Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WRITING INSTRUCTION
DURING FIRST YEAR
COMPOSITION
CHRYSTAL RICH
student writing.
Focus often on writing strengths rather than
weaknesses. Ask yourself, “What does this student
do particularly well?”
Student
Disconnectedness
From Assignments
Student Disconnectedness From
Assignments
Often times we hear the complaint, “This is boring.”
This could reflect student attitudes carried from
previous writing instruction, or perhaps students are
genuinely bored. How can instructors encourage
students to become more engaged with writing
instruction?
Authors Sweeney and McBride offer some sound
advice in their essay, “Difficulty Paper (Dis)
Connections: Understanding the Threads Students
Weave Between Their Reading and Writing."
Student Disconnectedness From
Assignments
Sweeney and McBride adopted the idea of having
students write a “difficulty paper” wherein they discuss
all of the difficulties they encounter when reading a
text and how the reading assignments seem to be
disjointed from writing assignments. They wanted to be
able to pinpoint the location of the disconnect.
“By examining students’ difficulty papers in reference to
this article in particular, we found that the main
difficulty students faced was a mismatch between
expectations in their reading and writing classes”
(Sweeney and McBride 596).
Student Disconnectedness From
Assignments
Things to consider…
Why is it okay for the “experts” to make
grammatical, formatting, and organization “errors”
that instructors often criticize students for?
The reasoning for assigning specific texts needs to
be explicit and should be practical.
Why is this necessary?
Are we creating writing assignments that are
relevant?
Teaching Writing in
Isolation from
Reading
Teaching Writing in Isolation from
Reading
The previous pitfall dealt with the disconnect of
transfer from reading texts to composition.
Have you ever heard the claim that good readers
make good writers?
Bill Marsh, in “Reading-Writing Integration in
Developmental and First-Year Composition,”
discusses how reading and writing taught
separately rather than together is not beneficial for
the improvement of students’ writing development.
Teaching Writing in Isolation from
Reading
Marsh describes how Conley’s recipe for successful
writing requires reading skills such as “…finding
evidence, incorporating source material, addressing
authorial bias, explaining terms, and determining
relationships between texts and larger themes and
structures—all of which require a strong understanding
of how reading and writing connect in the act of
composing” (Marsh 60).
Reading is necessary in the cultivation of writing skills
because when students learn to read critically, they are
able to increase their knowledge about a topic through
research and integrate evidence to support their
positions.
Teaching Writing in Isolation from
Reading
To get students writing…
Have them read pieces that mimic the type of
writing you would expect them to compose.
Have them identify elements of argument, thesis,
main points, evidence in reading assignments.
Allow them to mimic some of the material they are
reading. (This is not to be confused with plagiarism.
They can mimic the style and formatting while
composing original ideas.)
Lacking Creative
Space for Process
Instruction
Lacking Creative Space for Process
Instruction
As mentioned in the introduction, TYC instructors are often
teaching non-traditional students who have either not had a
prior disposition to education or are already managing
families and careers.
It may be unreasonable to expect to fully cultivate their
writing skills when the expectations for non-traditional
students are the same as traditional students entering their
college career straight out of high school, absent of the
additional strains of balancing these other elements.
In the TYC context, this might mean limiting assignments and
devoting class time to help teach students strategies needed
to become effective writers.
Lacking Creative Space for Process
Instruction
Sweeney and McBride explain how they transform
their curriculum for this type of instruction when they
write, “We provide class time to find points of
connection as a classroom community rather than
explaining cultural contexts and expecting students
to make connections independently, without the
support of the classroom or their peers” (Sweeney
and McBride 610).
Lacking Creative Space for Process
Instruction
To create space for process work…
Limit the amount of assignments/ readings students
are given to enhance the quality of the assignments.
Allow students to work in writing groups during
process work such as brainstorming and outlining so
they can bounce ideas off of one another.
Model the process in front of your class. Show
students that initial process work is often messy and
disjointed.
Ineffective Feedback
Ineffective Feedback
As mentioned in the introduction, the lack of hands-
on training in providing feedback on student writing
reflects a reluctance on the behalf of the new
composition instructor to execute feedback.
This is often a scary dimension of TYC instruction
because giving feedback seems too subjective.
Summer Smith, author of “The Genre of the End
Comment: Conventions in Teacher Responses to
Student Writing” proclaims that instructors “have the
power to motivate, educate, or chastise” (250).
Ineffective Feedback
In reflecting on this power to educate, motivate, or
chastise…
We want to educate students on what works in their
writing and what does not work.
Chastising them will kill motivation.
With that in mind, how can we provide feedback
that will result in improved writing?
Through motivation!
Ineffective Feedback
How can we improve feedback?…
Providing feedback as an informal way to help
guide students through their process, rather than as
a means to criticize their work.
Make time for writing conferences so that you can
provide face to face feedback.
❖ This works really well when you are allowing space
during class for process work, as you can take a
few minutes to speak with each student while others
are working.
Ineffective Feedback
When face to face is not possible, consider
providing verbal feedback via recorded messages.
Hearing an instructor talk about their work may be
more effective than reading comments that may or
may not be understood accurately.
Allow space for plenty of revision and drafts.
Allow space for plenty of informal writing
assignments to build on writing skills.
Ineffective Feedback
There is not a standard, generic process for providing
feedback.
Feedback is subjective, so we want to avoid negative
feedback, and focus on what works in their writing.
In areas that could use improvement, use a
conversational style of feedback. Point out instances
where, as a reviewer, you have the feeling of “being
lost” or “confused” in the student’s writing.
Maybe you could suggest that you felt as if the student
left you hanging by not filling in some of the gaps in
their writing.
SOLUTIONS TO
COUNTER PITFALLS
SOLUTIONS TO COUNTER PITFALLS
Different students are going to find that one strategy might be more
effective for them than another strategy. It is important that we
allow them the freedom to choose the strategies that work best for
them in addition to requiring them to utilize strategies outside their
comfort zone as they will be required to demonstrate different skill
types beyond their education.
Multi-modal Teaching Strategies
Rather than resist multi-modal forms of discourse,
composition instructors can embrace this as an
integral part of their curriculum better preparing
students for an ever-changing, technologically
advanced society.
Maintaining flexibility in teaching strategies allows
instructors to consistently increase knowledge/ skills
in different areas, and also promote personal
growth.
Developing Writer
Identity
Developing Writer Identity
Often, students feel as if they are not entitled to their own
“writer’s identity.” They have been fed the notion that there
is a “right” way or a “wrong” way to compose writing.