Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tohoku2011 PDF
Tohoku2011 PDF
0 Tohoku,
Japan Earthquake
Educational Slides
Created & Compiled by Gavin Hayes & David Wald
U.S. Geological Survey, National Earthquake Information Center
Contributions from:
Kuo-Wan Lin, USGS NEIC Jascha Polet, Cal Poly Pomona
Mike Hearne, USGS NEIC Charles Ammon, Penn State University
Lisa Wald, USGS NEIC Guangfu Shao, U. California, Santa Barbara
Harley Benz, USGS NEIC
Erol Kalkan, USGS Menlo Park
Volkan Sevilgen, USGS Menlo Park
Gavin Hayes and Mike Hearne are contracted to work for the USGS NEIC by Synergetics Inc., Fort Collins, CO.
Offshore Honshu, Japan Earthquake, 03/09/2011, Mw 7.2
USGS ShakeMap : NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
Wed Mar 9, 2011 02:45:20 GMT M 7.2 N38.42 E142.84 Depth: 32.0km ID:b0001r57
M 7.2, NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN PAGER
Origin Time: Wed 2011-03-09 02:45:20 UTC (11:45:20 local)
Hachinohe o o
Location: 38.42 N 142.84 E Depth: 32 km Version 4
FOR TSUNAMI INFORMATION, SEE: tsunami.noaa.gov Created: 21 hours, 44 minutes after earthquake
odate Estimated Fatalities Green alert for shaking-related fatalities Estimated Economic Losses
and economic losses. There is a low
likelihood of casualties and damage.
Iwate
40˚
Akita
Miyako
40˚ Estimated Fatalities Red alert level for economic losses. Extensive
damage is probable and the disaster is likely
Estimated Economic Losses
Akita widespread. Estimated economic losses are
0-1% GDP of Japan. Past events with this alert
level have required a national or international
level response.
Kitakami
Orange alert level for shaking-related fatalities.
Significant casualties are likely.
Sakata
Estimated Population Exposed to Earthquake Shaking
ESTIMATED POPULATION - -* 6k* 2,483k* 15,269k* 10,864k* 36,088k* 6,781k* 66k 0
EXPOSURE (k = x1000)
Sendai ESTIMATED MODIFIED
MERCALLI INTENSITY
Niigata PERCEIVED SHAKING Not felt Weak Light Moderate Strong Very Strong Severe Violent Extreme
38˚ Resistant
Structures none none none V. Light Light Moderate Moderate/Heavy Heavy V. Heavy
POTENTIAL
DAMAGE Vulnerable
Structures none none none Light Moderate Moderate/Heavy Heavy V. Heavy V. Heavy
Suzu Koriyama *Estimated exposure only includes population within the map area.
Hamamatsu
0 75 150 Selected City Exposure
from GeoNames.org
PERCEIVED SHAKING Not felt Weak Light Moderate Strong Very Strong Severe Violent Extreme
Resistant none none none V. Light Light Moderate Moderate/Heavy Heavy V. Heavy
POTENTIAL Structures
DAMAGE Vulnerable
Structures none none none Light Moderate Moderate/Heavy Heavy V. Heavy V. Heavy
*Estimated exposure only includes population within the map area.
Peak Ground Motion Acceleration (PGA) of the 11 March 2011 Tohoku M=9.0 earthquake
PGA(g)
K-Net KiK-Net KiK-Net
stations (surface) (downhole
100 m)
Send
Sendai
11 March 2011
M=9.0
Tokyo
Strong-motion
stations
Peak Ground
K-NET KiK-Net KiK-Net Acceleration (g)
(Surface) Downhole
(100 m)
Latitude(º)
Tokyo
50 Km
Longitude(º)
Population Density (Landscan) Strong motion stations
Mw 7.7 Aftershock
Mw 7.9 Aftershock
9.0
8.0
Magnitude (M)
7.0
6.0
5.0
a rate of 83 mm/yr, and begins its westward descent North America Plate
A
Seismicity of the Earth 1900–2007 1950 D 1963
K
IturupA N
1963
T
La Perouse Strai
t L 1978
c
Harbin
A
Kit ami - 200
i
1995
Yam a tu IL
v
300 Ban k 1978
R
IA
M
44°
C
1958 44°
e
Compiled by Susan Rhea, Arthur C. Tarr, Gavin Hayes, Antonio Villaseñor*, and Harley Benz U 1978
u
1978
sa
K
M
S
k
gh
s
*
1940
Institute of Earth Sciences, CSIC, Lluis Solé i Sabarîs s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain Kunish ir n
A
i
ou
B
U
1969 e
K
a
s.
