You are on page 1of 3

FRONT Row By Jack Kenny

C olor a n d b ra n d in g
Can you trademark a packaging color? Maybe, maybe not.

n the m orning o f D ecember 25, several turquoise boxes Single color trademarks come with restrictions. If Owens-Corning

O wrapped with white ribbon lay at the foot o f the Christmas


tree. Those packages made our faces light up more than
usual, because we all knew where they were from, and that they con­
tained special delights. It didn’t matter that a member o f our house­
decides to manufacture a line o f women’s clothing under the “Pink”
brand, it would run headlong into Victoria’s Secret. IfTiffany declares that
buildings or boats cannot be decorated in its shade o f turquoise, it would
be laughed out o f court.The reason is that a color trademark applies only
hold had been a seasonal employee at Tiffany & Co. in N ew York City. to the specific industry in which the trademark holder does business.
That color alone pushed our happy buttons. Another jeweler would be foolish to use turquoise in its branding, but
We associate that shade o f blue with the famous jeweler, w hich go right ahead and paint your 1960 Corvette that beautiful shade of blue.
began using it for its packaging in the mid-19th Century. W hen we W hat about John Deere and green? The company has been manufac­
see a brown delivery truck, we know whose it is. Even w ithout our turing farm equipment since the 1800s, and green seems to be its color. As
eyeglasses we know w hat’s in that bottle o f soda with the red label. And mentioned, its color scheme is protected, but it can’t own green because
when our stomachs are upset, we reach for that bottle o f pink liquid it does business in the agriculture industry, and green is the color o f just
on the drugstore shelf. The aforementioned blue, brown and red are about everything that grows, and therefore is functional. Others in the
trademarks ofTiffany, UPS and Coca-Cola, respectively. B ut if you’re agricultural equipment business can paint their machines green or use it
thinking pink for Pepto-Bismol, think again. in their branding because it’s a functional color, symbolizing vegetation.
It’s easy to assume that John Deere has a lock on the green color W ith the Pepto-Bismol case, the definition o f functionality was ex­
used on all o f its machinery. It doesn’t, and there’s a good reason for panded into new territory by the court. According to US trademark
that. The company does have trademarks on its name, its green and attorney David Lizerbram,“Even a psychological value can be functional.
yellow color scheme, and its leaping deer symbol. For example, the pink color o f Pepto-Bismol is considered functional.
Color and trademarks have been a legal battle zone for years. Color A court held that the color was functional because it was ‘soothing’ to
combinations to identify brands had long been recognized by US trade­ patients, thereby providing a psychosomatic effect and therapeutic value
mark officials (laws vary by country, but there are general consistencies), in treating upset stomachs. Because the color pink was found in a study
but they refused to acknowledge single colors as legally protected.That to make patients more likely to take the medicine and affected them on
changed in the 1980s when O wens-Corning, which had been manu­ a psychological level, the court ruled that Pepto’s competitors needed to
facturing pink insulation since 1956, won the right in federal court to use that color in order to compete effectively.”
the color pink for its insulation products. In an article posted on his web site, Lizerbram says,“As with all trade­
The key to the shift in legal perspective was the issue o f functional­ marks, the color must have a secondary meaning. It must have become
ity. Features or shapes that are considered functional have a utilitarian meaningful to a significant portion o f the public as a unique identifier of
purpose. A commonly applied definition is “a product feature essential the goods or services.Tiffany and UPS can show that when the public
to the use or purpose o f the article or which affects the cost or quality sees their shade o f blue or brown, in connection with their underlying
o f the article.” goods/services (jewelry and delivery services), they immediately think
Pink is not a functional part o f insulation, so its restriction to ofTiffany s jewelry boxes or UPS trucks.”
O w ens-Corning would not inhibit any other manufacturer o f similar Here are a few other examples o f when a color may or may not be
products from competing in the marketplace. Moreover, the company isolated by a trademark.
had established the color pink as its identifying hue for three decades, • Ambrit, a maker o f frozen foods, used royal blue in its dessert pack­
so now anyone w ho tried to copy it - and they are still trying - would aging. N ot long after, the food giant Kraft adopted royal blue for its line
run afoul o f trademark law. o f similar products. Ambrit took Kraft to court over the use o f the color
More recently, in a different case, the US Supreme C ourt restated in its packaging but lost the case. The judge ruled that royal blue is a
that a single color can be a brand as long as the public strongly asso­ cool color, suggesting coldness to consumers, and therefore the color
ciates the color with the specific product and that the color is in no has aesthetic functionality.
way functional. • The Life Savers Company tried to stop Curtiss Candy Co. from

40 Label & Narrow Web www.labelandnarrowweb.com March 2015


FRONT Row

using a pattern o f colors on its candy wrappers. Life Savers claimed registration for its red outsoles. O ne exception is noteworthy:The court
trademark rights on the multi-colored striped theme on its packaging, made it clear that the protection applies only w hen the rest o f the shoe
which it said represented the multi-flavored candies inside. The court is a different color or colors. Anyone, therefore, is allowed to make an
disagreed, saying that it was a general practice o f the trade for hard candy entirely red shoe.
manufacturers to market their products in packages with multi-colored Lizerbram has some strong advice for companies that might be think­
backgrounds to indicate that assorted flavors were inside. ing about seeking protection for a brand color:“Ifyou ever want to try to
• Bold, broadly used colors aren’t the only kinds that can be protected. claim trademark protection for a color, be sure to never, ever, ever suggest in
The category now includes accent colors. In 2010,WolfAppliances sued your marketing or advertising materials that the color has any sort of function.
Viking Range Corp. for using red knobs on its gas stoves.Viking main­ Does the green tint in your sunglasses help block harmful U V rays? Well,
tained that since both manufacturers marked their products with their then it can’t be a trademark. Will kids be happy to swallow this medicine
company names, the public could not be confused if both had red knobs. because o f its fun bubblegum color? N o trademark for you.This is one
Citing “likelihood o f confusion,” the court disagreed and upheld W olf’s o f those situations where the marketing/ advertising and legal sides o f
complaint. The decision used the example o f someone who goes to a a business need to be fully in sync from Day 1. There’s no going back
dinner party and notices the hosts range with red knobs.That person once you’ve shown that your color serves a real world purpose and isn’t
may later be at a showroom, and w ithout remembering the brand name merely ornamental.”
might think that the Viking range with the red knobs was the one they
had seen at the dinner party, when in fact it was a W olf range.
• The most recent case involves women’s shoes and the competitors The author is president of Jack Kenny Media, a communications
Christian Louboutin and Yves Saint Laurent. Louboutin is well known firm specializing in the packaging industry, and is the former
for coloring all of its shoes’ outsoles bright red.YSL chose to do the same, editor o fL & N W magazine. He can be reached atjackjkenny@
which landed the company in US court as the defendant. A federal ap­ gmail.com.
peals court ruled in favor o f Louboutin and upheld its existing trademark

WELCOME TO
OUR WORLD
OF FINISHING

tiigicon
series 3
The n e x t g e n e r a t i o n
of digital finishing
w w w .a b g in t.c o m

March 2015 www.labelandnarrowweb.com Label & Narrow Web 41


Copyright of Label & Narrow Web is the property of Rodman Publishing and its content may
not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's
express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for
individual use.

You might also like