Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A. S. DUNN
Chemistry Department, University of Manchester Institute of
Science and Technology, UK
SUMMARY
The importance of the emulsion polymerization of vinyl acetate derives from the
fact that poly(vinyl acetate) copolymers which contain a major propor-tion of
vinyl acetate have found increasing acceptance as the film forming resin in
emulsion paints and latex adhesives over the last 40 years. These materials were
first developed in Germany during the 1939-45 war and were originally disclosed
in the BIOS (British Intelligence Objectives Sub-commission) and the US FIAT
(Field Intelligence Agency Technical) reports made subsequently by teams of
scientific investigators who had the task of
11
finding out what developments had been made in German industry during the
war. Manufacture of emulsion paints based on poly(vinyl acetate) latex was begun
in England in 1948 on the basis of this information and most emulsion paint sold
in Europe is of this type. Events took a different course in North America because
of the need to find alternative applications for the output of the synthetic rubber
plants once supplies of natural rubber became available again, and, consequently,
latex paints based on butadiene-styrene copolymers dominated the market for
many years: synthetic rubber was not produced in Britain until International
Synthetic Rubber Ltd was set up by a consortium of oil companies in 1958. By
the time Bovey et al. 's Emulsion Polymerization! was published in 1955. most
(but not all) of the results of the crash programme of research undertaken under
the auspices of the Office of the Rubber Reserve in the United States during the
war into emulsion polymerization for the production of butadiene-styrene and
butadiene-acrylonitrile synthetic rubbers had been published and these results are
well summarized in that book. Because butadiene is a gas, it is much more con-
venient simply to investigate the emulsion polymerization of styrene which is
widely used as a model monomer, although the homopolymerization of styrene in
emulsion is of very limited industrial significance. The information available on
the emulsion polymerization of styrene was very adequately systematized in the
qualitative theory published by Harkins 2 in 1945 and later, and by the quantitative
theory given by Smith and Ewart3 in 1948, particularly when it was shown by
Bartholome et al. in 19564 and by Burnett and Lehrle in 19595 that the
propagation rate constant, kp, for styrene derived from measurements of rates of
emulsion polymerization by the use of Smith and Ewart's theory was in good
agreement with values derived from rates of bulk polymerization.
Thus it might have appeared even on a careful assessment of the situation in 1959
that the topic of emulsion polymerization was largely worked out (although
subsequent developments have shown that this was not so) but for the suspicion
that the theory which had been found so satisfactory for styrene did not really fit
the facts for the other monomers, vinyl acetate and vinyl chloride, of which the
emulsion polymerization was of major com-mercial importance. The
discrepancies appeared to be attributable to the greater water solubility of vinyl
acetate (2·8% at 60°C compared with 0·054% for styrene) and the insolubility of
polyvinyl chloride in its monomer. Conse-
POLYMERIZATION OF AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS OF VINYL ACETATE 13
0,----------------------------------,
o ·- 1 J
Ig(Rp• 10 mm
Iglc.%J
I I I
conform to Case 2 of the Smith-Ewart theory (in which the average number of
radicals per latex particle, fi = !). Methyl methacrylate for which the solu-bility in
water is about half of that of vinyl acetate, which is still very much higher than
that of styrene or vinyl octadecanoate, but which has a low transfer constant to
monomer similar to that of styrene, does conform to Case 2.9 Vinyl acetate and
vinyl chloride which have high transfer constants do not; and in fact it has
recently been recognized 10, 11 that it is Smith and Ewart's Case I (in which the
transfer of radicals out of latex particles is not negligible so that consequently ii ~
!) which applies to these monomers. The insolubility of the polymer in vinyl
chloride does not seem to be of major importance, perhaps because the polymer is
swollen by the monomer to a surprisingly large extentP It has recently been
observed13 that monomers of which the solubility in water is even lower than that
of styrene (e.g. dodecyl methacrylate, t-butyl styrene) do not undergo emulsion
polymerization when a water soluble initiator is used unless acetone or methanol
is added to increase their solubility in the aqueous phase.