I
n
Tr
TECTONIC SUMMARY 100 a
R
Z
k
Changchun m
Jilin bo MAP EXPLANATION
-
1973 1994
This map shows details of Japan and vicinity not visible in an earlier publication (Tarr and others, 2010). Ha
r
Hokkaido
ta
Japan and its island possessions lie across four major tectonic plates: Pacific plate; North America plate; A -1200 -1100 -1000 -900 -800 -700 -600 -500 -400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 A' 60
L
Magnitude classes Nucleation points
Ta
Eurasia plate; and Philippine Sea plate. The Pacific plate is subducted into the mantle, beneath Hokkaido
and northern Honshu, along the eastern margin of the Okhotsk microplate, a proposed subdivision of the Sapporo
1993 I
North America plate (Bird, 2003). Farther south, the Pacific plate is subducted beneath volcanic islands 42° Vladivostok 1993 R 42°
4–5.9
Rupture zones
along the eastern margin of the Philippine Sea plate. This 2,200 km-long zone of subduction of the Bogorov U 6–6.4
2003
Pacific plate is responsible for the creation of the deep offshore Ogasawara and Japan trenches as well as 0
Ridge K 6.5–6.9 Active volcanoes
parallel chains of islands and volcanoes, typical of Circumpacific island arcs. Similarly, the Philippine 1952
7–7.4
Sea plate is itself subducting under the Eurasia plate along a zone, extending from Taiwan to southern
Honshu, that comprises the Ryukyu Islands and the Nansei-Shoto trench.
Shenyang Fushun
1973
i n 1968 7.5
Mean slab depth
s 60 km
-100 A Ch'ongjin a 7.6
Subduction zones at the Japanese island arcs are geologically complex and produce numerous B 100
e
earthquakes from multiple sources. Deformation of the overriding plates generates shallow crustal Anshan
n 1968 7.7 200
is
earthquakes, whereas slip at the interface of the plates generates interplate earthquakes that extend from
40°
a 300
p 40° 7.8
R
near the base of the trench to depths of 40 to 60 km. At greater depths, Japanese arc earthquakes occur 1994
within the subducting Pacific and Philippine Sea plates and can reach depths of nearly 700 km. Since -200 Beijing a Aomori
1901 400
400
J 1983 1931
7.9
n
1900, two great earthquakes occurred off Japan and three north of Hokkaido. They are the M8.4 1933 500
1976
T R E N C H
p a
Sanriku-oki earthquake (Kawakatsu and Seno, 1983), the M8.3 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake (Miyazaki k 1960
8.0 600
600
Tangshan Sinuiju
and others, 2004), M8.4 1958 Etorofu earthquake (Fukao and Furamoto, 1979), the M8.5 1963 Kuril n
NORTH Ba 1933 Plate boundaries
300
earthquake (Beck and Ruff, 1987), and the M8.3 1994 Shikotan earthquake (Kikuchi and Kanamori, Tianjin
e 8.1
Ris
J a
1995).
