You are on page 1of 3

DTB | Bazedoxifene for HRT?

Bazedoxifene for HRT?


Duavive (Pfizer) is a modified-release formulation of conjugated oestrogens plus bazedoxifene acetate (a selective
oestrogen receptor modulator). It is licensed for treatment of oestrogen deficiency symptoms in postmenopausal women
with a uterus for whom treatment with progestogen-containing therapy is not appropriate.1,2 It was licensed by the
European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2014 and launched in the UK in July 2016.1,3 Here, we review the evidence on
efficacy and safety of conjugated oestrogens/bazedoxifene and consider its place in the management of symptoms
associated with the menopause.

2014 for the treatment of oestrogen deficiency symptoms in


Background postmenopausal women with a uterus who have not had a menstrual
During the menopause, many women experience a range of symptoms period for at least 12 months and for whom progestogen-containing
associated with the loss of oestrogen production, including vasomotor therapy is not appropriate. 5 The SPC states that for initiation and
symptoms (hot flushes and sweats), low mood, symptoms of vulvovaginal continuation of treatment of postmenopausal symptoms, the lowest
atrophy and loss of sexual desire.4,5 A National Institute of Health and Care effective dose for the shortest duration should be used.1 The licensed dose
Excellence (NICE) guideline recommends offering women hormone is one tablet taken daily.
replacement therapy (HRT) for vasomotor symptoms after discussing with
them the short-term (up to 5 years) and longer-term benefits and risks.4
Although HRT reduces the risk of fragility fractures, the baseline risk of fragility
Assessing outcomes
fractures for women around menopausal age in the UK is low. Other issues EMA guidance on clinical trials of medicinal products for hormone replacement
associated with the use of HRT that need to be taken into consideration include:4 therapy of oestrogen deficiency symptoms in postmenopausal women
recommends that the proposed primary outcome for efficacy is the frequency
• venous thromboembolism (VTE)—there is a higher risk with oral compared
of moderate to severe hot flushes.10 Enrolled subjects should have a defined
with transdermal HRT products; minimum number of hot flushes per day at baseline to justify a need for
• cardiovascular disease—HRT with oestrogen alone is associated with no, treatment (at least five moderate to severe hot flushes). Other scales for
or a reduced risk of coronary heart disease; HRT with oestrogen and assessing menopausal symptoms, if fully validated, can be used as secondary
progestogen is associated with little or no increase in the risk of coronary outcomes (see Box). A 3-month duration of treatment is generally recommended
heart disease; for evaluation of efficacy.10

• stroke—HRT with oral oestrogen is associated with a small increase in the risk
of stroke; the baseline risk of stroke in women aged <60 years is very low;
Box: Assessing outcomes in menopause trials3,11-13
• breast cancer—HRT with oestrogen alone is associated with little or no
change in the risk of breast cancer; HRT with oestrogen and progestogen Menopause-specific Quality of Life questionnaire (MENQOL):
can be associated with an increase in the risk of breast cancer. self-administered 29-item scale (range 1–8 in each of four domains
[vasomotor, psychosocial, physical and sexual]); higher scores represent
Oestrogens are associated with an increased risk of endometrial hyperplasia
more troublesome symptoms. Estimated clinically important difference
and endometrial cancer in women with an intact uterus.6 The addition of a
for the domains ranges from 0.5–1.2.
progestogen (for at least 10 days per 28-day cycle) reduces the additional
risk of endometrial cancer; this additional risk is eliminated if a progestogen Menopause Symptoms—Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire
is given continuously.7 However, this should be weighed against the (MS-TSQ): eight-item questionnaire on a five-point scale.
increased risk of breast cancer. Use of progestogen-containing HRT has been Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) sleep scale: 12-item self-administered
associated with vaginal bleeding, breast pain or tenderness, and increase in questionnaire, including assessment of sleep disturbance, sleep
breast density. 5 adequacy, somnolence and quantity of sleep.
Arizona Sexual Experiences (ASEX) scale: five-item questionnaire on a
six-point scale (1=hyperfunction, 6=hypofunction)
Conjugated oestrogens/bazedoxifene
Duavive is a combination of 20mg bazedoxifene, a selective oestrogen
receptor modulator (SERM) and 450µg conjugated oestrogens. The summary Clinical efficacy
of product characteristics (SPC) describes the combination of a SERM with an
The majority of evidence for the safety and efficacy of conjugated oestrogens/
oestrogen as a tissue-selective oestrogen complex.1
bazedoxifene in the treatment of menopausal symptoms comes from a series
SERMs have a range of agonistic and antagonistic effects on oestrogen of five trials known by the acronym SMART (Selective estrogens, Management
receptors in different tissues.6 This group of drugs includes raloxifene, which is And Response to Therapy). The EMA assessment report for Duavive included
licensed in the UK for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis in four efficacy and safety studies (a 2-year study [SMART-1], two 12-week efficacy
postmenopausal women.8 Bazedoxifene has selective oestrogen-receptor studies [SMART-2 and 3] and a 12-month safety study [SMART-5]). 3,5 A fifth trial,
agonist activity in skeletal tissue and antagonist activity in breast and uterine SMART-4, used a tablet formulation that was not bioequivalent to the marketed
tissues. 5,9 It is licensed in several countries outside the UK for the prevention product and is not reported here.
or treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. 5 It is combined with conjugated
Most of the trials included conjugated oestrogens/bazedoxifene 450µg/20mg
oestrogens to inhibit the adverse effects of oestrogen on the endometrium
and 625µg/20mg. The higher strength was removed from the licence
and breast tissue without the adverse effects of progestogens.1,5
application, along with an indication for osteoporosis in menopausal women. 3
The combination of conjugated oestrogens and bazedoxifene as a modified
release tablet was licensed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in
Except where specified, we report results for the conjugated oestrogens/
bazedoxifene 450µg/20mg dose licensed in the UK.