Despite the prominence given to the micellar nucleation of latex particles in the
Harkins2 theory, and although this is certainly the principal particle nucleation
process in the polymerization of styrene in the presence of micellar emulsifier,
neither the presence of micelles nor even of a surfactant below its critical micelle
concentration is an essential feature of emulsion polymerization, provided a stable
latex can be formed. Electrostatic stabiliza-tion of a poly(vinyl acetate) latex by
ionic end-groups derived from the initiator was first observed by Priest in 1952.14
The essential characteristic of emulsion polymerization as emphasized by Haward
15
in 1949 is the isolation of individual polymerizing radicals in discrete
loci.
Persulphate is the most widely used initiator for emulsion polymerization
reactions. It provides ionic end-groups capable of stabilizing latex particles in the
absence of surfactants, although sulphate end-groups are liable to acid catalysed
hydrolysis giving hydroxyl end-groups which may possibly be oxidized to
carboxyl by the persulphate.
The outcome of polymerizations of aqueous solutions and emulsions of vinyl
acetate depends vitally on the initiator selected. So far as solutions are concerned,
although vinyl acetate is relatively soluble in water, poly( vinyl acetate) is not, and
precipitates as soon as it is formed. Monomer is then
POLYMERIZATION OF AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS OF VINYL ACETATE 15
(Mp) = l3·7(Mw)2
where (Mp) and (Mw) are the monomer concentrations by weight in the polymer
and water phases respectively. The form of this relation has been confirmed
independently: 17 it arises because the miscibility of vinyl acetate with water is
limited whereas vinyl acetate and poly(vinyl acetate) are miscible in all
proportions, and consequently the activity of the monomer increases much more
rapidly than its concentration in the aqueous phase. The H 20 2/Fe3+ system does
not introduce charged end-groups capable of stabiliz-ing electrostatically the
poly(vinyl acetate) latex which is produced. Conse-quently the polymer particles
coalesce and (in the absence of stirring) sink to the bottom of the reaction vessel
extracting most of the monomer which remains. Because of the low interfacial
area, radicals generated in the water phase are unable to reach the remaining
monomer in the polymer phase so that the polymerization slows down and stops
without all the monomer being polymerized. In the experiments shown in Fig.
2/6 the concentrations of persulphate and H 20 2/Fe3+ were chosen to give the
same rate of initiation,
80
60
"0
"
.~40
0-
~
L
">-e
o
Q.
~
o 20
20 40 60 80
time, min
Fig. 2. Polymerization of 2% v/v solutions of vinyl acetate at 60°C without
emulsifier. Initiator concentrations were chosen to give the same rates of radical
production.16
16 A.S. DUNN
and it can be seen that the initial rates of polymerization are actually identi-
cal; but when persulphate was used and a stable latex was produced, the rate
of polymerization soon accelerated by a factor of about twenty and the con-
ditions are those of an emulsion polymerization during Interval III when
monomer droplets have disappeared and virtually all the remaining monomer
is in the latex particles. These observations have recently been confirmed by
Hayashi and Hoje.18
The ionic strength of the aqueous phase affects the stability of the latex
particles and the rate of reaction. The effect of increasing ionic strength is to
reduce the electrostatic repulsive energy barrier so that the latex ultimately
coagulates. When emulsifier is present this factor is less obvious and it has
generally been neglected, although it is taken into account by Klein et al. 19
and by Goodwin et al., 20 cf. Fig. 3.
6~------------------------~
[KCll/mol dm-3
EFFECT OF OXYGEN
Although oxygen inhibits the polymerization of vinyl acetate, it does not have a
critical effect on the course of the reaction (Fig. 4). The course of the reaction
when a little oxygen is present initially appears to be identical after the end of the
inhibition period with that observed when oxygen is removed completely by
16
vacuum degassing. Nevertheless, soluble oligomer is formed during the
inhibition period which is surface active and which is adsorbed on the latex
particles once they form, reducing their size slightly compared with that observed
in the complete absence of oxygen. With a 0·232 mol dm-3 solution of vinyl
acetate with 7·4 x 10-4 mo} dm-3 persulphate, the diameter of a particle with the
21
weight-average mass, dT> was found by a light scattering method to be 293
nm when vacuum degassing was used, 260 nm when most of the oxygen was
displaced with a stream of nitrogen, and 219 nm when the oxygen concentration
22
was increased by passing in oxygen.