-300
KOREA to Subduction
a o
at
500
m A'
200
8.2
BO HA Korea Bay a
u m nk Honshu Transform
a
Dalian
Several relevant tectonic elements, plate boundaries and active volcanoes, provide a context for the a Ba
te
Y
I Depth of focus Divergent
Y
a-
seismicity presented on the main map. The plate boundaries (Bird, 2003) are known most accurately P'yongyang Wonsan o
at
la
along the axis of the trenches and are more diffuse or speculative in the Sea of Japan, China, and Russia. -400 38° 38° Others
it
m 0–69 km
P
Ya
K
The active volcanic arcs (Siebert and Simkin, 2002) follow the Izu, Volcano, and Ryukyu island chains 1915 70–299 km
an
and the main Japanese islands parallel to the Japan trench. 1964 1978 300–700 km
re
Sendai
DATA SOURCES Ya m a t o
Ko
-500
Kaesong
Basin
J A PA N
100
The earthquakes portrayed on the main map and the depth profiles are taken from two sources: (a) the PROFILE A 1938
N
Centennial earthquake catalog (Engdahl and Villaseñor, 2002) and annual supplements for the interval 1900- Jinan Inch`on
2007, where the magnitude floor is 5.5 globally, and (b) a catalog of earthquakes having high-quality depth Seoul
Dokdo Syun-Yo 1938 1938
-600
A
determinations for the period 1964-2002 and a magnitude range of 5.0≤M≤5.4 (Engdahl, personal comm. SOUTH (Admin by S. Korea) Rise e
2003) 36° KOREA i dg 36°
60
Tu s i m a
P
Qingdao R 1938
ki
Ch'ungju
The nucleation points of great earthquakes (M≥8.3) are designated with a label showing the year of Basin
u
O
A
occurrence. Their rupture areas are shown as pale yellow polygons. Major earthquakes (7.5≤M≤8.2) are Taejon
B
B -600 -500 -400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 B'
YELLOW
h
labeled with the year of occurrence. Slab contours are from Hayes and Wald (2010). Dōgo
SEA
J
Dōzen
s
The Seismic Hazard and Relative Plate Motion panel displays the generalized seismic hazard of the region
Chonju Taegu
n Tokyo
H o
Kawasaki
(Giardini and others, 1999) and representative relative plate motion vectors using the NUVEL-1A model Yokohama 0
(DeMets, et.al., 1994.) Gifu 1923
60
Kwangju
Pusan Nagoya
1923 Cipa
34° 34°
0
Pre-instrumental seismicity was obtained from the NOAA National Geophysical Data Center (2010) database Kyoto
10
1909 B'
I Z U
of significant earthquakes; locations are approximate, based on macro-seismic reports and field investigations. Ō-shima
Kobe -100
We selected for earthquakes with associated reports of moderate to major damage, deaths, an estimated Osaka
magnitude of 7.5 or greater, or tsunami generation. ShimonoTsushima Hiroshima
Nii-shi ma 1953
Shima Kōzu-shima Miyaki-shim a
it 1906
S i t
CHIN
Base map data sources include GEBCO 2008, Volcanoes of the World dataset (Siebert and Simkin, 2002), Mikura-shima
ra
Shimonoseki
A
plate boundaries (Bird, 2003), Digital Chart of the World, and ESRI (2002). 1944
St
Kita Matsuyama -200
Kyushu ku e 1972
iko
s
i t o
a Fukuoka
ot
Cheju-do re g
Sh
-
REFERENCES
Ko d
uy
To s a 1946 i Hachij o-shim a
- O z
Bank
G
32° R
N i s h i
Nanjing n o -300 32°
Izu-Sh
Hefei
Gotō Rettō
a
Beck, S.L., and Ruff, L.J., 1987, Rupture process of the great 1963 Kuril Islands earthquake sequence—Asperity
O G
Nagasaki
a
sh
.
interaction and multiple event rupture: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 92, no. B13, p. 14123–14138.
i m a
Kyushu 1968 m PROFILE B
Aoga-shima
ei
Bird, Peter, 2003, An updated digital model of plate boundaries: Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, v. 4, no. 3, 52 p.
u asaw ara
o tō (I
Izu - Og
G
DeMets, C., Gordon, R.G., Argus, D.F., and Stein, S., 1994, Effects of recent revisions to the geomagnetic time scale 1909
K
1931 Rise
.
on estimates of current plate motions: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 21, p. 2191–2194. -400
A S
- S h i c
zu Is
R i d
Engdahl, E.R., and Villaseñor, Antonio, 2002, Global seismicity 1900–1999, in Lee, W.H.K., Jennings, Shanghai
1961 1941
.