42 | DTB | Vol 55 | No 4 | April 2017dtb.bmj.com


DTB | Bazedoxifene for HRT?

We are not aware of any published studies of direct comparisons with other hyperplasia. However, the EMA reported concerns over certain aspects of
combination HRT preparations, although some trials used an active control. the study (including missing source data and the handling of biopsy
specimens and reports from pathologists), and the results on endometrial
In a randomised placebo-controlled double-blind study in 332 postmenopausal
safety were not taken into account in the evaluation for the European
women aged 40–65 years (mean 53 years) with moderate to severe hot flushes
licensing application. 5
(SMART-2), the number and severity of hot flushes at 4 and 12 weeks (primary
outcome) was significantly reduced in the conjugated oestrogens/bazedoxifene A randomised, double-blind placebo- and active-controlled 1-year safety
group (p<0.001).14 The average number of moderate and severe hot flushes study in 1,886 women (SMART-5) reported endometrial hyperplasia in
daily at 12 weeks was reduced by 7.5 (from 10.3 to 2.8) in the conjugated one of 335 women receiving conjugated oestrogens/bazedoxifene
oestrogens/bazedoxifene group (133 women) and by 5.1 (from 10.5 to 5.4) in 450µg/20mg, one of 354 women in the placebo group (both 0.3%), and
the placebo group (66 women), a difference between the two groups of 2.4 none in the conjugated oestrogens/medroxyprogesterone group (n=149) at
hot flushes (p<0.001). Quality of life and effects on sleep (secondary outcomes) 12 months.9 The EMA noted that four women who had an endometrial
were reported separately.12 There were statistically significant improvements thickness of at least 4mm did not have an endometrial biopsy and a further
in sleep parameters (time to fall asleep, sleep adequacy, sleep disturbance eight did not have either a biopsy or transvaginal ultrasound carried out.
and sleep problems as assessed by the MOS index) compared with placebo The amount of missing data was not considered unusual for a study of this
(p<0.001) and regression analysis showed a significant relationship between size, but some members of the EMA’s Committee for Medicinal Products for
sleep disturbance and reduction in hot flushes (p<0.05). Small but statistically Human Use (CHMP) pointed out that even a very low number of additional
significant improvements were reported for total MENQOL score compared with cases of hyperplasia would change the outcome of the study from success
placebo (change from baseline at 12 weeks –1.6 vs. –1.0, p<0.001) and MS-TSQ to failure. 5
(percentage reporting overall satisfaction 73.5% vs. 44.4%, p<0.001).12
Changes in breast density were assessed by mammography in a subset of 507
A randomised double-blind placebo and active-comparator (bazedoxifene women from SMART-1 after 24 months19 and in a subset of 940 women from
alone) controlled study in 664 postmenopausal women aged 40–65 years SMART-5 after 1 year.20 Treatment with conjugated oestrogens/bazedoxifene
(mean 56 years) with vulvar or vaginal atrophy (SMART-3) investigated the was not associated with increases in breast density.
effects on vulvovaginal symptoms.15 There was a statistically significant
increase in vaginal superficial cells and a decrease in parabasal cells
(co-primary outcomes) at 12 weeks in the conjugated oestrogens/ Cautions
bazedoxifene group compared with placebo (p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively) Conjugated oestrogens/bazedoxifene should not be prescribed for women
and with bazedoxifene 20mg alone (both p<0.001). The authors concluded with undiagnosed genital bleeding, untreated endometrial hyperplasia,
that these changes in surrogate markers suggested an improvement in the known thrombophilic disorders (e.g. protein C, protein S or antithrombin
condition and were associated with patient-reported improvements in deficiency) or with a current or past history of breast or endometrial cancer,
symptoms. However, decreases in vaginal pH and the severity of vulvar or venous or arterial thromboembolic disorders or liver disease.1
vaginal symptoms (co-primary outcomes) were not significantly different
between conjugated oestrogens/bazedoxifene and placebo groups. The The drug should be used with caution in women with uterine fibroids,