100~-----------------------------------'
80
.~~ 60
~ 40
S:0.-
~ 20
timf!. min
Fig. 4. Effect of oxygen on polymerization of 1% vjv aqueous solutions of vinyl
acetate at 60°C with 0·01% K2S20S.16 (A) Rigorously degassed: maximum rate
3·24% min-I. (B) Without degassing: maximum rate 3·18% min-I.
Morris and Parts23 found that the rate of decomposition of persulphate was
greatly accelerated in the presence of oxidizable substrates (including, notably,
vinyl acetate) by induced chain decomposition:
S20~- -+ 2S04 .
S04 . + RH -+ HSO~ + R·
Induced chain decomposition does not necessarily increase the rate afradical
fannatian and is, in any case, likely to be less important at the concentrations of
persulphate used to initiate polymerization, which are much lower than those
required for titrimetric determinations of persulphate concentration according to
the procedure used by Morris and Parts. The rate of consump-tion of the inhibitor
diphenylpicrylhydrazyl was used to measure the rate of radical formation at the
concentrations of persulphate used to initiate poly-merization. 24 The initial rate of
consumption of the inhibitor (Fig. 5) is precisely that expected on the basis of
Kolthoff and Miller's rate constant for persulphate decomposition,25 which is the
value which is most widely used although there are many other higher values to
be found in the literature. However, the rate of consumption of
diphenylpicrylhydrazyl seems to be autocatalytic. Nevertheless, it appears that
under conditions in which radicals can initiate polymerization as soon as they are
formed no acceleration of the decomposition rate will be observed. Although the
23
arsenious oxide-bromate titration used by Morris and Parts is suitable for the
determination of persulphate concentrations in the absence of additives, it was not
successful in the presence of oxidizable substrates in our experiments.
~ ..l. 4'4
0\
\
\
'0
!P \
I
I
0 50 100 150 200
time,min
Fig. 5. Rate of decomposition of potassium persulphate in presence of
24
vinyl acetate at 60°C. Persulphate concentrations were measured by
determining the rate of consumption of diphenylpicrylhydrazyl. The
full line indicates the concentrations expected on the basis of Kolthoff
25
and Miller's decomposition rate constant.
and is therefore not an ideal initiator for kinetic work. Even if induced chain
decomposition and acid catalysed decomposition do not increase the rate of
radical formation they do increase the rate of decomposition of the initiator so
that the rate of initiation may decrease more rapidly than would be expected. The
introduction of the azonitrile initiators which are not subject to induced chain
decomposition brought a great simplification to bulk polymerization kinetics.
Sulphonated azonitrile initiators were claimed by Rhone-Poulenc 26 in 1960 as a
means of introducing anionic end-groups into po1yacrylonitrile fibre to render it
dyeable with basic dyes. Better methods of achieving this object have
subsequently been developed but these initiators
(I, II)
(I)
(II)
DLVOTHEORY
TABLE I
Effect of vinyl acetate on the density of water
selected as being typical of the material in commercial use at the time, reduces the
rate of polymerization of vinyl acetate solutions to about half its original value
even at a concentration of only 0·36% (much larger concentra-tions, e.g. 5%, are
used in emulsion polymerization recipes). The effect of polyvinyl alcohol depends
also on monomer concentration: the rate of poly-merization of vinyl acetate
emulsions does increase with concentration of the same polyvinyl alcohol. The
32
work of Donescu and co-workers has done much to elucidate this effect of the
amount of monomer: under some condi-tions considerable amounts of graft
copolymers are formed.
