60.2
30 0.0132 0.1790 0.979 29.6 60.4
40 0.0125 0.2768 0.938 31.0 60.7
50 0.0158 0.2580 0.927 30.9 60.1
The tylose samples having 0.5% salt content (tyl05)
10 0.0181 0.0338 0.996 29.7 60.1
20 0.0182 0.0495 0.997 29.7 60.4
30 0.0141 0.2284 0.986 29.6 61.6
40 0.0167 0.0734 0.998 31.9 62.0
50 0.0160 0.2450 0.947 32.2 63.4
The tylose samples having 0.67% salt content (tyl067)
10 0.0173 0.2151 0.994 29.7 60.2
20 0.0219 0.0948 0.996 29.8 60.5
30 0.0160 0.2500 0.982 30.6 60.3
40 0.0208 0.1316 0.985 30.5 60.9
50 0.0200 0.3949 0.948 32.4 62.2
a
Regression coefficient.
Table 4
The overall linear electrical conductivity–temperature relationships of the samples during ohmic heating
Sample B (Eq. (12)) C (Eq. (12)) R2a
The minced beef samples having lower fat content (mbl) 0.0125 0.4584 0.9231
The minced beef samples having higher fat content (mbh) 0.0119 0.2765 0.9212
The tylose samples having 0.5% salt content (tyl05) 0.0182 0.0388 0.9750
The tylose samples having 0.67% salt content (tyl067) 0.0174 0.2088 0.9456
a
Regression coefficient.
74 F. Icier, C. Ilicali / Journal of Food Engineering 69 (2005) 67–77
Table 5
The non-linear electrical conductivity–temperature relationships of the minced beef samples during ohmic heating
Voltage gradient (V/cm) B (Eq. (13)) N (Eq. (13)) C (Eq. (13)) R2a
The minced beef samples having lower fat content (mbl)
10 0.871 0.241 1.153 0.986
20 1.026 0.250 1.687 0.948
30 1.236 0.234 2.005 0.985
40 1.837 0.261 3.425 0.975
50 1.082 0.241 1.595 0.937
The minced beef samples having higher fat content (mbh)
10 0.657 0.287 1.088 0.967
20 0.802 0.251 1.285 0.967
30 0.727 0.278 1.313 0.987
40 1.201 0.210 1.828 0.966
50 1.023 0.246 1.638 0.944
a
Non-linear regression coefficient.
Table 6
The SPC values of the samples during ohmic heating used in the mathematical model and model predictions
Voltage gradient (V/cm) Qtaken (J) Qgiven (J) SPC texp (s) tadb (s) tmod1 (s) tmod2 (s)
The minced beef samples having lower fat content (mbl)
10 1508 3864 0.390 273 104 267 270
20 1458 3626 0.402 64 25 61 63
30 1712 4119 0.416 34 13 31 32
40 1613 4279 0.377 16 6 15 15
50 1777 4993 0.356 11 4 11 11
The minced beef samples having higher fat content (mbh)
10 1637 4562 0.359 370 133 370 370
20 1575 3712 0.424 82 34 81 81
30 1662 3750 0.443 36 17 38 37
40 1677 3674 0.456 20 9 18 18
50 1707 3580 0.477 12 5 10 10
The tylose samples having 0.5% salt content (tyl05)
10 1680 3975 0.423 310 140 331 326
20 1700 3404 0.500 73 35 69 70
30 1700 3633 0.468 32 16 34 34
40 1554 3371 0.461 19 9 19 19
50 1875 4297 0.436 11 5 11 11
The tylose samples having 0.67% salt content (tyl067)
10 1681 3694 0.453 239 118 259 254
20 1694 3210 0.528 53 28 53 53
30 1643 3476 0.473 28 13 28 28
40 1674 3627 0.462 16 7 15 15
50 1644 4005 0.411 9 4 9 9
F. Icier, C. Ilicali / Journal of Food Engineering 69 (2005) 67–77 75
Temperature (°C)
55
samples, SPC values were higher, the range being 50
0.41–0.53. Icier (2003) reported that the SPC values 45
40
for the liquid samples were in the range of 0.47–0.92 35
30
during ohmic heating. This result suggests that in the 25
ohmic heating of solid samples, the energy loss depends 20
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
on the properties of the sample to be heated and has to (a) Time (s)
be considered in the design of ohmic heaters. However,
1.4
this point must be further studied in detail.
1.2
The mathematical model was modified by taking the
1
energy losses in the system into account by using Eq.
0.8
(11). The heating times, tmod1 and tmod2, from 30 °C to
0.6
60 °C were predicted numerically by using the linear
0.4
and non-linear electrical conductivity models respec-
0.2
tively. The level of agreement between the predicted
0
and experimental heating times was very good 20 30 40 50 60 70
(P < 0.01). At high-voltage gradients, the predictions
using the non-linear equation for the electrical conduc-
tivity gave similar predictions to those of the linear rela- Fig. 7. The comparisons of the electrical conductivities and ohmic
tionship. At low-voltage gradients, heating times heating curves of the tylose samples having 0.5% salt content (tyl05)
and minced beef samples having higher fat content (mbh) at 10 V/cm.
predicted by using the non-linear electrical conductivity
() ty105, (s) mbh.
equation were closer to experimental heating times than
those by using the linear equation (Table 6).