difference in total ASEX score (secondary outcome) with conjugated endometriosis, hypertension, liver disorders, diabetes mellitus, cholelithiasis,
oestrogens/bazedoxifene compared with placebo was not statistically migraine, epilepsy, asthma or otosclerosis, and in those with a history of
significant (–1.87 vs. –1.34).13 Statistically significant improvements with endometrial hyperplasia or with risk factors for thromboembolic disorders
conjugated oestrogens/bazedoxifene compared with placebo and (e.g. SLE, obesity, cancer) or oestrogen-dependent tumours.1
bazedoxifene alone were reported for change in total MENQOL score (–1.09 vs. People with a personal or family history of hypertriglyceridaemia should be
–0.67 and -0.37, respectively, both p≤0.001) and MS-TSQ (overall satisfaction monitored during treatment and all patients should have triglyceride levels
62.6% vs. 47.4%; p<0.05 and 62.6% vs. 40.4%, p<0.001, respectively). monitored once a year.21
While the fourth study (SMART-5) was primarily concerned with safety, Other potential risks identified by the EMA that need further
the effect on bone density was evaluated in a subgroup of 590 investigation include use in people with cardiovascular risk factors or a
postmenopausal women aged 40–65 years without history of history of cardiovascular disease, and use in people with a history
osteoporosis.9 At 12 months, bone mineral density increased slightly from of malignancies. 21
baseline in the conjugated oestrogens/bazedoxifene group compared
with the placebo group in whom bone density decreased (adjusted mean
change from baseline 0.24% [±0.29] vs. -1.28% [±0.28], p<0.01). Effects on Limitations of the evidence
sleep and quality of life were evaluated in a subgroup of 459 women
reporting sleep disturbances related to vasomotor symptoms.16 Beneficial There is limited evidence in women aged over 65 years and a lack of direct
responses on sleep, assessed by MOS sleep score, were reported with comparisons with established HRT options. Overall, the effects on the
conjugated oestrogens/bazedoxifene at 12 months compared with incidence of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, VTE or cancer (including
placebo (mean adjusted change from baseline: time to fall asleep –16.2 breast and ovarian cancer) compared with placebo or with conjugated
mins vs. –8.6; sleep disturbance score –17.4 vs. –12.0, both p<0.05). There oestrogens/progestogen remains unclear. 5,17
was also an improvement in quality of life assessed using the total The evidence relating to the efficacy and safety of conjugated oestrogens/
MENQOL score (mean adjusted change –1.4 vs. placebo –0.9, p<0.001). bazedoxifene comes almost entirely from a single series of trials and the
reproducibility of these results must be determined before firm conclusions
can be reached as to its place in therapy.17
Unwanted effects The EMA noted that, although the efficacy of conjugated oestrogens/
The commonest unwanted events in clinical trials included headache bazedoxifene in reducing vasomotor symptoms was lower than that of
(13.3–18.7%), pain (7.9–11.4%) and back pain (9.6–9.7%). 3,17 Other adverse conjugated oestrogens/progestogen combinations, the difference could not
effects categorised as common (≥1/100 to <1/10) included vulvovaginal be quantified. 5
candidiasis, constipation, nausea, diarrhoea, muscle spasms and increased
Conjugated oestrogens/bazedoxifene has been shown to have an effect on
blood triglyceride concentrations.1 Venous thromboembolic events were rare
surrogate markers of vulvovaginal atrophy.4 However, the clinical significance
(≥1/10,000 to <1/1,000).
of such findings is not clear. Usual first-line treatment for urogenital atrophy is
A randomised double-blind dose-ranging study (SMART-1) evaluated six with vaginal rather than oral oestrogens.
combinations of conjugated oestrogens 450µg or 625µg plus bazedoxifene
Patient-orientated outcomes such as fracture prevention are currently lacking.17
10mg, 20mg or 40mg compared with active (raloxifene) and placebo
controls in 3,397 postmenopausal women (40–75 years, mean 56.5 years) Three members of the EMA’s CHMP did not agree with the CHMP’s opinion
over 2 years.18 The primary outcome was the incidence of endometrial recommending the granting of marketing authorisation for Duavive. 5