P., Kisslinger, C., and Kanamori, H., eds, International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering
Sumis u-shim a asi
l an d 2
hda B
40
.
0
Nadez
g e
ESRI, 2002, ESRI Data and Maps: ESRI, Redlands, CA
s ) 00
A
Fukao, Yoshio, and Furumoto, Muneyoshi, 1979, Stress drops, wave spectra and recurrence intervals of
.
h i t o
300
Tori-shima
W
.
International, v. 57, p. 23–40. M ≥ 7.5, tsunami, or deaths D -500 -400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 D'
EAST CHIN
GEBCO, 2008, The GEBCO_08_Grid, ver. 20091120, accessed January 8, 2010 at
A SEA
A
60
.
K
http://www.gebco.net/.
0
20
0
10
Giardini, D., Grünthal, G., Shedlock, K., Zhang, P., and Global Seismic Hazards Program, 1999, Global
R
y
.
0
Seismic Hazards Map, accessed January 9, 2007 at http://www.seismo.ethz.ch/GSHAP.
R i d g e
1843
u
Hayes, G,. and Wald, D., 2010, Slab models for subduction zones: U.S. Geological Survey Earthquake 1679 1763 50
A
Kikai
e
0
.
s
1897 1896 Basin
s
Kawakatsu, H. and Seno, Tetsuo, 1983, Triple seismic zone and the regional variation of seismicity
K i
1611
.
h
along the northern Honshu arc: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 88, no. B5, p. 4215–4230. 28° -100 28°
t
1897
100
1847
T
O g awara- S h
1793
n a
Kikuchi, Matsayuki, and Kanamori, Hiroo, 1995, The Shikotan earthquake of October 4, 1994—
O ga
u
.
M
Lithospheric earthquake: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 22, no. 9, p. 1025–1028. 1891 1898 Amami Ō Shima
asa
R E
n
s
h
Miyazaki, Shin-ichi, Segall, Paul, Fukuda, Junichi, and Kato, Teryyuki, 2004, Space time distribution of e
s)
a
1586
is
.
afterslip following the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake—Implications for variations in fault zone 1668 60
-
-200
S e
g
r i
w a r a ( Bonin Is lands)
.
1703
d
frictional properties: Geophysical Research Letters, v. 31, no. L06623, p. 1–4. 1911 A m a m i
H
rettō
Mukojima--jima
1707
n
u
NOAA National Geophysical Data Center, 2010, : U.S. Dept of Commerce, accessed March 31, 2010 1854 Tokuno Shima Yome
a m
N C H
Chichijima-
P
C
a
60
.
at http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/hazards. 1854
ot ō
o
0
n
sl
Siebert, L., and Simkin, T., 2002, Volcanoes of the world—An illustrated catalog of Holocene rettō
Ridge
D
a
N
o u
r
a
-300
.
volcanoes and their eruptions: Smithsonian Institution, Global Volcanism Program Digital
I
T
l
.
Information series, GVP-3, http://www.volcano.si.edu/world/, last accessed January 9, 2007. 26° Fuzhou
ge Hahajima-rettō O g 26°
n t
E
u
e a
B
id a s a
oR P l a t
a
Tarr, A.C., Villaseñor, Antonio, Furlong, K.P., Rhea, Susan, and Benz, H.M, 2010, Seismicity of the
a Okinaw w a r a
y
e a Koh
a
Earth 1900–2007: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3064, 1604 200 g
k
C h
u
id C'
.