For the temperature range studied, tylose samples tent of 0.67% and the minced beef samples having a
showed similar heating curves and electrical conductiv- lower fat content gave good agreement. At all voltage
ity changes to those of the minced beef samples. Espe- gradients, the agreement between changed after critical
cially, the level of the agreement between the tylose temperatures where reached, after which the electrical
samples having a salt content of 0.5% and the minced conductivity showed a decreasing trend. Critical temper-
beef samples having a higher fat content was good (Figs. atures were 55–60 °C for the minced beef samples and
6 and 7). Similarly, the tylose samples having a salt con- above 65 °C for tylose samples. As the voltage gradient
76 F. Icier, C. Ilicali / Journal of Food Engineering 69 (2005) 67–77
applied increased, critical temperature values for all de Alwis, A. A. P., & Fryer, P. J. (1992). Operability of the ohmic
samples decreased. In addition to this, the decrease in heating process: electrical conductivity effects. Journal of Food
Engineering, 15, 21–48.
the electrical conductivities above the critical tempera- Dolan, K. D., Singh, R. P., & Heldman, D. R. (1987). Prediction of
ture values decreased the heating rates of the samples. temperature in frozen foods exposed to solar radiation. Journal of
One way Anova and paired t-test results showed that Food Processing and Preservation, 11, 135–158.
no significant differences were obtained between the Geankoplis, C. J. (1993). Transport processes and unit operations (3rd
heating times and the electrical conductivities of the ty- ed.). Singapore: Prentice-Hall.
Goullieux, A., Pain, J. P., & Baudez, P. (1996). A new pilot-scale batch
lose samples having a 0.5% salt content and the minced ohmic heater. In Proceedings of the IFT annual meeting (pp. C29–C32).
beef samples having higher fat contents (P < 0.05). Sim- Halden, K., de Alwis, A. A. P., & Fryer, P. J. (1990). Changes in the
ilarly the heating times and the electrical conductivities electrical conductivity of foods during ohmic heating. International
of the second pair, the tylose samples having a 0.67% Journal of Food Science and Technology, 25, 9–25.
salt content and the minced beef samples having lower Huang, L., Chen, Y., & Morrissey, M. T. (1997). Coagulation of fish
proteins from frozen fish mince wash water by ohmic heating.
fat contents, were not statistically different (P < 0.05). Journal of Food Process Engineering, 20(4), 285–300.
In conclusion, tylose can be used as a food analog by Hung, Y. C., & Thompson, D. R. (1983). Freezing time prediction for
adjusting the salt content to give similar ohmic heating slab shape foodstuffs by an improved analytical method. Journal of
effects to those of the minced beef samples used. In this Food Science, 48, 555–560.
study, tylose samples having 0.5% and 0.67% salt con- Icier, F. (2003). The experimental investigation and mathematical
modelling of ohmic heating of foods. Ph.D. Thesis, Ege University,
tents gave good agreement with the minced beef samples Food Engineering Department, Izmir, Turkey, 245 p.
of certain compositions. It is thought that the results ob- Incropera, F. P., & De Witt, D. P. (1993). Introduction to heat transfer
tained in this study can be useful in further studies on (2nd ed.). Jon Wiley & Sons.
the detailed ohmic heating modeling by using tylose Luzuriaga, D. A., & Balaban, M. O. (1996). Electrical conductivity of
samples as a food analog. Since SPCs are lower in heat- frozen shrimp and flounder at different temperatures and voltage
levels. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology, 5(3), 41–63.
ing of solid samples, the design of ohmic heaters to be Mizrahi, S. (1996). Leaching of soluble solids during blanching of
used in solid samples must be more critical. vegetables by ohmic heating. Journal of Food Engineering, 29,
153–166.
Palaniappan, S., & Sastry, S. K. (1991). Electrical conductivities of
Acknowledgement selected solid foods during ohmic heating. Journal of Food Process
Engineering, 14, 221–236.
This study was supported by Ege University Scientific Park, J. W., Lin, T. M., & Yongsawatdigul, J. (1997). New
developments in manufacturing of surimi and surimi seafood.
Research Projects Fund, Project no: 2001/MUH/03,
Food Reviews International, 13(4), 577–610.
Turkey. Park, J. W., Yongsawatdigul, J., & Kolbe, E. (1998). Proteolysis and
gelation of fish proteins under ohmic heating. In F. Shadidi, C. T.
Ho, & N. V. Chayen (Eds.). Advances in experimental medicine &
References biology, Vol. 4, Process-induced chemical changes in food
(pp. 25–33). New York: Plenum Press.
Abdalla, H., & Singh, R. P. (1985). Simulation of thawing of foods Pham, Q. T. (1996). Prediction of calorimetric properties and freezing
using finite element method. Journal of Food Process Engineering, time of foods from composition data. Journal of Food Engineering,
7, 273–286. 30, 95–107.