dtb.bmj.com Vol 55 | No 4 | April 2017 | DTB | 43


DTB | Bazedoxifene for HRT?

Costs What guidelines say


Drug Cost for In the absence of a submission from the company, neither the Scottish
84 days Medicines Consortium nor the All Wales Medicines Strategy Group has
approved conjugated oestrogens/bazedoxifene for use within NHS Scotland
Conjugated oestrogens 450µg/bazedoxifene 20mg (Duavive) £45.00 or NHS Wales.22,23
Conjugated oestrogens 300µg/medroxyprogesterone £6.52 NICE has published an evidence summary on the use of conjugated
1.5mg (Premique low dose) oestrogens/bazedoxifene. 3
Conjugated oestrogens 625µg/medroxyprogesterone £10.61 The Revised Global Consensus Statement on Menopausal Hormone
5mg (Premique) Therapy lists the combination of conjugated oestrogens plus bazedoxifene
as an effective treatment for vasomotor symptoms and in the prevention
Conjugated oestrogens 625µg/norgestrel 150µg (Prempak-C) £6.25 of bone loss. 24
Conjugated oestrogens 1.25mg/norgestrel 150µg (Prempak-C) £7.40
Costs based on prices in Chemist and Druggist and the Drug Tariff.

Conclusion
For women with an intact uterus, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with a combination of oestrogen and progestogen is an established treatment
option for menopausal symptoms. The progestogen component, included to protect against oestrogen-related endometrial hyperplasia, may be associated
with vaginal bleeding and breast disease.
Duavive is a combination of conjugated oestrogens with bazedoxifene, a selective oestrogen receptor modulator that acts as an oestrogen antagonist in
endometrial tissue. It is licensed as an alternative to conventional HRT for women with a uterus who are unable to tolerate progestogens. Clinical trials
have shown that conjugated oestrogens/bazedoxifene produced a modest reduction in the number of moderate and severe hot flushes, and
improvements in measures of quality of life and sleep in younger postmenopausal women for periods of up to two years. However, the majority of the
evidence comes from a single series of clinical studies with no direct comparisons with conventional HRT.
The combination of oestrogen with a selective oestrogen receptor modulator holds the possibility of HRT without the concerns of breast cancer. There
remains some uncertainty relating to endometrial safety during long-term treatment. We believe that independent confirmation of efficacy and safety,
direct comparisons with conventional HRT, and more experience in older women and for longer periods will be needed before it can be recommended as
an alternative to standard HRT products.