u
s
scale 1:25,000,000. Naha -400
a y
T
0 - 7.9 R
i n
n (R D
a i
i o a PROFILE D
ot
8 - 8.7
R
k tō
i t
n
O
Ka za n
TA I WA O100 Sh Kita-io-jim a
Taipei
1910 1938 o
N o
i
- h R i -500
T
1959 e i o Jima- S d g e
60
O
1922 s Miyak Ok i-Da it o
-ret tō
24° 60 an Te rrace Iwo-jima 24°
N aki i
H
g
Jiman s e
T'aichung
Iriom ote Jima Ishig
P'e nghu
S O
(Vo
Ya
1999
Na
e
t tō
I-
Ch'untao 1920 ey a k -600
SEISMIC HAZARD AND RELATIVE PLATE MOTION m a - re i
lc
an
FIGURE EXPLANATION D
1915
E
oI
115° 120° 125° 130° 135° 140° 145°
1951 a
S i t
sl a
45° T'ainan
Peak ground acceleration 45° ds
o
N
10
)
N A
0
0–0.2 m/s² R
RUSSIA Kaoshsiung
20
0.2–0.4 CHINA i s
0
1972 e
0.4–0.8 Mangetsu
83
22° Basin 2000 22°
1998
P H I L I P P I N E
0.8–1.6
S E A
40° 30 1914
1.6–3.2 NORTH 40° 0 2007
3.2–6.4 KOREA OKHOTSK
6.4–9.8 PLATE
i Daikoku
)
SOUTH .
120° 122° 124° 126° 128° 130° 132° 134° 136° 138° 140° 142° 144° DEPTH
146° PROFILE EXPLANATION
Relative plate motion KOREA JAPAN 90
35°
Magnitude classes Depth of focus Distance (km)
11.0–19.9 Albers Equal Area Conic Projection
39 35°
X
C -400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 C' Albers Equal Area Conic Projection 4–5.9 0–69 km Profiles of earthquake and volcano 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 X'
Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only 20.0–39.9 PACIFIC Digital map database and cartography by Susan Rhea and Arthur Tarr 70–299 km locations are constructed from the
and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 47 56
SCALE 1:6 000 000 6–6.4
TRENCH AXIS
40.0–59.9 EURASIA (AMUR) PLATE Manuscript approved for publication July 28, 2010 6.5–6.9 300–700 km mapped data. Locations of the profile
Although this information product, for the most part, is in
0 100 200 400 600 800 0
PLATE 0 Kilometers 7–7.4
intersection with the surface are drawn
the public domain, it also contains copyrighted materials
as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted 51 53 Nucleation points in the map and labeled to coincide with -100
60.0–79.9 30° 7.5
items for other than personal use must be secured from 30° the profile label. Box defines extent of
the copyright owner. 7.6 Active volcanoes earthquakes included in profile. Length -200
49
Depth (km)
This map was produced on request, directly from 7.7 of the profile graphic is the same as in
80.0–100.0 57 -100 Earth structure
digital files, on an electronic plotter. PHILIPPINE SEA 7.8 the map. Distance in kilometers from the -300
Air trench axis is indicated in the X
For sale by U.S. Geological Survey Information Services PLATE 45
Box 25286, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225 Plate boundaries 70 63 7.9 Crust direction, depth in kilometers is -400
1-888-ASK-USGS 25°
25° Upper mantle indicated in the Y direction. There is no
Subduction 67 8.0 -500
-200 vertical exaggeration. See Explanation
A PDF for this map is available at
http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2010/1083/d/
Transform Transition zone PROFILE X
at side for color key. Not all earth layers,
Divergent PROFILE C 8.1 Lower mantle -600
Suggested citation: earthquake depths or magnitudes, are
Rhea, Susan, Tarr, A.C., Hayes, Gavin, Villaseñor,
Others visible on every map.