Later we wished to vary the viscosity of the aqueous phase and obtained for
this purpose a series of 'Gohsenol' (Nippon Gohsei, Japan) polyvinyl alcohols of
the same acetyl content but differing degrees of polymerization. Surprisingly, the
effect of these on the rate of polymerization of vinyl acetate solutions was entirely
different: any retardation of the rate of polymerization was slight.
-c=c-c-
/I
o
or 285 nm
-c=c-c=c-
II
o
The viscosity of polyvinyl alcohol latexes is very sensitive to the properties of the
polyvinyl alcohol used in their preparation. This may be partly a func-tion of the
average particle size and the particle size distribution of the latex formed:
increased adsorption of polyvinyl alcohol will result in a reduction of average
39
particle size. However, Shiraishi has shown that latex viscosities may differ
markedly even when the average particle size of the latex is the same (although it
is possible that the particle size distributions might differ). We examined two
polyvinyl alcohols which conformed to the same specification
-acetyl content 12 ± 1 mole %, aqueous solution viscosity at a concentration of
4%, 30 ± 5 cPo One of these was a standard grade of Japanese manufacture,
'Gohsenol' GH-17, the other, sample B, was of undisclosed origin. The actual 4%
solution viscosities were respectively 26·4 and 27·5 cP but when B was directly
substituted for GH-17 in a standard emulsion polymerization recipe the latex
viscosity obtained was only 8·9 P instead of 16·3 P. Reformulation with an
increased quantity of B would be required to restore the original latex viscosity.
The samples appeared to be identical in most respects':"'X-ray powder diffraction,
infrared spectra, 13C nuclear magnetic resonance chemical
shifts. The crystalline melting point of polyvinyl alcohol is reduced by
copolymerization with vinyl acetate in a way which depends on the distribu-tion
of the acetate groups31 and a slight difference in melting point was observed by
Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA). However, the DTA melting point is very
sensitive to the precise acetyl content which differed by 1 mole %
between the samples. When this was taken into account, the derived average
acetyl sequence length, ii = 2·7, was identical. The ultraviolet absorbance of the
samples was not identical, being somewhat lower for sample B. But the difference
in the conjugated monoene carbonyl content (GH-17 0·67 mole %, B 0·50 mole
%) seems to be too small to account for the observed difference in latex viscosity.
The main features of the 13C NMR spectrum of polyvinyl alcohol are the
methylene (CH2) and methine (CR) bands. A methyl (CH3) band due to the
residual acetyl groups may also be observed. The me thine band is split first into
components attributable to CHOH and CHOAc methines each of which,
secondarily, shows fine structure attributable to groups in isotactic, hetero-tactic,
and syndiotactic placements. The methylene band has three main components
attributable to a methylene group (a) between two hydroxyl groups, (b) between a
hydroxyl group and an acetyl group, and (c) between two acetyl groups; each of
these has fine structure due to tacticity. From the
POLYMERIZATION OF AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS OF VINYL ACETATE 25
CH
GH-17
a b c
~pm
integrations (Fig. 6) it is apparent that the ratio ~CH/~CH2 differs slightly between
the samples when the spectra are run under identical conditions. Unfortunately,
the conditions used do not seem to have been quite the optimum for quantitative
determination because the ratio obtained with a sample prepared by
photosensitized polymerization at - 25°C, which was expected to be genuinely
linear40 under the same operating conditions, was
26 A.S. DUNN
0·95. However, the ratio obtained for the linear sample could be raised to 0·99 by
modifying the operating conditions. The ratios for GH-17 and B differed from
each other and were both lower than for the linear sample. In general, secondary
hydrogen atoms have a lower bond dissociation energy than primary hydrogen
atoms and are therefore more reactive in transfer reactions. Transfer to the
secondary hydrogen atom of the me thine group transforms it into a quaternary
carbon atom which has a long relaxation time and is diffi-cult to detect in low
concentration by 13C NMR spectroscopy. This reduces the CH/CH 2 ratio. The
concentration of branch points is probably about 2 mole % in GH-17 and 1 mole
% in B. These must presumably be mostly short-chain non-hydrolyzable branches
formed by intramolecular transfer because the frequency of long-chain non-
hydrolyzable branches formed by intermolecular transfer to the main chain is
believed to be considerably lower than this. The adsorption isotherms of the
samples on emulsifier-free poly( vinyl acetate) latex differ considerably (Fig. 7 35),
GH-17 being more strongly adsorbed. GH-17 is also more strongly adsorbed at
the air/water interface (Fig. 8). The shallower curvature of the surface tension-
concentration
50
01 40
's
C/O
1/'1
'0
- 30
1
i 20
~
~~ B
O-----__ ~~
GH-17 u --0-
55
·001 '002 '003 ·004 concentra tion. °/0
graph for B suggests that it has a broader distribution of acetyl sequence lengths
despite the average acetyl sequence length being the same for the two samples.