[R=randomised controlled trial; M=meta-analysis]   R 13. Bachmann G et al. Effects of bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens on quality of
1.
Duavive 0.45mg/20mg modified-release tablets. Summary of product life in postmenopausal women with symptoms of vulvar/vaginal atrophy.
characteristics, UK. Pfizer Limited, 2016. Climacteric 2010; 13: 132-40.
2.
Duavive 0.45mg/20mg modified-release tablets. Summary of product   R 14. Pinkerton JV et al. Relief of vasomotor symptoms with the tissue-selective
characteristics, UK. Merck Sharp & Dohme Limited, 2016. estrogen complex containing bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens: a
randomized controlled trial. Menopause 2009; 16: 1116-24.
3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2016. Oestrogen deficiency
symptoms in postmenopausal women: conjugated oestrogens and   R 15. Kagan R et al. A randomized, placebo- and active-controlled trial of
bazedoxifene acetate (ES3) [online]. Available: https://www.nice.org.uk/ bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens for treatment of moderate to severe
guidance/es3/resources/oestrogen-deficiency-symptoms-in-postmenopausal- vulvar/vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women. Menopause 2010;
women-conjugated-oestrogens-and-bazedoxifene-acetate-32172999109 17: 281-9.
[Accessed 22 March 2017].   R 16. Pinkerton JV et al. Sleep parameters and health-related quality of life with
4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2015. Menopause: diagnosis bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens: a randomized trial. Menopause 2014;
and management (NG23) [online]. Available: https://www.nice.org.uk/ 21: 252-9.
guidance/ng23/resources/menopause-diagnosis-and- 17. Pazhekattu R et al. The tissue-selective estrogen complex: a review of current
management-1837330217413 [Accessed 22 March 2017]. evidence. Rheumatol Ther 2015; 2: 47-58.
5. European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use,   R 18. Lobo RA et al. Evaluation of bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens for the
2014. Assessment report: Duavive [online]. Available: http://www.ema.europa. treatment of menopausal symptoms and effects on metabolic bone
eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Public_assessment_report/ parameters and overall safety profile. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 1025-38.
human/002314/WC500181564.pdf [Accessed 22 March 2017]. 19. Harvey JA et al. Breast density changes in a randomized controlled trial
6. Santen RJ et al. Current and evolving approaches to individualizing estrogen evaluating bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens. Menopause 2013; 20: 138-45.
receptor-based therapy for menopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014; 20. Pinkerton JV et al. Breast effects of bazedoxifene-conjugated estrogens: a
99: 733-47. randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121: 959-68.
7. Joint Formulary Committee. British National Formulary. Edition 72. London: BMJ 21. European Medicines Agency, 2014. Summary of the risk management plan
Group and Pharmaceutical Press, September 2016. (RMP) for Duavive (conjugated oestrogens / bazedoxifene) [online]. Available:
8.
Evista 60mg film-coated tablets. Summary of product characteristics, EU. Daiichi http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Risk-
Sankyo Europe GmbH, August 2012. management-plan_summary/human/002314/WC500176258.pdf [Accessed 22
  R 9. Pinkerton JV et al. Effects of bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens on the March 2017].
endometrium and bone: a randomized trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014; 22. Scottish Medicines Consortium, 2017. Oestrogens, conjugated, bazedoxifene
99: E189-98. acetate (Duavive) [online]. Available: http://www.scottishmedicines.org.uk/
10. European Medicines Agency, 2005. Guideline on clinical investigation of SMC_Advice/Advice/1220_17_oestrogens_conjugated_Duavive/oestrogens_
medicinal products for hormone replacement therapy of oestrogen deficiency conjugated_Duavive_Non_Sub [Accessed 22 March 2017].
symptoms in postmenopausal women [online]. Available: http://www.ema. 23. All Wales Medicines Strategy Group, 2015. Conjugated oestrogens/bazedoxifene
europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/ (Duavive®) [online]. Available: http://www.awmsg.org/awmsgonline/app/
WC500003348.pdf [Accessed 22 March 2017]. appraisalinfo/1511 [Accessed 22 March 2017].
11. Bushmakin AG et al. Evaluation of the measurement model and clinically 24. de Villiers TJ et al. Revised global consensus statement on menopausal
important differences for menopause-specific quality of life associated with hormone therapy. Climacteric 2016; 19: 313-5.
bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens. Menopause 2014; 21: 815-22.
  R 12. Utian W et al. Bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens and quality of life in
postmenopausal women. Maturitas 2009; 63: 329-35. DOI: 10.1136/dtb.2017.4.0466

44 | DTB | Vol 55 | No 4 | April 2017dtb.bmj.com

You might also like