8.2 -700
Antonio, and Benz, H.M., 2010, Seismicity of the earth -300
1900–2007, Japan and vicinity: U.S. Geological Survey
Open-File Report 2010–1083-D, scale 1:6,000,000. 120° 125° 130° 135° 140° 145° -800
Tohoku, Japan Earthquake: Summary Poster
USGS V1 - 4.5 hrs after OT
Tohoku, Japan Earthquake: Summary Poster
USGS Current Version
Web Traffic Statistics
Tohoku
Christchurch (M9.0) JP
(M6.1) NZ
Tohoku, Japan Earthquake: Source
Region Slab Geometry
NEIC Epicenter
TRENCH
240 200 160 120 80 40 0 -40
0
20
Depth (km)
40 Slab1.0
Cross-section through hypocenter
20 Slab1.0
Red dashed line represents dip of slab. Grey circles
are dips of mechanisms used to constrain geometry
40
240 200 160 120 80 40 0 -40
Distance Perpendicular to Average CMT Strike (km)
Tohoku, Japan Earthquake: Source
Region Slab Geometry
NEIC Epicenter
TRENCH
240 200 160 120 80 40 0 -40
0
20
Depth (km)
40 Slab1.0
Cross-section through hypocenter
20 Slab1.0
Red dashed line represents dip of slab. Grey circles
are dips of mechanisms used to constrain geometry
40
240 200 160 120 80 40 0 -40
Distance Perpendicular to Average CMT Strike (km)
Tohoku, Japan Earthquake: Moment Tensor Solutions
(Faulting Mechanisms)
NEIC Epicenter
TRENCH
240 200 160 120 80 40 0 -40
0
20
Depth (km)
40 Slab1.0
Cross-section through hypocenter
20 Slab1.0
Red dashed line represents dip of slab. Grey circles
are dips of mechanisms used to constrain geometry
40
240 200 160 120 80 40 0 -40
Distance Perpendicular to Average CMT Strike (km)
Tohoku, Japan Earthquake: Moment Tensor Analysis
Dip/Depth Sensitivity
NEIC Epicenter
TRENCH
240 200 160 120 80 40 0 -40
0 Mww 9.04
Mww 8.99
PREM interface Mww 9.03
20 Mww 9.02
PREM interface Mww 9.07 Mww 9.07
Depth (km)
Mww 9.10
40
60 W-Phase Results
Fixed centroid locations, vary hypocenter to match slab geometry
80
Tohoku, Japan Earthquake: Moment Tensor Analysis
Dip/Depth Sensitivity
NEIC Epicenter
TRENCH
240 200 160 120 80 40 0 -40
0
gCMT, V1
PREM interface Mww 9.03 (Mw 9.12)
20 PREM interface
Depth (km)
gCMT, V2
(Mw 9.08)
40
60 W-Phase vs gCMT
NEIC Epicenter
TRENCH
240 200 160 120 80 40 0 -40
0
PREM interface
-20 PREM interface
Depth (km)
Slip (cm)
1800
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
50 km Dept
h
40 km
30 km
400
20 km
10 km 200
0
14 6
Finite Fault Model USGS V1 -
Comparison with locking
estimates (Hashimoto et al. ,
2009, Nat. Geo.)
Tohoku, Japan Earthquake: Population Exposure &
Shaking Intensities vs Slab Geometry & Slip Extent
Population (per sq. km), summed along strike
of USGS slip model V1 (240 km, sampled Extent of major slip
every 10 km) (USGS FFM V1)
1
Note that slip during
(as fraction of
FFM Slip
max slip)
the earthquake likely
did not extend to the
depths of the plate
0 boundary directly
Instrumental Intensity (USGS Shakemap) under the Japan
II IV VI VIII X coastline as shown
here, because GPS data
(as fraction of
1
FFM Slip
max slip)
indicate that the
coastline moved down
0 coseismically.
0
40
e
Plan
80 FFM
Depth (km)
120
160
200
240
280
560 480 400 320 240 160 80 0 -40
Distance Perpendicular to Average CMT Strike (km)
Tohoku, Japan Earthquake: Finite Fault Model
USGS V2 - 2011/03/18
Slip (cm)
1
Tohoku, Japan Earthquake: Finite Fault Model
U. California, Santa Barbara
40° 40°
39° 39°
"
2011/3/11 M9.0
38° 38°
2011/3/11 M9.0
37° 37°
36° 36°
50cm 10cm
138° 139° 140° 141° 142° 143° 138° 139° 140° 141° 142° 143°
'
Tohoku, Japan Earthquake: Other Groups
Many groups have published (online) slip models for this earthquake; below is a list
of some of these (note this is not complete):
Charles Ammon, Penn State; Thorne Lay, UCSC; Hiroo Kanamori, Caltech:
http://eqseis.geosc.psu.edu/~cammon/Japan2011EQ/
For a more comprehensive list of models, and results from other analyses, see the
special IRIS website:
http://www.iris.edu/news/events/japan2011/
A History Of Large Earthquakes