CONCLUSION
Despite the fact that the water solubility of vinyl acetate is a major factor which
causes the characteristics of its polymerization in emulsion to differ from those of
styrene, the study of the polymerization of aqueous solutions of vinyl acetate in
the absence of a separate monomer phase has not really contributed much to the
elucidation of these differences because these poly-merizations have essentially
the character of an emulsion polymerization in Interval III after all the monomer
has been absorbed by the polymer phase. Nevertheless, some useful observations
have been made. Stable, monodisperse latexes can easily be produced without the
use of an emulsifier which could be stabilized by a single type of well
characterized ionic end-group if a suit-able initiator system were used. It has been
shown that the only important particle nucleation mechanism when the monomer
is sufficiently soluble in water is oligomeric precipitation, when the effect of
solubilization of monomer in emulsifier micelles becomes irrelevant.
Conventional emulsifiers are much less well adsorbed by polar polymers than by
non-polar polymers but polyvinyl alcohol (with 12 mole % residual acetyl) is
compatible with poly(vinyl acetate) and its use is often required to obtain a
sufficiently stable
28 A.S. DUNN
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The results reviewed here were mostly obtained by Drs P. A. Taylor, L. C.-H.
Kwan (nee Chong), C. J. Tonge and S. R. Naravane whose work was made
possible by Research Scholarships provided by Vinyl Products Ltd, the Science
Research Council, and Air Products and Chemicals Inc. Research projects
undertaken by UMIST undergraduates have also made useful contributions.
REFERENCES
19. A. Klein, C. H. Kuist and V. T. Stannett, J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed.,
11,2111 (1973).
20. J. W. Goodwin, J. Hearn, C. C. Ho and R. H. Ottewill, Br. Polym. J., 5, 347
(1973).
21. G. M. Burnett, R. S. Lehrle, D. W. Ovenall and F. W. Peaker, J. Polym. Sci.,
29,417(1958).
22. C. J. Tonge, Ph.D. Thesis, Manchester, 1972.
23. C. E. M. Morris and A. G. Parts, Makromol. Chem., 119, 212 (1968).
24. A. S. Dunn and C. J. Tonge, Polymer Preprints, 13, 1261 (1972).
25. I. M. Kolthoff and I. K. Miller,J. A mer. Chem. Soc., 73,3055 (1951).
26. 1. A. Phelisse and C. A. Quiby (Rhone-Pou1enc), US Patent 3161630, 1964.
27. C. H. Bamford, A. D. Jenkins and R. P. Wayne, Trans. Faraday Soc., 56, 930
(1960).
28. L.-J. Liu and I. M. Krieger, in Emulsions, Latices, and Dispersions,
P. Becher and M. N. Yudenfreund (eds.), New York, Dekker, 1979, p. 344.
29. (a) B. V. Derjaguin and J. D. Landau, Acta phys.-chim. USSR, 14,633 (1941).
35. R. B. Abdul Ghani, unpublished work; cf. A. S. Dunn, Chern. Ind. (in press).