Anon. (1964). Determination of the inorganic materials (ash). Turkish Piette, J. P. G., & Jacques, L. (1996). Evaluation of a rapid fat
Standards Institute, TS 00135/April 1964, Ankara. analyzer, based on ohmic heating, for the classification for
Anon. (1995). Meat-minced beef. Turkish Standards Institute, 11566/ ground beef. Fleischwirtschaft (from English summary), 76(12),
March 1995, Ankara. 1340–1342.
Assiry, A., Sastry, S. K., & Samaranayake, C. (2003). Degradation Qihua, T., Jindal, V. K., & van Winden, J. (1993). Design and
kinetics of ascorbic acid during ohmic heating with stainless steel performance evaluation of an ohmic heating unit for liquid foods.
electrodes. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 33(2), 187–196. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 9, 243–253.
Becker, B. R., & Fricke, B. A. (1999). Freezing times of regularly Reznick, D. (1996). Ohmic heating of fluid foods. Food Technol-
shaped food items. International Communications in Heat and Mass ogy(May), 250–251.
Transfer, 26, 617–629. Sanz, P. D., Ramos, M., & Mascheroni, R. H. (1996). Using equivalent
Bellmer, D., Tilahun, M., & Achour, M. (1999). Electrical conductivity volumetric enthalpy variation to determine the freezing time in
of ground beef during ohmic heating: effects of fat content and foods. Journal of Food Engineering, 27, 177–190.
particle size. In Proceedings of ASAE-CSAE-SCGR annual inter- Sastry, S. K. (1989). A model for continuous sterilization of particulate
national meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 18–21 July 1999. foods by ohmic heating. Presented at the 5th Int. Cong. Eng. Food,
ASAE Paper No. 996065, 14 p. Cologne, Germany, May 28–June 03, 1989.
Chaiwanichsiri, S., Ohnishi, S., Suzuki, T., Takai, R., & Miyawaki, O. Sastry, S. K., & Li, Q. (1996). Modeling the ohmic heating of foods.
(2001). Measurement of electrical conductivity, differential scan- Food Technology(May), 246–248.
ning calorimetry and viscosity of starch and flour suspensions Sastry, S. K., & Salengke, S. (1998). Ohmic heating of solid–liquid
during gelatinization process. Journal of Food Science and Agricul- mixtures: a comparison of mathematical models under worst-case
ture, 81, 1586–1591. heating conditions. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 21, 441–458.
Cleland, D. J., Cleland, A. C., Earle, R. L., & Bryne, S. J. (1987). Sheen, S., & Hayakawa, K. (1991). Parametric analysis for the freezing
Experimental data for freezing and thawing of multi-dimensional of spheroidal or finitely cylindrical objects with volumetric changes.
objects. International Journal of Refrigeration, 10, 22–31. Journal of Food Science, 56(2), 543–549.
F. Icier, C. Ilicali / Journal of Food Engineering 69 (2005) 67–77 77
SPSS Statistical Package (1999). SPSS for Windows. Ver. 10.0. parameters and mathematical model verification. Journal of Food
Chicago: SPSS Inc. Engineering, 20, 311–323.
Succar, J., & Hayakawa, K. (1983). Empirical formulae for predicting Wang, W. C., & Sastry, S. K. (1997). Starch gelatinization in ohmic
thermal physical properties of food at freezing or defrosting temper- heating. Journal of Food Engineering, 34, 225–242.
atures. Lebensmittel Wissenschaft und Technologie, 16, 326–331. Wu, H., Kolbe, E., Flugstad, B., Park, J. W., & Yongsawatdigul, J.
Succar, J., & Hayakawa, K. (1984). Parametric analysis for predicting (1998). Electrical properties of fish mince during multi-
freezing time of infinitely slab-shaped food. Journal of Food frequency ohmic heating. Journal of Food Science, 63(6),
Science, 49, 468–477. 1028–1032.
Succar, J., & Hayakawa, K. (1986). A response surface method for the Yaser, A., & Kolbe, E. (2000). Analysis of heat transfer in surimi paste
estimation of convective and radiative heat transfer coefficients heated by conventional and ohmic means. Journal of Aquatic Food
during freezing and thawing of foods. Journal of Food Science, Product Technology, 9(2), 43–54.
51(5), 1314–1322. Yongsawatdigul, J., Park, J. W., & Kolbe, E. (1995). Electrical
Wang, W. C., & Sastry, S. K. (1993a). Salt diffusion into vegetable tissue as conductivity of Pacific whiting surimi paste during ohmic heating.
a pre-treatment for ohmic heating: electrical conductivity profiles and Journal of Food Science, 60(5), 922–935.
vacuum infusion studies. Journal of Food Engineering, 20, 299–309. Yun, C. G., Lee, D. H., & Park, J. (1998). Ohmic thawing of a frozen
Wang, W. C., & Sastry, S. K. (1993b). Salt diffusion into vegetable meat chunk. Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology, 30(4),
tissue as a pre-treatment for ohmic heating: determination of 842–847.